LIGNOPHYTA

True roots +; lateral meristems: cork cambium producing cork abaxially, vascular cambium producing phloem abaxially and xylem adaxially.

EXTANT SEED PLANTS/SPERMATOPHYTA

Plant woody, evergreen; nicotinic acid metabolised to trigonelline, (cyanogenesis via tyrosine pathway); primary cell walls rich in xyloglucans and/or glucomannans, 25-30% pectin [Type I walls]; lignins derived from (some) sinapyl and particularly coniferyl alcohols, thus containing p-hydroxyphenyl and guaiacyl lignin units, (lignins derived from p-coumaryl alcohol, i.e. S [syringyl] lignin units); true roots present, apex multicellular, xylem exarch, and branching endogenous; arbuscular mycorrhizae +; shoot apical meristem multicellular, interface specific plasmodesmatal network; stem with ectophloic eustele, endodermis 0, xylem endarch, branching exogenous; vascular tissue in t.s. discontinuous by interfascicular regions; vascular cambium + [xylem ("wood") differentiating internally, phloem externally]; wood homoxylous, tracheids and rays alone, tracheid/tracheid pits circular, bordered; mature sieve tube/cell lacking functioning nucleus, plastids with starch grains; phloem fibres +; stem cork cambium superficial, root cork cambium deep seated; leaves with single trace from sympodium ["nodes 1:1"]; stomata ?; leaf vascular bundles collateral; leaves megaphyllous [determinancy evolved first, then ad/abaxial symmetry], spiral, simple, lamina with vein density up to 5 mm/mm2 [mean for all non-angiosperms 1.8]; axillary buds associated with at most some leaves; prophylls [including bracteoles] two, lateral; plant heterosporous, sporangia eusporangiate, on sporophylls, sporophylls aggregated in indeterminate cones/strobili; true pollen [microspores, i.e. no distal pore for release of gametes] +, grains mono[ana]sulcate, exine and intine homogeneous; ovules unitegmic, crassinucellate, megaspore tetrad tetrahedral, only one megaspore develops, megasporangium indehiscent; male gametophyte development first endo- then exosporic, tube developing from distal end of grain, to ca 2 mm from receptive surface to egg, gametes two, developing after pollination, with cell walls, with many flagellae; female gametophyte endosporic, initially syncytial, walls then surrounding individual nuclei; seeds "large", first cell wall of zygote transverse, embryo straight, endoscopic [suspensor +], short-minute, with morphological dormancy, white, cotyledons 2; plastid transmission maternal; two copies of LEAFY gene, PHY gene duplications [three - [BP [A/N + C/O]] - copies], nrDNA with 5.8S and 5S rDNA in separate clusters; mitochondrial nad1 intron 2 and coxIIi3 intron and trans-spliced introns present.

MAGNOLIOPHYTA

Lignans, O-methyl flavonols, dihydroflavonols, triterpenoid oleanane, non-hydrolysable tannins, quercetin and/or kaempferol +, apigenin and/or luteolin scattered, [cyanogenesis in ANITA grade?], S [syringyl] lignin units common, positive Maüle reaction [syringyl:guaiacyl ratio more than 2-2.5:1], and hemicelluloses as xyloglucans; root apical meristem intermediate-open; root vascular tissue oligarch [di- to pentarch], lateral roots arise opposite or immediately to the side of [when diarch] xylem poles; origin of epidermis with no clear pattern [probably from inner layer of root cap], trichoblasts [differentiated root hair-forming cells] 0; shoot apex with tunica-corpus construction, tunica 2-layered; reaction wood ?, with gelatinous fibres; starch grains simple; primary cell wall mostly with pectic polysaccharides, poor in mannans; tracheid:tracheid [end wall] plates with scalariform pitting, wood parenchyma +; sieve tubes enucleate, sieve plate with pores (0.1-)0.5-10< µm across, cytoplasm with P-proteins, cytoplasm not occluding pores of sieve plate, companion cells from same mother cell that gave rise to the sieve tube; sugar transport in phloem passive; nodes unilacunar [1:?]; stomata with ends of guard cells level with pore, paracytic, outer stomatal ledges producing vestibule; leaves petiolate, lamina [formed from the primordial leaf apex], development of venation acropetal, 2ndary veins pinnate, fine venation reticulate, veins (1.7-)4.1(-5.7) mm/mm2, endings free; most/all leaves with axillary buds; flowers perfect, pedicellate, polysymmetric, parts spiral [esp. the A], free, numbers unstable, development in general centripetal; P not sharply differentiated, with a single trace, outer members not enclosing the rest of the bud, often smaller than inner members; A many, filament not sharply distinguished from anther, stout, broad, with a single trace, anther introrse, tetrasporangiate, sporangia in two groups of two [dithecal], ± embedded in the filament, with at least outer secondary parietal cells dividing, each theca dehiscing longitudinally by action of hypodermal endothecium, endothecial cells elongated at right angles to long axis of anther; tapetum glandular, binucleate; microspore mother cells in a block, microsporogenesis successive, walls developing by centripetal furrowing; pollen subspherical, tectum continuous or microperforate, ektexine columellar, endexine thin, compact, lamellate only in the apertural regions; nectary 0; G free, several, ascidiate, with postgenital occlusion by secretion, stylulus short, hollow, cavity not lined by distinct epidermal layer, stigma ± decurrent, dry [not secretory]; ovules few [?1]/carpel, marginal, anatropous, bitegmic, micropyle endostomal, outer integument 2-3 cells across, often largely subdermal in origin, inner integument 2-3 cells across, often dermal in origin, parietal tissue 1-3 cells across [crassinucellate], nucellar cap?; megasporocyte single, hypodermal, megaspore tetrad linear, functional megaspore chalazal, lacking sporopollenin and cuticle; female gametophyte four-celled [one module, nucleus of egg cell sister to one of the polar nuclei]; P deciduous in fruit; seed exotestal; pollen binucleate at dispersal, trinucleate eventually, germinating in less than 3 hours, pollination siphonogamous, tube elongated, growing at 80-600 µm/hour, with pectic outer wall, callose inner wall and callose plugs, growing between cells, penetration of ovules via micropyle [porogamous] within ca 18 hours, distance to first ovule 1.1.-2.1 mm, tube moves between nucellar cells; double fertilisation +, endosperm diploid, cellular [micropylar and chalazal domains develop diffently, first division oblique, micropylar end initially with a single large cell, divisions uniseriate, chalazal cell smaller, divisions in several planes], copious, oily and/or proteinaceous, embryo cellular ab initio, minute; germination hypogeal, seedlings/young plants sympodial; Arabidopsis-type telomeres [(TTTAGGG)n]; whole genome duplication, ndhB gene 21 codons enlarged at the 5' end, single copy of LEAFY and RPB2 gene, knox genes extensively duplicated [A1-A4], AP1/FUL gene, paleo AP3 and PI genes [paralogous B-class genes] +, with "DEAER" motif, SEP3/LOFSEP and three copies of the PHY gene, [PHYB [PHYA + PHYC]].

Evolution. Possible apomorphies for flowering plants are in bold. Note that the actual level to which many of these features, particularly the more cryptic ones, should be assigned is unclear. This is because some taxa basal to the [magnoliid + monocot + eudicot] group have been surprisingly little studied, there is considerable homoplasy as well as variation within and between families of the ANITA grade in particular for several of these characters, and also because details of relationships among gymnosperms will affect the level at which some of these characters are pegged. For example, if reticulate-perforate pollen is optimized to the next node on the tree (see Friis et al. 2009 for a discussion), it effectively makes the pollen morphology of the common ancestor of all angiosperms ambiguous... For other features such as details of sugar transport in the phloem, their placement on the tree is frankly speculative. Finally, for features such as parietal tissue/a nucellus only one (Nymphaeales) to three cells thick above the embryo sac and a stylar canal lacking an epidermal layer, although plesiomorphous for basal grade angiosperms (Williams 2009), I am unsure where on the tree a thicker nucellus and a stylar epidermal layer are acquired.

NYMPHAEALES [AUSTROBAILEYALES [[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]]]: vessels +, elements with elongated scalariform perforation plates; wood fibres +; axial parenchyma diffuse or diffuse-in-aggregates; tectum reticulate-perforate [here?]; ?genome duplication; "DEAER" motif in AP3 and PI genes lost, gaps in these genes.

[AUSTROBAILEYALES [[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]]]: ethereal oils in spherical idioblasts [lamina and P ± pellucid-punctate]; tension wood 0; tectum reticulate-perforate [here?], nucellar cap + [character lost where in eudicots?]; 12BP [4 amino acids] deletion in P1 gene.

[[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]] / MESANGIOSPERMAE: benzylisoquinoline alkaloids +; outer epidermal walls of root elongation zone with cellulose fibrils oriented transverse to root axis; P more or less whorled, 3-merous [possible position]; carpels plicate; embryo sac bipolar, 8 nucleate, antipodal cells persisting; endosperm triploid; ?germination.

[MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]: (veins in lamina often 7-17mm/mm2 or more [mean for eudicots 8.0]); (stamens opposite [two whorls of] P); (pollen tube growth fast).

[CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]: ethereal oils 0.

EUDICOTS: myricetin, delphinidin scattered, asarone 0 [unknown in some groups, + in some asterids]; root epidermis derived from root cap [?Buxaceae, etc.]; nodes 3:3; stomata anomocytic; flowers (dimerous), cyclic; K/outer P members with three traces, "C" with a single trace; A few, (polyandry widespread, initial primordia 5, 10, or ring, ± centrifugal, numbers of C/G usually not changed), filaments fairly slender, anthers basifixed; microsporogenesis simultaneous, tetrads tetrahedral, pollen tricolpate, apertures in pairs at six points of the young tetrad [Fischer's rule], cleavage centripetal, wall with endexine; G with complete postgenital fusion, stylulus/style solid [?here]; seed coat?

[PROTEALES [TROCHODENDRALES [BUXALES + CORE EUDICOTS]]]: (axial/receptacular nectary +).

[TROCHODENDRALES [BUXALES + CORE EUDICOTS]]: benzylisoquinoline alkaloids 0; euAP3 + TM6 genes [duplication of paleoAP3 gene: B class], mitochondrial rps2 gene lost.

[BUXALES + CORE EUDICOTS]: ?

CORE EUDICOTS / GUNNERIDAE: ellagic and gallic acids common; compitum + [one place]; micropyle?; PI-dB motif +, small deletion in the 18S ribosomal DNA common.

[ROSIDS ET AL. + ASTERIDS ET AL.] / PENTAPETALAE: root apical meristem closed; (cyanogenesis also via [iso]leucine, valine and phenylalanine pathways); flowers rather stereotyped: 5-merous, parts whorled; calyx and corolla distinct, the calyx enclosing the flower in bud, sepals with three or more traces, petals with a single trace; stamens = 2x K/C, in two whorls developing internally/adaxially to the corolla whorl and successively alternating, (numerous, but then usually fasciculate and/or centrifugal); pollen tricolporate; G [5], G [3] also common, when [G 2], carpels superposed, compitum +, placentation axile, style +, stigma not decurrent; endosperm nuclear; fruit dry, dehiscent, loculicidal [when a capsule]; whole genome triplication; RNase-based gametophytic incompatibility system present.

[SANTALALES [BERBERIDOPSIDALES [CARYOPHYLLALES + ASTERIDS]]] / ASTERIDS ET AL. / SUPERASTERIDS : ?

[BERBERIDOPSIDALES [CARYOPHYLLALES + ASTERIDS]]: ?

[CARYOPHYLLALES + ASTERIDS]: seed exotestal; embryo long.

ASTERIDS / Sympetalae redux? / ASTERIDAE / ASTERANAE Takhtajan: nicotinic acid metabolised to its arabinosides; (iridoids +); tension wood decidedly uncommon; C enclosing A and G in bud, connate, if evident only early in development and then petals often appearing to be free; anthers dorsifixed?; (nectary gynoecial); style +, long; ovules unitegmic, integument thick, endothelium +, nucellar epidermis does not persist; exotestal cells lignified, esp. on anticlinal and/or inner periclinal walls; endosperm cellular, embryo long.

[ERICALES [ASTERID I + II]]: ovules tenuinucellate.

[ASTERID I + II] / CORE ASTERIDS: Ellagic acid 0, non-hydrolysable tannins not common; sugar transport in phloem active; inflorescence basically cymose; C forming a distinct tube; A epipetalous, = and opposite sepals or P, polyandry associated with increased numbers of C or G, very uncommon; (pollen with orbicules); duplication of the PI gene.

ASTERID I / LAMIIDAE: G [2], superposed; loss of introns 18-23 in d copy of RPB2 gene.

[BORAGINACEAE + VAHLIACEAE + GENTIANALES + LAMIALES + SOLANALES]: (8-ring deoxyflavonols +); vessel elements with simple perforation plates; C tube initiation late [sampling!]; [vascularized] nectary at base of G; style long.   Back to Main Tree

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. Magallón and Castillo (2009) offer estimates of ca 81 million years for both relaxed and constrained penalized likelihood datings for this clade - but note topology; Boraginaceae are included, Vahliaceae excluded. The divergence of Solanales and Gentianales has been estimated at 89-83 million years ().

Endress (2011a) suggested that a key innovation for a clade [Lamiales + Solanales] might be anthers with a pollen sac placentoid.

Morphology, Anatomy, etc. There are several morphological characters of potential phylogenetic interest in this group. Protein crystals in nuclei are apparently not known from Avicennia, etc. (Speta 1977, 1979), and information is needed for groups recently moved to Lamiales. Whether or not such crystals characterise both Lamiales and also Boraginaceae s. str. (see also Wagstaff & Olmstead 1997) needs to be confirmed. Although some Boraginaceae do have protein bodies in their nuclei, they are of two very different kinds, and many Boraginaceae lack them; there is also variation within Lamiales. Lamiales and Boraginaceae have in common similar hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, i.e. disaccharide esters of rosmarinic/lithospermic/caffeic acids (Mølgaard & Ravn 1988). Boraginaceae s. str. have callose plugs in the pollen tube, as do Solanales, but they are both present and absent in Hydophylloideae, and absent in Heliotropioideae, Cordioideae, and monosymmetric-flowered Lamiales (Cocucci 1983). Oleaceae, Lamiaceae, and Solanaceae have (arabino)xyloglucans and some (galacto)xyloglucan hemicelluloses in the cell wall; the plesiomorphic condition for seed plants is to have (fuco(galacto))xyloglucans (O'Neill & York 2003; Harris 2005), but the sampling is very poor. Wu et al. (2006) suggest that the ancestral chromosome number of Solanales and Gentianales (specifically Solanaceae and Rubiaceae) was x = 11 or 12; no palaeopolyploidization seemed to have occurred in this general area.

Phylogeny. Vahlia is placed sister to Lamiales, but with only 63% bootstrap support by Albach et al. (2001b), or is associated more specifically with Boraginaceae in other analyses (Lundberg 2001e; B. Bremer et al. 2002 - unusually, not immediately associated in Qiu et al. 2010, although they are not strongly separated). Boraginaceae (plus Vahliaceae) may be associated with Lamiales; only in ndhF analyses is there some support for a linkage with Solanales (Olmstead et al. 1999, 2000; see also Savolainen et al. 2000a; Lundberg 2001e). In general, relationships between Gentianales, Lamiales and Solanales are unclear (Albach et al. 2001b; B. Bremer et al. 2002; Janssens et al. 2009, Boraginaceae s.l. not included; J. Li & Zhang 2010). Even the analysis of all 79 protein-coding plastid genes and four mitochondrial genes did not clarify relationships in this area (Moore et al. 2008) nor did the 17-gene 640-taxon study of Soltis et al. (2011). Finet et al. (2010) found quite good support for a [Gentianales + Solanales] clade, but no Boraginaceae s.l. were included.

Unplaced:  Back to Main Tree

BORAGINACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons.

Cork superficial to mid-cortical (pericyclic); (silicon concentration high [?level]); (vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates); sieve tubes with nuclear non-dispersive protein bodies; nodes 1:1; petiole bundle(s) arcuate; plant often roughly hairy, hairs with a basal cystolith or cystolith-like body, and/or walls calcified; inflorescences terminal, cyme scorpioid, (bracteoles 0); K free, C tube formation late; anther placentoid 0; (pollen with pseudocolpi); nectary not vascularized; ovary with secondary ["false"] septae, (heterostyly +), stigma dry; ovules 2/carpel, pendulous, epitropous; K persistent in fruit; micropylar endosperm haustoria +, cotyledons accumbent[?].

Boraginaceae tree

148[list]/2740 - in six groups below. Temperate to tropical. [Photos - Collection]

1. Boraginoideae Arnott

Boraginaceae

Herbs (shrubs); pyrrolizidine alkaloids, alkannin, prenylated naphthoquinones [roots with reddish or purple dye], gamma-linolenic acid +, stem storage polysaccharides isokestose and higher inulin oligosaccharides [fructans] (with starch; none in annuals); (pits vestured); one (or both) bracteoles 0; corolla often rotate, mouth with fornices [inpushings of corolla tube, but morphology variable] (0), anther connective produced or not; tapetal cells multinucleate (uninucleate - Cynoglosseae); pollen trinucleate, (with pseudocolpi; 4- or more colporate), tube with callose; style gynobasic, hollow, (styles divided), stigma punctate to capitate; integument 7-12 cells across, (nucellar cap +), endothelium 0, placental obturator +; fruit a schizocarp (capsule - Wellstedia), with (1-)4 nutlets, exocarp sclerified; testa (vascularized), exotestal cells with outer walls thickened and lignified (other patterns of thickening, or unthickened), most other cells disappear; endosperm oily or 0, also nuclear, haustoria 0; n = (4-)12(-13).

112/1600: Onosma (150), Cryptantha (150), Myosotis (90), Cynoglossum (75), Paracaryum (70), Plagiobothrys (70), Lithospermum (70: used in dyeing), Echium (60), Amsinckia (50), Mertensia (50), Trigonotis (50). Largely (warm) north temperate, some on mountains in the tropics (map: see Meusel et al. 1978; Hultén & Fries 1986; Böhle et al. 1996; Långström & Chase 2002; FloraBase 2005; Wiegend et al. 2010: still incomplete).

Synonymy: Anchusaceae Vest, Buglossaceae Hoffmannsegg & Link nom. illeg., Cerinthaceae Berchtold & Presl, Cynoglossaceae Döll, Echiaceae Rafinesque, Onosmaceae Martynov

Codonoideae

Codon/Codonoideae Retief & A. E. van Wyk/Codonaceae Weigend & Hilger

Subshrubs; plant prickly-hairy; flowers 10-12-merous; K deeply linear-lobed, C broadly campanulate, with flaps near filament bases; pollen without pseudocolpi; G [2], placentation strongly intrusive parietal, style terminal, deeply bilobed; ovules many/carpel; fruits loculicidal; testa reticulate-papillate; endosperm copious; n = ?.

1/2. S.W. Africa (map: see Retief et al. 2005).

Wellstedia/Wellstedioideae Pilger/Wellstediaceae Novák

Wellstedioideae

Plant small, shrubby; peltate glands +; flowers in two serried ranks along the stem; flowers four-merous; C lobes three-veined, the tube, eight veined; pollen 12-25 x 8-15 µm, exine perforate to reticulate, pseudocolpi +, mesocolpium coarse-reticulate (cf. hydrophylloids); nectary 0; G [2], style terminal, stigma bifid, wet; ovule one/carpel, pendulous, epitropous; fruit a loculicidal capsule, septae may separate from the walls; seed with fringe of downwardly-pointing hairs from near the apex; embryo curved, cotyledons accumbent, endosperm 0; n = ?

1/5. S.W. and N.E. Africa (map: see Thulin & Johansson 1996; Reteif & van Wyk 2008).

Hydrophyllaceae [Heliotropioideae + Cordioideae + Ehretioideae + Lennooideae]: (plant smells unpleasantly); endothelium +; single layer of transfer cells [cells with labyrinthine ingrowths of the wall] in the testa; micropylar (and chalazal) haustoria +.

2. Hydrophylloideae Burnett

Herbs (shrubs); tannins 0, inulin?, alkaloids?; (pollen tubes lacking callose); leaves (opposite; compound), margins lobed, toothed (entire), 2ndary veins pinnate to palmate; cymes scorpioid, bracts and bracteoles usu. 0; (K free); C tube formation late [Nemophila]; A usu. with small scales at each side of the base; pollen also colpate, tubes with callose (0 [Phacelia]); nectary usu. 0; G (seminferior), placentation parietal, styles +/0, stigma punctate; ovules 2-many carpel, (pleurotropous), (crassinucellate), integument 5-10 cells across; fruit a loculicidal (+ septicidal) capsule (indehiscent); (seeds ruminate by inpushings of the exotestal cells), exotestal cells thickened on inner and radial walls, (largely disappearing - Nemophila), endotestal cells persistent, walls esp. the inner periclinal ± thickened; endosperm also nuclear, copious to scanty, no haustoria, or chalazal and micropylar haustoria +, with lateral projections, (reserve hemicellulose), embryo (short), green or white; n = 5, 9-13, 19.

17[list]/225: Phacelia (150), Nama (45). New World, esp. drier areas of western North America. [Photo - Undetermined Flower.]

Synonymy: Ellisiaceae Berchtold & J. S. Presl [?status], Eutocaceae Horaninow, Hydrophyllaceae R. Brown, nom. cons., Sagoneaceae Martynov

Heliotropioideae + Cordioideae + Ehretioideae + Lennooideae: bark oxidises; pollen tubes lacking callose; transfer cells in funicle and placenta also; fruit with a multilayered lignified endocarp; endosperm cellular.

3. Heliotropioideae Arnott

Trees or lianes to herbs; pyrrolizidine alkaloids +; cambium not storied; pericyclic sheath 0 [?always]; pits not vestured (+); petiole bundles arcuate; (tetrahedral crystals +); leaves usu. conduplicate [Tournefortia]; C imbricate or with involute margins; A connate at apex via papillae, connective not produced; tapetal cells binucleate; (pollen with pseudocolpi; 4 colporate); style + (0), stigma receptive only basi-laterally, discoid, then conical and ± bilobed at sterile apex, or hemispherical, with a ring of hairs, wet; ovules with integument (?3-)8 cells across, parietal tissue ca 1 cell across [?], nucellar cap ca 2 cells across, obturator +; fruit (drupe with 4, 1-seeded stones), schizocarp; seed exotestal; endosperm 0 (slight) at maturity, embryo curved or straight, cotyledons large, suspensor long; n = 5, 7-9, 11-14, etc.

Heliotropoideae

5/405: Heliotropium (250), Tournefortia (150, salicylic acid: polyphyletic - see Diane et al. 2002a). Tropical to warm temperate (map: see Gottschling et al. 2004; Flora Base 2005). [Photo - Flower.]

Synonymy: Heliotropiaceae Schrader, nom. cons.

4. Cordioideae Beilschmied

Trees, shrubs or lianes; terpenoid-based quinones +; cambium storied; 2ndary phloem stratified; nodes 3:3 [Cordia, but see below]; petiole bundles (invaginated) annular and with (cortical and) rib bundles; crystal sand and prismatic or columnar crystals +; lamina margins toothed to entire; bracteoles usu. 0; K valvate to open, persistent to accrescent, C contorted (imbricate); anther connective usu. not produced; pollen often spiny, pseudocolpi 0, (3-porate - Varronia); styles + (divided), stigmas punctate to capitate; ovules straight, tenuinucellate, nucellar cap [Cordia] +; fruit often a drupe, stones 1 (2, 4) (K accrescent [an anthocarp!]); testa vascularized [Cordia], 3-4 layers of transfer cells; endosperm haustoria?, 0, cotyledons plicate, toothed; n = 9, 14-16, 19.

Cordioideae

3/330: Cordia (300+: esp. West Indies, heterostylous, inc. Varronia - 100+). Tropical, especially South America (map: see Gottschling et al. 2004; Flora Base 2005). [Photo - Flower, Fruit.]

Synonymy: Cordiaceae Dumortier, nom. cons., Hoplestigmataceae Gilg, Sebestenaceae Ventenat, nom. illeg.

5. Ehretioideae Arnott

?Smell; trees or shrubs (herbs); inulins?; cambium storied; (pits vestured - e.g. Ehretia, Rochefortia); petiole bundle arcuate; lamina margins toothed (entire); bracteoles?, flowers (4-)5-merous; K (5-15; valvate), C imbricate or inwards-folded; anther connective usu. not produced; tapetal cells multinucleate; (pollen 3-porate), mesocolpium coarse-reticulate; placentation apical to axile, styles ± well developed, stigmas capitate or elongate; ovules (1/carpel), integument ca 10-12 cells across, parietal tissue 1 cell across, nucellar cap ca 2 cells across, epidermal cells anticlinally elongated, placental obturator +; embryo sac bisporic, 8-nucleate [Allium type]; K accrescent or not, fruit a drupe, stone (1-)2-(4-)seeded, or a schizocarp; endosperm copious to 0, embryo curved, suspensor long; n = 5, 7-11, 13, 16, etc.

Ehretioideae

8/170: Ehretia (75), Bourreria (50). Mostly tropical (map: see Gottschling et al. 2004; Flora Base 2005).

Synonymy: Ehretiaceae Martius, nom. cons.

6. Lennooideae Craven

Echlorophyllous, herbaceous root parasites; chemistry?; cork?; sieve tubes with nuclear non-dispersive protein bodies?; stem with cortical bundles; nodes?; leaves spiral, reduced to scales; inflorescences congested, flowers 5-10-merous; K long, narrow, free; pollen tube callose?; nectary 0; G [5-16], placentation axile, loculi subdivided, ;style stout, stigma capitate or lobed; ovule type?; fruit a drupe, irregularly schizocarpic (± circumscissile), K and C persistent; exotesta with fine reticulate thickening; endosperm starchy, ?development, ?haustoria, embryo minute, undifferentiated; n = 9.

Lennooideae

3[list]/7. S.W. U.S.A. to N. South America (map: from Brummitt 2007).

Synonymy: Lennoaceae Solms-Laubach, nom. cons.

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. The diversification of primarily woody taxa may have taken place in the mid-Cretaceous, some 90 million years ago, in South America (Gottschling et al. 2004); Wikström et al. (2001) estimate divergence of the whole Boraginaceae 81-77 million years before present, i.e. rather later and some time in the Ypresian-Thanetian ([Vahliaceae + Lamiales] are the sister clade), with Hydrophylloideae and Boraginoideae separating 59-56 million years before present. Moore and Jansen (2006) also suggest rather later dates, with very end Cretaceous 67-63 million years ago being a date for the diversification of the woody taxa. Magallón and Castillo (2009) suggest an age of ca 77.5 million years for both relaxed and constrained penalized likelihood stem datings for this clade - but note the topology; Gentianales are its sister clade, Vahliaceae excluded.

Divergence within Boraginoideae {Ogastemma + [Lithospermeae, etc.]] is estimated to have occured some 43 million years (56-30) ago (Weigend et al. 2009). Luebert et al. (2011a) suggest Heliotropoideae diversified in the Paleocene or earlier, and within Heliotropium (inc. Tournefortia) diversification began about 45 million years ago, stem node age is ca 60.7 million years ago in the Middle Eocene (see Luebert et al. 2011b for many more details).

Moritzia and Thaumatocaryon are the only Boragineae endemic to South America (and the only Boragineae in the New World); sister taxa, they in turn are sister to all other Boragineae, which are largely Eurasian; interestingly, there are fossils from North America of late Miocene age that are assignable to this clade, so filling the distributional gap (Weigend et al. 2010). Moore and Jansen (2006) and Moore et al. (2006) outline speciation and distribution in the amphitropical disjunct desert genus, Tiquilia (Ehretioideae), in some detail; it may have originated in the Palaeocene ca 58 million years before present but began to diversify only rather later, some 33-38 million years before present, and with repeated dispersal from W. North America to W. South America.

Echium is a good example of "island woodiness" - woody, more or less tree-like forms in otherwise herbaceous groups that evolve on islands, and it is noted for the distinctive secondarily woody sometimes monocarpic (but up to 3 m tall!) species that have evolved on Macaronesia, within at most twenty million years. Divergence within Echium may have begun some 20.6 million years ago, but the Macaronesian diversification - there seem to have been two reversions to the herbaceous habit, and the majority of the species are on the Canary Islands - can be dated to a mere (6.3-)3.9(-1.5) million years ago (Böhle et al. 1996; Stöcklin 2011; García-Maroto et al. 2009: see Mansion et al. 2009 for other Mediterranean insular endemic Boraginoideae).

Floral Biology & Seed Dispersal. Floral evolution shows much of interest in this group, although lacking both a comprehensive phylogeny as well as developmental studies of the more distinctive flowers, details must remain poorly known. Thus several taxa have flowers that are not the normal 5-merous core eudicot flower. These include Codon (10-12-merous, ex Hydrophyllaceae; the only African member of that family in its old circumscription), Hoplestigma, and Lennooideae. The first two of these have many more stamens and petals than normal, but a simple bicarpellate gynoecium; Lennooideae also show an increase in carpel number. Both the petals and stamens of Hoplestigma are described as being in several series (Goldberg 1986), and its floral morphology and development would clearly repay investigation. The combination of a many-lobed corolla and a bicarpellate gynoecium is a little odd in the asterid I + II groups, but c.f. Dialypetalanthus (Rubiaceae), some Potalieae (Gentianaceae), Lamiaceae-Symphorematoideae, etc.

Boraginoideae are well known as a group that has a gynobasic style, but the terminal style of Heliotropoideae, at least, is also likely to be derived from a gynobasic style. This would explain the fact that in Heliotropoideae the pollen transmitting tissue proceeds to the base of the gynoecium (e.g. Hanf 1935).

Pollination in predominantly by insects, and in Boraginoideae the corolla often shows color changes on aging, pink to blue, yellow to pink to blue, yellow to white; p.H. changes of the cell sap are involved. In a number of Boraginoideae there is buzz pollination; nectar is also produced by these flowers (Teppner 2011).

Nutlets of Boragineae have elaiosomes and are dispersed by ants, while in taxa like Cynoglossum the nutlets have glochids and are dispersed in the fur of larger animals. (Selvi et al. 2011).

The relationships of the several-seeded capsules of Hydrophylloideae to the few-seeded indehiscent/schizocarpic fruits of the rest of the group are unclear, but parallelisms and/or reversals would seem to be the order of the day. In the large genus Cryptantha, especially diverse in West North and South America, some species have inflorescences with basal, cleistogamous flowers and non-dispersing fruits (Grau 1983).

Ecology & Physiology. Heliotropium, especially section Orthostachys contains perhaps ca 150 species with C4 photosynthesis, and also intermediates between C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathways (Vogan et al. 2007; Sage et al. 2011).

The holoparasitic Lennooideae may be sister to - or even a clade within - Ehretioideae (Smith & dePamphilis 1998; Smith et al. 2000; Olmstead & Ferguson 2001), so members of Lennoaceae appear to be parasitizing their close relatives. More work is needed to clarify the evolution of this distinctive parasitic clade.

Plant-Animal Interactions. Boraginaceae (including Hydrophylloideae) are not often eaten by caterpillars of butterflies (Ehrlich & Raven 1964). However, wilting plants and/or flowers of Boraginoideae and Heliotropoideae, especially the latter, are visted by adult butterflies and moths belonging to Ctenuchidae, Arctiidae, Danainae and Ithomiinae; the pyrrolizidine alkaloids the plants contain are used in the pheromones of these lepidoptera or are distasteful to other animals (see also Crotalaria and some Apocynaceae and Asteraceae-Asteroideae: Edgar et al. 1974; Ackery & Vane-Wright 1984 [considerable detail for the danaines]; Boppreé 1986; Brown 1987). Cordia (Cordioideae) is also sometimes visited, although it is not known to contain these alkaloids. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids and pentacyclic triterpene saponins variously sequestered and modified are found in the secretions of the defensive glands of some Chrysolina and Platyophora beetles (Chrysomelidae, both genera are very speciose: Pasteels et al. 2001; Termonia et al. 2002; Hartmann et al. 2003).

Bacterial/Fungal Associations. Holm (1979) noted that some Boraginoideae and Hydrophylloideae have similar rusts.

Vegetative Variation. For secondary woodiness in Echium, see above. Leaves subtending branches are sometimes displaced up the branches they subtend in Tournefortia. The growth pattern of some species of Cordia, including the myrmecophilous species, is distinctive: the apex of the stem aborts, some branches are plagiotropic, while one becomes orthotropic and forms the renewal shoot. The inflorescence can also be oddly placed.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. The hydroxycinnamic acid depside, rosmarinic acid, is known from Boraginoideae and Hydrophylloideae (as well as some Lamiaceae: Mølgaard & Ravn 1988). Taxa with root trichoblasts in radial files are quite common in Boraginaceae s.l.

There is considerable variation in ovule and endosperm development, conveniently summarized by Khaleel (1985). A variety of septal structures are produced in this group (see Gottschling 2004). There is controversy as to whether the ovules in some Boraginaceae s.l. are crassinucellate or tenuinucellate. Given that ovules with even a single layer of parietal tissue are crassinucellate by some definitions, Boraginoideae, for example are tenuinucellate, while Ehretioideae and Heliotropoideae are crassinucellate, Hydrophyllaceae s. str. may have both conditions (e.g. Di Fulvio 1981, 1987; cf. Gottschling 2004; Berg 2009). The style in at least some Boraginoideae and Hydrophylloideae apears to be hollow (Guéguen 1901). Suspensor size in the embryo varies considerably in this group; I have not attempted to see if variation correlates with clades. There is variation in the presence of the mitochondrial coxII.i3 intron (two species sampled...).

Within Boraginoideae, fructans are absent in annual species but also in the perennial Alkanna; starch may sometimes also be present (Bourdu 1957; Meier & Reid 1982). Trichodesmis has opposite leaves and the pendulous and campanulate flowers are borne in a congested inflorescence at the end of a rather long peduncle. Echium has obliquely monosymmetric flowers, while the flowers of some species of Nonea may be vertically monosymmetric, the abaxial stamen being much longer than the others (the flowers of Echiochilon are also monosymmetric - I would guess obliquely so); Cerinthe has an oblique plane of symmetry (Selvi et al. 2009), although the flowers are functionally polysymmetric. With pollen grains at ca 4.1 µm long, Cryptantha clevelandii has about the smallest grains of any flowering plant (Hargrove & Simpson 2003). Amsinckia has very strongly bilobed cotyledons. The corolla in Boraginaceae s.l. usually has many veins diverging in the lobes, but not in Wellstedia. Thulin and Johansson (1996) described the capsule of Wellstedia as being septifragal, Reteif and van Wyk (2008) as being loculicidal; the latter appear to be correct. The ovule has a distinctive shape caused by some kind of chalazal projection (e.g. Reteif & van Wyk 2008).

There are acicular protein bodies in the nucleus of sieve elements in Hydrophylloideae. The mesocolpium is coarse-reticulate, as in some Boraginaceae s. str. (Wagenitz 1992). Di Fulvio (1989a) described the ovules of Nama as being crassinucellate, but tenuinucellate condition seems to be common (e.g. Berg 2009). For details of embryogenesis, seed coat, etc., see also Berg (2009 and references) and di Fulvio (1987, 1990). Tournefortia astrotricha (Heliotropoideae) lacks inulin. Details of embryology are taken from DiFulvio (1978). The central foliar trace of Cordia (Cordioideae) is at least sometimes inverted C-shaped when it joins the central stele, but I do not know how widespread this character is (see Neubauer 1977 for nodal anatomy of Cordia myxa - also modified 1:3). Ehretioideae are heterogeneous in wood anatomy; both Antrophora and Lepidocordia have vessels in radial groups, apotracheal parenchyma, and fibre tracheids with bordered pits (Gottwald 1982). In embryology Ehretioideae are perhaps closest to Heliotropioideae (Diane et al. 2002a). The embryology of Lennooideae is largely unknown.

For general information on Codon in particular, see Retief and van Wyk (2005), Retief et al. (2005) and Weigend and Hilger (2010). For other information, see Gürke (1891: general), Svensson (1925: embryology), K. A. Wilson (1960: Hydrophyllaceae, general), Khaleel (1977: testa anatomy), Prósperi and Cocucci (1979: callose, in Boraginoideae, variable in Hydrophylloideae, sampling needs to be extended), Gottwald (1982), Fisher et al. (1989: sieve tubes with nuclear non-dispersive protein bodies), Heubl et al. (1990: esp. Cordia), Al-Shehbaz (1991: general), Thulin and Johansson (1996), Di Fulvio (1997: protein inclusions in nucleus), Gunstone (1992) and Velasco and Goffman (1999: fatty acids, esp. gamma linolenic acid - but note that this is by no means restricted to Boraginoideae, see Gunstone 1992), Förther (1998: esp. Heliotropioideae), Diane et al. (2002b: transfer cells), Buys and Hilger (2003: inflorescence morphology), Gottschling et al. (2004: diversification), Aniszewski (2007: alkaloids), and Guignard (1893: ovules vascularized), Millsaps (1940), Venkateswarlu and Atchutaramamurti (1955), and Johri and Vasil (1956) - all embryology, etc. For floral morphology in Hydrophylloideae, see Hilger (1987) and Hofmann (1999). For Boraginoideae, see Y. Heslop-Harrison (1981) and Bigazzi and Selvi (2000) for the morphology of stigma papillae, Hilger (1985) for fruit development, Seibert (1978: Lithospermeae), Ovczinnikova (2007) and Simpson and Hasenstab (2009: Cryptantha, see the cover photograph!) for fruit morphology, and Rabaey et al. (2010: vestured pits, ± correlations with clades within Boraginoidae). For pollen morphology of Boraginoideae, see Weigend et al. (2009), for that of Boragineae, Bigazzi and Selvi (1998), for that of Cordioideae, see Nowicke and Miller (1990), and for that of Ehretioideae, see J.-X. Liu et al. (2003). See The Parasitic Plant Collection for general information about Lennooideae.

Phylogeny. Boraginoideae are sister to rest of the group, and this clade may include Codon (10-12-merous, ex Hydrophyllaceae, but the only African member of that family) and Wellstedia (also African) as clades successively sister to the remainder (e.g. Luebert & Wen 2008). However, the position of Wellstedia - and Codon - must be confirmed; the former did unambiguously link with the other two Boraginoideae in the analysis in Moore and Jansen (2006). Two groups of ex Hydrophyllaceae also are successive sister taxa within the other major clade in some reconstructions, hence loculicidal capsules may be plesiomorphic for the whole group; Nameae in particular may be sister to the [Cordioideae + Heliotropoideae + Ehretioideae] clade (Olmstead & Ferguson 2001; Moore & Jansen 2006, low bootstrap but high posterior probabilty; Luebert & Wen 2008). Nameae include the only woody and tropical members of Hydrophyllaceae s. str. (i.e., excluding Hydrolea, see below). However, Gottschling et al. (2001), looking at the secondary structure of the ITS1 transcript, found Hydrophyllaceae s. str. to be monophyletic (the position of Codon is uncertain) and sister to [Heliotropoideae [Cordioideae + Ehretioideae]] - in the discussion above I follow this topology, but not with much conviction. Note that Boraginaceae and Hydrophylloideae also have meroterpenoids, rusts (see above) and very variable endosperm development in common. See also Ferguson (1999) for relationships.

Långström and Chase (2002) discuss tribal relationships within Boraginoideae. Within Lithospermeae, the limits of Lithospermum itself are to be extended (Weigend et al. 2009; Cohen & Davis 2009a, b), however, the topology of the tree is rather labile and the addition of relatively few (22) morphological characters has a major effect on support values and some on topology (Cohen & Davis 2011). Vegetative and floral features are highly homoplastic when optimised on the tree (Cohen & Davis 2011). For the limits of Lithospermeae, see also Saadati et al. (2011); Lithodora is polyphyletic (Thomas et al. 2008). Trigonotidae are to be completely dismembered (Weigend et al. 2010), the two South American genera that used to be placed in the tribe being sister to the Eurasian Boragineae. For the phylogeny of insular Echium, see García-Maroto et al. (2009). Cynoglossum is likely to be paraphyletic (Selvi et al. (2011).

For the phylogeny of Cordioideae, see Gottschling et al. (2003); Coldenia is sister to the rest of Cordioideae and Saccelium is included in Cordia s. str. For Cordia s. str. and its immediate relatives, see Miller and Gottschling (2007) and Weeks et al. (2010).

For relationships and evolution of habit, etc., in neotropical Heliotropium, see Luebert et al. (2011b).

The distinctive West African Hoplestigma, a deciduous tree with perulate buds, a connate, irregularly-splitting calyx, 11-14 basally connate petals and 20-35 stamens that are adnate to the base of the corolla, belongs in this general area morphologically. It has intrusive parietal placentation and long styles that are bent outwards, then inwards, and are terminated by U-shaped, expanded stigmas. Hoplestigma has been placed near Boraginaceae because of its scorpioid cymose inflorescence, absence of bracts, pollen with pseudocolpi (e.g. as in Bourreria and Ehretia - Ehretioideae: Nowicke & Miller 1989), and gynoecium - two carpels with parietal placentation, perhaps as in Hydrophyllaceae (see also Takhtajan 1997). Molecular data place it close to Cordia (K. Wurdack, pers. comm.). The embryology, etc., of Hoplestigma are largely unknown, but there appear to be three vascular traces in the base of the petiole; its nodal anatomy may be similar to that of Cordia, which is rather distinctive?

Lennooideae are often associated with Boraginaceae and/or Hydrophyllaceae (Cronquist 1981; Takhtajan 1997; esp. Yatskievych et al. 1986). rps2 data even suggest a position within Ehretioideae. Both Ehretia + Lennoaceae have a shared intron in the mitochondrial gene cox1, and Tiquilia in particular is sister to Pholisma (Smith & dePamphilis 1998; Smith et al. 2000; Olmstead & Ferguson 2001). (Tiquilia and immediate relatives, mostly plants of American deserts, are unusual within Ehretioideae in being herbs, or shrubs that flower very quickly, and their inflorescences may be crowded. Their fruits are dry, and secondary veins in the leaves go to the sinuses [Richardson 1977]). However, until there is further resolution of phylogenetic relationships, I have retained Lennooideae as separate from Ehretioideae. For other relationships within Ehretioideae, see Gottschling and Hilger (2001).

Classification. All in all, it may be useful to recognize more than one family here, given appropriate phylogenetic support and morphological distinctions, or at least five subfamilies, but the situation is getting complicated. Gottschling et al. (2005) equivocate as to whether Coldenia should be included in their Cordiaceae - if it is, as here, the clade has few apomorphies. Family names are being added (e.g. Weigend & Hilger 2010), so the classification of the group is somewhat in limbo, indeed, Luebert and Wen (2008) suggest a narrow circumscription for Cordiaceae (see below), their Hydrophyllaceae are paraphyletic, and they of course do not include the distinctive Hoplestigma.... If narrow family limits are adopted, then, depending on the phylogeny, there could be some 11 families in this clade - hardly a desirable outcome, perhaps.

For generic limits in Cordioideae, see Gottschling et al. (2003); Saccelium is included in Cordia s. str.; Miller and Gottschling (2007) segregated Varronia from Cordia, although since the two are sister taxa, strictly speaking this is not necessary, even if the split is supported by morphology. For tribes in Boraginoideae, see Långström and Chase (2002). The limits of Lithospermum have been adjusted, but the relationships of names and clades around there is still unclear (Cohen & Davis 2009b; Cohen 2011). Generic limits in Heliotropoideae need attention (Diane et al. 2002a; Hilger & Diane 2003; Luebert et al. 2011a, b); Craven (2005) suggested that the whole lot were best placed in Heliotropium s.l. - a suggestion not without merit. For the genera of Ehretioideae, see Miller (2003).

Previous Relationships. Boraginaceae have sometimes been associated with Lamiaceae (Lamiales) because both often have gynobasic styles and fruits with four separate nutlets, but the latter have iridoids, opposite leaves, square (not rounded) stems, monosymmetric flowers usually with 4 stamens, endosperm with haustoria and embryo with a long suspensor, and the two are not close. Furthermore, the radicle in Boraginaceae points upwards in fruit, while in Lamiaceae it faces downwards. No putative relative of Boraginaceae s. l. has alkannin or the carcinogenic pyrrolizidine alkaloids found in that clade. Pteleocarpa, with vestured pits, is usually included in Boraginaceae s.l., but it is here placed in Gelsemiaceae (Gentianales). Hydrolea, ex Hydrophyllaceae, but with axile placentation, is here to be found in Solanales. Hoplestigmataceae were included in the Violales by Cronquist (1981), perhaps because of their parietal placentation. Taktajan (1997), however, placed them in Boraginales, and they have even been included within Boraginaceae in the past (e.g. Hallier 1912).

Thanks. I am grateful to Mark Gottschling for discussion, and also the tree used here.

Synonymy: Boraginales Berchtold & J. Presl, Cordiales Martius, Echiales Lindley, Ehretiales Martius, Hydrophyllales Martius - Boraginanae Doweld

VAHLIACEAE Dandy   Back to Unplaced

Herbs or subshrubs; iridoids +; nodes 1:1; petiole bundle arcuate; hairs uniseriate-glandular; leaves opposite; flowers small; K valvate, C free; netcary +; G [2(-3)], inferior, 1-locular, placentae apical, confluent, styles distinct, diverging, stigmas ± capitate; ovules many/carpel, bitegmic, micropyle endostomal, outer integument 2-3 cells across, inner integument 2-3 cells across, endothelium 0, parietal tissue 1 cell across; fruit a septicidal capsule, K persistent; exotestal cells ± elongated, outer wall or all walls thickened, endotesta a layer of cells with well-developed U-thickenings, neither lignified, raphe disappears; endosperm slight; n = 6, 9.

Vahliaceae

1[list]/8. Africa and Madagascar to India (map: from Bridson 1974).

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. Magallón and Castillo (2009) offer estimates of ca 83 million years for relaxed and constrained penalized likelihood datings for stem group Vahliaceae - but note topology. Friis and Skarby (1982) described two species of Scandianthus, from the Upper Cretaceous of Sweden, which has an unilocular gynoecium with apical-lateral placentae and free styles; dehiscence is septicidal (not emphasized by the authors), and the genus has been linked with Vahlia (see also the morphological analysis in Martínez-Millán 2010). Friis and Skarby (1982) also noted a phenetic similarity to some Hydrangeaceae, Phyllonomaceae, Escalloniaceae, and even some Saxifragaceae s. str. The genus has ten stamens, a decidedly unusual number for any member of the asterid I + II clade - if indeed it is to be placed here.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Although the ovary has only a single locule, dehiscence of the fruit occurs between the styles, and this is normally equivalent to dehiscence along the septal radii.

Some information is taken from Thouvenin (1890), Mauritzon (1933: ovules), and Cutler and Gregory (1998: anatomy).

Classification. Bridson (1974) monographed the family.

Previous relationships. Vahliaceae were included in Saxifragales by Cronquist (1981) and Takhtajan (1997).

Synonymy: Vahliales Doweld

LAMIALES + GENTIANALES + SOLANALES: ?

GENTIANALES Berchtold & J. Presl  Main Tree, Synapomorphies.

Iridoids [different pathways!], monoterpene indole alkaloids, (O-methylated) flavones and flavonols +, myricetin rare; glandular hairs 0; pits vestured; nodes?; petiole bundle(s) arcuate; branching from current flush; leaves opposite, joined by a line across the stem, (stipules +), colleters +; (corolla swollen at the apex in bud); pollen orbicules +; ovules many/carpel, endothelium 0; endosperm nuclear. - 5 families, 1118 genera, 16637 species.

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. Gentianales may be some 89-83 million years old (Wikström et al. 2001), but timing of diversification within the clade is unclear since Dialypetalanthus is shown sister to the rest of the clade in this study - here it is included well within Rubiaceae. Janssens et al. (2009) date stem group Gentianales to 101±7.9 million years ago and the crown group to 79±10.2 million years (comparable figures are 108 and 78 million years in Bremer et al. 2004). Magallón and Castillo (2009) suggest an age of ca 81 million years for both relaxed and constrained penalized likelihood datings for stem Gentianales; Boraginaceae are included in its sister clade, Vahliaceae excluded.

Endress (2011a) suggested that a key innovation in Gentianales (and Lamiales) was tenuinucellate ovules.

Wink (2008) noted that the enzyme strictosidine synthase, a key intermediary in the formation of the monoterpene indole alkaloids commonly found in this clade, is in fact quite widely distributed in flowering plants.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. The monoterpene indole alkaloid camptothecin is scattered through Gentianales, e.g. it is found in Opiorrhiza (Rubiaceae), Mostuea (Gelsemiaceae) and Ervatamia (Apocynaceae) (see Lorence & Nessler 2004). The colleters consist of secretory palisade surrounding an elongated axis, so they are "proper" emergences. However, in many Gentianaceae they have a simpler structure and are "true hairs". Colleters are frequently borne on leaves, the calyx or corolla (Renobales et al. 2001), or even in a ring below the leaves and encircling the stem, as well as in their normal axillary position. Tapetal variation is considerable, plasmodial tapeta being known from some species of Gentianaceae, Rubiaceae and Apocynaceae (Furness 2008a). Most families have taxa with bi- or trinucleate pollen grains. There is substantial variation in the presence of the mitochondrial coxII.i3 intron in this clade.

Some information is taken from Rogers (1986: general), Erbar and Leins (1996: corolla development), Conn et al. (1997: general), Jansen and Smets (1998: wood anatomy, 2000: vestured pits), and Vinckier and Smets (2002a, c: orbicules).

Phylogeny. Struwe et al. (1995) suggested that Loganiaceae, even when more narrowly circumscribed, were extremely paraphyletic, with clades including about 1,300 genera and 15,500 species (Rubiaceae, Gentianaceae, Apocynaceae + Asclepiadaceae) coming from within them; they delimited families accordingly. However, B. Bremer (1996a), Potgeiter et al. (2000) and Backlund et al. (2000) found rather different relationships - Rubiaceae are sister to Loganiaceae, Gentianaceae, Gelsemiaceae and Apocynaceae. Relationships between these last four families are still not clear. M. Endress et al. (1996) found the relationships Gelsemiaciaceae [[Strychnaceae + Geniostomaceae (well supported)] Apocynaceae], see also B. Bremer and Struwe (1992). In other analyses, as in the tree below, there is weak support for a relationship between Gelsemiaceae and Apocynaceae (Backlund et al. 2000; Jiao & Li 2007: for the tree, see also B. Bremer 1999; Rova et al. 2002), while Soltis et al. (2011: sampling) found some support for a sister group pair [Gentianaceae + Apocynaceae].

Previous Relationships. The circumscription and relationships of Loganiaceae are a key to understanding the both the past and present circumscription and relationships of Gentianales. Loganiaceae seemed to show relationships with many sympetalous groups, and Bentham (1856) compared a broadly delimited Loganiaceae to a less-wooded area from which obvious forests representing more distinctive families such as Rubiaceae, Solanaceae, etc., had been removed. Loganiaceae in this sense (e.g. Leeuwenberg 1980) had ca 22 genera and 310 species. However, Buddleja s.l. and Androya (not immediately related), Peltanthera and Sanango (not immediately related), Plocospermum, Nuxia and Retzia and Polypremum, all members of a broadly circumscribed Loganiaceae, are in five separate clades in Lamiales (Scrophulariaceae, near Gesneriaceae, Plocospermataceae, Stilbaceae and Tetrachondraceae respectively), while Desfontainia (Desfontainiaceae) is in Bruniales, a campanulid/asterid II (for references, see those families) - hence it is not surprising that Loganiaceae seemed to be such a "central" family. Chemical variation within Loganiaceae s.l. strongly supports its break-up (e.g. Jensen 1999).



Includes Apocynaceae, Gelsemiaceae, Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae, Rubiaceae, Voyria.

Synonymy: Apocynales Berchtold & J. Presl, Asclepiadales Berchtold & J. Presl, Chironiales Grisebach, Cinchonales Lindley, Galiales Bromhead, Loganiales Lindley, Lygodisodeales Martius, Rubiales Berchtold & J. Presl, Strychnales Link, Theligonales Nakai, Vincales Horaninow

RUBIACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons.   Back to Gentianales

Plant woody; tanniniferous; (cork cambium deep-seated); true tracheids +; nodes 1(-3 or more):1(-3 or more), (+ split laterals); crystal sand +/0; secretory sacs widespread; stomata paracytic; lamina vernation usu. flat, stipules interpetiolar (sheathing; intrapetiolar; two pairs; toothed or not), innervated from circumferential vascular ring; infloresences often thyrsoid, flowers often aggregated; flowers 4- or 5-merous, (heterostyly +); K small, aestivation open (free; 0), C with early tube formation, (valvate); ovary inferior (largely superior in fruit), nectary on top, placentation axile (to parietal), style usually well developed, stigma wet or dry; ovules (apotropous), (parietal cells +), (nucellar epidermal cells anticlinally elongated), (obturator +); megaspore mother cells several, (embryo sacs several, ± haustorial); fruit baccate, drupaceous or capsular, variously dehiscent; seeds 1-many, (pachychalazal; ruminate), exotesta alone persisting, papillate/short hairy or not, cells variously thickened, (mesotestal cells thickened); endosperm cellular or nuclear, often hemicellulosic, embryo straight to curved, suspensor haustorium +; n = 11 (10-16).

Rubiaceae

611[list]/13150 - in four groups below. World-wide, but especially tropical (map: from Hultén 1958, 1971; Brummitt 2007). [Photo - Flower]

1. Rubioideae Verdcourt

Commonly herbs; (cylcotide proteins +), shikimic-acid derived anthraquinones +, plants Al-accumulators [esp. in woody taxa]; (root with superficial cork cambium - Paederia); raphides + [square in transverse section]; hairs articulated; heterostyly esp. common; C valvate; (pollen grains 3-celled); integument (0), 1-14 cells across; (antipodal cells persist); (suspensor haustorium +); loss of atpB promoter.

Psychotria s. str. (1400: ?inc. Myrmecodia, Hydnophytum [55]), Galium (400), Spermacoce (inc. Borreria: 275), Palicourea (250: inc. Cephaelis [100]), Oldenlandia (250, but polyphyletic), Hedyotis (200), Argostema (100), Morinda (80), Gaertnera (70). Worldwide. [Photo - Fruit]

Synonymy: Aparinaceae Hoffmannsegg & Link, Asperulaceae Spenner, Cynocrambaceae Endlicher, nom. illeg. Galiaceae Lindley, Hedyotidaceae Dumortier, Houstoniaceae Rafinesque, Hydrophylacaceae Martynov, Lippayaceae Meisner, Lygodisodeaceae Bartling, Nonateliaceae Martynov, Operculariaceae Perleb, Pagamaeaceae Martynov, Psychotriaceae F. Rudolphi, Spermacoceaceae Berchtold & J. Presl, Theligonaceae Dumortier, nom. cons.

[Luculia, etc. + Cinchonoideae + Ixoroideae]: plants woody; route II carboxylated iridoids +, indole alkaloids; hairs mostly cylindrical; secondary polen presentation common; exotestal cells with perforations[?].

2. Luculia [Acranthera + Coptasapelta]

(Raphides +).

3/53: Acranthera (35). Himalayas, China, to Malesia.

3. Cinchonoideae Rafinesque

Corynanthean and complex indole alkaloids +; (raphides + - Hillieae, Hamelieae); C left contorted; ovules often numerous; fruits usu. dry.

Timonius (150), Guettarda (80). Predominantly Neotropical.

Synonymy: Catesbaeaceae Martynov, Cephalanthaceae Rafinesque, Cinchonaceae Batsch, Coutareaceae Martynov, Guettardaceae Batsch, Henriqueziaceae Bremekamp, Naucleaceae Wernham

4. Ixoroideae Rafinesque

(Latex +); (calycophylls +); C contorted or cochleate; (pollen buds +); (placentation parietal), (stigma not bilobed - e.g. Gardenia); ovule number variable; fruits often fleshy; embryo short [?distribution].

Pavetta (400), Ixora (300), Mussaenda (200), Randia (100), Coffea (110: includes Psilanthus), Tricalysia (90), Gardenia (60), Bertiera (55). Pantropical.

Synonymy: Coffeaceae Batsch, Dialypetalanthaceae Rizzini & Occhioni, nom. cons., Gardeniaceae Dumortier, Hameliaceae Martius, Randiaceae Martynov, Sabiceaceae Martynov

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. Graham (2009) summarized the fossil history of Rubiaceae - there are no certain records from the Cretaceous or Palaeocene. Antonelli et al. (2009) suggest that divergence within Rubiaceae began a mere (68.8-)66.1(-63) million years ago, the minimum age of Cinchonoideae being (54.6-)51.3(-47.8) million years; movement of the family into South America was via a North Atlantic land bridge. Bremer and Eriksson (2009) also provide a comprehensive dated phylogeny for the family, but with rather older dates; they suggest ages of some 90.4 million years for stem and about 85 million years for crown Rubiaceae (divergence of Rubioideae from the rest); the split of Ixoroideae and Cinchonoideae was approximately 73 million years ago, with subsequent divergence within those two subfamilies beginning some 59.6 and 34.7 million years ago respectively.

Antonelli et al. (2009) give dates for divergences within the South American members of the family, especially within Isertieae and Cinchoneae. The minimum divergence time of Rubieae is (37.6-)28.6(-20.2) million years ago (Bremer & Eriksson 2009), although Graham (2009) suggested that fossil Galium was at least 55 million years old); the origin of the Rubieae clade seems to be in the Old World (Soza & Olmstead 2010a).

Endress (2011a) thought that the inferior ovary of Rubiaceae might be a key innovation for them.

Floral Biology & Seed Dispersal. Many Rubiaceae have rather small flowers but make them attractive to pollinators in a variety of ways. Large, coloured calyces (calycophylls) are particularly common in Ixorodinae and help to attract the pollinator. The Old World Mussaenda is an example with its its large petaloid calyx lobes usually occurring singly on a few flowers in the quite lax inflorescence (the genus may be polyphyletic - see Alejandro et al. 2005), while in the New World Warsewiczia has similarly conspicuous individual sepals. The flowers are often more or less closely aggregated, and Claßen-Bockhoff (1996a) has surveyed the more flower-like inflorescences that are quite common in the family. Taxa like Cephalanthus and Naucleeae have flowers aggregated into spherical heads, and Cephaelis (Rubioideae) has a condensed inflorescence immediately subtended by paired and coloured inflorescence bracts. In some species of Spermacoce the apices of the corolla lobes become incurved and extensively modified, and pollination may be explosive (Vaes et al. 2006); palynological variation in this genus is extreme, being almost equivalent to that in the whole of the rest of the family (Dessein et al. 2002). Explosive pollination is also known from Posoquerieae, pollen being catapulted onto the pollinating insect; the flowers are monosymmetric (and may be inverted: Delprete 2009). Nilsson et al. (1990), Puff et al. (1996) and de Block and Igersheim (2001) discuss secondary pollen presentation, which is notably common in Cinchonoideae, but also occurs in Ixoroideae (e.g. Vanguerieae - see Tilney et al. 2011); pollen is presented on tips of the styles. Hundreds of species, especially members of Rubioideae, are heterostylous. Dioecy occurs in Vanguerieae, and there have been apparent reversals to hermaphroditism there (Razafimandimbison et al. 2009), and also in New World Galium, in this case with reversals to polygamy (Soza & Olmstead 2010b). Taxa like the sister genera Gaertnera (see Malcomber 2002) and Pagamea have secondarily superior ovaries (Igersheim et al. 1994).

Theligonum is monoecious and has very distinctive flowers. However, the differences between its flowers and those of other Rubiaceae are those that might be expected of a wind-pollinated plant, i.e., breeding system, reduced and modified perianth, many stamens, and only a single-seeded fruit (see Wunderlich 1971 for details of the flowers). Henriquezia has a monosymmetric corolla, and it, too, was once placed in a separate family.

Within Rubiaceae there is a correlation between fruit types, plant habit, and diversification. Thus clades that are shrubs or trees and in which winged seeds are apomorphic; shrubs/animal-dispersed fruits, and herbs/abiotic dispersal, but not winged seeds, are notably speciose (Eriksson & Bremer 1991; B. Bremer & Eriksson 1992). Fleshy fruits may have evolved about twelve times in the family, especially during the Eocene-Oligocene period (B. Bremer & Eriksson 1992), although these figures are likely to be underestimates, fleshy fruits having evolved at least four times in a New World clade of Galium alone (Soza & Olmstead 2010b, which see for other fruit morphologies in that part of the genus). In cases of apparent long-distance dispersal in the family, the plants involved seem often to have had drupaceous fruits (B. Bremer & Eriksson 1992). In Galium in paricular, fruit morphology is a poor indicator of sectional relationships (Soza & Olmstead 2010b; see also Abdel Khalik et al. 2009).

Plant-Animal Interactions. Rubiaceae are not often eaten by caterpillar larvae of butterflies (Ehrlich & Raven 1964), although some sphingids (Semanophorae) do prefer members of the family (Forbes 1956).

Myrmecodia, Hydnophytum and related genera placed in Hydnophytinae are vegetatively highly modified epiphytic Malesian ant plants. The ants live in chambers in the grossly swollen stem (hypocotyl) base, and nutrients from the material brought in by the ants and stored in chambers of distinctive morphology are taken up by the plant. Some species have more or less branched root spines arising from the stem, inflorescence, end even the torn and eaten surfaces of the leaves (Huxley 1978; Jebb 1991; see Huxley & Jebb 1991 for the taxonomy of the group). Myrmecophily has arisen several other times in Rubiaceae. Thus there are several myrmecophytic Naucleeae, the ants living in hollowed stems in plants with a much more "normal" appearance than that of many Hydnophytinae; interestingly, some myrmecophytic clades of Naucleeae seem to have diversified notably slowly and/or have very limited distributions (Razafimandibison et al. 2005).

There are hundreds of species of Psychotria s.l. throughout the Pacific, including on Hawaii (Nepokroeff et al. 2003; Givnish et al. 2008b). The genus is abundant throughout Malesia and in New Guinea (Nepokroeff et al. 1999; Andersson 2002), and a Pacific-Malesian clade of Psychotria includes the ant plants Myrmecodia and Hydnophytum mentioned above (see Andersson 2002 for a taxonomy differing from that in Nepokroeff). Psychotria is largely divided up into Old and New World clades, and in a subclade of the latter (= Psychotria subgenus Psychotria) it has been shown that older species tend to occupy larger areas than younger species (Paul et al. 2009; cf. J. C. Willis's "age and area" [e.g. Willis 1922] but the conceptual baggage presumably very different in the former).

Bacterial/Fungal Associations. Bacterial leaf nodules are known from some African species of Psychotria, and their presence seems to be correlated with development of distinctive colleters (Lersten 1974 and references). Bacteria of the ß-proteobacterium Burkholderia have been isolated from the nodules (van Oevelen et al. 2004). Burkholderia is known to be a nitrogen-fixing symbiont in the root nodules of some Faboideae, however, early studies failed to detect fixation of nitrogen in Psychotria (Miller 1990), and there seems to be nothing more recent on the subject. Pavetta and Sericanthe also have leaf nodules.

Vegetative Variation. Although Rubiaceae can usually be readily recognised by a distinctive combination of vegetative characters (see above), vegetative variation in the family is actually quite extensive even apart from distinctive morphologies of the myrmecophytic taxa just mentioned. Herbaceousness has evolved most notably in Rubioideae, where some Spermacoceae may be secondarily woody while Knoxeae are both primarily and secondarily woody (Lens et al. 2009a, b). Genipa and Posoqueria have a deeply lobed lamina; "latex" is not uncommon. Anisophylly is well known in the family, occurring also in herbaceous taxa like Theligonum and Argostemma, being especially marked in taxa like A. humilis.

Stipules characterize Rubiaceae. However, in Galium there are whorled "leaves" whose exact nature is a matter of some dispute and there are no clearly distinct stipules, but there are only two opposite branches per node, suggesting that the basic construction of the plant is of paired, opposite leaves; this is confirmed by the pattern of vascularization in most species (e.g. Neubauer 1981). Soza and Olmstead (2010a) found the basic condition in Rubieae to be six leaves per whorl, although there was frequent evolution of four-membered whorls (and even reversal to six again). Taxa like Galium rubioides have four large leaves at the node all of which are directly vascularized from the stele (Rutishauser 1999); this is likely to be a derived condition (Soza & Olmstead 2010a). However, leaves and stipules may develop from different primordia (e.g. Pötter & Klopfer 1987), and it is even suggested that "leaf-like stipules are independent structures, not part of the leaf" (Soza & Olmstead 2010a). Indeed, most taxa in Rubiaceae have 1:1 nodal anatomy, only some twelve genera being trilacunar (Neubauer 1981: how this fits in the context of the family phylogeny is unknown); unilacunar nodes are unusual in taxa with stipules, trilacunar nodes being the norm (Sinnott & Bailey 1914). Rubiaceae have been considered to be a classic case of a family with stipules, yet here lateral branches of the single traces separate and diverge and form a vascular collar around the stem from which the stipular bundles themselves diverge (Majumdar & Pal 1958). Stipule morphology and position in general shows considerable variation; there are sometimes two pairs of stipules, one more or less intrapetiolar, the other interpetiolar.

Genes & Genomes. Molecular evolution in the herbaceous Rubioideae seems to be speeded up compared to that in the woody members (Rydin et al. 2009b: note the laggard woody Dunnia within the herbaceous clade!).

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Petiole anatomy is variable, although the bundles are often open; in some Ixoroideae they are circular (Martínez-Cabrera et al. (2009). A few Rubiaceae, including Theligonum and Dialypetalanthus, have more than twice the number of stamens as perianth/sepals/petals (e.g. Endress 2003a). For pollen variation in the paraphyletic Spermacoce, see Dessein et al. (2005b). There is considerable variation in ovule morphology and development (Maheshwari 1950; de Toni & Mariath 2008, 2010). Ronse Decraene and Smets (2000) discuss floral development in the family, emphasizing variation in the relative development of a stamen-corolla tube with a common meristem and a corolla tube sensu stricto; filaments may fuse postgenitally with the corolla tube proper.

For additional information on Rubiaceae, see Lloyd (1902: esp. suspensor, very variable), Ragelinf (1937: embryology and much else), Verdcourt (1958), Robbrecht (1988, 1993), Robbrecht et al. (1996), and Rogers (2005), all general, Koek-Noorman & Hogeweg (1974), Koek-Noorman (1977) and Martínez-Cabrera et al. (2010), all wood, Weberling (1977: inflorescences), Rogers (1984: Gleasonia, etc.), Rutishauser (1984: stipules), Puff et al. (1993a: pollen, fruits in Mussaenda et al., 1993b, much detail about Schradereae), Huysmans et al. (1997: orbicules in Cinchonioideae), Vinckier et al. (2000: orbicules in Ixoroideae), Verstraete et al. (2011: orbicules in whole family: not integrated with earlier observations?), Jansen et al. (2002a, 2003: Al accumulation), Delprete (2004: morphology), Dessein et al. (2005a) and Verellen et al. (2007), both pollen, not really a great help taxonomically, Aniszewski (2007: alkaloids), Gamalei et al. (2008: phloem), Lersten and Horner (2011: calcium oxalate crystal morphology in Naucleeae [Cinchonoideae], interesting variation), and for chromosomes of Rubioideae, see Kiehn (2010). For the odd cylcotide proteins, scattered in Rubioideae, see Gruber et al. (2008).

Phylogeny. Bremer (2009) summarizes phylogenetic work on the family. The basic phylogenetic structure in the family is [Rubioideae + the rest], and in the latter relationships are [[Luculia [Acranthera + Coptasapelta]] [Cinchonoideae + Ixoroideae]] (see B. Bremer 1995, 1999; Rova et al. 2002; Robbrecht & Manen 2006; Rydin et al. 2009a; etc.). The positions of Luculia and Coptosapelta - and now Acranthera - seem moderately well supported (but Bremer & Eriksson 2009 suggest that the three may not form a single clade). Indeed, Luculia and Coptasapelta differ considerably in major characters so assigning polarity to, say, raphide presence in the family becomes rather tricky. As Robbrecht and Manen (2006) emphasize, these two genera differ in having, as in Coptosapelta (or not, as in Luculia) raphides, accumulating (or not) aluminium, T-shaped hairs (not), the corolla is contorted to the right, and in having pororate, acolumellate (tricolporate) pollen grains and distyly or secondary pollen presentation (Verellen et al. 2004; for pollen presentation, see Puff et al. 1996). Although Acranthera is sister to Coptasapelta (see also Bremer & Eriksson 2009), again the two have little morphologically in common (Rydin et al. 2009a).

Within Rubioideae, relationships are becoming clarified. Opiorrhiza has the atpB promoter region that is lacking in other Rubioideae (Manen & Natali 1996; Natali et al. 1996) and was thought to be sister to the rest of the subfamily. Rydin et al. (2009a) found it was close to Urophylleae, mainly because of support from ITS, not chloroplast genes, and relationships between major clades in Urophylleae are clarified by Smedmark and Bremer (2011: note, species-level relationships unclear). Sister to the whole of Rubioideae, and with strong support, is the monotypic African genus Colletoecema (Rydin et al. 2009a). Rubieae are well supported as being monophyletic by both morphological and molecular data (Rogers 2005 for literature). There is now considerable phylogenetic resolution within the tribe, with relationships between seven strongly-supported (both bootstrap and posterior probabilities) major clades themselves being well supported (Soza & Olmstead 2010a, also 2010b for New World Galium; see also Manen & Natali 1995; Manen et al. 1994; Natali et al. 1996). De Toni and Mariath (2011) found that flowers and fruits suggested that Galium and Relbunium were sister taxa and both worthy of generic status, and Soza and Olmstead (2010b) noted that the latter were distinctive (but not unique) in Galium in that they had fleshy fruits. However, the Relbunium group is embedded in a larger South American clade that is in turn firmly part of Galium (Soza & Olmstead 2010b). Kårehed et al. (2008) investigated the phylogeny of Spermacoceae; they suggested that Hedyotis was to be resticted to Asian taxa; relationships within Spermacoceae have been investigated further by Groeninckx et al. (2009a, esp. 2009b) and Rydin et al. (2009b). Rydin et al. (2008) discuss the placement of some small and little-kmown genera of Rubioideae; they considerably affect our understanding of evolution and diversification of that clade. The Psychotria and Palicourea complexes are sister taxa, and the former, often having caducous stipules, is largely divided up into Old and New World clades. A Pacific-Malesian clade of Psychotria includes myrmecophytes as well as genera like Amaracarpus (Nepokroeff et al. 1999; Andersson 2002, note that the important optimisation of marginal preformed germination slits on the pyrenes seems questionable on the tree presented); Cephaelis groups with Palicourea, and overall there is considerable geographical signal in the clades. For further information on the phylogeny of Rubioideae, see Andersson and Rova (1999), B. Bremer and Manen (2000: phylogeny and classification in Rubioideae), Backlund et al. (2007), Kårehed and Bremer (2007: Knoxieae), Smedmark (2008: Urophylleae), and Razafimandimbison et al. (2008: relationships around Psychotrieae, many-seeded carpels evolve from one-seeded carpels in Schradereae). Morinda, with its apparently distinctive capitate inflorescences, is in fact polyphyletic (Razafimandimbison et al. 2009b).

For phylogenetic relationhips within Cinchonoideae, see Andreasen and Bremer (1996), Rydin et al. (2009), and especially Manns and Bremer (2010); the latter recognise nine tribes within the subfamily, all of which are strongly supported as being monophyletic, however, some of the relationships between groups of tribes are as yet poorly supported (Manns & Bremer 2010). For relationships within these triibes, see Manns and Bremer (2010), also, within Vanguerieae, see Lantz and Bremer (2005) and references and Razafimandimbison et al. (2009). For relationships in Sabiceeae, see Khan et al. (2008). [Naucleeae + Hymenodictyeae] are a well supported clade sister to the only moderately (jacknife) supported remainder of Cinchonoideae (Andersson & Antonelli 2005: Luculia and Coptasapelta excepted). For relationships in Naucleeae, see Razafimandimbison & Bremer (2002).

Within Ixoroideae, Ixora (Ixoridinae) is paraphyletic (Mouly et al. 2009a, b, see also Andreasen & Bremer 2000). Sipanea and Posoqueria form a clade (Razafimandimbison et al. 2011). Condamineae, a basal clade, are circumscribed by Kainulainen et al. (2010); they are very heterogeneous, and include Mastixiodendron, the morphologically even more distive Dialypetalanthus, a number of genera with calycophylls - expanded and coloured calyx lobes - etc. For the circumscription of Coffeeae, see A. Davis et al. (2007); see Maurin et al. (2007) for a phylogeny of Coffea. Razafimandimbison et al. (2011) found that at the base of the clade encompassing the ca 1100 species of Vanguerieae there were successively four monotypic clades... Tosh et al. (2009) have adjusted the limits of the African Tricalysia, Cortés-B. et al. (2009) looked at Retiniphylleae, Razafimandimbison et al. (2009a), the phylogeny of dioecious Vanguerieae, Kainulainen et al. (2009), Alberteae, and A;ejandro et al. (2011), at Octropoideae.

For other phylogenetic studies, see B. Bremer (1996b).

Two genera are perhaps particularly odd morphologically -

Classification. Robbrecht and Manen (2006) and B. Bremer (2009) should be consulted for a detailed discussion on taxon limits, formal classification, etc. Manns and Bremer (2010) provide a tribal classification of Cinchonoideae and assign nearly all genera to those tribes, at least provisionally. Bremer (2009) notes that of the ca 611 genera in the family, 1/3 are monotypic - and obviousy some are very large and are turning out to be paraphyletic. Generic limits are problematic in a number of places, indeed, if the maitenance of the names of these small genera seems desirable, then wholseale dismemberment of larger genera and a host of small genera will be the logical if unfortunate result. Within Rubieae, the circumscriptions of both Asperula and Galium are currently a mess (Soza & Olmstead 2010a). Spermacoceae are very difficult with both considerable lumping and considerable splitting having occurred in the past. Oldenlandia appears to be wildly polyphyletic, and Spermacoce very paraphyletic (Kårehed et al. 2008; Groeninckx et al. 2009a, esp. 2009b), and the taxonomic solution that is being adopted here is to chip away very small new genera in the context of local phylogenetic analyses... (Groeninckx et al. 2010a, b). For generic limits in Urophylleae, see Smedmark and Bremer (2011, nine of Bremekamp's small genera are still unsampled). Generic limits around the polyphyletic Morinda have been adjusted (Razafimandimbison et al. 2009). A Pacific-Malesian clade of Psychotria also includes myrmecophytes like Myrmecodia and Hydnophytum as well as a number of genera like Amaracarpus (Andersson 2002); Andersson (2002) seemed inclined to split this clade up, while Nepokroeff et al. (1999) would include them in Psychotria s.l. The limits of Ixora have been formally adjusted (Mouly et al. 2009a, b), while Coffea is to include Psilanthus, see Maurin et al. (2007). Generic and tribal limits are diffficult around Rondeletieae and Guettardeae (Rova et al. 2009); Guettarda itself is polyphyletic (Achille et al. 2006).

Previous Relationships. Rizzini and Occhioni (1949) were sure Dialypetalanthaceae were in Myrtales, while Cronquist (1981) placed Dialypetalanthaceae adjacent to Pittosporaceae in his Rosales, and Theligonaceae was in his Rubiales. Both families are also maintained as separate by Takhtajan (1997) but are included in Rubiales.

I am grateful to Elmar Robbrecht for help with the synonymy.

Gentianaceae + Loganiaceae + Gelsemiaceae + Apocynaceae: route I secoiridoids +; internal phloem + [bicollateral vascular bundles]; C tube formation late; syncarpy postgenital; testa with anticlinal walls thickened.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Bouman and Schrier (1979) noted that exotestal cells with thickenings on their anticlinal walls are common around here; Gelsemiaceae and Loganiaceae were not mentioned.

GENTIANACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons.   Back to Gentianales

Herbs to shrubs (trees), mycorrhizal (and echlorophyllous); (plants Al-accumulators), no starch, but oligosaccharides +, monoterpene indole alkaloids, tannins 0; plants glabrous; cork?; (vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates); rays often 0; parenchyma septate; nodes 1(-3 or more):1(-3 or more), (+ split laterals); mucilage cells + (0); (stomata anisocytic); leaves sessile, usu. connate basally, lamina vernation variable, 2ndary veins ± palmate (pinnate), (stipules +); flowers 4-5(-16)-merous, "disc-like" structure between K and C, C right-contorted, marcescent, (tube formation intermediate); A (extrorse; placentoids +), basally connate; tapetum (amoeboid), cells uninucleate; disc 0; G ?transverse, stigma broadly 2-lobed (capitate), wet; funicle with at best poorly developed vascular tissue, integument 2-20 cells across, outer epidermal cells early massive, hypostase +; (antipodal cells multinucleate - Halenia, diploid to polyploid, secondarily multiplying, persistent); fruit a septicidal capsule, calyx often prominent; seeds small to minute; testa multiplicative, exotestal cells (± elongated), inner walls variously thickened (not), other layers ± disappeared; embryo white or green; 100 bp deletion in trnL gene.

Gentianaceae

87[list]/ca 1655 - 6 tribes below. World-wide, but especially temperate (map: from Gillett 1963; Hultén 1958, 1971; van Steenis & van Balgooy 1966; Klackenberg 1985; Ho & Liu 2001; Struwe & Albert 2004). [Photo - Flower, Flower.]

1. Saccifolieae Struwe, Thiv, V. A. Albert & Kadereit

(Echlorophyllous mycoheterotrophic herbs; shrubs); chemically unknown; (leaves spiral); flowers (heterostylous), (4-)5(-6)-merous; placentation parietal; (dust seeds +); (endosperm cellular - Voyriella; cotyledons 0); n = 10-14.

4/19. tropical South America, Panama.

Synonymy: Saccifoliaceae Maguire & Pires

2. Exaceae Colla

(Plant myco-heterotrophic); (flowers monosymmetric/enantiostylous - Exacum, Orphium); K connate or not, usu. prominently keeled; (endothelium + - Exacum); anticlinal walls of exotestal cells sinuous or not; x = 7, n = 9, 11, 15, etc.

6/165: Sebaea (60), Exacum (70, inc. Cotylanthera). Africa, esp. Madagascar, Indo-Malesia, and to Australia and New Zealand (some Sebaea).

[Chironieae [Helieae + Potalieae + Gentianeae]]: xanthones, L-(+)-bornesitol +; placentation parietal.

3. Chironieae Endlicher

(Shrubs); distinctive 6-substituted xanthones; flowers (2-)4-5(-12) merous, K connate, (pollen in tetrads); n = 10, 13-15, 17, etc.

23/159: Centaurium (50). Tropics and warm N. temperate.

Synonymy: Chironiaceae Berchtold & J. Presl, Coutoubeaceae Martynov

[Potalieae [Helieae + Gentianeae]]: nectary +.

4. Potalieae Reichenbach

Trees to lianes or herbs; C-glucoflavones +; nodes 5 or more:5 or more; cortical sclereids + [Fagraea]; (massive sheathing stipule-like structure); flowers 3-16(-24)-merous, K basally connate; (fruit a berry); n = ?

13/154: Fagraea (75), Lisianthus (30). Pantropical.

Synonymy: Potaliaceae Martius

Berchtold & J. Presl

[Helieae + Gentianeae]: ?

5. Helieae Gilg

(Shrubs); (inter/intrapetiolar sheaths, stipules +); flowers (4-)5(-6)-merous, (corona at adaxial base of A); pollen usu. in tetrads, polyads; style often long, twisted and flattened when dry; n = ?

22/205: Macrocarpaea (110), Symbolanthus (30). Tropical Central and South America, Caribean.

6. Gentianeae Colla

Distinctive xanthones, C-glucoflavones +, (fructans/inulin +); (nectary on C - Swertia et al.); style often short or 0; seeds larger; n = ³5, very variable.

17/950: Gentiana (360), Gentianella (250: polyphyletic), Halenia (80), Swertia (135: ?polyphyletic). North temperate, to the Celebes (some Tripterospermum) and Africa and Madagascar (some Swertia).

Synonymy: Obolariaceae Martynov

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. The age of the family may be some 50 million years (Yuan et al. 2003). Although fossils with pollen like that of Macrocarpaea are reported from the Eocene ca 45 million years ago, the identity of these fossils is questionable (Stockey & Manchester 1985; Struwe et al. 2002).

Von Hagen and Kadereit (2001) suggested that Gentianella had moved into South America from the north and diversified considerably in the Andean region - and from the Andes it moved on to New Zealand by long distance dispersal. The wide distribution of Exacum was also probably attained by dispersal (Yuan et al. 2005).

Bacterial/Fungal Associations. Paris-type endomycorrhizae involving Glomeromycota are common in Gentianaceae, including the myco-heterotrophic members (Imhoff 1999; Franke et al. 2006). Both "normal" and myco-heterotrophic species are found in genera like Sebaea and Exacum; Voyriella and the unplaced Voyria (see below) are other myco-heterotrophs; in such cases root hairs are generally absent.

Floral Biology. Swertia and other Gentianeae sometimes have fimbriate appendages and nectaries on the petals; Halenia has flowers with five nectar spurs, uncommon in angiosperms. Sebaea s. str. has a distinctive secondary stigma (Kissling et al. 2010), apparently unique in the angiosperms.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Flavone-O-glycosides are known from two species of Exacum, alone in the family. The plants are often bitter-tasting because of the iridoids they contain. Plants of Exacum may be foetid. 1:3 nodes are scattered through the family, e.g. Exacum, Gentiana and Sabatia. Although Gentianaceae do not have stipules, Potaliinae, especially Fagraea, have inter/intrapetiolar sheaths and auriculate structures at the nodes; for the diversity of stipule-like structures in Macrocarpaea (Helieae), see Grant and Weaver (2003).

Corolla tube formation for some taxa has been described as being late-early. Exacum has an imbricate corolla (and calyx), and the flower is monosymmetric because of the orientation of the androecium and style and curvature of the pedicel (Ronse de Craene 2010). Chassot and von Hagen (2008) discuss variation in pollen in Swertia. Gentiana has ovules over almost the entire inner surface of the loculus. An endothelium is sometimes reported from Gentianaceae, (Kapil & Tiwari 1978), however, as Shamrov (1996) describes this, it consists of one or two layers of cells of the integument that are elongated periclinally, not more or less anticlinally enlarged, as is common. Hakki (1999) clearly described the multiplicative integument of Orphium frutescens; it is about 6 cells across at anthesis. The considerable variation in integument thickness in the family needs to be put into a phylogenetic context.

Cotylanthera (= Exacum) has straight, ategmic ovules, as have some Voyria; there are also taxa with higly reduced cotyledons. Interestingly, the polarity of the embryo sac in such cases is reported to have been inverted 180o, the egg cell being near the chalaza (Bouman et al. 2002). Another interpretation is that the ovule is indeed anatropous, and so the polarity of the embryo sac is normal - the ovules are so highly reduced that there is little in the way of landmarks left. The funicles of these taxa also lack vascular tissue (Bouman et al. 2002).

Potalieae-Potaliinae are timber trees (secondarily woody?) with multilacunar nodes and cortical sclereids; the flowers of Anthocleista and Potalia are up to 16-merous, the corolla is deciduous, the pollen porate, carpellary fusion is congenital, and the fruits are berries. Young plants of Anthocleista have leaves over 2 m long. The group is palynologically heterogeneous (Nilsson et al. 2002).

For myco-heterotrophic taxa, see Oehler (1927), for nodes, see Post (1958), for seeds, Bouman and Devente (1986) and Bouman et al. (2002), general embryology, see Hakki (1997), for ovule development, see Shamrov (1996), Bouman and Schrier (1979), and Bouman et al. (2002), for orbicules, see Vinckier and Smets (2000a), for a summary of pollen variation, see Nilsson (2002) and Nilsson et al. (2002), for chemistry, see Jensen and Schripsema (2002: the first two tribes mentioned above need particular study), for gynoecium, see Shamrov and Gevorkyan (2010b), and for general information, see Struwe and Albert (2002) and Gentian Research Network.

Phylogeny. Relationships between many of the tribes are still not well supported (Molina & Struwe 2009), and basic anatomical and developmental knowledge of Saccifolieae and Exaceae needs to be improved if the evolution of Gentianaceae is to be understood. The Guayanan Saccifolium, with its distinctive ascidiate leaves, is in a clade with the mycoheterotrophic Curtia, Voyriella, etc., that is sister to all other Gentianaceae (Thiv et al. 1999; Struwe et al. 2002; cf. Struwe et al. 1998); the glandular bodies in the leaf axils of Saccifolium are best interpreted as colleters. For the phylogeny of Exaceae, see Yuan et al. (2003) and Kissling et al. (2009: Sebaea s.l. is paraphyletic). For relationships in neotropical Helieae, see Struwe et al. (2009). Within Gentianeae, Gentianella seems to be polyphyletic (von Hagen & Kadereit 2001), while Swertia, too, may be polyphyletic (Chassot et al. 2001; Kadereit & von Hagen 2003). Relationships within Gentianineae are being clarified, with Metagentiana probably being polyphyletic (Chen et al. 2005b; Favre et al. 2010), but more work is needed before the biogeogphy of this largely alpine group can be understood.

Classification. For an infra-familial classification of Gentianaceae, see Struwe et al. (2002), also the Gentian Research Network. Kissling et al. (2009) divide Sebaea s.l. into three genera.

Previous Relationships. Anthocleista, Fagraea, and Potalia used to be in Loganiaceae (Struwe & Albert 2000), but details of their iridoid chemistry are very gentianaceous and they are well embedded in the family (e.g. Backlund et al. 2000). Emblingia has been placed here (Savolainen et al. 2000a), but a position in Brassicales in its own family (q.v.) is justified on both molecular and morphological grounds.

Voyria

Voyria   Back to Gentianales

Small, echlorophyllous mycoheterotrophs; axis may lack nodes but bear roots and shoots; both roots and shoots may be exogenous, or both endogenous; vascular bundles separate; (leaves connate basally), colleters +/0; pollen variously clumped, (asymmetrical), 1-6-porate with smooth to scabrate exine, orbicules 0; placentae strongly bilobed, stigma expanded, infundibular; ovules straight, no integument, or anatropous, one integument, endothelium +, nucellar cap +; capsule septicidal; seeds dust-like; exotesta +; endosperm cellular or nuclear, present to almost absent, embryo undifferentiated; n = 16-20.

1/19. Tropical America, Voyria primuloides in Africa (map: from Maas & Ruyters 1986; Raynal-Roques 1967).

Evolution. Ecology & Physiology. Root hairs are generally absent in Voyria, but they are are present in V. primuloides and also where V. aphylla roots abut roots of other plants and also litter; fungal penetration occurs in the former situation (Imhof 1999). The association of Voyria aphylla roots with roots of other plants is interesting; even if the latter are described as being decomposed, this is apparently only locally, and there is the possibility of carbon exchange (Imhoff 1999), so perhaps parasitism occurs.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. There are sometimes two almost stamen-like appendages on either side of the ovary - are they modified nectaries?

For information, see Johow (1889 and references: anatomy, seed, etc.), Oehler (1927: general), Wood & Weaver 1982; Maas & Ruyters 1986), Bouman and Devente (1986), Bouman and Louis (1990) and Bouman et al. (2002), seed, the latter also ovules, Albert and Struwe (1997; morphological phylogenetic analysis), Struwe et al. 2002; Franke 2002: [Voyria flavescens]; Hentrich et al. 2010 (reproductive biology).

Previous Relationships. Although there is evidence from pollen, etc., that Voyria is not particularly similar to the myco-heterotropic Voyriella, etc., its immediate relationships are unclear, although it has bicollateral vascular bundles like many other Gentianales in this part of the tree.

[Loganiaceae + Gelsemiaceae + Apocynaceae]: ?

LOGANIACEAE Martius, nom. cons.   Back to Gentianales

Annual herbs to shrubs or lianes; tryptophane-derived alkaloids, quercetin, kaempferol +; nodes 1:1 or 3:3 (split laterals); stomata?; lamina vernation ± flat, (2ndary veins palmate), (sheathing stipule +); flowers 4- or 5-merous, (median K abaxial - Logania; monosymmetric - Usteria); K basally connate or not, C (valvate), often hairy at the mouth, (A 1, abaxial - Usteria); disc 0, poorly developed, or nectary on walls of G; G often partly inferior and partly apocarpous (carpels congenitally syncarpous; postgenitally connate apically only), placentation axile, styles 0, or styles +, stigma capitate, long-clavate, 2-lobed, or punctate; ovules 1-many/carpel, integument 4-6 cells across; fruit a follicle, loculicidal and/or septicidal capsule, drupe or berry; seeds often embedded in pulp/placentae swollen, exotestal cells papillate or hairy, ± thick-walled and lignified except outer wall; endosperm starchy or hemicellulosic, horny; n = 10, 12, 16; seedings epigeal and phanerocotylar.

Loganiaceae

13[list]/420: Strychnos (190), Mitrasacme (55), Geniostoma (55). Pantropical, esp. Australia and New Caledonia (map: from Leenhouts 1962; van Steenis & van Balgooy 1966; Leeuwenberg 1969). [Photo - Flower, Fruit]

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. The wood of Strychnos has included phloem; the plant has branch tendrils. Colporate pollen without lateral extensions at the endocolpus is reported to be a character unique (in this group) to Strychnos and its immediate relatives. The ovules of Mitrasacme have an endothelium and the endosperm is "intermediate" in development. Mitreola oldenlandioides has straight ovules and cellular endosperm (Reddy et al. 1999). The herbaceous Spigelia is distinctive. Its leaves are often pseudoverticillate; the inflorescence is a cincinnus; it has late corolla tube formation; and its fruit is a septicidal+loculicidal capsule, the valves all falling off.

For information, see Hasselberg (1937: nodes and stipules), Leeuwenberg (1980: general), Keller (1996: "stipules"), Hakki (1998: Usteria), and Aniszewski (2007: alkaloids).

Synonymy: Antoniaceae Hutchinson, Gardneriaceae Perleb, Geniostomataceae L. Struwe & V. Albert, Spigeliaceae Berchtold & J. Presl, Strychnaceae Perleb

[Gelsemiaceae + Apocynaceae]: nodes 1:1; seeds ± flattened.

Phylogeny. Backlund et al. (2000) note that C17 indole alkaloids, the number of tapetum layers, and cytology support this relationship - and that the presence of quercetin and kaempferol, imbricate corolla, and horny (starchy) endosperm might support a close relationship between Gelsemiaceae and Loganiaceae.

GELSEMIACEAE L. Struwe & V. Albert   Back to Gentianales

Shrubs or lianes; quercetin, kaempferol +; true tracheids +; stomata?; (stipules 2, interpetiolar or short sheathing); flowers heterostylous; A extrorse [Gelsemium] or latrorse; style twice branched; fruit a loculicidal and/or septicidal capsule, K persistent; seeds winged or hairy; testa?; endosperm horny, starchy; n = 8, 10.

Gelsemiaceae

2[list]/11. ± tropical; South East Asia, Africa, America (map: from Leeuwenberg 1961; van Steenis & van Balgooy 1966). [Photo - Gelsemium Collection © M. Dirr, Flower (Pin), Flower (Thrum).]

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. For the phylogeny and biogeography of the family (Pteleocarpa not included), see Jiao and Li (2007).

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Pteleocarpa, a poorly known and rather odd west Malesian genus, is probably to be placed here; it was previously included in Boraginaceae s.l., but as an anomalous genus (Olmstead & Ferguson 2001). It has not been incorporated into the description; it has i.a. spiral leaves, two ovules/carpel, and a single-seeded, more or less orbicular samara; when in flower, the whole branch is yellow, the leaves having a colour similar to that of the yellow corolla. Brummitt (2007) recognized this as a separate family (he described it formally in 2011).

Vascular pits in Gelsemium are not vestured (Rogers 1986), those of Pteleocarpa are. The latter also has mainly apotracheal parenchyma in unilateral, uniseriate bands and fibre tracheids with bordered pits (Gottwald 1982).

Synonymy: Pteleocarpaceae Brummitt

APOCYNACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - hierarchy below below very much under construction -   Back to Gentianales

Lianes to trees (herbs); tryptophane-derived and steroidal alkaloids, cardenolides, route II decarboxylated iridoids +, tanniniferous; (cork cambium deep-seated - Rhazya); pericyclic fibres 0 [always?]; (vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates), vessels single or in radial groups; tracheids in ground tissue; non-articulated (articulated) laticifers +; (petioles also with adaxial bundles); stomata also paracytic (actinocytic); leaves (spiral), lamina vernation usu. flat or conduplicate, ("stipules" +, cauline); K with basal adaxial colleters, C left-contorted, postgenital connation forming the upper [above the insertion of the A] tube, corona from C; A ± connivent, filament short; pollen transported in foam; (nectary on outer wall of ovary, 0); G (-8), (connate - Allamanda, Carissa; transverse), styles elongated, usu. apex alone postgenitally syncarpous, stylar head swollen, adhesive, wet or dry; ovules (hemitropous), integument 6-9 cells across, endothelium 0; (seeds rounded); testa multiplicative, exotestal cells with all walls thickened, (flattened mesotestal crystalliferous cells); extensive polyploidy including triploids, protein crystalloids in the nuclei; also sporophytic incompatibility system present.

415[list]/4555 in five groups below. Largely tropical to warm temperate (map: from ). [Photo - Flower, Fruit]

1. "Rauvolfioideae" Kosteletzky

Indole alkaloids +/0; anthers connivent, (pollen porate), G apocarpous or not, placentation then axile or parietal; fruit berry, drupe or follicle; (seed with coma - Haplophyton); n = (9 - esp. Alyxieae) 10, 11, (23).

84/980: Alyxia (120), Melodinus (75). Tropical.

Aspidospermeae

Alstonieae Trees.

[Vinceae [Willughbeieae + Tabernaemontaneae]]: ?

Vinceae> - 9/100: Rauvolfia (110). Synonymy: Vincaceae Vest

Willughbeieae> - 18/130: Landolphia (60). Synonymy: Willughbieaceae J. Agardn

Synonymy (not checked): Carissaceae Bertolini, Cerberaceae Martynov, Ophioxylaceae Martius, Pacouriaceae Martynov, Plumeriaceae Horaninow

Tabernaemontaneae G. Don

K with several to many basal colleters; A sessile, anthers with thick, lignified guide rails; nectaries paired; G apocarpous or not, stigmatic head complex with a five-lobed upper crest and a thickened basal flange (not); fruit a berry; (seed with aril, ± ruminate, with long hilar groove - Tabernaemontaninae).

15/150: Tabernaemontana (100-120). Northern South America (Ambelaniinae) and palaeotropical (Tabernaemontaninae).

Plumerieae/p>

Synonymy: Plumeriaceae Horaninow

Carisseae

"Apocynoideae" + Periplocoideae [Baisseeae [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae] - APSA Clade: iridoids 0 [this level?]; C right-contorted; anthers with lignified basal appendages [guide rails]; pollen porate; anthers adnate to style head [forming gynostemium], retinaculum [region of stamen by which it attaches to style head] of trichomes; G apocarpous, stylar head radially differentiated; fruit a follicle; seeds comose, coma chalazal.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. See especially Livshulz et al. 2007 {general) and Lens et al. (2009: wood characters, not all analyzed in the context of the phylogeny here).

2. "Apocynoideae" Burnett

C right-contorted; A inserted well below bases of corolla lobes; n = (6-)10, 11 (12).

77/860. Largely tropical.

: gynostegium + lignified guide rails result in trap and guide pollination mechanism.

Wrighteae

C left contorted.

3/29: Wrightia (23). Old World tropics.

Nerieae

4/47: Strophanthus (38). Africa (most) and Europe to Japan and Malesia.

[Rhabdadenia, Periplocoideae, [Asian clade + New World clade]. [Baisseeae [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae]]] - Crown Clade: few wide vessels and several narrow vessels in clusters; vasicentric tracheids +; fibres [not tracheids] in ground tissue; nectary surrounding base of ovary [?level].

Rhabdadenia

Wood fibres very thin-walled, parenchymatous.

1/4. Tropical America.

Asian clade + New World clade: ?

Asian clade

Stamen-corolla tube very short; style head fusiform, no basal collar.

Apocyneae

Lianes; (pollen in tetrads); (style head with strap-like bands of adhesive).

22/ Largely Malesian-South East Asian, also North Temperate (Apocynum).

[Echiteae, Mesechiteae, Odontadenieae] / New World clade

Echiteae

19/ Parsonsia (120), Prestonia (65). New World, tropical, also New Caledonia (two genera) to Australasia and South East Asia (Echites).

Mesechiteae

5/ Mandevilla (115), Forsteronia (50). New World.

Odontadenieae

7/ New World.

Periplocoideae Endlicher

Plants with tuberous roots; C (valvate), tube formation intermediate; stamen-corolla tube very short, staminal feet erect, connate, forming tube around ovary; nectar secreted on margins of staminal feet in alternistaminal position [nectary disc 0];, anthers without lignified guide rails; pollen in tetrads, tetrads T-shaped, tetragonal, etc. [microsporogenesis successive], 4-16 porate, surface smooth; tetrads collected on translator [spoonlike structure + basal sticky viscidium]; retinaculum formed by cellular fusion; exotestal cells unthickened [Periploca]; embryo color?; n = 11 (mostly).

Periplocoideae

31/180. Old World, esp. Africa, tropics to dry temperate (map: Good 1952).

Synonymy: Periplocaceae Schlechter, nom. cons.

Baisseeae [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae]: colleters on leaves; stamen-corolla tube very short; G initially half inferior, style head without basal collar.

Baisseeae

Large lianes; (trichomes branched); (leaves with domatia); (style head with strap-like bands of adhesive).

4/ . Africa. Inc. Dewevrella

[Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae]: (fructans/inulin +), monoterpene indole alkaloids 0; C tube formation intermediate; A inserted well below bases of corolla lobes, corona usually staminal, filament 0, anthers inserted on top of fused basal tube [specialized ring corona, staminal feet], with alternistaminal sections nectariferous [nectaries behind guide rails; nectary disc 0]; pollinaria erect, pollinia of the one pollinarium from half anthers of adjacent stamens, translator [retinaculum] of hardened resinous secretion [mostly stigmatic] and apical adhesive corpusculum; pollen in tetrads when mature, tetrads T-shaped and tetragonal [microsporogenesis successive], orbicules 0, grains inaperturate, psilate; endosperm nuclear (cellular), embryo green; n = 11.

Evolution. Endress (2011a) suggested that a key innovation within Gentianles was the possession of pollinaria; this is one place it could be optimized.

4. Secamonoideae Endlicher

Lianes; C also left-contorted; pollinia 4, lacking outer wall, translator arms [caudicle] 0; granular layer of exine thick.

9/170: Secamone (100). Old World, esp. Madagascar, tropics to temperate.

5. Asclepiadoideae Burnett

(Lianes); (latex clear - Marsdenieae and esp. Ceropegieae); (included phloem +); (leaves spiral); C also valvate; anthers bisporangiate [1 sporangium from each theca is lost], pollinia 2, anther secreting wall around pollinium, pollen tetrads linear during development, (orbicules + - Riocreuxia), granular layer of exine thin; nectar usually accessible at or near base of guide rails; (exotestal cells with outer walls unthickened - Hoya); n = (9-14).

Asclepiadoideae

214/2365. Tropics to temperate, drier areas esp. in Africa (map: see Good 1952). [Photo - Flower, Flower, Flower, Fruit.]

5a. Fockeeae

Plants with tuberous roots; connective appendages +, inflated; no pollinium wall [?: Cibirhiza].

2/9. Drier parts of southern and eastern Africa, Arabia.

5b. The rest.

Pollinia with caudicles; pollen in monads when mature.

212/2356: Cynanchum (200), Matalea (180), Ceropegia (160), Asclepias (100), Gonolobus (100), Marsdenia (100), Brachystelma (100), Hoya (90[-200+]), Oxypetalum (90), Dischidia (80), Ditassa (75), Stapelia (70), Orbea (55), Huernia (50), Tylophora (50), Caralluma (47). Tropics to temperate, drier areas esp. in Africa.

Synonymy: Asclepiadaceae Borkhausen, nom. cons., Cynanchaceae G. Meyer, Stapeliaceae Horaninow

Evolution. Divergence & Distribution. Livschultz et al. (2011) have recently suggested that [Asclepiadoidese + Secamonoideae] moved into drier habitats, the large rainforest lianes of Baisseeae representing the ancestral habit/habitat of the whole milkweed clade. Asclepiadoideae, often small herbs, represent the most derived members of this clade, and pollinia developed to increase efficiency of pollination by generalist pollinators of members the rather small population in the rather dry areas they were favouring - reduction of the Allee effect (Livschultz et al. 2011).

Within "Apocynoideae" genera in major clades usually are from either the Old or the New World, with little overlap between the two (Livschultz et al. 2007). There is also substantial geographical structuring of clades within groups like e.g. Asclepiadoideae (Goyder 2006 for a summary).

Floral Biology. In all Apocynaceae, the anthers are closely associated with a swollen stigmatic head. In some perhaps plesiomorphic Apocynaceae cells of the stigmatic head secrete a sticky polysaccharide-terpenoid material to which the pollen adheres; there are no spatially-localized receptive and secretory areas on the stigma. Such taxa are found in basal grade of "Rauvolfioideae", however, it is possible that these stigmas have been derived more than once, and that the differentiated stigma described below is plesiomorphic for the whole family (Simõs et al. 2007a; see also Shamrov & Gevorkyan 2010a for the morphology of the stigmatic head). In taxa with spatial differentiation within the stigmatic head, pollen is deposited onto the apex of the swollen head where sticky material is secreted (again, this is secondary pollen presentation). An annulus around the middle of the head aids in the removal of the pollen from the proboscis of the pollinator, scraping it off, while the receptive stigma itself is a ring around the base of the head. A gynostegium, formed by the post-genital fusion of anthers and stigma, develops in some "Apocynoideae" when the connective tissue of the anther becomes adnate to the stigmatic head (the staminal retinacle of Simões et al. 2007b). Commonly in "Apocynoideae" pollen from thecae of adjacent anthers mixes, whereas pollen from the thecae of the same anther is more or less prevented from mixing by the zone of adnation of the connective, that is, the basic arrangement of the androecium is the same as that in Asclepiadoideae. There are interesting correlations evident in floral evolution. Thus in Tabernaemontaneae several features - an androecium with thick, lignified guide rails, a stigmatic head complex like that of "Apocynoideae" in particular (there is a five-lobed upper stigmatic crest and a thickened basal flange), and paired nectaries - are all associated, all being lost together five times on the tree (Simões et al. 2010).

The intimate association of the androecium and gynoecium to form the gynostegium that characterizes Asclepiadoideae and Secamonoideae is postgenital. Within Periplocoideae, pollinia seem to have evolved at least three times (Ionta & Judd 2007). Since it is unlikely that Periplocoideae are sister to [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae] (esp. Livschultz et al. 2007), details of the evolution of the pollinarium that characterize the two latter is unclear. Variation in the pollinarium of Fockeeae (which includes both Fockea and Cibirhiza), sister to all other Asclepiadoideae, further confuses the issue (see Verhoeven et al. 2003). In any event, the old idea of the evolution of the pollinia of Asclepiadaceae via Periplocaceae/Periplocoideae as some sort of intermediate needs to be revised (see also Ionta & Judd 2007; Potgeiter & Albert 2001; Sennblad & Bremer 2002; esp. Livschultz et al. 2007).

Nectar in many of the old Apocynaceae is secreted by distinct nectaries at the base of the gynoecium, but in Secamonoideae and Asclepiadoideae in particular it may be secreted in "staminal outgrowths" from the petaloid staminal feet (i.e. the corolla + filament tissue below the anther) that completely surround the gynoecium. Kunze (e.g. 1991, 1997 and references) show that it is secreted beneath the guide rails, although it may be accessible to the pollinator only elsewhere in the flower (Fahn 1979 suggested that the stigma itself might secrete nectar in Asclepias). The diversity of form produced by tissues from the corolla, stamens, and staminal feet in [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae] is remarkable and has been used to delimit genera and species (see Liede & Kunze 1993 for terms used). Indeed, flowers of Apocynaceae in general develop a variety of petaloid appendages. These may develop from the corolla tube (Nerium, Allamanda) or from the apices of the anthers (Adenium, Nerium). Strophanthus can have appendages at the apices of the anthers or more or less bilobed appendages in the angles of the corolla lobes, while the corolla lobes themselves terminate in a narrow, pendulous appendix that in some species is almost 30 cm long; there is no nectary. Within Asclepiadoideae, the corona develops very late and is clearly staminal, and this is consistent with the pattern of gene expression in the flower (Livshultz & Kramer 2009), although Kunze (2005b) suggests that it is an organ sui generis - which it is, from another point of view. There is much variation in details of the gynostegium in Asclepiadoideae. Here Kunze and Wanntorp (2008a) discuss corona and anther skirt evolution while Kunze and Wanntorp (2008b) puzzle over the morphologically distinctive gynostegium of the molecularly unremarkable Hoya spartioides. Nectar may be a reward in such flowers, and is usually accessible at or near the base of the guide rail (Kunze 1991, see also Kunze & Wanntrop 2008b); a variety of floral volatiles have also been characterized (Jürgens et al. 2009).

For a general survey of pollination in Apocynaceae, see Ollerton & Liede (1997). In general, pollination is a rather precise process. Hairs on the anthers or stigmatic head, or lignified guide rails (Secamonoideae, Asclepiadoideae) at the bases of the anther, are all involved in pollen presentation and guiding the mouth parts of the pollinator so that effective pollination occurs (e.g. Fallen 1986). Particularly when the nectar is physically associated with the guide rails just mentioned, the proboscis of the insect is guided to the viscidium, which thus attaches the pollinia to the pollinator (e.g. Kunze 1991). Fly pollination is quite widespread, particularly in Asclepiadoideae (see e.g. the photographs in Pilbeam 2010). It has been studied in detail in Ceropegia (Vogel 1961) where it is very common; in one study, about 60% of the some 60 species examined were each pollinated by a single genus of flies (Ollerton et al. 2009b: see below for the phylogeny of the genus).

Wyatt and Lipow (2007) suggest that the evolution of pollinia and the secondary apocarpy in Asclepiadoideae and Apocynaceae s.l. is connected with the post-zygotic incompatibility system that characterises Apocynaceae (?all) and at least some other Gentianales. At least some Asclepiadoideae have no compitum developed at all, one of the reasons for the frequent occurrence of fruits in which only a single carpel has developed.

Plant-Animal Interactions. Caterpillars of Nymphalidae-Danainae-Danaini (often as Danainae) relish members of this family (Ehrlich & Raven 1964; see Ackery & Vane-Wright 1984 for a comprehensive treatment; Brower et al. 2010 for a phylogeny), but they also eat other plants with latex, including several Moraceae and Carica. Apocynaceae are likely to be the ancestral host family for Danainae, caterpillars of all three main clades of which are found on plants of this family (Janz et al. 2006; cf. Wahlberg et al. 2009, as Gentianales), although many New World Ithomiini eat Solanaceae (q.v.); the danaine clade diverged from other butterfly clades ca 89 million years ago (Wahlberg et al. 2009). The cardenolides of Apocynaceae are noxious and may protect both larva and adult (e.g. Malcolm 1991; see also Dobler et al. 2011). Brightly-colored danaine caterpillars and bright orange aphids are to be found on Asclepiadoideae in both North America and southern Africa; aphids may on occasion induce cardenolide production (Martel & Malcolm 2004). Aposematic aphids seem to feed preferentially on internal phloem/adaxial phloem of leaf bundles which are believed to be the cardenolide transport system, so acquiring food and protection at the same time (Botha et al. 1977), although which bundles are targeted may also depend on the age of the leaf (Botha et al. 1975).

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are known from some Apocynaceae, so the plants attract adult Danaini (practically all the species, usually males, are involved) which use these compounds as the basis of their pheromones and for defence(Boppreé 2005; Brehm et al. 2007). Ithomiini are also attracted, and these alkaloids also occur in Crotalaria, some Boraginaceae and Asteraceae-Asteroideae. Interestingly, Ithomiini preferentially visit bait with withered flowers, while Arctiidae moths prefer crushed roots; Brehm et al. (2007) suggest that the pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Prestonia (Echiteae) may have been originally involved in the pharmacophagous behaviour by Ithomiini butterflies which are now commonly found on Solanaceae (Wilmott & Freitas 2006).

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids and pentacyclic triterpene saponins variously sequestered and modified are found in the secretions of the defensive glands of some Chrysolina and Platyophora beetles (Chrysomelidae, both genera are very speciose: Pasteels et al. 2001; Termonia et al. 2002; Hartmann et al. 2003). Hosts of seed-eating bugs of Hemiptera-Lygaeidae-Lygaeinae are concentrated in the old Apocynaceae (Slater 1976).

For the possible co-evolution of the longicorn beetle Tetraopes with Asclepias, see Farrell and Mitter (1998), and for a study of the different defence syndromes of Asclepias, see Agrawal & Fishbein (2006). Although the resprouting ability of the plant - or simply its tolerance of herbivory - may be an effective defence against specialist herbivores in particular in Asclepias (Agrawal & Fishbein 2008), the situation is complex; production of a variety of phenolics also changed, showing an overall increase as cardenolide production decreased (Agrawal et al. 2009a). Indeed, one interpretation of the initial diversification in North American Asclepias is that this was accelerated by reduced investment in defensive traits like latex and cardenolide production (Agrawal et al. 2009b; see also ). Furthermore, there is an inverse correlation between the presence of leaf surface waxes and that of indumentum, the presence of either making it more difficult for potentially noxious insects to alight, although other plant traits were also affected (Agrawal et al. 2009c).

Bacterial/Fungal Associations. Although Paris-type mycorrhizae are found in Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae, and Rubiaceae, Arum-type endomycorrhizae, or intermediates, are common in Apocynaceae, especially in Asclepiadoideae (Imhoff 1999).

Ecology & Eco-Physiology. Succulence is widespread in the family, particularly in Periplocoideae (root succulents) and Asclepiadoideae. Meve and Liede-Schumann (2010) estimate that there are about 65 genera, mostly small, that include only succulent taxa, and some succulent taxa are found in seven larger genera; Nyffeler and Eggli (2010b) give figures of 74 genera containing 1151 species that are succulents. Any part of the vegetative plant may become succulent. Members of Asclepiadoideae are the most speciose scandent group in tropical New World forests, "Apocynaceae" somewhat less so, although in Africa the latter are perhaps the most prominent group with the scandent habit (Gentry 1991).

Vegetative Variation. in genera with opposite leaves such as Hoya, the seedlings may have spiral leaves; Absolmsia, previously segregated from Hoya, has spiral leaves even at the flowering stage. In taxa such as Vallesia there are cauline "stipules", apparently colleters in a stipular position; Vallesia also has spiral leaves. Mandevilla has a distinctive ring of large, radiating, almost fleshy projections immediately below the leaves. A variety of stipule-like structures is also found in Stapelia and relatives; in Edithcolea grandis the "stipule" is represented by a single hair (Bruyns 2000, see also 2004), while there is a variety of hairs and other structures in the stipular position in Caralluma (Bruyns et al. 2010). In other Apocynaceae like Alstonia there is an adaxial excavation at the base of the petiole in which the axillary bud is enclosed, often surrounded by secretions from the colleters.

Branching in a number of taxa is complex. The apical bud may abort, or be converted into an inflorescence, and there may be a pair/whorl of reduced leaves with a very short internode at the end of each innovation, and these reduced leaves subtend vegetative branches or inflorescences which then appear to be in an extra-axillary position (Troll & Weberling 1990). The "lateral" inflorescences of at least some stapeliads may be displaced-terminal (Bruyns 2004), and such inflorescences are also found in Apocynum, Asclepias, etc., however, Leptadenia (Asclepiadoideae) has axillary inflorescences.

Chemistry, Morphology, etc. For distinctive fatty acids in the seed, see Badami and Patil (1981).

The cambium is occasionally storied. The leaves of Asclepiadoideae and many genera more basal to them have flat vernation (Cullen 1978). Cymose inflorescences of some sort are the norm in the family, and some Marsdenieae in particular have very long-lived but contracted inflorescences in which single flowers or whorls of flowers open at intervals over a year or more (Meve et al. 2009).

There is some variation in the direction of overlap of the corolla lobes (Eichler 1874); note that how the corolla tube is initiated in Periplocoideae is unknown. Much has been written about the homology of the various structures associated with the corolla, stamens, and stigmatic head, and deciding on which structures in one flower are similar (see Remane's criteria) to perhaps comparable structures in another flower can be very difficult. Thus if the staminal feet in Periplocoideae are considered similar to the fused basal tube of [Secamonoidae + Ascleiadoideae], in that both are outgrowths of the stamen-corolla tube, then there is a potential synapomorphy for the larger group (or an aditional parallelism if they do not form a single clade) (Livshulz et al. 2007). Again, strap-shaped bands on the style head are scattered in ex-Apocynoideae, and may be similar to translators in Asclepiadoideae, Secamonoideae, and Periplocoideae; could this yield a high-level character in the whole APSA clade (Livshulz 2010)? There is quite a lot of variation in pollen morphology in Apocynaceae, independent of pollinarium formation. Alyxieae in particular have grains with large pores, and some species have remarkable barrel-like pollen grains, the pores forming the ends of the barrel (M. Endress et al. 2007a). For tetrad morphology, see Omlor (1998); Periplocoideae, Secamonoideae, and Asclepiadoideae - including Fockeeae - are reported to have T-shaped and tetragonal tetrads. There has been considerable discussion about the nature of the paired nectaries of Vinca, and because of their vasculature, etc., it has been suggested that they are carpels (Fahn 1979 for literature); this is unlikely. When the carpels are connate, placentation may be axile or parietal. Syncarpy seems to have evolved more than once in the family, it may be congenital (Acokanthera) or postgenital (Allamanda) (Sennblad & Bremer 1996). The carpels may be collateral (Spichiger et al. 2002). An endothelium has been reported in the ovules of Apocynaceae s. str. (Kapil & Tiwari 1978; Cronquist 1981), but it is absent according to Rohwer (1996).

Apocynaceae are a much-studied group, see Glück (1919: colleters), Andersson (1931: embryology), Leeuwenberg (1983: Plumerioideae), Woodson (1935), Liede and Weberling (1985) and Steck and Weberling (1982), all inflorescence morphology, Kunze (1990: corona), Nilsson et al. (1993) and Verhoeven and Venter (1994, 2001), all pollen, P. Endress (1994b: much floral morphology, esp. Asclepiadoideae), Kunze (1996: stamen), Sennblad (1997: general), Sennblad and Bremer (1996: rbcL phylogeny, morphology), Civeyrel et al. (1998: comparison of molecular phylogeny with variation in the pollinaria), Omlor (1996: translator structure in Periplocoideae and Secamonoideae, 1998: floral morphology and testa anatomy), M. Endress and Bruyns (2000, much general information), Albers and Meve (2001: karyology), Vinckier and Smets (2002b: orbicules), Kunze (2005a: morphology and development of the corona), Aniszewski (2007: alkaloids), Van der Ham et al. (2001: pollen of Alyxieae, variable, asymmetrical, many with remarkable nexine), Van de Ven and Van der Ham (2006: pollen of Melodinus, etc.), Demarco et al. (2006: laticifer type), Lens et al. (2009c: wood anatomy, much still to be integrated), Meve et al. (2009: floral morphology of Marsdenieae) and Shamrov and Gevorkyan (2010b: gynoecium). There is much information on Periplocoideae, Secamonoideae, and Asclepiadoideae at a site run by S. Liede-Schumann and U. Meve while F. d'Alessi and L. Viljoen provide information on stapeliads in particular.

Phylogeny. Note that both Rauvolfioideae and Apocynoideae are paraphyletic (Sennblad & Bremer 2002); see Livshultz et al. (2007) for the phylogeny of "Apocynoideae" and Simões et al. (2007) for that of "Rauvolfioideae". "Rauvolfioideae" are particularly highly paraphyletic. The relationships of seven tribes are more or less clear, but those of the remaining five tribes remain to be established; there is good support for Aspidospermeae and Alstonieae as successively sister to all other Apocynaceae (Simões et al. 2007), and both tribes more or less lack uniseriate rays, a feature uncommon in other "Rauvolfioideae" (Lens et al. 2008b). Of the other tribes, Tabernaemontaneae have an androecium with lignified guide rails and a stigmatic head complex like that of "Apocynoideae" in particular, there being a five-lobed upper crest and a thickened basal flange (Simões et al. 2010). Simões et al. (2010) have clarified relationships within the tribe, i.a. circumscribing Tabernaemontana broadly to include Stemmadenia; major clades within that genus are correlated with geography. Alyxieae have irregularly-shaped 2-3-porate pollen grains the ectoapertures having thickened margins (Lens et al. 2008b and references); all tribes can be more or less readily distinguished by a combination of features in their wood anatomy (Lens et al. 2008b). For a phylogeny of Tabernaemontaneae, see Simões et al. (2006a, 2010), of Alyxieae, M. Endress et al. (2007) and of "Rauvolfioideae" as a whole, see Simões et al. (2007a).

Apocynoideae, as well as the old Asclepidaceae and Periplocoideae, form the APSA clade, relationships within which are being clarified. A small African clade, Baisseeae (Dewevrella, with coiled filaments [?; Livshultz 2009], is included here, although it does not have the morphological features of the other genera), has strong support as sister to [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae], and below Baisseeae is a polytomy including a largely Asian clade (but including Apocynum) of ex-Apocynoideae, a largely American clade of that group, Rhabdadenia, and Periplocoideae (Livshultz et al. 2007; Livshulz 2010; see also Lahaye et al. 2007). Within Periplocoideae Phyllanthera is sister to the rest; pollinia seem to have evolved at least three times (Ionta & Judd 2007; see also Venter & Verhoeven 2001). It is currently unclear whether or not Periplocoideae are immediately related to [Baissaaeeae [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae]], indeed, relationships in this area could be [Periplocoideae [[Asian clade + New World clade] [Baisseeae [Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae]]], with the position of Rhabdadenia unclear (e.g. Livshulz 2010, perhaps 8 times the current amount of parsimony-informative data will solve the problems!). How relationships play out will of course affect the optimization of characters on the tree...

Parsonsia and Echites (Echiteae: Sennblad & Bremer 2002) are part of the New World clade, Mesechiteae, and are also to be included. For phylogenetic relationships in Mesechiteae, see Simões et al. (2004, 2006b); in its earlier circumscription, the tribe was polyphyletic.

Relationships within New World Asclepiadoideae are being clarified by Liede-Schumann (2005) and Rapini et al. (2007). Hoya is a particularly speciose genus; see Wanntorp et al. (2006a, b, 2009) for phylogenies, Wanntorp and Forster (2007: floral morphology in general), Kunze and Wanntorp (2008a: corona and anther skirt) and Kunze and Wanntorp (2008b: the morphologically distinctive gynostegium of the molecularly unremarkable Hoya spartioidea). Hoya and Dischidia (Marsdenieae) appear to be separable by morphological features, possibly apomorphies, such as pollinarium morphology, inner guide rail absence, and nectary position (Wanntorp & Kunze 2009); estimates of species numbers in these two genera in particular vary widely. Relationships along the backbone of Hoya remain poorly resolved (Wanntorp et al. 2011a). For relationships within Asclepias, polphyletic, see Goyder et al. (2007); Asclepias in the New World is sister to an Old World clade in which the Old World Asclepias are embedded, but support for the two clades is not strong, and basal relatiosnhips within the Old World clade have little support. A study focussing on New World Asclepias found that Trachycalymma was sister to both the Old and New World clades, although none of these relationships had much non-parametric bootstrap support (Fishbein et al. 2011); in Goyer et al. (2007) Trachycalymma was embedded within the Old World clade. For the delimitation and relationships of Cynanchum, see Liede and Kunze (2002) and Liede and Täuber (2002). Within Ceropegieae relationships are complex, Ceropegia itself occurring all over the tree (Meve & Leide 2001, 2002; Meve & Liede-Schumann 2007), indeed, various genera are embedded within Caralluma, in turn embedded in Ceropegia... (Bruyns et al. 2010). For the Gonolobus area, see Krings et al. (2008).

Classification. The classification here is based on that of M. Endress et al. (2007a; see also Endress & Bruyns 2000), however, it will be clear that any classification of the entire family must for now be rather provisional (e.g. M. Endress 2004). In general, generic limits need attention (see e.g. Liede & Täuber 2000; Liede et al. 2002; Rapini et al. 2003; Goyder et al. 2007l; Meve & Liede-Schumann 2007). For generic limits in Tabernaemontaneae, see Simões et al. (2010). Generic limits in Asclepiadoideae seem to be particularly difficult, perhaps because floral characters used to delimit genera are often suspect in asterids, and genera in Asclepiadoideae often seem to be distinguished on floral minutiae. Asclepias itself is definitely polphyletic, the New World clade including the type of the genus (Goyder et al. 2007), but morphology alone is not clarifying relationships too much; Goyder (2009) provisionally included even Trachycalymma (see above) in an admittedly unsatisfactorily circumscribed African Asclepias. Ceropegieae are another very difficult area, Ceropegia perhaps polyphyletic and including Caralluma et al. (Meve & Leide 2001, 2002; Meve & Liede-Schumann 2007; Bruyns et al. 2010: see de Kock & Meve 2007 for a checklist); one can only guess what the ultimate clade limits will be. For the circumscription of Sarcostemma, see Liede and Täuber (2000). For genera in the Asclepiadoideae-Marsdenieae, see Omlor (1998) and Meve et al. (2009). For a magnificent revision of southern African stapeliads, see Bruyns (2004).

Thanks. I thank M. Endress for comments.