EMBRYOPSIDA Pirani & Prado
Gametophyte dominant, independent, multicellular, initially ±globular, not motile, branched; showing gravitropism; glycolate oxidase +, glycolate metabolism in leaf peroxisomes [glyoxysomes], acquisition of phenylalanine lysase* [PAL], flavonoid synthesis*, microbial terpene synthase-like genes +, triterpenoids produced by CYP716 enzymes, CYP73 and phenylpropanoid metabolism [development of phenolic network], xyloglucans in primary cell wall, side chains charged; plant poikilohydrous [protoplasm dessication tolerant], ectohydrous [free water outside plant physiologically important]; thalloid, leafy, with single-celled apical meristem, tissues little differentiated, rhizoids +, unicellular; chloroplasts several per cell, pyrenoids 0; centrioles/centrosomes in vegetative cells 0, microtubules with γ-tubulin along their lengths [?here], interphase microtubules form hoop-like system; metaphase spindle anastral, predictive preprophase band + [with microtubules and F-actin; where new cell wall will form], phragmoplast + [cell wall deposition centrifugal, from around the anaphase spindle], plasmodesmata +; antheridia and archegonia +, jacketed*, surficial; blepharoplast +, centrioles develop de novo, bicentriole pair coaxial, separate at midpoint, centrioles rotate, associated with basal bodies of cilia, multilayered structure + [4 layers: L1, L4, tubules; L2, L3, short vertical lamellae] (0), spline + [tubules from L1 encircling spermatid], basal body 200-250 nm long, associated with amorphous electron-dense material, microtubules in basal end lacking symmetry, stellate array of filaments in transition zone extended, axonemal cap 0 [microtubules disorganized at apex of cilium]; male gametes [spermatozoids] with a left-handed coil, cilia 2, lateral, asymmetrical; oogamy; sporophyte +*, multicellular, growth 3-dimensional*, cuticle +*, plane of first cell division transverse [with respect to long axis of archegonium/embryo sac], sporangium and upper part of seta developing from epibasal cell [towards the archegonial neck, exoscopic], with at least transient apical cell [?level], initially surrounded by and dependent on gametophyte, placental transfer cells +, in both sporophyte and gametophyte, wall ingrowths develop early; suspensor/foot +, cells at foot tip somewhat haustorial; sporangium +, single, terminal, dehiscence longitudinal; meiosis sporic, monoplastidic, MTOC [= MicroTubule Organizing Centre] associated with plastid, sporocytes 4-lobed, cytokinesis simultaneous, preceding nuclear division, quadripolar microtubule system +; wall development both centripetal and centrifugal, 1000 spores/sporangium, sporopollenin in the spore wall* laid down in association with trilamellar layers [white-line centred lamellae; tripartite lamellae]; plastid transmission maternal; nuclear genome [1C] <1.4 pg, main telomere sequence motif TTTAGGG, KNOX1 and KNOX2 [duplication] and LEAFY genes present, ethylene involved in cell elongation; chloroplast genome with close association between trnLUAA and trnFGAA genes [precursors for starch synthesis], tufA, minD, minE genes moved to nucleus; mitochondrial trnS(gcu) and trnN(guu) genes +.
Many of the bolded characters in the characterization above are apomorphies of more or less inclusive clades of streptophytes along the lineage leading to the embryophytes, not apomorphies of crown-group embryophytes per se.
All groups below are crown groups, nearly all are extant. Characters mentioned are those of the immediate common ancestor of the group,  contains explanatory material, () features common in clade, exact status unclear.
Sporophyte well developed, branched, branching dichotomous, potentially indeterminate; hydroids +; stomata on stem; sporangia several, terminal; spore walls not multilamellate [?here].
II. TRACHEOPHYTA / VASCULAR PLANTS
Sporophyte long lived, cells polyplastidic, photosynthetic red light response, stomata open in response to blue light; plant homoiohydrous [water content of protoplasm relatively stable]; control of leaf hydration passive; plant endohydrous [physiologically important free water inside plant]; PIN[auxin efflux facilitators]-mediated polar auxin transport; (condensed or nonhydrolyzable tannins/proanthocyanidins +); borate cross-linked rhamnogalactan II, xyloglucans with side chains uncharged [?level], in secondary walls of vascular and mechanical tissue; lignins +; roots +, often ≤1 mm across, root hairs and root cap +; stem apex multicellular [several apical initials, no tunica], with cytohistochemical zonation, plasmodesmata formation based on cell lineage; vascular development acropetal, tracheids +, in both protoxylem and metaxylem, G- and S-types; sieve cells + [nucleus degenerating]; endodermis +; stomata numerous, involved in gas exchange; leaves +, vascularized, spirally arranged, blades with mean venation density ca 1.8 mm/mm2 [to 5 mm/mm2], all epidermal cells with chloroplasts; sporangia in strobili, sporangia adaxial, columella 0; tapetum glandular; sporophyte-gametophyte junction lacking dead gametophytic cells, mucilage, ?position of transfer cells; MTOCs not associated with plastids, basal body 350-550 nm long, stellate array in transition region initially joining microtubule triplets; archegonia embedded/sunken [only neck protruding]; embryo suspensor +, shoot apex developing away from micropyle/archegonial neck [from hypobasal cell, endoscopic], root lateral with respect to the longitudinal axis of the embryo [plant homorhizic].[MONILOPHYTA + LIGNOPHYTA]
Sporophyte growth ± monopodial, branching spiral; roots endomycorrhizal [with Glomeromycota], lateral roots +, endogenous; G-type tracheids +, with scalariform-bordered pits; leaves with apical/marginal growth, venation development basipetal, growth determinate; sporangium dehiscence by a single longitudinal slit; cells polyplastidic, MTOCs diffuse, perinuclear, migratory; blepharoplasts +, paired, with electron-dense material, centrioles on periphery, male gametes multiciliate; nuclear genome [1C] 7.6-10 pg [mode]; chloroplast long single copy ca 30kb inversion [from psbM to ycf2]; mitochondrion with loss of 4 genes, absence of numerous group II introns; LITTLE ZIPPER proteins.
Sporophyte woody; stem branching axillary, buds exogenous; lateral root origin from the pericycle; cork cambium + [producing cork abaxially], vascular cambium bifacial [producing phloem abaxially and xylem adaxially].
SEED PLANTS† / SPERMATOPHYTA†
Growth of plant bipolar [plumule/stem and radicle/root independent, roots positively geotropic]; plants heterosporous; megasporangium surrounded by cupule [i.e. = unitegmic ovule, cupule = integument]; pollen lands on ovule; megaspore germination endosporic, female gametophyte initially retained on the plant, free-nuclear/syncytial to start with, walls then coming to surround the individual nuclei, process proceeding centripetally.
EXTANT SEED PLANTS
Plant evergreen; nicotinic acid metabolised to trigonelline, (cyanogenesis via tyrosine pathway); microbial terpene synthase-like genes 0; primary cell walls rich in xyloglucans and/or glucomannans, 25-30% pectin [Type I walls]; lignin chains started by monolignol dimerization [resinols common], particularly with guaiacyl and p-hydroxyphenyl [G + H] units [sinapyl units uncommon, no Maüle reaction]; roots often ≥1 mm across, stele diarch to pentarch, xylem and phloem originating on alternating radii, cork cambium deep seated, gravitropism response fast; stem apical meristem complex [with quiescent centre, etc.], plasmodesma density in SAM 1.6-6.2[mean]/μm2 [interface-specific plasmodesmatal network]; eustele +, protoxylem endarch, endodermis 0; wood homoxylous, tracheids and rays alone, tracheid/tracheid pits circular, bordered; mature sieve tube/cell lacking functioning nucleus, sieve tube plastids with starch grains; phloem fibres +; cork cambium superficial; leaf nodes 1:1, a single trace leaving the vascular sympodium; leaf vascular bundles amphicribral; guard cells the only epidermal cells with chloroplasts, stomatal pore with active opening in response to leaf hydration, control by abscisic acid, metabolic regulation of water use efficiency, etc.; branching by axillary buds, exogenous; prophylls two, lateral; leaves with petiole and lamina, development basipetal, lamina simple; sporangia borne on sporophylls; spores not dormant; microsporophylls aggregated in indeterminate cones/strobili; grains monosulcate, aperture in ana- position [distal], primexine + [involved in exine pattern formation with deposition of sporopollenin from tapetum there], exine and intine homogeneous, exine alveolar/honeycomb; ovules with parietal tissue [= crassinucellate], megaspore tetrad linear, functional megaspore single, chalazal, sporopollenin 0; gametophyte ± wholly dependent on sporophyte, development initially endosporic [apical cell 0, rhizoids 0, etc.]; male gametophyte with tube developing from distal end of grain, male gametes two, developing after pollination, with cell walls; embryo cellular ab initio, suspensor short-minute, embryonic axis straight [shoot and root at opposite ends], primary root/radicle produces taproot [= allorhizic], cotyledons 2; embryo ± dormant; chloroplast ycf2 gene in inverted repeat, trans splicing of five mitochondrial group II introns, rpl6 gene absent; ??whole nuclear genome duplication [ζ/zeta duplication event], 2C genome size (0.71-)1.99(-5.49) pg, two copies of LEAFY gene, PHY gene duplications [three - [BP [A/N + C/O]] - copies], 5.8S and 5S rDNA in separate clusters.
IID. ANGIOSPERMAE / MAGNOLIOPHYTA
Lignans, O-methyl flavonols, dihydroflavonols, triterpenoid oleanane, apigenin and/or luteolin scattered, [cyanogenesis in ANA grade?], lignin also with syringyl units common [G + S lignin, positive Maüle reaction - syringyl:guaiacyl ratio more than 2-2.5:1], hemicelluloses as xyloglucans; root cap meristem closed (open); pith relatively inconspicuous, lateral roots initiated immediately to the side of [when diarch] or opposite xylem poles; epidermis probably originating from inner layer of root cap, trichoblasts [differentiated root hair-forming cells] 0, hypodermis suberised and with Casparian strip [= exodermis]; shoot apex with tunica-corpus construction, tunica 2-layered; starch grains simple; primary cell wall mostly with pectic polysaccharides, poor in mannans; tracheid:tracheid [end wall] plates with scalariform pitting, multiseriate rays +, wood parenchyma +; sieve tubes enucleate, sieve plates with pores (0.1-)0.5-10< µm across, cytoplasm with P-proteins, not occluding pores of plate, companion cell and sieve tube from same mother cell; ?phloem loading/sugar transport; nodes 1:?; dark reversal Pfr → Pr; protoplasm dessication tolerant [plant poikilohydric]; stomata randomly oriented, brachyparacytic [ends of subsidiary cells ± level with ends of guard cells], outer stomatal ledges producing vestibule, reduction in stomatal conductance with increasing CO2 concentration; lamina formed from the primordial leaf apex, margins toothed, development of venation acropetal, overall growth ± diffuse, secondary veins pinnate, fine venation hierarchical-reticulate, (1.7-)4.1(-5.7) mm/mm2, vein endings free; flowers perfect, pedicellate, ± haplomorphic, protogynous; parts free, numbers variable, development centripetal; P = T, petal-like, each with a single trace, outer members not sharply differentiated from the others, not enclosing the floral bud; A many, filament not sharply distinguished from anther, stout, broad, with a single trace, anther introrse, tetrasporangiate, sporangia in two groups of two [dithecal], each theca dehiscing longitudinally by a common slit, ± embedded in the filament, walls with at least outer secondary parietal cells dividing, endothecium +, cells elongated at right angles to long axis of anther; tapetal cells binucleate; microspore mother cells in a block, microsporogenesis successive, walls developing by centripetal furrowing; pollen subspherical, tectum continuous or microperforate, ektexine columellate, endexine restricted to the apertural regions, thin, compact, intine in apertural areas thick, orbicules +, pollenkitt +; nectary 0; carpels present, superior, free, several, spiral, ascidiate [postgenital occlusion by secretion], stylulus at most short [shorter than ovary], hollow, cavity not lined by distinct epidermal layer, stigma ± decurrent, carinal, dry; suprastylar extragynoecial compitum +; ovules few [?1]/carpel, marginal, anatropous, bitegmic, micropyle endostomal, outer integument 2-3 cells across, often largely subdermal in origin, inner integument 2-3 cells across, often dermal in origin, parietal tissue 1-3 cells across, nucellar cap?; megasporocyte single, hypodermal, functional megaspore lacking cuticle; female gametophyte lacking chlorophyll, four-celled [one module, egg and polar nuclei sisters]; ovule not increasing in size between pollination and fertilization; pollen grains bicellular at dispersal, germinating in less than 3 hours, siphonogamy, pollen tube unbranched, growing towards the ovule, between cells, growth rate (ca 10-)80-20,000 µm h-1, tube apex of pectins, wall with callose, lumen with callose plugs, penetration of ovules via micropyle [porogamous], whole process takes ca 18 hours, distance to first ovule 1.1-2.1 mm; male gametophytes tricellular, gametes 2, lacking cell walls, ciliae 0, double fertilization +, ovules aborting unless fertilized; fruit indehiscent, P deciduous; mature seed much larger than fertilized ovule, small [<5 mm long], dry [no sarcotesta], exotestal; endosperm +, ?diploid [one polar nucleus + male gamete], cellular, development heteropolar [first division oblique, micropylar end initially with a single large cell, divisions uniseriate, chalazal cell smaller, divisions in several planes], copious, oily and/or proteinaceous, embryo short [<¼ length of seed]; plastid and mitochondrial transmission maternal; Arabidopsis-type telomeres [(TTTAGGG)n]; nuclear genome [2C] (0.57-)1.45(-3.71) [1 pg = 109 base pairs], ??whole nuclear genome duplication [ε/epsilon event]; ndhB gene 21 codons enlarged at the 5' end, single copy of LEAFY and RPB2 gene, knox genes extensively duplicated [A1-A4], AP1/FUL gene, palaeo AP3 and PI genes [paralogous B-class genes] +, with "DEAER" motif, SEP3/LOFSEP and three copies of the PHY gene, [PHYB [PHYA + PHYC]]; chloroplast IR expansions, chlB, -L, -N, trnP-GGG genes 0.
[NYMPHAEALES [AUSTROBAILEYALES [[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]]]]: wood fibres +; axial parenchyma diffuse or diffuse-in-aggregates; pollen monosulcate [anasulcate], tectum reticulate-perforate [here?]; ?genome duplication; "DEAER" motif in AP3 and PI genes lost, gaps in these genes.
[AUSTROBAILEYALES [[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]]]: phloem loading passive, via symplast, plasmodesmata numerous; vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates in primary xylem; essential oils in specialized cells [lamina and P ± pellucid-punctate]; tension wood + [reaction wood: with gelatinous fibres, G-fibres, on adaxial side of branch/stem junction]; anther wall with outer secondary parietal cell layer dividing; tectum reticulate; nucellar cap + [character lost where in eudicots?]; 12BP [4 amino acids] deletion in P1 gene.
[[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]] / MESANGIOSPERMAE: benzylisoquinoline alkaloids +; sesquiterpene synthase subfamily a [TPS-a] [?level], polyacetate derived anthraquinones + [?level]; outer epidermal walls of root elongation zone with cellulose fibrils oriented transverse to root axis; P more or less whorled, 3-merous [?here]; pollen tube growth intra-gynoecial; extragynoecial compitum 0; carpels plicate [?here]; embryo sac monosporic [spore chalazal], 8-celled, bipolar [Polygonum type], antipodal cells persisting; endosperm triploid.
[MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]: (veins in lamina often 7-17 mm/mm2 or more [mean for eudicots 8.0]); (stamens opposite [two whorls of] P); (pollen tube growth fast).
MONOCOTYLEDONS / MONOCOTYLEDONEAE / LILIANAE Takhtajan
Plant herbaceous, perennial, rhizomatous, growth sympodial; non-hydrolyzable tannins [(ent-)epicatechin-4] +, neolignans 0, CYP716 triterpenoid enzymes 0, benzylisoquinoline alkaloids 0, hemicelluloses as xylan, cell wall also with (1->3),(1->4)-ß-D-MLGs [Mixed-Linkage Glucans]; root epidermis developed from outer layer of cortex; endodermal cells with U-shaped thickenings; cork cambium [uncommon] superficial; stele oligo- to polyarch, medullated [with prominent pith], lateral roots arise opposite phloem poles; stem primary thickening meristem +; vascular development bidirectional, bundles scattered, (amphivasal), vascular cambium 0 [bundles closed]; tension wood 0; vessel elements in roots with scalariform and/or simple perforations; tracheids only in stems and leaves; sieve tube plastids with cuneate protein crystals alone; ?nodal anatomy; stomata oriented parallel to the long axis of the leaf, in lines; prophyll single, adaxial; leaf blade linear, main venation parallel, of two or more size classes, the veins joining successively from the outside at the apex and forming a fimbrial vein, transverse veinlets +, unbranched [leaf blade characters: ?level], vein/veinlet endings not free, margins entire, Vorläuferspitze +, base broad, ensheathing the stem, sheath open, petiole 0; inflorescence terminal, racemose; flowers 3-merous [6-radiate to the pollinator], polysymmetric, pentacyclic; P = T = 3 + 3, all with three traces, median T of outer whorl abaxial, aestivation open, members of whorls alternating, [pseudomonocyclic, each T member forming a sector of any tube]; stamens = and opposite each T member [A/T primordia often associated, and/or A vascularized from T trace], anther and filament more or less sharply distinguished, anthers subbasifixed, wall with two secondary parietal cell layers, inner producing the middle layer [monocot type]; pollen reticulations coarse in the middle, finer at ends of grain, infratectal layer granular; G , with congenital intercarpellary fusion, opposite outer tepals [thus median member abaxial], placentation axile; compitum +; ovule with outer integument often largely dermal in origin, parietal tissue 1 cell across; antipodal cells persistent, proliferating; seed small to medium sized [mean = 1.5 mg], testal; embryo long, cylindrical, cotyledon 1, apparently terminal [i.e. bend in embryo axis], with a closed sheath, unifacial [hyperphyllar], both assimilating and haustorial, plumule apparently lateral; primary root unbranched, not very well developed, stem-borne roots numerous [= homorhizic], hypocotyl short, (collar rhizoids +); no dark reversion Pfr → Pr; nuclear genome [2C] (0.7-)1.29(-2.35) pg, duplication producing monocot LOFSEP and FUL3 genes [latter duplication of AP1/FUL gene], PHYE gene lost.
[ALISMATALES [PETROSAVIALES [[DIOSCOREALES + PANDANALES] [LILIALES [ASPARAGALES + COMMELINIDS]]]]]: ethereal oils 0; (trichoblasts in vertical files, proximal cell smaller); raphides + (druses 0); leaf blade vernation supervolute-curved or variants, (margins with teeth, teeth spiny); endothecium develops directly from undivided outer secondary parietal cells; tectum reticulate with finer sculpture at the ends of the grain, endexine 0; septal nectaries + [intercarpellary fusion postgenital]. - Back to Main Tree
Age. Magallón and Castillo (2009) suggest ca 162 Ma or 126.5 Ma for the divergence of Alismatales from other monocots. 140-130 Ma covers many estimates: ca 130 Ma in Givnish et al. (2018b), ca 130.8 Ma in Magallón et al. (2015), ca 131 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004), (156-)138(-130) Ma in Nauheimer et al. (2012b: sampling), and (139-)132(-125) Ma in Givnish et al. (2016b). Close are (123-)128(-133) Ma in Merckx et al. (2008a), ca 142 Ma in Tank et al. (2015: Table S1, [stem] Petrosaviidae, younger than Alismatales) and (139-)132, 128(-123) Ma in Hertweck et al. (2015). A mere 108.1 or 101.2 Ma is the estimate in in Xue et al. (2012), but 137-116 Ma in Mennes et al. (2013, see also 2015), (147-)136, 118(-107) Ma in Bell et al. (2010), (163.1-)147.1(-130.6) Ma in Eguchi and Tamura (2016), ca 148 Ma in Foster et al. (2016a: q.v. for details) and ca 170 Ma in Z. Wu et al. (2014). Estimates of (128.1-)123.9, 107.4(-92.85) Ma by Lutzoni et al. (2018) may refer to this node, but see also above.
Evolution: Ecology & Physiology. For a possible major reduction of plant height around here, see the monocots node.
Plant-Animal Interactions. Overall, herbivory in this clade is relatively low (Turcotte et al. 2014: see caveats).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Although raphides occurring in bundles and largely filling the cells containing them are common in this clade, druses may at least sometimes be found along with them (e.g. Prychid et al. 2008). Root hair development is poorly known, thus although Clowes (2000) records no trichoblasts from Pandanales, Dioscoreales, Asparagales, Liliales or Petrosaviales, indeed, sampling was hardly extensive (one orchid examined...).
Phylogeny. For an [Acorus + Alismatales] relationship, see Acorales; this is unlikely.
ALISMATALES Dumortier - Main Tree.
(Cyanogenesis + [triglochinin]); starch grains pteridophyte-type, amylophilic; inflorescence ± scapose, peripheral ring of sclerenchyma +; anthers extrorse; tapetal cells uninucleate; carpels free, plicate or mostly so, with completely unfused canals, styles +, stigma dry [common]; fruit a follicle; endosperm helobial; embryo (chlorophyllous), large, cotyledon large; seedling with hypocotyl and root well developed, collar rhizoids +. - 14 families, 166 genera, 4,785 species.
Includes Alismataceae, Aponogetonaceae, Araceae, Butomaceae, Cymodoceaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Juncaginaceae, Maundiaceae, Posidoniaceae, Ruppiaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Scheuchzeriaceae, Tofieldiaceae, Zosteraceae.
Note: In all node characterizations, boldface denotes a possible apomorphy, (....) denotes a feature the exact status of which in the clade is uncertain, [....] includes explanatory material; other text lists features found pretty much throughout the clade. Note that the precise node to which many characters, particularly the more cryptic ones, should be assigned is unclear. This is partly because homoplasy is very common, in addition, basic information for all too many characters is very incomplete, frequently coming from taxa well embedded in the clade of interest and so making the position of any putative apomorphy uncertain. Then there are the not-so-trivial issues of how character states are delimited and ancestral states are reconstructed (see above).
Age. Crown-group Alismatales are dated to 124-111Ma by Wikström et al. (2001), ca 128Ma by Janssen and Bremer (2004) and around 103Ma by Bremer (2000b); Magallón and Castillo (2009) suggested ca 147 Ma and 126 Ma, Bell et al. (2010) ages of (138-)122, 102(-93) Ma, and Magallón et al. (2013, 2015) suggested ages of around 122.6 Ma and 128.9 Ma respectively (see also Hertweck et al. 2015, dates at ca 125-120 Ma are in the same bailiwick); estimates were (133-)123(-97) Ma in Merckx et al. (2008a), ca 124 Ma in Givnish et al. (2018b: Ar sister), (146-)138(-130) Ma in Nauheimer et al. (2012b), 134-90 Ma in Mennes et al. (2013, Mennes et al. 2015 is similar), around 145.8 Ma in Tank et al. (2015: Table S2), ca 146 Ma in Z. Wu et al. (2014), (144.8-)132.1(-120) Ma in Eguchi and Tamura (2016) and as little as ca 91.2 Ma in Tang et al. (2016). These dates all need checking in the context of the topology suggested by Y. Luo et al. (2016).
Stockey (2006) reviewed fossils that have been placed in Alismatales; see also Araceae below. Viracarpon, common in Deccan Intertrappean beds ca 67 Ma, has 6 carpels that are fused at the centre of the fruit but are free laterally, quite long marginal styles, and one pendulous seed/carpel, may belong around here (Matsunaga et al. 2018; see also Chitaley 1954: most similar to Pandanaceae, next most similar group is Araceae). A similar set of relationships was suggested for the Mexican Operculifructus (Estrada-Ruiz & Cevallos-Ferriz 2007), that was found in Upper Cretaceous rocks ca 75 Ma (and also younger), but this has recently been moved to Cornales, where it is sister to Grubbiaceae (Hayes et al. 2018)... Z.-J. Liu et al. (2018) thought that Sinoherba ningchengensis known from Lower Cretaceous deposits ca 125 Ma in China was probably best placed around here.
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Les et al. (2003) discuss the distributions of a number of hydrophytic clades here; most of them are likely to be rather young.
Furness (2013a) optimised a number of palynological characters in Alismatales (surface sculpture, microsporogenesis, tapetum type); those connected with hypohydrophily in marine members are homoplasious. For optimisation of other characters associated with hydrophily, see Du and Wang (2014), and for granulate exine infratectum, see Doyle (2009: Aponogetonaceae, Aroideae). Sokoloff et al. (2015c) discuss and optimize the various manifestations of syncarpy in Alismatales under both Tofieldiaceae- and Araceae-basal scenarios. Relationships at the base of the tree affect how variation in features like tapetum, endosperm and carpel connation is optimized; here, as elsewhere, treat suggestions of possible apomorphies sceptically.
Ecology & Physiology. Alismatales include the only marine angiosperms that grow fully submerged, the so-called sea-grasses (see below). They also include many other aquatics and hydrophytes and plants of marshy habitats, and this may well be the ancestral condition for the group as a whole (for Araceae, see Nauheimer et al. 2012b). It is not surprising that a number of taxa lack vessels.
Economic Importance. Araceae-Lemnoideae, Potamogetonaceae, Alismataceae and Hydrocharitaceae in particular are notably serious and widespread weeds (quite common in aquatic plants), and the latter are important invaders of natural areas (Daehler 1997).
Bacterial/Fungal Associations. The absence of mycorrhizae in many Alismatales (see also Maherali et al. 2016; Brundrett 2017b) may be because many of its members grow in water, either rooted in the mud or free-floating; mycorrhizae are usually absent in such situations (e.g. Safir 1987). However, Araceae occupy a variety of habitats.
Plant-Animal Interactions. Caterpillars of Pyralidae-Schoenobiinae are found on aquatic monocots, as are larvae of Chrysomelidae-Donaciinae (Powell et al. 1999; Jolivet 1988; esp. Kölsch & Pedersen 2008); the latter, at least, are found on aquatic plants in general and so are also to be found on Nymphaeaceae, Haloragaceae, etc..
Genes & Genomes. There has been an increase in the GC content of the genome in this clade (Smarda et al. 2014). For chromosome number evolution, see Sousa and Renner (2015).
For comments on chloroplast genome arrangement and evolution, see Y. Luo et al. (2016). Chloroplast ndh genes have been mostly or all lost (or exist only as pseudogenes) four times (Ross et al. 2015; Ruhlman et al. 2015).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. The root stele is often tri- to pentarch. A number of wholly aquatic Alismatales lack vessels in any part of the plant (Cheadle 1944), and some, but not all, lack a root hypodermis (e.g. Kroemer 1903). For what is known of leaf development in Alismatales, see the Acorales page. When the leaves are petiolate, the vascular bundles are in an arc; inverted bundles are also common. Riley and Stockey (2004) describe the venation of a number of net-veined members of this order in considerable detail; such leaves usually have tertiary veins.
There are suggestions that the bract subtending the flower and the abaxial tepal may be fused or otherwise developmentally linked, so producing a hybrid organ, or the bract may be lost, and both phenomena can occur in the one genus (Buzgo 2001; Remizowa et al. 2013a, b), and it has been suggested that in some Alismatales the flowers are pseudanthial (Soltis et al. 2005; Remizowa et al. 2011). Is the pollen endexine ever lamellate (it is in Acorus)? It has been said that Alismatales, including Araceae, are the only monocots with green (chlorophyllous) embryos (Seubert 1993), although they are also known from some Amaryllidaceae-Amaryllidoideae-Amaryllideae, for example. Although endosperm is usually not well developed in seeds here, when it does occur it at least sometimes contains starch as a reserve (Dahlgren et al. 1985).
For leaf anatomy of aquatic members, see Sauvageau (1891), for pollen, see Grayum (1992), Furness and Banks (2010), for ovules, see Igersheim et al. (2001), and for seedling morphology, see Tillich (1985).
Phylogeny. Basal relationships in Alismatales were summarized by Les and Tippery (2013). Tofieldiaceae were placed here with only moderate support (Källersjö et al. 1998; Chase et al. 2000a). They have sometimes been found to be sister to the rest of the order (Graham et al. 2006, but sampling; Iles et al. 2013: support weak; Thadeo et al. 2015: including morphology; Eguchi & Tamura 2016) or sister to Araceae (Tamura et al. 2004b; X.-X. Li & Zhou 2007; Von Mering & Kadereit 2010: support weak; Ross et al. 2015: most analyses; Petersen et al. 2015a; H.-T. Li et al. 2019: support weak). In a study involving 22 taxa and 79 protein-coding plastid genes, Y. Luo et al. (2016) found strong (100% bootstrap, 1 p.p., bootstrap support lower only in anayses of combined first and second codon positions) for Tofieldiaceae sister to the rest, and this topology is followed here. However, Tamura et al. (2004a), Janssen and Bremer (2004), Chase et al. (2006), Givnish et al. (2006b, 2018a: support weaker than in Chase et al. 2006), Chase et al. (2006: strong support), Soltis et al. (2011: little support, but sampling), Nauheimer et al. (2012b), Hertwick et al. (2015) and Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016) all found Araceae to be sister to the rest of the order, and Tofieldiaceae sister to the remaining taxa. For the inclusion of Acoraceae in Alismatales in some analyses, see the monocot node.
For relationships between other Alismatales, see Les et al. (1997b: the rest of the tree here is largely based on this), also Y. Kato et al. (2003), J.-M. Chen et al. (2004a, b), G. Petersen et al. (2006c: 2 mitchondrial and 1 chloroplast genes), Liu and Li (2010), Nauheimer et al. (2012b), Iles et al. (2013), Les and Tippery (2013), L.-Y. Chen et al. (2013), Du and Wang (2014), Petersen et al. (2015a), Ross et al. (2015), Du et al. (2016: focus on aquatic taxa), and Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016: Chinese taxa), although support was not always strong. In a chloroplast analysis with good generic-level sampling these relationships were again recovered, support for the relationships between the sea-grass groups was strengthened, and support in general was strong (Ross et al. 2015), while they were also recovered in the 77-gene plastid analysis of Givnish et al. (2018b). However, the positions of Aponogetonaceae and Scheuchzeriaceae are sometimes reversed, as in Janssen and Bremer (2004) and especially H.-T. Li et al. (2019: support strong), relationships between these two families were unclear in von Mering and Kadereit (2010), while Aponogetonaceae and Scheuchzeriaceae were found to be sister taxa and in turn sister to the other members of the group in a rbcL analysis of Y. Kato et al. (2003) and also in Liu and Li (2010).
Some uncertainties remain. Thus G. Petersen et al. (2006c) did not even recover a monophyletic [Hydrocharitaceae + Alismataceae + Butomaceae], and Petersen et al. (2015a) recovered Alismataceae as sister to other core Alismatales, and in turn Acorus was sister to the combined group. The tree in Janssen and Bremer (2004) is largely similar to that below. However, authors such as L.-Y. Chen et al. (2013), Du and Wang (2014), Du et al. (2016) and Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020) have recovered a clade [Butomaceae + Alismataceae], and Butomaceae were even embedded in Hydrocharitaceae in a rbcL analysis of Y. Kato et al. (2003), but this position has not been confirmed. Von Mering and Kadereit (2010) were not sure of the exact position of Maundia, ex-Juncaginaceae. However, Maundia is usually sister to the main sea-grass clade, as in Petersen et al. (2015a), Ross et al. (2015), Du et al. (2016), etc., and for details of relationships within that clade, see below. Relationships in Baker et al. (2021: see Seed Plant Tree) are [Tofieldiaceae [Araceae [Scheuzeriaceae ...]]], but support values in the upper part of the tree are often low.
Classification. Many small families have been described in Alismatales, especially in the sea grasses, because the adaptations associated with the aquatic habitat are so striking. A more restricted circumscription of Alismatales has been suggested given the past uncertainty over the relationships of Acoraceae and Tofieldiaceae, although the two have very rarely been placed ouside the clade recently; this also entails the recognition of Potamogetonales, etc. (Les & Tippery 2013). Eguchi and Tamura (2016) suggest a largely age-based dismemberment of Alismatales.
Previous Relationships. Most of the taxa here included in Alismatales have long been recognised as being related, thus most are in Engler's (1892) Helobiae + Spathiflorae and Cronquist's (1981) and Takhtajan's (1997) Alismatidae. However, Spadiciflorae - all taxa with a spadix, i.e. Cyclanthaceae, Pandanaceae, Araceae (often including Acoraceae) and Arecaceae - have sometimes been recognised (e.g. Cronquist 1981; Goldberg 1989). These families are now placed in three immediately unrelated orders, Pandanales, Alismatales (Araceae) and Arecales, and also Acorales. The relationships of Tofieldiaceae have been unclear, although they have usually been placed in a quite different part of the monocots, having a flower that fitted into the concept of the old Liliaceae sensu latissimo (see below, also Dahlgren & Clifford 1982; Tamura 1998).
Synonymy: Alismatales Dumortier, Aponogetonales Hutchinson, Arales Dumortier, Butomales Hutchinson, Cymodoceales Nakai, Elodeales Nakai, Hydrocharitales Dumortier, Juncaginales Hutchinson, Lemnales Link, Najadales Dumortier, Orontiales J. Presl, Pistiales Richard, Posidoniales Nakai, Potamogetonales Dumortier, Ruppiales Nakai, Scheuchzeriales B. Boivin, Tofieldiales Reveal & Zomlefer, Vallisneriales Nakai, Zosterales Nakai -- Alismatidae Takhtajan, Aridae Takhtajan - Aropsida Bartling, Hydrocharitopsida Bartling, Najadiopsida Hoffmannsegg & Link
TOFIELDIACEAE Takhtajan - Back to Alismatales
?Mycorrhizae; steroidal saponins, chelidonic acid +; vessels?; fibres mixed with phloem; sieve tube plastids also with polygonal crystals; endodermal cells with U-shaped thickenings [distribution around here?]; stomata anomocytic; also prismatic crystals +; leaves two-ranked, ventralized isobifacial [oriented edge on to the stem], (unifacial); inflorescence bracts +, (flower single - Isidrogalvia); floral bracts +, ± foliaceous (0), calyculus below individual flowers (some Tofieldia 0); T free (basally connate), with one trace [Tofieldia], (median member of outer whorl adaxial - Tofieldia; A (9-12 - Pleea; adnate to base of P; basally connate), introrse to latrorse, (filaments with three traces - some Isidrogalvia); microsporogenesis simultaneous; pollen di(trichotomo)sulcate (monosulcate - Isidrogalvia); septal or tepal nectaries +; G stipitate, carpel periphery completely postgenitally fused, (placentation parietal), (style + - Isidrogalvia); ovules 5-many/carpel, ana-campylotropous, (unitegmic), (nucellar cap +), hypostase +, integumentary obturator +; embryo sac also bisporic, eight nucleate [Allium type], (with long chalazal extension), antipodal cells not multinucleate; fruit also a septicidal capsule ["ventricidal" capsule], (P persistent); seeds with terminal appendages, obliquely stacked; phlobaphene +, tegmen thin; ?embryo; n = (14) 15 (16), x = 15 (?16, ?14), chromosomes 0.9-2.5 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.188-)2.037(-22.016) pg; radicle 0?.
3-5[list]/31: Isidrogalvia (14). S.E. U.S.A., N. South America, N. temperate (map: see Hultèn 1961; Meusel et al. 1965; Hultén & Fries 1986; Fl. N. Am. 26: 2002; Campbell 2010; Campbell & Dorr 2013). [Photo - Flowers] [Photo - Flowers.]
Age. Crown-group Tofieldiaceae are dated to ca 100 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004); other age estimates are 80-75 Ma (Wikström et al. 2001) and (95-)64, 61(-35) Ma (Bell et al. 2010).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. The leaves of Tofieldia may lack palisade mesophyll (Kao 1989). Branching in Tofieldiaceae needs study. Remizowa et al. (2005a) suggest that the first two leaves of axillary shoots in Tofieldia (the prophyll and the next leaf) are both adaxial; this would be very unusual, if true. Generalised comparisons between the calyculus of Tofieldiaceae, made up of two or three connate scales, with the spathe of Hydrocharitaceae and pseudowhorls of bracts in Alismataceae have been made (Remizowa and Sokoloff 2003; Remizowa et al. 2006b). Remizowa et al. (2010a) found that the calyculus is usually supplied by three vascular traces, but in Tofieldia pusilla it is basal on the pedicel and supplied by a single trace - part bract and part calyculus?
The nectaries of Tofieldiaceae may be unique. They are triradiate, being borne on the inner bases of the connate carpellary stipes (Remizowa et al. 2006a and references), and so appear to be the perfect "intermediate" between the septal nectaries found in many other monocots and the nectary-less condition.
For additional general information, see Ambrose (1975, 1980), Zomlefer (1997b), Tamura (1998 - as Nartheciaceae), and Campbell (2010), for the single-flowered Harperocallis, described from Florida in 1968 but recently synonymized in Isidrogalvia, c.f. McDaniel (1968) and Remizowa et al. (2011b), for sieve tube plastid type, see Behnke (2000, 2003), for inflorescence and floral morphology, see Gatin (1920), Remizowa et al. (2006a, 2010b, 2013b), for ovary morphology, see Sterling (1979), for embryology, see Sokolowska-Kulczycka (1980), and for ovule and endosperm development, see Holloway and Friedman (2008).
Phylogeny. Pleea is sister to the rest of the family (Tamura et al. 2004b; Azuma & Tobe 2011; Iles et al. 2103). It is the only genus that has two stamens opposite members of the outer tepal whorl and single stamens opposite members of the inner whorl - as in a few Alismataceae, Butomaceae and Hydrocharitaceae (Azuma & Tobe 2011). There is a fair amount of phylogenetic structure in the rest of the family, but little in the way of morphology to support the clades. L.-Y. Chen et al. (2013) found that Isidrogalvia was embedded in Petrosaviaceae, which is rather remarkable (they did not comment on its position), but Y. Luo et al. (2016) thought that contamination or misidentification was likely.
Classification. For a checklist of the family, see World Checklist of Monocots.
Previous Relationships. Tofieldiaceae have often been included in other families. Dahgren et al. (1985) placed them, along with representatives of Nartheciaceae and Petrosaviaceae, in Melanthiaceae (here Liliales), Tamura (1998) placed them in Petrosaviaceae (along with Nartheciaceae), and Cronquist (1981) considered Tofieldia to be an archaic genus of his broadly-drawn Liliaceae. Tofieldiaceae were included in Melanthiales by Takhtajan (1997).
[Araceae [[Alismataceae [Butomaceae + Hydrocharitaceae]] [Scheuchzeriaceae [Aponogetonaceae [Juncaginaceae [Maundiaceae [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]]]]]]]: tapetum amoeboid.
Age. This node is (132-)118.5(-100.5) Ma (Givnish et al. 2016b).
ARACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Cyanogenic glucoside triglochinin, flavone C-glycosides +; root hairs from unmodified rhizodermal cells, root hypodermis with dimorphic cells; sieve tube plastids also with starch; petiole bundles scattered; stomata unorientated, also anomo- ["basal" genera] and tetracytic; shoots consisting of reiterated sympodial modules; leaves spiral, with petiole and blade; inflorescence scapose, inflorescence bract large [= spathe]; flowers densely spicate [= spadix], sessile, small; flowering period up to weeks, floral bracts, bracteoles 0; flowers 2-3-merous, in latter case median member of outer whorl of T adaxial, T ± hooded, with single trace, free; (microsporogenesis simultaneous); pollen (often starchy), ektexine +; septal nectaries 0; carpels connate, (basally) ascidiate, fusion usu. congenital, loculus with mucilage [usu. secretory trichomes], style at most short, stigma also wet; ovules ± unvascularized, nucellar cap + (0); fruit a berry; testa multiplicative, >5 cells across, often parenchymatous/exotesta and/or endotesta and mesotesta lignified, tegmen collapsed; x = 16; endosperm +/0, ?cellular; x = 7, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.254-)2.251(-19.989) pg, cotyledon not photosynthetic, radicle +, (collar rhizoids or collar roots +).
144[list, to subfamilies, some tribes]/3,645 - 4,550, 5,422, 6,500 (Boyce & Croat 2016 - The Überlist of Araceae) other estimates... - 8 subfamilies below. Mostly tropical, but relatively few in Africa-Madagascar and Australia.
Age. Crown-group Araceae have been dated to (132-)122(-112) Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b); other dates include 98-89 Ma (Wikström et al. 2001), ca 128 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004) and (114-)89, 79(-55) Ma (Bell et al. 2010).
Distinctive pollen assigned to Pothoideae-Monstereae has been found in Early Cretaceous deposits of the late Barremian-early Aptian of some 120-110 Ma old in Portugal (Friis et al. 2004); other pollen types that may also be Araceae were found at the same place (see also Hesse & Zetter 2007). However, Mayoa portugallica, one fossil involved, may be an individual of Laganella, an euglenid alga... (Hoffmann & Zetter 2010). The site is now, alas, developed.
[Gymnostachydoideae + Orontioideae]: stomata parallel; shoots branching from the axil of the foliage leaf outside the inflorescence spathe; parallel veins in 2(+) orders; tectum ± continuous, ovules straight, 1-2/carpel; seedling with cataphylls.
Age. The age for this node was estimated as (115-)96(-73) Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b).
1. Gymnostachydoideae Bogner & Nicolson
Cauline endodermis 0; foliar vascular bundles with fibre sheaths and girders; leaves two-ranked, no petiole/blade distinction, linear, margins minutely toothed, venation parallel; inflorescence branched, green "spathe" at each branching point, spadices many; flowers 2-merous [outer pair of T lateral]; floral vasculature forms a basal complex; G 1, unilocular, ascidiate, loculus lacking secretory trichomes; ovule 1/carpel, apical, unitegmic, nucellus apex exposed, integument ca 4 cells across, parietal tissue ca 4 cells across; seed coat 0; endosperm chlorophyllous, ?development, copious, with starch, embryo chlorophyllous; n = 12; collar rhizoids 0.
1/1: Gymnostachys anceps. East Australia (map: from Mayo et al. 1997).
2. Orontioideae Mayo, Bogner & Boyce
Flavonols +, glycoflavones 0; cauline endodermis + (0); vessels 0; (collenchyma in cortical bands), bundle-associated fibre strands +/0; (laticifers + - Orontium); biforine raphides + (0 - Lysichiton); (stomata anomocytic); leaf blade with midrib (0 - Orontium); inflorescence bract large, coloured [spathe] (0); flowers 2-3-merous; (A also ventrifixed); ovary inferior (not - Orontium), secretory trichomes 0 - Symplocarpus; ovules ± basal to apical, (hemianatropous - Orontium), outer integument 22+ cells across, (lobed - Symplocarpus), inner integument 5-10 cells across, funicular obturator; tegmen also multiplicative, endosperm nuclear, ± 0; n = 13-15.
3/6. Temperate East Asia, W. and E. North America (map: from Mayo et al. 1997).
Age. The age for crown-group Orontioideae is estimated at (77-)53(-28)Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b).
The fossil Spixiarum kipea, from the Crato formation in Brazil, is dated to 115-112 Ma, so if it were included in the crown group (a possibility: Coiffard et al. 2013b) both its age and locality would be rather discordant. However, fossil Orontium is reported from rocks of Campanian-Maastrichtian age (late Cretaceous) 70.6-65.5 Ma from Coahuila, Mexico (Bogner et al. 2007; Estrada-Ruiz et al. 2011) and fossil Symplocarpus (as Albertarum pueri) with perfect, tepalline flowers and a stout, conical, stigma/style from late Campanian rocks ca 72 Ma in Alberta (Bogner et al. 2005).
Synonymy: Orontiaceae Bartling
[Lemnoideae [[Pothoideae + Monsteroideae] [Lasioideae [Zamioculcadoideae + Aroideae]]]]: raphides twinned [?level]; nucellar tissue disappears during ovule maturation, endothelium +; endosperm ± cellular.
Age. The age for this node was estimated as (113-)104(-93)Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b).
Fossils placed in stem Lemnoideae are known from the Early to Middle Campanian (ca 79 Ma) in Egypt (Coiffard & Mohr 2018).
3. Lemnoideae Engler
Floating aquatic herbs; roots (0-)1-5, unbranched, hairs 0, monarch; collenchyma and bundle fibres 0; vessels 0; (prophyll 0); biforine raphides + (0); stomata anomocytic [on adaxial surface of thalli only; ?cyclocytic], (always open); plant made up of thalloid stem-leaf units; primary vein alone (no vascular tissue), two (one) series of axillary buds, (branching "terminal"); (spathe 0), peduncle and spadix not discernable; one perfect (plus one staminate) flower; P 0; A 1, (monothecal - Wolffia), wall with secondary parietal layers not dividing; pollen grains tricellular, mixed with raphides, globose to ellipsoid, ulcerate, spiny; G 1, stigma funneliform; ovules 1-7/carpel, (straight), (outer integument to 4 cells across), parietal tissue to 4 cells across; embryo sac bisporic [chalazal dyad], 8-nucleate [Allium-type]; fruit achenial; seed elliptical to ovate, ± ribbed, operculate [operculum tegmic], testa ca 4 cells across; endosperm starchy [?all], copious, chalazal haustorium +, embryo undifferentiated; n = (15, 18) 20(-22), extensive polyploidy and dysploidy; chromosomes 0.1-1.7 µm long, 1C value = 0.15-1.63 pg/150-1881 Mb; two genome duplications; plastid infA gene lost; hypocotyl 0, primary root 0, cataphylls 0.
5/37: Wolffia (11). World-wide (map: Hultén 1962; Meusel et al. 1965; Landolt 1986: "absence" in tropical America and Africa may be due to undercollecting; Fl. Austral. 39: 2011; Tippery & Les 2020: fig. 2:2). [Photo - Wolffia.]
Age. Crown-group Lemnoideae are estimated to be (88-)73(-59)Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b).
Limnobiophyllum scutatum, ca 66 Ma, has been assigned to stem node Lemnoideae (Iles et al. 2015). The leaves have well-developed venation, and the pollen grains are porate and spiny (Bogner 2009).
Synonymy: Lemnaceae Gray, nom. cons., Wolffiaceae Bubani
[[Pothoideae + Monsteroideae] [Lasioideae [Zamioculcadoideae + Aroideae]]]: (velamen +) [?here]; (vessels 0); shoots branching from the axil of the penultimate foliage leaf outside the inflorescence spathe; leaf blade with midrib, secondary veins ± palmate, fine venation reticulate, base with lateral (auriculate) flanges, (ligule +), petiole apically pulvinate; inflorescence bract large, coloured [= spathe]; (calcium oxalate crystals, inc. raphides, mixed with pollen); (endosperm ± 0, cotyledons green); seedling cataphylls +/0.
Age. The age for this node was estimated to be (107-)97(-87) Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b) and (148.2-)111.1, 87.1(-57.1)/(132.2-)105(-82.2) Ma by Canal et al. (2018: mean = 111.14 Ma!, 2019).
[Pothoideae + Monsteroideae]: Stem usu. aerial, plants (hemi)epiphytes, climbers; (separate stem cortical vascular system +); (vessels in stem); styloids +; fibres ensheathing bundles; stomata oriented randomly [?level]; leaf blade elliptical to complex, petiole apically geniculate; crystals often surrounding the embryo.
Age. The age for this node was estimated at (94-)81(-68)Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b) and (121.1-)93.8, 68.5(-29.5)/(113.2-)86.4(-51.3) Ma by Canal et al. (2018, 2019).
4. Pothoideae Engler
Spathe not enclosing spadix, erect to ± reflexed; placentation basal/parietal, (with apical septum); outer integument 6-8 cells across, inner integument 6-8 cells across, parietal tissue? ca 1 cell across; (micropylar megaspore germinates); spathe persistent in fruit; (testa not multiplicative), (inner integument to 8 cells across); (interstitial telomere repeats +); (seedling internodes long; very short unifacial part of cotyledon).
3/900. Tropical America, Madagascar, Indo-Malesia and N.E. Australia (map: from Mayo et al. 1997).
Age. Crown-group Pothoideae are some (77-)65(-56) Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b).
4a. Potheae Engler
Climbers; main axis monopodial; (trichosclereids + - Pothos, Pothoidium), leaves 2-ranked, petiole often flattened, foliaceous and geniculate apically; inflorescences terminal on branches, (branch branching, inflorescences several - Pothoidium); flowers (2-)3-merous, (pedicels +); (T connate); style ± 0, stigma umbonate; ovule 1/carpel, epitropous, swelling; endosperm 0; n = 12.
1/75: Pothos. Indo-Malesia, Madagascar and N.E. Australia (map: see above, from Mayo et al. 1997).
Synonymy: Pothaceae Rafinesque
4b. Anthurieae Engler
Terrestrial herbs, climbers, epiphytes; leaves spiral, petiole geniculate at apex, blade with reticulate venation; flowers 2-merous; pollen 3-4 porate (0, 2); style usually short, (stylar canal occupied by intertwined trichomes), (stigma umbonate); ovules 1-2(-few)/carpel, apotropous; berries usually dangling; endosperm copious, with starch, (chlorophyllous); n = 10, 12, 14, 15.
1/950(-?3,500: Anthurium. Tropical America, the Antilles (map: see above, from Mayo et al. 1997). [Photo - Flowers, Fruits.]
5. Monsteroideae Schott
(Fibres only capping bundles); H- or T-shaped trichosclereids +; pollen inaperturate, (ektexine dissected/0); style with abundant trichosclereids; ovules 1-4(-many)/carpel, often basal, (hemianatropous); seeds >10/fruit, often embedded in mucilage; x = 15.
11/385 (?700). Tropical, but only 4 spp. Africa.
Age. The age of crown-group Monsteroideae is (64-)55(-47) Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b) or ca 68.8 Ma (Zuluaga et al. 2019).
The viny Rhodospathodendron tomlinsonii was described from Intertrappean Indian deposits of ca 66 Ma (Bonde 2000).
5A. Spathiphylleae Engler
Terrestrial herbs, habitats shady; trichosclereids "small", in bundles; spathe partly adnate to spadix; flowers 3-merous; (T connate); pollen multiaperturate, exine striate/polyplicate; spathe marcescent; endosperm +.
1/42. Tropical America, few spp. E. Malesia to the Solomon Islands.
Age. The age of crown-group Spathiphylleae is ca 34.2 Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b) or 29.9/27 Ma (Zuluaga et al. 2019).
[Heteropsideae + Monstereae]: trichosclereids "large", separate; flowers 2-merous; T 0; pollen zonate, hamburger-shaped, sulcus extended/encircling; spathe deciduous, abscising; seeeds 1-many/fruit; endosperm 0.
5B. Heteropsideae Engler
Lianes, ± epiphytic; (trichosclereids 0 - Heteropsis).
4/126: Rhodospatha (75), Stenospermation (36). Tropical America.
Age. Crown-group Heteropsidae are ca 21.6 Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b) or ca 38.6 Ma (Zuluaga et al. 2019).
5C. Monstereae Engler
(Climbers +), ± epiphytic; (trichosclereids 0 - Anadendrum); (leaf blades pinnatifid/perforate); (embryo curved - Monstera).
7/217: Rhaphidophora (100), Monstera (40), Scindapsus (30). Tropics, few African.
Age. Crown-group Monstereae are ca 29.7 Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b) or ca 38.4 Ma (Zuluaga et al. 2019).
Synonymy: Monsteraceae Vines
[Lasioideae [Zamioculcadoideae + Aroideae]]: plant tuberous or rhizomatous.
Age. The age of this node is estimated at some (101-)90(-80) Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b), however, stem Lasioideae are dated to around 48.7 Ma (Iles et al. 2015) or (97.5-)87.7, 72.9(-59.2)/(98.3-)88.6(-80.1) Ma by Canal et al. (2018, 2019 respectively).
6. Lasioideae Engler
(Rooted aquatics), often prickly; sieve tube plastids with a little starch; fibres ensheathing or capping bundles; petiole long, warty, aculeate, or strikingly coloured, ± geniculate apically; spathe often spirally twisted, inflorescence flowering basipetally; P (0 [Pycnospatha], 4-9); A (-12), anthers with oblique pore-like slits; pollen grains lacking starch, sulcus with lamellate ectexine and thick bilayered endexine [outer: flakes or lamellae; inner: spongy]; G 1 [2-3(-16)], 1 (-6) locular, placentation various, inc. basal-diffuse; ovules 1-2(-many - esp. Cyrtosperma)/loculus, apotropous, ana-campylotropous, ?parietal tissue, ?endothelium, hypostase +, podium +; seed surface lamellate or warty (not Cyrtosperma), exotesta papillate, inner part of mesotesta and endotesta both lignified; endosperm thin (0), embryo chlorophyllous, curved; n = 13.
10/58. Pantropical (Africa - Lasimorpha) (map: from Mayo et al. 1997).
Age. Crown-group Lasioideae can be dated to some (38-)26(-15) Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b).
Late Campanian pollen from Eastern Siberia (Hoffmann & Zetter 2010) and Middle Eocene seeds ca 48.7 Ma from the Princeton Chert in British Columbia (Smith & Stockey 2003) have been identified as Lasioideae.
Synonymy: Dracontiaceae Salisbury, Lasiaceae Vines
[Zamioculcadoideae + Aroideae]: plants monoecious (dioecious); spathe differentiated into tube plus blade, spadix differentiated into zones with staminate and carpelate flowers, (zone of sterile female flowers, sometimes much enlarged, in between), flowers opening simultaneously in each zone, flowering period usu. 2-4 days; flowers imperfect; pollen inaperturate; (cotyledonary hypophyll expanded, flattened, photosynthetic), (radicle 0, hypocotyl 0, roots break through body of cotyledon).
Age. This node can be dated to (97-)87(-77) Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b).
7. Zamioculcadoideae Bogner & Hesse
Plant rhizomatous; leaves compound, (simple - Stylochaeton), fine venation reticulate, pulvinate along petiole/base of petiolules (0 - Stylochaeton); staminate flowers: A (connate), (introrse); pollen also encircling sulcate, columellae winding and forming a sort of internal tectum as well as the external tectum, endexine lamellate, intine thin, (calcium oxalate crystals mixed with pollen); pistillode +; carpelate flowers: G , placentation axile; ovule 1/carpel, ascending, ?parietal tissue; n = (14), 17.
3/21. Africa, Liberia to Kenya and Natal (map: from Mayo et al. 1997).
Age. The age of crown-group Zamioculcadoideae was estimated at (42-)23(-6)Ma by Nauheimer et al. (2012b).
8. Aroideae Arnott
Habit various, (epiphytes); (plant monopodial); (glucomannans +); laticifers +, articulated, (anastomosing), (0); collenchyma in cortical bands or bundle-associated strands (0); fibres variously associated with bundles; biforine raphides + [H-shaped in T.S., wall thick, except for papillae at the two ends, unlignified, cell contents mucilaginous] (0); leaves very variable, (blade developing basipetally from hyperphyll/hypophyll junction), (parallel veins of different orders), (vein endings free), (foliar extrafloral nectaries - Philodendron, etc.); (inflorescences several together), (spadix with sterile zones); P 0; staminate flowers: A connate (not - Philodendron), connectives thick, (anthers introrse), (dehiscing by pores); pollen (mixed with raphides), atectate, (spiny, smooth, striate, etc.), (in tetrads), ectexine thin [pollen not resistant to acetolysis], sporopollenin 0 or +, wall with polysaccharides, endexine bilayed, (thick, spongy), intine massive; pistillode +; carpelate flowers: staminodes +, (G 1?, [2-4(-47)], placentation parietal, apical, basal, (styles connate), (stylar canals as many as carpels - Philodendron), stigma various; ovules 1-many/carpel, (straight), parietal tissue 0/1-3 cells across, ovule base broad, massive [Theriophonium]; (testa not multiplicative - Arisaema); (endosperm chlorophyllous), (with starch), chalazal haustorium +, unicellular, (storage cotyledons), (embryo chlorophyllous); n = 7+, 13, 14, 17 common; plastid transmission biparental [Zantedeschia]; (cotyledon sheath photosynthetic, bifacial [e.g. Colocasia, Philodendron, Xanthosoma], even leafy; collar rhizoids +).
75/2580: Amorphophallus (220), Arisaema (170), Alocasia (140), Schismatoglottis (120), Bucephalandra (70), Cryptocoryne (70). Tropical and warm temperate (the latter - Arum and relatives) (map: from Mayo et al. 1997, distribution attributable to Calla alone in green). [Photo - Flowers.]
Age. Crown-group Aroideae are estimated to be some (92-)82(-73) Ma (Nauheimer et al. 2012b) or (83.5-)73, 60.9(-55.9)/89.7-)79.2(-65.4) Ma (Canal et al. 2018, 2019: sampling).
Macrofossils apparently of Araceae-Aroideae, although with a loosely reticulate tectum, have been discovered in deposits 120-110 Ma in Portugal (Friis et al. 2010, 2011). Afrocasia (Araceae) from deposits in Egypt ca 73 Ma has been placed in crown-group Aroideae (Coiffard & Mohr 2016, 2018).
(Epiphytic), plant aromatic; carpelate flowers: staminode +; funicle long.
3/716: Philodendron (560 [?700-1,000]), Homalomena (140). South Mexico to tropical South America, the Antilles, South China to Malesia.
Synonymy: Philodendraceae Vines
(Submerged aquatic); (pollen in tetrads); ovule 1, basal.
7/339: Xanthosoma (204), Chlorospatha (68). Neotropical, South China to West Malesia (Hapaline).
Synonymy: Caladiaceae Salisbury
Synonymy: Arisaraceae Rafinesque, Callaceae Bartling, Colocasiaceae Vines, Cryptocorynaceae J. Agardh, Pistiaceae C. Agardh
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Mayoa pollen grains that look very like those of Monsteroideae have been found in Early Cretaceous deposits of the late Barremian-early Aptian of some 120-110 Ma in Portugal (Friis et al. 2004; see also Hesse & Zetter 2007). Although the identity of some of these grains has been questioned (Hoffmann & Zetter 2010), macrofossils apparently of staminate flowers belonging to Aroideae (a decidedly non-basal clade) have been discovered in slightly younger deposits ca 112 Ma and also in Portugal (Friis et al. 2010: c.f. pollen; Friis et al. 2011; Isles et al. 2015). Thus the fossil record would suggest that all eight subfamilies of Araceae may have diverged in the Cretaceous. See also Wilde at al. (2005), Bogner et al. (2007), and Herrera et al. (2008: leaf fossils).
Molecular estimates of diversification are rather younger than those based on these Portugese fossils, but even they suggest separation of the subfamilies before the K/P boundary, early evolution in the family possibly occuring in Laurasia (Nauheimer et al. 2012b: table S4, esp. S5 with 140+ dated nodes and further discussion of diversification in the family). If Limnobiophyllum scutatum is stem group Lemnoideae (Iles et al. 2015 think that it definitely goes there), much diversification in Araceae could be Palaeogene since the fossil is early Caenozoic, only some 66 Ma - but not "would be Palaeogene", since of course the age of a stem group may have little to do with that of the crown group associated with it.
Givnish et al. (2018b) and P. Soltis et al. (2019) suggest that there has been an acceleration of speciation in the [[Pothoideae + Monsteroideae] [Lasioideae [Zamioculcadoideae + Aroideae]]] clade, the second group proposing that fleshy fruit (a family-level apomorphy) and the epiphytic habit (common in this clade) limited dispersal and promoted diversification...
Aquatic Araceae have a rich fossil history. Although Limnobiophyllum seems morphologically "intermediate" between Lemnoideae and Pistia, in Aroideae (Stockey et al. 1997), those two groups are not at all close in molecular phylogenies. The palynomorph Pandaniidites, spiny and monoporate, is associated with flowers of Limnobiophyllum known from North American rocks up to 70 Ma that span the Cretaceous-Caenozoic boundary (Hotton et al. 1994; see Stockey et al. 1997; Stockey 2006), and this is quite like the pollen of Lemnoideae (Bogner 2009). The pollen of Pistia is dramatically different, being inaperturate, lacking sporopollenin, and having a plicate-undulate surface (Bogner 2009). There are yet other unrelated fossil floating aquatics in the family (Stockey et al. 2007). The recently-described Aquaephyllum auriculatum from rocks ca 67 Ma of the Crato formation in Argentina is sister to Lemnoideae in morphological phylogenetic analyses, Pistia and some other fossil aquatic Araceae are in turn sister to that clade, and the whole lot are embedded in Aroideae (Gallego et al. 2014; some analyses in Stockey et al. 2016b). Aquaephyllum has a peltate petiolate lamina with a crenate margin and veins proceeding to the margin, and it is difficult to know what to make of it, and it is placed apart from all other aquatic Araceae in some analyses in Stockey et al. (2016b); interestingly, Pandaniidites is known from these Crato sediments. In general, all the aquatic taxa tend to group together in morphological analyses, parallel evolution of adaptations to the aquatic habitat overwhelming signals of other relationships (Stockey et al. 2016b). Both Lemnoideae and Pistia are quite old, the latter being perhaps 90-76 Ma (Renner & Zhang 2004) - older than some estimates for the age of Lemnoideae (see above).
For the ages of some intercontinental disjunctions within Lemnoideae, see Les et al. (2003). It has been estimated that Alocasia, centred in Borneo, diversified ca 13.5 or 19.3 Ma (stem group ages are ca 10 Ma more), and there were many subsequent dispersal events through the whole Southeast Asian/Malesian region (Nauheimer et al. 2012a: m.l. trees with little support). The speciose Philodendron subgenus Philodendron, largely epiphytic, started major diversification ca 12 Ma, perhaps associated with the uplift of the Andes, the other two clades in the genus, terrestrial and vining respectively, are similar in ages but much less speciose (Canal et al. 2018), however, Caddick et al. (2019) suggest rather earlier start of diversification at around (32.1-)24.7(-17.8) My; both give several other ages for clades within the genus.
Araceae are the fifth most speciose family in Amazonian forests (Cardoso et al. 2017).
Ecology & Physiology. See Croat (1990, 1991) for life forms and ecology in Araceae, while Schuyler (1984) discusses classifications of growth forms of aquatic species - largely unecessary (Cook 1996). The original habitat for the family is likely to have been more or less marshy (Nauheimer et al. 2012b).
Climbers/lianes and epiphytes - not exclusive categories here (see also Apocynaceae) - are notably common in Pothoidaeae and Monsteroideae, particularly in the former; all told, about 570 species of Araceae are climbers (Gentry 1991, ca 400 species in the New World; see also Benzing 1990), and they are root climbers. Skototropism, the movement of the seedling to dark areas, i.e. where there might be a tree trunk to climb, rather than the reverse, phototropism, movement from dark to light, is known from Araceae (Strong & Ray 1975). The attachment of Syngonium podophyllum (Aroideae-Caladieae) to its support is largely mediated by root hairs which initially produce a mucilaginous substance which hardens and attaches the root to the surface, later the walls of the root hairs break down into spirals (= helical crack root hairs) that are probably effective energy-dissipating units like tendrils - and as with tendrils, the direction of the spiral may reverse (X. Yang & Deng 2016: see also Orchidaceae, Posidoniaceae). Climbing Araceae are often strongly heteroblastic, in this case the leaves of a plant in the climbing phase are notably smaller and sometimes simpler than when it is reproductive. Indeed, the shingle-leaf syndrome in which the climbing form of the plant is characterised by more or less sessile leaves closely adpressed to the trunk/branch of the host plant/phorophyte is common in geners of climbing Araceae like Monstera, Pothos and Rhaphidophora (Zona 2020). Frequently the plant is heterophyllous, the climbing form changing into a reproductive phase with more conventional leaves (heteroblasty, Zona 2020), although in some taxa the plant is homophyllous, the shingle-leaf form persisting during reproduction, perhaps reflecting neoteny (Boyce & Bogner 2000). Hemiepiphytic Araceae quite commonly have positive root pressures, and this is also a feature of climbers, perhaps reducing the dangers of irreversible cavitation (Fisher et al. 1997), however, embolism formation and refilling may controlled by the activity of living cells around the vessels (Knipfer et al. 2016) and/or lipid surfactants in the xylem that i.a. coat nanobubbles, so preventing the formation of fully-fledged embolisms (Schenk et al. 2017). For epiphytes in Araceae, most of which are in Anthurium (ca 2/3 of its species), see Kress (1989), Holtum et al. (2007), Zotz (2013) and Reimuth and Zotz (2020), and they are also common in Philodendron subgenus Philodendron (Canal et al. 2018); a number of these epiphytes, e.g. in sectionPachyneurium, trap litter (Zona & Christenhusz 2015). Interestingly, in Anthurium endemism is highest in the central Andes, and Reimuth and Zotz (2020) note that the median range size of the epiphytic species is more than eight times that of the terrestrial species, although the altitudinal ranges of the two are similar (similar range disparities are common, but not universal, in epiphytes).
In groups like Orchidaceae and Bromeliaceae crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) is associated with the epiphytic habit, but not in Araceae, which tend to live in moister habitats than members of those families. The only known CAM species in the family is Zamioculcas zamiifolia, a ground-dwelling plant of drier habitats (Holtum et al. 2007).
Rheophytic Schismatoglottidae (Aroideae) are notably diverse in Borneo, Boyce and Wong (2019) noting that some 149 described species of this subtribe were rheophytes, overall, perhaps one third of the aroid flora of the island (and 23 genera of Schismatoglottidae are rheophytes restricted to the island). Rheophytes are plants growing in flowing water, or in places where there is flowing water at some times of the year, whether on waterfalls or along the sides of streams (Boyce & Wong 2019; see van Steenis 1981, 1987 and references for a general treatment). The rheophytic habit in Schismatoglottidae has evolved several times; some rheophytic species are restricted to a single stream (Wong 2013). Wong (2013) discussed features that might be adaptations to the rheophytic habit, including the ability of the shoot to break off from the root system when the water flow becomes too strong; roots develop both from the rootstock and from the shoot, wherever it ends up downstream. Rheophytic taxa also have a distinctive ligule and seeds (see below).
Lemnoideae are widespread in aquatic ecosystems, and Spirodela in particular efficently takes up nitrogen, including in the form of ammonia, from polluted systems - aside from having 15-45% protein dry weight, comparable with soybeans and alfafa, it can produce about 50% dry weight of starch, depending on the conditions (Cheng & Stomp 2005. Ziegler et al. (2014) also discuss the speed of plant growth in Lemnoideae, the fastest in embryophytes, with a doubling time of as little at 1.34 days (as frond number or biomass, and varying at the strain rather than species level) under standardized culture conditions. Roots in those Lemnoideae that have them function more as sea anchors than as absorbtive organs; they neither branch nor have root hairs (An et al. 2019) and may be sticky, perhaps also helping in stabilization or in attaching the plant to birds and so aiding in vegetative long distance dispersal (Cross 2017); nutrient uptake is via the lower surface of the frond (An et al. 2019 and references). An et al. (2019) note the increase in number of disease-resistance genes by tandem duplication in Spirodela - potentially noxious microorganisms are may be all around the plant in the aquatic habitat - and, as in Zostera, the loss of a number of gene families involved in life on land.Pistia (Aroideae) can also be dominant in lakes, etc., where it is an important aquatic weed.
Many Araceae are plants of shaded conditions, and net-veined leaves and fleshy fruits are associated with this habitat (Givnish et al. 2005).
It has been suggested (e.g. Hejnowicz & Bartlott 2005; esp. Claudel et al. 2019) that the mottling and sculpturing of the surfaces of the petioles that is quite common in Amorphophallus, especially in Malesian species with larger leaves, may be protective mimicry. This mottling, etc., makes the petioles look as if they are covered with lichens and the like, and so appear to be tree trunks. As a result they are avoided by animals; without such defences, animals might crash into the petioles (Claudel et al. 2019), which are not that strong (Hejnowicz & Bartlott 2005, see also under Vegetative Variation). This is not easy to test, alack.
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal.
Gibernau (2003, 2011, 2016) and Gottsberger (2016a) summarize information on pollinators, while Chouteau et al. (2008) looked at possible connections between pollination devices and life form and habitat in the family. Important elements in pollination mechanisms in Araceae are the morphology of the infloresecnce, the nature of the scent it produces (for osmophores, see Gonçalves-Sousa et al. 2017) and the occurrence of thermogenesis, and these three elements interact in pollination systems that generally involve insects of one sort or another. Diáz Jiménez et al. (2019) recently reviewed pollination mechanisms in Araceae with perfect flowers; the inflorescences tended to remain open longer than in Aroideae, but as with other Araceae, beetles, flies and bees were the main pollinators. For a discussion on the evolution of the distinctive pollen that characterises most Aroideae, see Hesse (2006b).
The spathe of Aroideae is usually more or less differentiated into tubular and blade-like portions, although it may be undifferentiated and then more or less spreading. Sterile female (?sometimes male - see Low et al. 2016) flowers may be at the very bottom of the spadix, then female flowers, then sterile male flowers, then male flowers, and then there is a sometimes much elongated sterile portion, or all flowers may be perfect. The fertile flowers may be more or less enclosed by the sometimes inflated tubular portion of the spathe (= kettle), mostly obviously in Aroideae. Pollinators of Aroideae, mostly flies and beetles, attracted by the color of the blade of the spathe, the smell, the heat, or even the dangling apical portion of the spadix (flies: e.g. some Arisaema) may be temporarily trapped inside the tubular basal portion of the spathe by hairs, radiating sterile flowers, etc., but they are usually released when the staminate flowers open and they get covered with pollen as they leave (see Bröderbauer et al. 2012). There is a variety of traps, and they have evolved at least ten times (Bröderbauer et al. 2012; see also Delpino 1873). In most situations the pollinators are not rewarded and while they are trapped they also deposit pollen (Chartier et al. 2014a).
Thermogenesis has been detected in the inflorescences of a number of Araceae (e.g. Meeuse & Raskin 1988; Skubatz 2014; Gottsberger 2016a; Milet-Pinheiro et al. 2017; Diáz Jiménez et al. 2019). It is caused both by proteins that uncouple the components of the glycolytic pathway and by the mediation of an alternative oxidase, the net result being that glycolysis results in heat, not energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate, and rates of respiration can be very high. The spadix may become warm at particular times of the day, photoperiodicity being involved, too, and the trigger may be in the staminate flowers (Meeuse & Raskin 1988; Gibernau et al. 2005; Watling et al. 2006; Onda et al. 2008; Barthlott et al. 2008 and references; Chouteau et al. 2009; Seymour 2010). There is biphasic thermogenesis in Schismatoglottis calyptrata marking the opening of the staminate and carpelate flowers and it is normally the sterile spadix that becomes hot (Hoe et al. 2018). The heat may volatilize compounds that attract pollinators, and/or provide a warm roost for them inside the spathe. Thus temperatures reach 200 above ambient in some species of Xanthosoma, a large genus that is thought to be predominantly pollinated by these beetles (Milet-Pinheiro et al. 2017 and references), and over 30oC above ambient in Xanthosoma robustum when the plant is kept at 10oC (Meeuse & Raskin 1988). In at least some species of Philodendron the staminate flowers are the source of the heat, although not all species in the genus are thermogenic (Gonçalves-Souza et al. 2017; Barbosa et al. 2018).
As mentioned, smell is important, indeed, Diáz Jiménez et al. (2019) consider variation in scent bouquets to be key to understanding pollination mechanisms, at least in Araceae with perfect flowers. More or less unpleasant (to us) smells are frequent in araceous inflorescences, as is evident from common names like skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus) and dead horse arum (Helicodiceros [Dracunculus] muscivorus) - the latter might be more accurately called the dead gull arum (Jürgens et al 2006; Stensmyr et al. 2002 for the volatiles). Pollination is often by a variety of flies and beetles - Gottsberger (2016a) estimated that together they might pollinate ca 1,500 species - as well as bees. Beetle pollination may be the plesiomorphic condition in the family (Sannier et al. 2009; c.f. Bröderbauer et al. 2012; Chartier et al. 2014a), and there are oviposition/pollination mutualisms. Schiestl and Dötterl (2012; see also Schiestl & Johnson 2013) argue that the ability to detect particular volatile compounds in scarab beetles developed in the Jurassic, while similar compounds such as the indole skatole evolved in the plants that they now pollinate in the Cretaceous/Palaeocene about 100 Ma later; this is an example of what appears to be a quite common disconnect between the evolution of the pollinator and that of the plant. Interestingly, 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole (heterocyclic, C, N, S in a 5-membered ring) plays an important role in attracting cyclocephaline scarabs both in Caladium and in Annona (Maia et al. 2012; also M. R. Moore & Jameson 2013 and Moore et al. 2015 for cyclocephaline pollinators); the beetles seem to have no particular preferences for compounds that are apparently unique to the plant (Schiestl & Dötterl 2012). The scent of some species of Xanthosoma has been analysed, and it was suggested that the distinctiveness of a scent was the result of the predominance of "unique dominant compounds", but whether visitors are unique to a species and/or are elements in barriers separating sympatric species is currently unknown (Milet-Pinheiro et al. 2017). However, Maia et al. (2018) noted that different species of scarabs were attracted to the inflorescences of the three species of Araceaee whose scents they were analysing.
The volatiles produced by Arum attract insects in search of brood sites, thus the smell of A. palaestinum is that of rotting fruit, and it attracts Drosophila flies (Linz et al. 2010; see also Kite et al. 1998: pollinators mostly dipterans; Urru et al. 2011); see also Nauheimer et al. (2012a) fruit flies and Alocasia and Bröderbauer et al. (2014), fruit flies and Colocasia. Punekar and Kumaran (2010) described the pollination of Indian species of Amorphophallus (see also Kite et al. 1998: odours; Claudel et al. 2017 for pollination: inc. mimicry of mammalian dung). There is a variety of odours in the genus, including dimethyl sulphides that are "gaseous" or smell like rotting meat, phenylethanol derivatives that smell of fruit or anise, trimethylamine that smells like fish, and isocaproic acid that smells (I think) like cheese or goats. Some correlation both with phylogeny and with ecology/geography was found, thus some odours seemed to have evolved only once, others several times, Amorphophallus species that smelled like fish were not all immediately related but were found only in northern Borneo, and sister species that can be sympatric smell of dung and corpses respectively... (Kite & Hetterscheid 2017). For a general treatment of chemical mimicry of different kinds, including mimicry of carrion, of oviposition sites, a form of deceptive pollination, see also Jürgens et al. (2013).
Some neotropical Araceae, including species of both Anthurium and Spathiphyllum, are pollinated by euglossine bees (orchid bees) which show fair visitor specificity despite the apparently unspecialised flowers - the scent bouquets of the attractants are different (N. Williams & Dressler 1976; Schwerdtfeger et al. 2002; Roubik & Hanson 2004; Hentrich et al. 2010b; Schiestl 2012). Schwerdtfeger et al. (2002; see also Croat 1980) found that rather limited data showed that euglossine bees were common pollinators of Anthurium, although both cecidomyid midges and drosophilid flies were also visitors. A nectar-like but sometimes foul-tasting exudate may be produced by stigmatic hairs, etc., as in Anthurium (Daumann 1931; see also Fahn 1979), and this, too, attracts pollinators. Duckweeds produce sucrose-containing drops of liquid at the stigmatic apex, and pollination is probably by small flies (Landolt 1986).
A number of Aroideae are pollinated by cyclocephaline dynastine scarab beetles that use the inflorescences as mating sites (Chartier et al. 2014a; Gibernau 2015; Milet-Pinheiro et al. 2017), thus Caladium is a member of a clade characterised by being pollinated by these beetles (Mayo & Bogner 1988; Maia & Schlindwein 2006). In Philodendron each species attracts usually but a single species of scarab (see also Maia et al. 2010), and Gottsberger (2016a: Fig. 2) shows a marvellous scrum of Erioscelis emarginata beetles at the bottom of an inflorescence of P. selloum. The inflorescences are often highly thermogenic (c.f. Barbosa et al. 2018)`, in P. adamantinum the male flowers being the source of the heat, and terpenoids, etc., are produced by the osmophores (Gonçalves-Souza et al. 2017). True resins are produced on the inside of the spathe and covers the smooth body of the beetle so enabling pollen to stick to it (Gonçalves-Souza et al. 2018) Xanthosoma is another large genus in which there is thermogenesis and which is thought to be predominantly pollinated by these beetles (Milet-Pinheiro et al. 2017 and references).
Arisaema is another member of Aroideae in which pollination has been studied in some detail. This genus is serially monoecious, i.e. in any one year a plant is either staminate or carpelate, but it can change "sex" from year to year, perhaps connected with the size of the plants - female plants are larger (see also Araliaceae-Panax, Schlessman 1991), interestingly, some tetraploids seem to have reverted to the normal monoecious condition for Aroideae (Renner et al. 2004). Dipteran fungus gnats are the pollinators, and they can escape from any male inflorescence they visit via a hole at the base of the spathe. Visiting female inflorescences is another story. Covered in pollen, they slide down the slippery slope inside the spathe and pollinate the female flowers - but there is no basal exit hole, they cannot climb out of the inflorescence, and so they die (Vogel & Martens 2000). The gnats are attracted by the smell produced by osmophores which are usually at the tip of the spadix, and the spadix itself can be up to 80 cm, some reports suggest 1.5 m, long, and dangles from the mouth of the spathe. In some species it may reach the ground (as also in Amorphophallus pendulus!), and the insects may climb up the spadix into the spathe from the ground (Vogel & Martens 2000).
There are over 250 species of Schismatoglottideae (Aroideae), and over 150 are from Borneo alone, and Low et al. (2016 and references) describe the diversity of their pollination mechanisms, where complex movements of the spathe, or its splitting in various ways, sometimes very irregularly, even its abscission (e.g. Boyce & Wong 2007) are part of the whole process; the drosophilid Colocasiomyia is one of the pollinators. There is thermogenesis, and a mixed fly-beetle pollination system may be ancestral here, with the beetles eating the interpistillar staminodes; the staminodes are fewer in fly-pollinated species (Hoe et al. 2018). After the female flowers have opened in Bucephalandra, flattened staminodes reflex so sealing the female flowers off as the staminate flowers open and thus preventing selfing (Wong & Boyce 2014).
For a discussion on the evolution of the distinctive pollen that characterises most Aroideae, see Hesse (2006b). Here the pollen is often extruded from the anthers in little balls or toothpaste-like threads, and the anthers of several genera open by pores. A discriminant analysis of thirteen putatively pollinator-related characters of the pollen (but not the pollen surface) identified bee- and also less sharply differentiated beetle- and fly-pollinated morphologies (Gibernau et al. 2010; Gibernau 2003 for references), although how such analyses would fare if pollinator groups were not assumed is unclear. Grayum (1986) had earlier looked at features of the pollen surface and how they might correlate with pollinators; smooth and sometimes rather larger pollen and beetle pollination were linked, as were spiny pollen and fly pollination, and so on. Sannier et al. (2009: but see their caveats, Lemnoideae, Gymnostachys not included, only two Orontioideae, etc.) looked at pollinator and pollen across the whole family, and also suggested there was some correlation between pollen morphology and pollinator. The arborescent South American Montrichardia has "explosive" pollen; the massively thick intine swells to an elongated structure ca 400 µm long within a few seconds, perhaps aiding its attachment to the visiting hairless beetle (Weber & Halbritter 2007). The pollen wall of Amorphophallus is sometimes shed before the pollen tube develops (Ulrich et al. 2017).
Raphides, prismatic calcium oxalate crystals, and other crystal types from the walls of the anther may become mixed with the pollen (Barabé et al. 2004b; Barabé & Lacroix 2008b, Coté 2010; Coté & Gibernau 2012; Low et al. 2016); their exact function is unclear. In Monsteroideae there are numerous trichosclereids in the stylar tissue and the spathe is deciduous; the trichosclereids may protect the exposed ovary against insects (there can be a variety of crystalline forms in different cells and tissues of the one plant - see Coté 2009). A variety of crystals is also found in the ovary (Coté & Gibernau 2012).
Understory Araceae in the Neotropics are a particularly important source of food for bats (Lobova et al. 2009). Monstereae are frequently epiphytic and often have seeds embedded in pulp, whether from the testa, trichomes, or the inner pericarp, perhaps to help them stick to branches (Mayo et al. 1998); in South America birds like the mistletoe-specialist friar birds (Euphoniinae, near Fringillidae) may disperse the seeds of epiphytic taxa like Anthurium (Snow 1981; Restrepo 1987; Reid 1991). In some Araceae the basal part of the spathe remains fleshy and encloses the fruits; when the latter are mature it splits irregularly, exposing them to the dispersing animals (see also Boyce & Wong 2007 for the mechanics of spathe senescence in Schismatoglottidae; Uhl et al. 2013). A number of small Malesian Aroideae-Schismatoglottidae growing on the forest floor or on rocks have splash-cup dispersal mechanisms, the shape of the persistent spathe directing the dispersal of the seeds/fruits, or the fruits may be corky and water-dispersed, or the seeds of rheophytic taxa may have distinctive micropylar appendages that act as grapnels for anchoring the seeds as they germinate (Wong 2013; Boyce & Yeng 2015 for references). The aquatic Cryptocoryne is the only Araceae to have dehiscent fruits (clearly derived!). Here the female part of the spadix is described as consisting of gynoecia (Mayo et al. 1998) or female flowers (Wongso et al. 2017) and the fruit as being a syncarp (Wongso et al. 2017); images of dehiscing fruits in the latter look like a septicidal capsule, although they are in fact a whorl of follicles with basally-attached seeds. The seeds float and are dispersed by water (Bown 2000).
Plant-Animal Interactions. Araceae are not much liked as food by butterfly caterpillars (Ehrlich & Raven 1964). A number of species of galerucine beetles (Aplosonyx) have been found feeding on laticiferous Aroideae from South East Asia where they make circular trenches in the leaves to interrupt the latex flow and then eat out the portion of the leaf so isolated - the resultant holes in the blade look as if they were made by a paper punch (Darling 2007); galerucines are known from other monocots and beetle herbivory in Araceae may be geographically more widespread.
Philodendron (Aroideae), species of which are scandent or hemiepiphytic, is unusual in that it has foliar extrafloral nectaries. Ants are common on the plants, perhaps affording them a measure of protection against herbivores (Gonçalves-Souza et al. 2016). In the New World in particular species of Anthurium and Philodendron may be inhabitants of ant gardens (Orivel & Leroy 2011).
Vegetative Variation. Although Araceae may appear to be monopodial, the stem is usually a complex sympodium built up of repeating units each made up of an expanded and a reduced leaf, a prophyll, and a terminal inflorescence (Engler 1877, translated by Ray & Renner 1990; Ray 1987, 1988). These stems often have conspicuous annular scars surrounding the stem and C-shaped scars on one side of the stem; the former represent leaf scars, the latter the stem apex/inflorescence, the termination of each unit of the sympodium. Growth continues by the development of an axillary bud that evicts the stem apex/inflorescence; details of branching patterns seem to correlate with major groups within the family (see French & Tomlinson 1981b; Mayo et al. 1998 and references). Ray (1987b) questioned whether all taxa have axillary buds; axillary buds may be superposed, and the upper (developing) bud may be displaced some way from the axil of the leaf that subtends it.
Leaves and their development vary considerably in Araceae. Those of a number of taxa, including Monstera, the swiss cheese plant, and relatives, are fenestrate (see Melville and Wrigley 1969) because of localised cell death (Kaplan 1984; Gunawardena & Dengler 2006), while in Anchomanes localised cell death results in what is an initially simple leaf blade with entire margins separating into a complex structure with numerous "leaflets" (c.f. palm leaves). The leaves of Zamioculcas appear to be truly compound, with the blastozone, the marginal leaf meristem, becoming discontinuous and producing the individual leaflets (Kaplan 1984; Gunawardena & Dengler 2006). The related Gonatopus also has dissected leaves (?development) and remarkable pulvini in the middle of its long petioles (hence its name, "giraffe's knees"), and they also occur along the petiole of Zamioculcas. Pulvini are also quite commonly found at the top of the petiole, as in Monstera and Rhaphidophora. Aroid leaves can be huge, in Dracontium gigas and Amorphophallus titanum the dissected foliar part, which can reach up to 4 m in diameter, being born on a massive erect petiole up to ca 5 m or so tall (Bown 2000). Hejnowicz and Barthlott (2005) examined the structure and function of the petiole of such leaves, noting that the parenchymatous shell of the petiole in which there are vascular bunndles and also collenchyma bundles occupied 10% of its volume and ca 35% of its mass, there was no lignification, and air spaces occupied almost 80% of its volume, also, flimsy though the aerenchyma might appear to be, it can still offer some support, and in the humid environment in which the plants grow, cells were likely to have high turgor. The leaves of Anthurium are notably variable, being entire to deeply lobed or apparently compound.
The leaves of Scindapsus develop in a "typical" monocot fashion, i.e. from the leaf base (Troll & Meyer 1955; Bharathan 1996; Doyle 1998b), while in taxa like Arisaema, Orontium, and Zamioculcas the blade develops from the upper part of the leaf primordium, i.e., they are similar in this to broad-leaved angiosperms (Troll 1955; Periasamy & Muruganathan 1986: Arisaema; Bharathan 1996). Kaplan (1973) thought that the blade in Zantedeschia aethiopica developed from the lower part of the leaf, although he also noted that it developed acropetally, and in this was like other Araceae (unspecified) and broad-leaved angiosperms. Ertl (1932) suggested that leaves with more normal monocot venation may be common in taxa now placed in the basal pectinations of Araceae, but blades with highly reticulate venation are common in the family (Mayo et al. 1997; Coiffard & Mohr 2016).
The highly reduced vegetative body of Lemnoideae, called a thallus, is variously interpreted as being some combination of leaf and shoot. Wolffia and Wolffiella entirely lack roots and also veins in the thallus, although W. microscopica has a root-like structure of uncertain function. The thallus of Wolffia may be less than 1 mm across; it is the smallest flowering plant known (see Lemon & Posluszny 2000b; Sree et al. 2015). The reproductive parts have been interpreted as either a reduced but perfect flower or a very highly reduced inflorescence; at least some species are interpreted as having a staminate flower with a single stamen and a perfect flower (Bogner 2009; Gramzow & Theißen 2020). W. Wang et al. (2014), in a genome analysis of Spirodela, found that genes promoting the juvenile phase of growth and inhibiting adult features like flowering were preferentially enhanced, suggesting that the adult body is paedomorphic, retaining juvenile traits, but whether by progenesis, speeding up sexual development, or neoteny, slowing down vegetative development, is unclear, although perhaps the former is the better fit; as might be expected, some genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis have been lost or their copy numbers reduced. The aquatic Pistia has a much less unconventional plant body, and its inflorescence, although reduced, is basically similar to that of other Aroideae; however, its vegetative shoots are monopodial (Lemon & Posluszny 2000a). Both Lemnoideae and Pistia have supernumerary axillary buds which increases the complexity of their branching patterns, however, the two are not immediately related (c.f. Lemon & Posluszny 2000b, see also above).
Genes & Genomes. A genome duplication in Lemnoideae and the clades above it, the SPPOα event, is dated at 83 Ma (Landis et al. 2018). Earlier, W. Wang et al. (2014) had suggested that there was evidence of two whole genome duplications in Spirodela polyrhiza, the αSP/βSO events, and dated these to around 95 Ma. Bliss and Suzuki (2012) found substantial variation in genome size in Anthurium, but there was little correlation with anything. For chromosome number change, descending dysploidy being common, see Sousa and Renner (2015), although even species with chromosome numbers as high as 2n = 60 showed no evidence of polyploidy (Sousa & Renner 2015), which is remarkable if there has been a duplication. Chromosome number is especially variable in e.g. Cryptocoryne, haploid numbers of 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 being recorded in Wongso et al. (2017); for chromosome numbers, etc., see Urbanska-Worytkiewicz (1980) and Cao and Vu (2020), both Lemnoideae, Bogner and Petersen (2007) and E. V. Vasconcelos et al. (2018: Philodendron and 35S rDNA sites). For a possible base chromosome number of x = 16 for the family, see Cusimano et al. (2012 and references); Urbanska-Worytkiewicz (1980) suggested that x = 10 in Lemnoideae.
The nuclear genome of Spirodela is quite small, around 158 Mb, other Lemnoideae can be around 12 times larger and genome size seems to have increased within the subfamily; there is comparable variation in chromosome size (Cao & Yu 2020). In Lemnooideae several genes have been lost, concentrated blocks of heterochromatin are uncommon, and there is no evidence of retrotransposons, however, there are many microsatellite tandem repeats, ca 1 Mb in total (W. Wang et al. 2014; Harkess et al. 2020). In Spirodela in particular several methylation genes are non-functional, however, this may not affect the plant much because of its very rapid vegetative reproduction, and maintenance methylation persists (Harkess et al. 2020), Lemnoideae also seem to have lost genes involved in e.g. lignin biosynthesis, cell growth and flowering, but they have diversified in some genes e.g. those involved in nitrogen metabolism; genome size variation in Lemnoideae is due to variation in repetitive sequences (An et al. 2018). For the extensive loss of MADS-Box genes in duckweeds, see Gramzow and Theißen (2020), and for general information on duckweed genomes, see papers in Cao et al. (2020).
Chloroplast DNA substitution rates are particularly high in the free-floating Lemnoideae, Pistia, and Aroideae-Cryptocoryneae, all more or less aquatic, and perhaps along the stem [Pothoideae ... + Aroideae] (Nauheimer et al. 2012b). For the highly autapomorphic chloroplast genome of Zantedeschia and to a lesser extent that of Anchomanes (both Aroideae, close to each other?), see Henriquez et al. (2014). The organization of the chloroplast genome in Lemna is also distinctive (Mardanov et al. 2008), although overall, chloroplast genes show little variation (J. Tang et al. 2016).
In crosses within Zantedeschia, there may be incompatability between chloroplasts from one parent and the hybrid genome (plastome-genome incompatability - PGI) resulting in the death of those chloroplasts and thus to variegation or complete albinism (Snijder et al. 2007 and references).
The mitochondrial genome of Spirodela has been substantially rearranged, and it shows no synteny with other mitochondrial genomes (W. Wang et al. 2012); analyses of mitochondrial sequences suggest rather different relationships than do those of chloroplast sequences (Henriquez et al. 2014).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Raphides in those taxa that have been studied are twinned calcium oxalate crystals, H-shaped in transverse section, and often with lateral barbs (Sakai & Hanson 1974; Cody & Horner 1983); Lemna also has such raphides [check]. Raphides appear earlier in development than druses, at least in Amorphophallus, and may help protect young tissue, as well as helping to regulate calcium (Prychid et al. 2008).
Xylem and phloem are mixed in the medulla of roots of Monstera, Heteropsis and Philodendron (Huggett & Tomlinson 2010) at least, knowing the broader distribution of this distinctive feature would be interesting. For stem anatomy in the family, see surveys by French and Tomlinson (e.g. 1981a, c, 1984) and for compound vascular bundles, see French and Tomlinson (1986). Gonçalves et al. (2004) noted that some taxa with perfect flowers may have collenchyma at the apex or base of the petiole; their comparative data is of collenchyma presence at the middle of the petiole. This may perhaps explain the apparent conflict in the literature. Thus although Keating (2000b) recorded collenchyma for a few members of Lasioideae and Pothoideae, Gonçalves et al. (2004) failed to find it for some of the same taxa.
In addition to Gymnostachys, I have seen one taxon (unnamed, from Thailand) with a leaf blade that had softly dentate/spinulate margins.
There are suggestions that the reproductive stuctures in Araceae are neither flower nor indlorescence, rather, they have properties of both (e.g. all flowers on a spadix open together, behaving more like a single unit) and thus should be reinterpreted accordingly (S. Y. Wong et al. 2020 and references). Buzgo (2001) suggested that Orontium was more like core Araceae in floral development than was Lysichiton or Symplocarpus. Orontieae have a long internode (not always obvious) between the base of the spike and the subtending leaf or spathe and there may be common A-C primordia (Buzgo 2001). The "flowers" of Lemnoideae may have up to three stamens, but because they mature at different times, Bogner (2009) suggested that they came from different flowers. The sterile flowers that are often found between the staminate and carpelate zones of the inflorescences of many Aroideae develop in a variety of ways, but whether this implies that there are correspondingly different evolutionary pathways is unclear (c.f. Barabé et al. 2004a). When flowers are 2-merous, the outer pair of tepals are lateral. Some taxa have binucleate tapetal cells (Wunderlich 1954), but they are usually uninucleate. Pseudomonomery has been documented for the family (Eckardt 1937; see Buzgo 2001). See Buzgo (2001) for discussion on the gyneocial construction of [Gymnostachydoideae + Orontioideae]; the gynoecium often has a single loculus.
Variation in ovule morphology is considerable but confusing. The ovules of Pothoidaeae and Monsteroideae are described as frequently being ana-campylotropous (Seubert 1997). Gymnostachys has no micropyle since the integuments do not cover the nucellus, Pistia is exostomal, and other taxa are bistomal; the ovules of Pothos macrophyllus are shown by Buzgo (2001) to be anatropous and apotropous, although Pothos is described in the same paper as having straight ovules (the former is correct); in a number of taxa the ovules are reported to be tenuinucellate while the nucellus of Pistia is "very well developed" and the cells appear to be in radial files (Mercado-Noriel & Mercado 1978); both a nucellar cap and an endothelium may be present; and so on. Parameswaran described Theriophonum minutum as being tenuinucellate, but drew a complete layer of cells below the nucellar epidermis, while Jüssen (1929) noted that Spathiphyllum had a doubled epidermal layer, but that is not evident from the illustrations given, and it is in general difficult to match statements of nucellus type with the illustrations there. Taxa in which the megaspore that germinates is micropylar are scattered in the family, especially in the basal clades (Grayum 1991).
Maheshwari and Khanna (1957) and Tobe and Kadokawa (2010) describe the endosperm as being cellular, but it could be interpreted as being an extreme form of helobial (see also Acorales). According to Mercado-Noriel and Mercado (1978) the seeds of Pistia have large amounts of perisperm as well as some endosperm. Variation in seedling morphology is great; in some taxa the roots are green, and in others they are always white (Tillich 1985, 2003b; Leck & Outred 2008). The cataphylls of the seedlings of Orontium are relatively long, linear structures (Tillich 2003b).
Information is taken from Grayum (1990), Mayo et al. (1997: particularly useful, 1998), Bown (2000), Croat and Ortiz (2020), Boyce and Yeng (2015: Malesian genera), Buzgo and Endress (1999: Gymnostachys), Hetterscheid and Ittenbach (1996: Amorphophallus) and Croat et al. (2017 and references: Xanthosoma, 2018: Caladieae). See also Dring et al. (1995: chemistry), Behnke (1995a: sieve tube plastids), French (1987b, 1988: laticifers, 1998: stem anatomy very variable), Keating (2000b: collenchyma, 2003a: general anatomy, b: leaf anatomy, 2004a: classification, b: raphides), Gonçalves et al. (2004: collenchyma), Carlquist and Schneider (2013: vessels), also Gow (1913), Maheshwari and Khanna (1956), Swamy and Krishnamurthy (1971), and Tobe and Kadokawa (2008: good summary, 2010: endosperm development), all embryology, Gatin (1921: unfortunately Gatin died before he could make more than this "première contribution") and Tillich (1985, 2003b, 2014) all seedlings, Seubert (1993: starch grains, seeds and seedlings, most of family; 1997: Lasioideae). For floral morphology, see Mayo (1989: Philodendron), Barabé and Lacroix (2008a) and Poli et al. (2012, 2015), all Anthurium, Barabé and Lacroix (2008b: Anaphyllopsis), Barabé et al. (2012: Syngonium), Fukai (2004: Arisaema) and Barabé (2011: floral merosity of Lasioideae, 2013: general, esp. Lasioideae), for ovary loculus hairs, see French (1987a), for floral anatomy, see Eyde et al. (1967) and for ovular vasculature, see French (1986). For pollen, see Grayum (1991, 1992: much variation), Weber et al. (1999), Hesse (2002: Lasioideae), Jayalakshmi (2004: phylogenetic framework inadequate), van der Ham et al. (2005: Amorphophallus and relatives), Hesse (2006a, b: summary, phylogenetic framework reasonable), Ulrich et al. (2012: Calla, 2017: Amorphophallus), and French (1985 and references: endothecial thickenings). See Smith and Stockey (2013) for seeds of Lasioideae.
For general information on Lemnoideae, see den Hartog and van der Plas (1970), Plant Biol. 17 (2015: special issue), and Cao et al. (2020), for a monograph, see Landolt (1980, 1986) and Landolt and Kandeler (1987) and for general morphology, see Landolt (1998) and especially Bogner (2009), for the morphology of Wolffia microscopica, see Sree et al. (2015), for chemistry, etc., see Landolt and Kandeler (1987), and for embryology, see Maheshwari (1954).
Phylogeny. Mayo et al. (2013) summarize phylogenetic work on the family. Early hypotheses of phylogeny based on restriction site analysis (French et al. 1995) suggested rather pectinate relationships in the family, while a consensus tree of morphological characters (Mayo et al. 1997) showed somewhat less resolution. Indeed, relationships have turned out to be pectinate, although of course that is in part because of what we have decided to call subfamilies. In most analyses the clade [Gymostachydoideae + Orontioideae] is sister to the rest of the family, and Lemnoideae are strongly supported as sister to the remainder, although Isles et al (2013) recovered a topology [Gymostachydoideae [Orontioideae + the rest]], although support was weak and sampling poor. Barabé et al. (2004a: little support) found that Lasioideae were not clearly separated from Aroideae. Although a trnL-trnF phylogeny (Rothwell et al. 2004) placed Callopsis and Asterostigma (both Aroideae) outside a clade with 100% jackknife support that included other Aroideae, Lemnoideae and Pothoideae, Tam et al. (2004: trnL-F sequences, Calla not examined) again suggest the phylogeny is rather pectinate, as do Cabrera et al. (2008: five chloroplast genes). The topology that Cabrera et al. (2008) present, quite well supported, is used here (see also Nauheimer et al. 2012b; Henriquez et al. 2014: chloroplast sequences).
Orontioideae: Orontium is sister to the rest of the subfamily (e.g. Nauheimer et al. 2012b).
For a phylogeny of Lemnoideae see Les et al. (2002), Rothwell et al. (2004), Wang and Messing (2011), Nauheimer et al. (2012b), Tippery et al. (2015, 2020), and Ding et al. (2017)- relationships are [Spirodela [[Landoltia + Lemna] [Wolfia + Wolfiella]]], however, Tippery and Les (2020) suggest the relationships [Spirodela [Landoltia [Lemna [Wolfia + Wolfiella]]]], with Wolffia perhaps being paraphyletic. For speciation in Lemnoideae, see Crawford et al. (2006).
Monsteroideae: Spathiphyllum may be sister to the rest of the subfamily (Henriquez et al. 2014; see also Tam et al. 2004).
Pothoideae: Carlsen and Croat (2013, 2019) have begun to disentangle relationships in Anthurium, the classical sections there are a poor guide to relationships (see also Tam et al. 2004). Weng et al. (2020 and references) examine the circumscription of Pothos.
Lasioideae: Urospatha is sister to the rest of the subfamily (Nauheimer et al. 2102b).
The exact position of Zamioculcadoideae needs confirmation, but they can reasonably be excluded from Aroideae. Although there is no strong molecular support for a clade [Zamioculcadoideae + Aroideae] in some analyses (e.g. Nauheimer et al. 2012b), it was well supported in the plastid analysis of Henriquez et al. (2014); this clade has several morphological features in common (see above). Bogner and Hesse (2005) raised the group [Zamioculcas + Gonatopus] to subfamilial status as Zamioculcadoideae. Stylochaeton has the same pollen as most Aroideae and simple leaves (Hesse et al. 2001), and since it is sister to other Zamioculcadoideae (see also Nauheimer et al. 2012b; c.f. some analyses in Chartier et al. 2014a), its inclusion in that subfamily (see Cabrera et al. 2008) means that the distinctive morphological features of [Zamioculcas + Gonatopus] are apomorphies at that level. The phylogeny of Cusimano et al. (2011) is largely similar to that of Cabrera et al. (2008); the former recognise a Zamioculcadoideae s. str.. It may be of interest that the pollen of Lasioideae, at least, has a lamellate endexine rather like that of Zamioculcadoideae.
Aroideae. Cabrera et al. (2008) offer a number of suggestions about tribal relationships here; for Chinese taxa, see Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016). Nauheimer et al. (2012b) found little support for relationships between many of the tribes; Callopsis was sister to the rest of the subfamily, but support was weak. Philodendreae. For a phylogeny of Philodendron, see Gauthier et al. (2008); Homalomena may be part of the same clade. Yeng et al. (2013) focussed on Southeast Asian Homalomena and found that H. cochinchinense was sister to all other species, while the New World species formed a quite separate clade that was sister to a clade of Philodendron, within which they are embedded (Yeng et al. 2013; see also S. J. Wong et al. 2016). New World species were found probably to be sister to Philodendron (as Adelonema: Loss-Oliveira et al. 2016; Canal et al. 2018, 2019; S. Vasconcelos et al. 2018). Canal et al. (2018, 2019) also examined relationships within Philodendron; sections within subgenus Philodendron, which makes up the bulk of the genus, were largely non-monophyletic (geography works better than morphology). Cusimano et al. (2010) and Ohi-Toma et al. (2010) discuss relationships within Areae, particularly Typhonium and related genera, while Espíndola et al. (2010) looked at Arum itself. Gonçalves et al. (2007) discuss the phylogeny of the Andean Spathicarpeae, a clade in which the spathe is adnate to the spadix; many of the species grow in very dry and/or high conditions, rather atypical for the family. Renner et al. (2004: support varied from slight to strong depending on the analysis) found that Arisaema tortuosa was sister to the rest of the genus, a position not recovered by Ohi-Toma et al. (2016) who found relationships along the backbone of Arisaema for the most part poorly supported, as in Renner et al. (2004). For relationships in the speciose Schismatoglottideae, see S. Y. Wong et al. (2010, 2018) and Wong (2013); for those in Alocasia, see Nauheimer et al. (2012a); and for those in Amorphophallus, see Sedayu et al. (2010) and in particular Claudel et al. (2017).
The position of Calla palustris, in early (prior to ed. 7) versions of this site placed in a separate subfamily, needs confirmation, although it seems to be best included in Aroideae for now. Barabé et al. (2004a) found that it was embedded in Aroideae, although without strong support (see also Nauheimer et al. 2012b: well embedded, but again with poor support). Calla came out in a clade of Aroideae along with other rooted aquatics/marsh plants in some molecular analyses (Cabrera et al. 2008), but its position was unclear in both morphological and restriction site analyses. Chartier et al. (2014a) found a clade [Anubias [Calla + Montrichardia]] sister to other Aroideae, but support was low. Calla and Schismatoglottis ("Calla and the rheophytes") formed a clade, albeit with weak support, that was sister to one of the two major clades within Aroideae and there were some morphological features for that clade (Henriquez et al. 2014). Just looking at Chinese taxa, Calla was in a separate clade off the backbone of the tree (Z.-D. Chen et al. 2016).
What does morphology have to say about all this? Calla and Aroideae both have laticifers, but the former has bisulcate pollen with sporopollenin and a tectate-columellate ektexine, perfect flowers, etc. (Ulrich et al. 2013) - and it has a much more northerly distribution (see the Map above), overlapping with that of other Aroideae only in Western Europe and N.E. North America. The ovules have parietal tissue, but so do those of some other Aroideae (Ariopsis, Arum). Its perfect flowers and many pollen features would represent reversals, its acropetal flowering is unique (c.f. Cusimano et al. 2011; Ulrich et al. 2013; Barabé 2013: floral morphology), although some other Aroideae do have perfect flowers, albeit atypical. Pollen data suggested to Ulrich et al. (2013) similarities with Stylochaeton (Zamioculcadoideae) and Aroideae on the one hand and with Lasioideae on the other. The phylogenetic position of Calla needs to be clarified in order to understand the evolution of its morphology.
Classification. See Mayo and Bogner (2013) for Adolf Engler's classification of the family, which lasted for about a hundred years. For a tribal classification, see Cabrera et al. (2008) and especially Cusimano et al. (2011), however, a few genera immediately basal to their Aroideae s. str. and Zamioculcadoideae s. str. are unplaced, and a broad circumscription of both subfamilies is adopted here (see also Mayo et al. 2013 for the classification of the family). Note that although Lemneae and Wolffieae are often recognized in Lemnoideae, the former is paraphyletic. For a checklist and bibliography, see Govaerts and Frodin (2002) and the World Checklist of Monocots, and for several keys and much more, see CATE-Araceae. T
Low et al. (2018) delimit genera in Aroideae-Schismatoglottideae, but perhaps rather splitty, indeed, there are lots of monotypic genera in Araceae. Sakaragui et al. (2018) raise a long-recognized group in Philodendron (Aroideae) - actually, its relationships are somewhat unclear - to generic rank, which seems a little odd (c.f. Canal et al. 2019). Ohi-Toma et al. (2016) provide a sectional classification for Arisaema and Claudel et al. (2017) a subgeneric classification for Amorphophallus.
Croat and Ortiz (2020) suggest that there may be a very large number of species in Anthurium, and most of them are undescribed...
Botanical Trivia. The nucleus in the chalazal endosperm haustorium of Arum maculatum is reported to be 24,576 n (Werker 1997).
Thanks. I am grateful to Monica Carlsen and Richard Keating for discussions about Araceae and to Simon Mayo for comments.
[[Alismataceae [Butomaceae + Hydrocharitaceae]] [Scheuchzeriaceae [Aponogetonaceae [Juncaginaceae [Maundiaceae [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]]]]]] // Helobiae // Fluviales: mycorrhizae uncommon; plant rooted aquatic (with floating stems), leaves often emergent; roots often not medullated [pith slight to none], rhizodermal cells dimorphic, root hairs from short cells; (protoxylem lacunae +); stem with lacunae; little oxalate accumulation; raphides and druses 0, (prismatic crystals +); bulliform cells 0 [?this level]; plant glabrous; leaves with intravaginal squamules [squamulae intravaginales, ?= colleters]; inflorescence scapose; pollen grains tricellular; carpel fusion via the central floral axis, partial at the carpel periphery; endosperm 0, suspensor unicellular, cell large; seedling collar and collar rhizoids +.
Age. The divergence of the two main clades above is dated at 91-81 Ma by Wikström et al. (2001: note topology), ca 107 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004), or a little younger, (115-)96, 83(-66) Ma (Bell et al. 2010: note topology) and ca 96.6 Ma (Magallón et al. 2015).
Fossils of Thalassocharis bosquetii ca 72 Ma from the early Maastrichtian of western Europe have been identified as those of a seagrass, although to what clade they should be assigned is unclear - they seem to lack intravaginal squamules. The stem anatomy of this plant is rather complex: There is a well-developed fibrous layer in which the vascular bundles are embedded and the bundles going to the leaves are constricted just before they depart the stem (van der Ham et al. 2017).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. L.-Y. Chen et al. (2013: disregard ages in Table 1) thought that the most recent common ancestor of this clade inhabited Eurasia.
For carpel evolution, see J.-M. Chen et al. (2004a); free carpels may have evolved twice, there have been reversions to syncarpy, and the unicarpelate condition also shows a complex pattern of evolution. For the evolution of aquatic growth forms, see J.-M. Chen et al. (2004b). An early sudy by Boutard et al. (1973) suggested that flavonoid variaton placed the species of this group studied into two groups, everything up to Aponogetonaceae and Juncaginaceae and those above. Posluszny and Charlton (1993) looked at floral evolution here, especially the perianth-androecium association in taxa like Juncaginaceae, Potamogetonaceae, etc., and they grappled with the relationships between flowers and inflorescences, but not invoking pseudanthia. Sokoloff et al. (2013) suggest an apomorpohy scheme for the group; the positions of Aponogetonaceae and Scheuchzeriaceae in their Fig. 17 are reversed compared with the topology below.
Ecology & Physiology. Nearly all members of this clade grow in more or less marshy or aquatic and sometimes saline conditions and are common in all aquatic environments in which angiosperms grow except fast-flowing rivers. J.-M. Chen et al. (2004b) discuss the evolution of various life forms in the group - parallelisms are common. This clade is particularly notable for the number of taxa it contains that can tolerate salt concentrations of 200mM (Flowers et al. 2010; see also Saslis-Lagoudakis et al. 2016), and it includes all fully marine angiosperms. Other clades are also prominent in estuarine conditions, Juncaceae in particular, but also Cyperaceae, have quite a number of halophytic species (22 and 121 respectively). As in Poaceae, the ability to tolerate salt has arisen several times in both families, ca 8 and 52 times respectively (Moray et al. 2015 - see also Saslis-Lagoudakis et al. 2016). True grasses like Spartina and Puccinellia can dominate in estuaries, but they are not usually thought of as being sea grasses (for the evolution of salt tolerance in Poaceae, see above). Caryophyllales like Plumbaginaceae, Amaranthaceae s. str. and especially Chenopodiaceae s. str are also notable components of such habitats. Note that Araceae-Lemnoideae are also much modified in connection with life in the aquatic habitat, and, like Zostera, they have lost a number of gene families involved in life on land; however, unlike Zostera Lemnoideae float and so have to deal with problems caused by high UV radiation, etc., and of course they live in freshwater (An et al. 2019), as does Ceratophyllum, another very highly modified aquatic angiosperm.
True sea-grasses are the major components of fully marine angiosperm communities, although not all are grass-like and none is at all close to Poaceae. This extreme halophytic habit has evolved probably two or three times and only in this part of Alismatales - once in Hydrocharitaceae and again in the [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]] clade. Hartog and Kuo (2006) estimate that there are some 48 species of extreme halophytes in this last clade and another 18 species in Hydrocharitaceae. There are reversals in the former group if extreme halophily there evolved only once (Les et al. 1997b; Les & Tippery 2013), some species of Ruppiaceae, Zosteraceae and Potamogetonaceae in particular tolerating a range of salinities (Barbour 1970; Hartog & Kuo 2006), furthermore, Maundiaceae and many Juncaginaceae happily grow in salt marshes. Like mangroves, sea grasses are most diverse in the area from the western Pacific to east Africa, less so in the Americas and west Africa (e.g. Tomlinson 1986).
Touchette (2007; see also Marbà et al. 2006; Mateo et al 2006, and other papers in Larkum et al. 2006) discuss the physiological problems faced by marine angiosperms, particularly problems with Na, Cl, and P. Romero et al. (2006) noted that sea-grasses were adapted to nutrient poor conditions. Invers et al. (1999) examined carbon acquisition via dissolved bicarbonates. For the effect of the oxygen concentration of the water on submerged angiosperms in general, see Caraco et al. (2006). Sulphated phenolic compounds and flavones are common in sea-grasses (McMillan et al. 1980), and probably arose in parallel; although their function is unclear, it is perhaps connected with the problems of living in saline environments (McMillan et al. 1980 and references; Marbà et al. 2006: sulphates/sulphites; Olsen et al. 2016: sulphated polysaccharides in Zosteraceae, involved in osmotic balance). Wissler et al. (2011) compare gene expression in Posidonia and Zostera with that in grasses and broad-leaved angiosperms; the approach is interesting, but the sampling is too poor to say much about specific adaptations to the marine habitat. In Zostera, at least, adaptation to the marine habitat has involved less the acquisition of novel genes than the loss of a number of genes such as those involved in hormone response, photosynthesis and cell wall composition (H. T. Lee et al. 2016; Olsen et al. 2016, see also Roodt et al. 2019), furthermore, since dessication is a problem that is unlikely to be faced much by marine angiosperms, Z. marina has fewer Late Embryogenesis Abundant gene families (and fewer absolute number of genes) than most other angiosperms, although not surprisingly Spirodela polyrhiza and more surprisingly Vitis vinifera come close, although the latter in particular has all the eight gene families normally found in angiosperms (Olsen et al. 2016; Artur et al. 2018). Gibbs (1958) found that the members of this clade that he sampled tend to have very low concentrations of syringyl lignin (although not some Alismataceae, at least), but from his observations it seems that this may be more a feature of plants growing in aquatic habitats in general. Erickson et al. (1973) were unsure in Zostera marina had lignin.
The ecological importance of sea-grasses is very great (see e.g. Marbà et al. 2006; Mateo et al. 2006). The sea-grass ecosystem is very productive, supports a considerable amount of diversity, captures much sediment, and stores much carbon (e.g. Marbà et al. 2006; Orth et al. 2006; Kennedy et al. 2010 for summaries; Marbà et al. 2015). Sea-grass stands are now usually relatively little grazed by marine mammals (e.g. Smith 1981; Waycott et al. 2009; Arnaud-Haond et al. 2012), and Valentine and Duffy (2006: p. 465) note that "one of the few existing paradigms of marine ecology is that little of the production of seagrasses is grazed by marine herbivores" - however, they question this paradigm. Grazing of sea-grasses by large vertebrates like sirenians, sea cows, used to be moderate to intense, but sirenians became much less diverse in the later Pliocene (a number of extinct sirenians are known) and humans may more recently have had substantial effects on their populations, thus Steller's sea cow has only recently (perhaps 1768) become extinct (Turvey & Risley 2005). The morpho-ecological characterisation of sea grasses by Valentine and Duffy (2006) parallels that of Poaceae, well known to tolerate grazing by large vertebrates. Now, however, smaller animals like some sea urchins commonly eat the leaves and grazing by small invertebrates of epiphytic algae on sea-grass detritus has become important (Valentine & Duffy 2006). Sea-grasses often grow in monodominant stands made up of clones that may be very extensive indeed (see Cymodoceaceae below). These stands are susceptible to attack by pathogens such as Labyrinthula, a heterokont protist that caused eel-grass wasting disease (Rasmussen 1998; K. A. Moore & Short 2006).
Estimates of the area occupied by sea-grass communities range from 22.8 x 106 (Waycott et al. 2009) to 30 x 106 (Duarte et al. 2005) to ca 40 x 106 ha, but this is less than 0.2% of the area of the oceans (Duarte et al. 2005. However, the gross primary productivity of sea-grass communities is high, around 1903 g C m2y-1 (like that of mangroves) and global primary productivity is 628 Tg C y-1, while their net ecosystem production (1211 gCm2y-1 and globally 400 Tg C y-1) is substantially higher than that of mangroves because of a relatively low respiration rate. Sea-grasses are responsible for 1.13% of all marine primary productivity; 27-44 Tg C y-1 produced by seagrasses is buried, and this is some 12% of the total C storage in the marine ecosystem (Duarte 2011: macroalgae excluded, area occupied = 0.3 x 1012 m2 [30 x 106 ha]). Indeed, this estimate of C buried may be only one half the actual amount (Fourqueran et al. 2012). Although the amount of C in sea-grass plants themselves may be small, that stored in the soil/trapped sediment in seagrass communities, which can be up to 11 m thick in the Mediterranean, is larger than that in the soils of most forests and comparable with that in terrestrial peats and mangroves. Estimates of global C storage by sea-grasses range from 4.2-8.4 or 9.8-19.8 Pg C, depending on the assumptions made, somewhat over 0.5% the global total (Fourqueran et al. 2012), and this C may be sequestered for maybe 12,000 years or so in the anoxic sea-grass soils (Orem et al. 1999; K. A. Moore & Short 2006; Serrano et al. 2011, 2013); Posidonia oceanica is particularly prone to form massive deposits containing refactory carbon (Mateo et al. 2006; Gobert et al. 2006). Indeed, sea grasses trap not only sediment but allochthonous carbon, too, and when thinking about sea-grass communities as carbon sinks, then an estimate of 169-186 g C m-2 yr-1 seems reasonable - net community production of ca 120 g plus 41-66 g of allochthonous C (Kennedy et al. 2010: higher areal estimate above).
Gross primary productivity is 3595 g C m2 y-1 and global primary productivity is 1438 Tg C y-1, while net ecosystem production is 1585 g C m2y-1 and globally 634 Tg C y-1, substantially higher than either mangrove or seagrasses. Estimates of C burial are 60.4-70.0 Tg C y-1 (Duarte et al. 2005). Furthermore, a substantial amount of sea-grass carbon moves into other marine ecosystems, including the deep sea (Suchanek et al. 1985). Mcleod et al. (2011) suggest a carbon burial rate of (100-)138(-176) g C m-2 y-1 (range 45-190), total carbon burial of 48-112 Tg C y-1), in a sea-grass area of 17.7-60.0 x 106 ha.
The rate of carbon accumulation and longer-term sequestration in coastal wetlands, including seagrass habitats, is likely to have been affected by recent changes in the sea level. Under stable sea levels, carbon accumulation in tidal marshes in particular is low, as it rises, accumulation increases, however, some C may be buried by fluvial and coastal processes and so sequestered, if sea levels fall, new areas become available for the establishment of such communities (Rogers et al. 2019; Treat et al. 2019). Sea-grass communities may also have been similarly affected by such changes in sea levels.
Estimates of the value of the ecosystem services provided by sea-grasses are about $20,000/ha y-1, twice or more those for mangroves, saltmarshes, and coral reefs (Orth et al. 2006). However, sea-grass ecosystems are under considerable pressure from humans and occasional pandemic diseases (Orth et al. 2006).
The age of seagrasses is uncertain. Pseudoasterophyllites, ca 97 Ma from the European Cenomanian, is possibly the earliest halophyte, and was described as growing in supratidal salt marshes, but since morphologically it tends to link Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllum (Kvacek et al. 2016) it is not immediately related to Alismatales or any other extant halophytic group. Within Alismatales, the crown-group age of the sea-grass clade in Hydrocharitaceae-Hydrilloideae is estimated to be only (41.3-)19.4(-15.9) Ma (Iles et al. 2015), although some estimates are far older. Fossils from the late Middle Eocene in Florida have been identified as Hydrocharitaceae (Thalassia) and Cymodoceaceae (Thalassodendron, Cymodocea), indeed, some have been referred to extant species, and these and other records from the Eocene in the Old World suggest a considerable age for the seagrass community (Lumbert et al. 1984; Ivany et al. 1990). Sea grasses may have originated in the eastern Tethys in the Late Cretaceous, with some taxa recorded from the New World by the Eocene that are now known only in the Old World (Ivany et al. 1990). See also Marbà et al. (2015) and Clade Asymmetries for additional information.
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. The remarkable pollination devices of water-pollinated Alismatales, both marine and freshwater, have been much discussed (e.g. Cox 1988: review; Cox et al. 1991: computer simulation of underwater pollination; Les et al. 1997b: phylogeny and hydrophily; see also Pettit et al. 1980; McConchie & Knox 1989; Les et al. 2006; Ackerman 2006; Remizowa et al. 2012b; Du & Wang 2014). These include staminate flowers that detach from the parent plant and rise to the surface, the floating flowers themselves transporting pollen to the stigma; pollen variously aggregated and forming masses especially on the water surface; and underwater pollination (hypohydrophily) where the pollen grains are sometimes very much elongated or are aggregated to form elongated strands, so increasing the chances of pollination. Monoecy or dioecy is common, the carpelate flowers often have a single ovule per carpel and the fruits have but a single seed, and so on - such features parallel those of wind-pollinated angiosperms. Interestingly, it has recently been suggested that marine arthropods may carry out night-time pollination of Thalassia testudinum, a species in which mucilage aggregates the pollen into strands (van Tussenbroek et al. 2016), supposedly an adaptation to hypohydrophily. Pollen exine is often absent (Ackerman 2006), and the genes involved in exine development may have been lost (Olsen et al. 2016). The progamic phase, the time between pollination and fertilization, is notably short in most of this clade, as in at least some other aquatic angiosperms (see Williams et al. 2010: I have not tried to optimize this). These adaptations are so striking that the flowers and inflorescences in particular, but also the vegetative bodies, of the plants appear very different both from one another and from other Alismatales with more conventional life styles.
Sea grasses in particular can be very widely dispersed, whether as fruits or plant fragments, perhaps for hundreds of kilometres (Kendrick et al. 2012). The seed coat is sometimes photosynthetic (Celdran 2016).
Plant/Animal Interactions. As suggested above, the current ecological relationships in sea grass beds, dominated by mostly small herbivores, some grazing algae on sea grasses rather than the plants themselves, and detritivores, may be fairly recent. Domning (2001) notes that sirenians, large marine herbivores from less than 100 to more than 1,000 kg in size, are well known as fossils in the New World from the Eocene onwards, with three or more species being sympatric; sirenians extant today do not reflect past diversity. The different sizes of the tusks of these animals, and the degree of rostral inflection (how much the front of the jaw is bent downwards) allows speculation about their feeding habits, which likely ranged from eating sea grass leaves to grubbing up the sometimes quite large rhizomes (to 10 mm across) of genera like Thalassodendron. However, in the later Pliocene the whole system may have broken down (see also above), with some sirenians and sea grasses going extinct. Thus general ecological relationships in the whole Caribbean region showed extensive changes at this time, whether because of geological changes or cooling of the climate or both (Ivany et al. 1990; Domning 2001 and references). Extant seagrass communities serve as nurseries for the young of a variety of animals, and this relationship is also evident in fossil seagrass communities (Ivany et al. 1990).
Bacterial/Fungal Associations. Seagrasses reduce the relative abundance of bacteria that are potential pathogens of fish and invertebrates living in seagrass communities, although how they do this is unknown (Lamb et al. 2017).
Vegetative Variation. Tomlinson (1974b) described the vegetative morphology of sea grasses. He noted that in some taxa branching patterns were remarkably precise; roots were initiated within apical meristems, and were themselves unbranched, although a few taxa did have branched roots. The growth of sea grasses is highly modular, and members show an allometric scaling of their parts, the sizes of leaves, fruits, shoots and rhizomes all being correlated: Species with thin rhizomes grow fast and have short-lived leaves; plants with thicker rhizomes grow more slowly, but have longer-lived leaves and more inter-module integration (Tomlinson 1974b; Duarte 1991). Resting buds are produced sporadically throughout this group.
Non-medullated roots are quite common, occurring in e.g. Butomaceae, Alismataceae (inc. Limnocharitaceae) (Stant 1964, 1967), Aponogeton, Triglochin, Potamogeton, and many of the core seagrass clade (Kuo & den Hartog 2006), although roots of e.g. Posidonia are somewhat medullated (von Guttenberg 1968). Maundia (the roots are sometimes branched here) has triarch roots that lack pith (Platonova et al. 2016). Arber (1921) noted that inverted vascular bundles were to be found in the leaf blades of some Hydrocharitaceae, Butomaceae, Alismataceae, Cymodoceaceae and Potamogetonaceae, while other taxa have unifacial leaves. Plants that produce some kind of exudate are scattered in this group; I know rather little about the morphology of the secretory canals and the composition of the exudate, so any mention of laticifer should not be interpreted literally.
Genes & Genomes. A genome duplication for taxa in this clade, the SALAα event, has been dated to ca 96.5 Ma (Landis et al. 2018). The cmt2 allele, chromomethylase, a methylation gene is not function in Spirodela and Zostera, and perhaps not in aquatic angiosperms (Harkess et al. 2020). For extensive cytological studies, see e.g. Harada (1956), Uchiyama (1989), Sharma and Chatterjee (1967) and Costa and Forni-Martins (2003).
There are a number of reports of sex chromosomes around here, e.g. in Phyllospadix (Harada 1956).
At least some genesfrom the chondrome show an accelerated rate of change in aquatic Alismatales (G. Petersen et al. 2006).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Thickened (nacreous) walls occur in the sieve tubes of a variety of seagrasses (Kuo 1983), and Platonova et al. (2016) discuss foliar vasculature in detail.
Remizowa et al. (2010b) discuss carpel fusion in the clade; when carpels are adnate to the central floral axis, they are often free laterally (see also Nymphaeaceae) and there is no compitum. The large single-celled suspensor is the micropylar cell produced by the first division of the zygote.
For general accounts of sea grasses, see den Hartog (1970), Tomlinson (1982: esp. anatomy), Kuo and McComb (1989), Hemminga and Duarte (2000), Green and Short (2003: inc. distribution maps, etc.), den Hartog and Kuo (2006, in Larkum et al. 2006: especially useful), Wissler et al. (2011) and Hogarth (2015); see Zidorn (2016) for summary of secondary metabolites, Zindler-Frank (1976) for oxalate accumulation, and Wilder (1975) for vegetative branching, inflorescence morphology, etc.; Eckardt (1957) discussed the gynoecium of a number of taxa in the group; Sokoloff et al. (2013c and references) describe the rather scattered distribution of taxa with air canals in the testa.
Phylogeny. Les and Tippery (2013: main tree 167 taxa, rbcL) provide a phylogeny of the whole group as well as detailed studies of most of the families within it. However, recent studies using 347 nuclear genes are not giving a clear picture of relationships around here (c.f. Baker et al. 2021: see Seed Plant Tree).
[Alismataceae [Butomaceae + Hydrocharitaceae]] : apical meristems of vegetative axes bifurcating; C-glycosyl flavones +; (adaxial peripheral foliar vascular bundles +, inverted); Vorläuferspitze on blades of emergent leaves 0; inflorescence branches determinate; bracteole +; members of both P whorls with many traces; (androecium with trunk bundles), A pairs +; compitum 0, placentation ± laminar; (ovules many/carpel); seeds testal; chromosomes (0.8-)2-13.6 µm long; seedlings with collar rhizoids [?level].
Age. The age of this clade is mid-Cretaceous, some (127≤-)103.6(-74) Ma (L.-Y. Chen et al. 2012a), ca 95 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004), or around 83.5 Ma (Tank et al. 2015: Table S2); ca 72.1 Ma is the estimate in Magallón et al. (2015) and ca 66.2 Ma is the estimate in Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020: But-Alis ca 46.3 Ma).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. L.-Y. Chen et al. (2013) thought that the ancestor of this clade inhabited Eurasia.
I have tentatively put a character of leaf development at this node, but sampling is exiguous in the extreme (Bharathan 1996). Floral morphology is very variable, particularly in Hydrocharitaceae (some species with very reduced flowers) and Alismataceae. And even in the monotypic Butomaceae, Sattler and Singh (1978), emphasising the timing of primordium initiation, describe paired stamens being associated with the inner T whorl, while Iwamoto et al. (2018), emphasising position, describe the flowers as having paired stamens opposite the outer T whorl. A glance at the literature shows disagreements over morphological interpretations are common... Sokoloff et al. (2013) suggested that a perianth differented into calyx and corolla might be an apomophy here - it might, or there might be parallel evolution in Hydrocharitaceae and Alimataceae, as here.
Ecology & Physiology. Crassulacean acid metabolism ( CAM) is known from both Hydrocharitaceae and Alismataceae (Keeley 1998a).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. In carpels that are incompletely sealed at anthesis (see Kaul 1976), pollen can get inside the carpels and even germinate there (Johri & Bhatnagar 1958).
Genes & Genome. Many protein genes involved in the large and small subunits of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins have been lost in this clade (Adams et al. 2002b). For cytogenetics in this clade, see Feitoza et al. (2009).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. The prophylls of Limnocharis (Alismataceae) and Vallisneria (Hydrocharitaceae) may not be in the normal adaxial position (Wilder 1975).
Whether or not and where staminal pairs develop and other aspects of androecial development seems to depend on available space in the meristem, itself determined by how (relatively) fast the members of the two perianth whorls grow (Iwamoto et al. 2018; see also Posluszny et al. 2000). Islam (1950) described both Alismataceae and Hydrocharitaceae as having tenuinucellate ovules.
For floral development, on which much work has been carried out, see e.g. Charlton and Ahmed (1973) and Charlton (2004), for tepal vasculature, see Glück (1919).
ALISMATACEAE Ventenat, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Plant (cormose, stoloniferous), with exudate; flavone and phenolic sulphates, tannins + (0); rhizome with endodermis; (vessels 0); hairs (unicellular or stellate); stomatal subsidiary cells with parallel divisions; leaves two-ranked or spiral, with petiole and blade, blade elliptic to sagittate, (terete), vernation involute, apical subepidermal pore +, primary veins merging with each other/not, (vascular bundles inverted), petiole terete; plant (mon- or dioecious);inflorescence scapose, branches whorled; P = K + C; C more or less crumpled in bud, thin, fugaceous, initiation delayed; nectary at base of C, A, or from staminodes or carpel flanks; A initially in pairs opposite C, also latrorse, endothecium with base-plate thickenings; pollen pantoporate; G 2-many, ± free, with residual floral apex, partly ascidiate, placentation also basal-lateral; ovules (one/carpel), epitropous, (apotropous - Luronium], (parietal tissue none); embryo sac bisporic [chalazal dyad], 6-nucleate [variant of Allium-type], (monosporic, 4-nucleate [Oenothera-type]); fruit also an achene; exotesta with outer wall thickened, (thin-walled, cells with upturned ends [Limnocharis]), (with glandular hairs), tegmen ± obliterated or walls ± thickened; endosperm nuclear [Alisma etc.]; embryo strongly curved; n = (5-)7-8(-13), x = 7, chromosomes 2.4-14.4 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.777-)10.007(-128.895) pg..
15 [list]/88 (115). Pantropical, also temperate (map: see den Hartog 1957; Hultèn 1961; Meusel et al. 1965; Haynes & Holm-Nielsen 1997; Fl. Austral. 39: 2011; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 7. 2012).
Age. L.-Y. Chen et al. (2012a) estimated the age of crown group Alismataceae as being Upper Cretaceous, some (109.2-)79.4(-68.6) Ma while the estimate in Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020) is a mere ca 32.7 Ma.
A 6 [Alisma]; pollen surface granular [Alisma etc.]; (G connate basally - Damasonium); radicle 0.
4 [= Luronium, Damasonium, Baldellia, Alisma]/10.
Synonymy: Damasoniaceae Nakai
A initially 3 opposite C, later A initiation centrifugal [Hydrocleis]/3 opposite K, later initiation centrifugal [Limnocharis]/etc.; pollen (0-3 porate - Caldesia), surface spinose; style with narrow canal filled with secretion [Sagittaria]; ovules 1-15/carpel, (nucellar cap ca 2 cells across - e.g. Sagittaria); radicle 0.
Limnocharis, etc. G open at anthesis, placentation laminar; ovules many/carpel; radicle +.
11/78: Echinodorus (30). [Photo - Limnocharis Flower, Echinodorus Flower, Fruit, Sagittaria Flower, Limnocharis vegetative, Hydrocleys flower.]
Age. Fossils from Early to Middle Campanian deposits in Egypt perhaps 79 Ma have been placed in Echinodorus (Coiffard & Mohr 2018).
Synonymy: Limnocharitaceae Cronquist
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. For the fossil record of Alismataceae, see Friis et al. (2011). Ages for clades within the family are given by L.-Y. Chen et al. (2012a), and there are also biogeographical reconstructions there.
Ecology & Physiology.There is single-celled C4 photosynthesis in Sagittaria (Bowes 2010).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. For a summary of pollination in Alismataceae, see also Gottsberger (2016a). In at least some species of Ranalisma and Sagittaria the pollen tubes grow down the style, out through an opening at the base of the carpel, into the floral axis and thence into adjacent carpels (X.-F. Wang et al. 2002, 2006, 2011; Huang et al. 2014). This could be quite a high-level apomorphy in the family!
The individual fruitlets of Limnocharis separate from the axis and float, while in Baldellia ranunculoides Sculthorpe (1967) noted that the fruits sank but the seedlings floated.
Genes & Genomes. For cytogenetics here, see Feitoza et al. (2010).
The chloroplast genome of Sagittaria lichuanensis, at a hair over 179,000 bp, is the second largest known (Y. Luo et al. 2016), after that of Pelargonium hortorum.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. The blade of Sagittaria develops from the upper part of the leaf; there is a Vorläuferspitze on cataphylls, but not on the blades of emergent leaves, and the petiole is evident in these leaves early in development (Bloedel & Hirsch 1979). Both leaf form and flower type (staminate, carpelate) are extremely plastic in taxa like Sagittaria latifolia (Dorken & Barrett 2004).
Although there are often many carpels and stamens, organ initiation is basically whorled. The inner tepals of Alisma are initiated after the stamens (Rudall 2010). Stamen initiation in the family may be centrifugal or centripetal; there are common stamen primordia (Sattler & Singh 1977). The pollen often contains starch, and the pores of the pollen grains have very irregular margins. The carpels in the antesepalous position may initiate first, sometimes on gynoecial bulges, or the carpels may be in many whorls (looking spiral!) and completely covering the axis (Singh & Sattler 1972, 1973, 1977a; Charlton 2004 and references; Rudall 2008). Alternatively, there may be a single whorl of carpels with a large, residual floral axis in the center, as in members of the old Limnocharitaceae (e.g. Leins & Stadler 1973); there the carpels are connate laterally, there are many ovules per carpel, and placentation is laminar.
General information is taken from Haynes et al. (1998b: as Alismataceae and Limnocharitaceae) and Hooper and Symoens (1982: as Limnocharitaceae); for general morphology, see Charlton and Ahmed (1973), for vegetative anatomy, see Stant (1964, 1967), for floral development, see Leins and Stadler (1973), Charlton and Ahmed (1973), Charlton (1991 and references), Wang and Chen (1997) and K.-M. Liu et al. (2002), for the endothecium, see Manning and Goldblatt (1990), and for embryology, see Dahlgren (1928b, 1934b) and Johri (1936 and references).
Phylogeny. Details of the relationships between and within Alismataceae s. str. and Limnocharitaceae are still rather unclear (Soros & Les 2002; Y. Kato et al. 2003; J.-M. Chen et al. 2004a, b; L.-Y. Chen et al. 2012a; von Mering & Kadereit 2010; Lehtonen 2009 for a summary). Echinodorus is polyphyletic (Soros & Les 2002; see also Lehtonen & Myllys 2008). Morphological analyses yield poorly supported basal pectinations with Butomopsis, Hydrocleys, and Limnocharis successively sister to the remainder of the clade; Alismataceae in the old sense then form a well supported clade (Lehtonen 2009: several characters show continuous variation). In an analysis with comprehensive sampling and using ITS plus three chloroplast genes a well-supported clade [Luronium, Damasonium, Baldellia, Alisma] was sister to the rest of the family (see also J.-M. Chen et al. 2004a), but there was only moderate to weak support along the basal part of the backbone. Furthermore, this clade was not recovered in a smaller study using additional chloroplast genes, or was in a different position when mitochondrial genes were used (L.-Y. Chen et al. 2012a). It was again well supported in the plastid phylogenomic study of Ross et al. (2015), but Du and Wang (2014) and Du et al. (2016) found that Ranalisma and Burnatia were successively sister to the rest of the family; basal relationships were unclear in Lehtonen (2017).
Classification. Alismataceae include the "old" Limnocharitaceae (first recognized by Takhtajan in 1954) here, and they certainly have much in common.
[Butomaceae + Hydrocharitaceae]: C/inner T whorl development not delayed; ovary loculi with secretions.
Age. The divergence of these two families is dated to ca 88Ma before present (Janssen & Bremer 2004) or around 21.8 Ma (L.-Y. Chen et al. 2012a).
BUTOMACEAE Mirbel, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Plant rhizomatous; monopodial; flavonols?; stomata variable; leaves ± two-ranked, blade triangular; inflorescence scapose, umbellate, with subtending bracts, (floral bracts 0), prophylls 2, lateral; flowers protandrous; T petal-like, but whorls not identical; A 9, in pairs opposite outer T/inner T[?], 3 opposite inner T, some latrorse; pollen monosulcate; nectar from carpel flanks; G 6, fusion postgenital, placentation laminar, stigma ± decurrent; ovules many/carpel, chalazal cells ± hypertrophied, surounding nucellar cells radially arranged; testa with air canals in testa, exotestal cells with outer walls thickened and with encrustations, tegmen persistent; embryo straight, ?colour; n = 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, etc., x = ?8, ?7, chromosomes 3.7-8.3 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.174-)4.581(-120.373) pg; ?seedlings.
1[list]/1: Butomus umbellatus. Temperate Eurasia, naturalised in N.E. North America (map: from Hultén & Fries 1986). [Photo - Habit © D. Woodland, Inflorescence © E. Parnis.]
Age. The age of crown-group Butomaceae is estimated at (50-)30(-15) or (10-)9 Ma (Hertweck et al. 2015).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Diversification rates in this clade are reduced (Hertweck et al. 2015).
Pollination Biology. The staminate and carpelate phases of the flowers in an umbel, possibly in an entire ramet, but not in different ramets, are synchronized (Bhardwaj & Eckert 2001).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Cook (1998) hesitantly suggested that the rhizome was monopodial (see also Bhardwaj & Eckert 2001); this should be checked. Stant (1967) reported crystals "in the form of small rods" (styloids) in the diaphragm cells surrounding the air spaces in the stem; she also suggests that the leaf of Butomus is equivalent to the petiole of Alismataceae (Limnocharitaceae).
For the position of the prophyll, see Eichller (1875). There appear to be C-A primordia, with a pair of stamens differentiating first, and then a single stamen adaxial to that pair (Singh & Sattler 1974). The basal cell of the endosperm may remain undivided but become hypertrophied, or there may be some free nuclear divisions (Fernando & Cass 1996).
Much information is taken from Cook (1998); see also Charlton and Ahmed (1973) for morphology, Iwamoto et al. (2018) for floral morphology, and Roper (1952) and Fernando and Cass (1996) for embryology.
HYDROCHARITACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Stem ± stoloniferous, leaves in groups; branching?; flavone and phenolic sulphates +; vessels 0; endodermis obscure or thick-walled; stomata ?type; (prophyll lateral); leaf blade ± linear; plant dioecious (flowers perfect); inflorescence subtended by 2 often connate bracts; P = K + C; androecium with trunk bundles?, (A introrse); pollen inaperturate, exine thin to none [pollen not resistant to acetolysis]; nectaries 3, staminodial (0); G inferior, carpels laterally ± free, closure by secretion only, placentae much intruded [= carpel walls], style single, short, stigmas branched, papillate adaxially; ovules with outer integument often >3 cells across, micropyle bistomal, parietal tissue 1-2(-more?) layers across, nucellar cap 2-3 cells across (0); fruit often ± fleshy, dehiscence irregular; seeds with short hairs/papillae/0, mesotesta of stone cells, 2-3 layers across, endotegmic cells with variously tuberculate inner walls; chalazal endosperm haustorium +; x = 8 (?7, ?6), nuclear genome [1 C] (0.285-)4.446(-40.263) pg; extensive loss of mitochondrial genes; cotyledon bifacial.
18[list]/116 (135) - four groups below. World-wide (map: blue, marine Hydrocharitaceae; red, freshwater members - see Hultén 1961; Hultén & Fries 1986; Fl. N. Am. 22: 2000; FloraBase 2005; Fl. Austral. 39: 2011; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 7. 2012: van Steenis & van Balgooy 1966; but commonly introduced and original distributions unclear; den Hartog 1970 for marine taxa).
Age. Crown group Hydrocharitaceae are dated to ca 75 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004), while L.-Y. Chen et al. (2012b) suggest a rather younger crown-group age of (72.6-)65.5(-54.7) Ma and Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020) an age of ca 61.0 Ma.
1. Hydrocharitoideae Eaton
Roots branched; foliar vascular bundles inverted; leaves spiral or spirally 2-ranked, with petiole and blade, blade vernation involute or convolute, ligule +, basal, adaxial (paired, lateral) [totally enclosing young leaves], ?sheathing base; plants monoecious; staminate flowers: A (3-)6-12(-18), extrorse, (connate in pairs - different whorls; innermost whorl staminodial Hydrocharis), (pistillode +); pollen tectate-columellate, with (minute) spines; nectary + [?also staminodial]; carpelate flowers: (C 0); (staminodes +); G [3-9], (carpels basally ascidiate - Limnobium), nectary abaxial base of style opposite C [Hydrocharis]; fruit filled with mucilage [H]; ovules straight; exotesta with 1-3-celled papillae, cells with annular thickenings [Hydrocharis]; n = 7-11, 13-15: ?seedlings.
2/5. Temperate and subtropical.
Age. Crown group Hydrocharitoideae are estimated to be ca 16.2 Ma by Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020: huge error bars, ca 41-2 Ma).
[Stratiotoideae [Anacharidoideae + Hydrilloideae]]: roots unbranched; leaf blade ± linear, base not sheathing; plant dioecious (flowers perfect); anthers latrorse [?all]; (ovules straight).
2. Stratiotoideae Luersson
Plant floating, vegetative growth monopodial; stem endodermis 0; leaves spirally 3-ranked, margins strongly spiny; staminate flowers: A many, adaxial 5-17 fertile, staminodes of three kinds, two nectariferous, ± abaxial; pollen baculate, tectum incomplete; pistillode 0; carpelate flowers: staminodes +; G 3, 6, in 2 whorls, outer opposite K, (carpels basally ascidiate); ovules 4-6/carpel; fruit filled with mucilage; testa multiplicative, mesotestal sclereids 9-11 cells across; n = 10+; ?seedlings.
1/1: Stratiotes aloides. Eurasia.
Age. The age of the stem node of Stratiotes is estimated to be 55.9 Ma (Iles et al. 2015).
Synonymy: Stratiotaceae Schultz Sch.
[Anacharidoideae + Hydrilloideae]: plant monopodial; submerged; roots lacking root hairs [?all]; (leaves scattered along stem), (margins spiny); inflorescences axillary, emersed or not; P = T 3 + 3; placentae usu. not much intruded; ovules usu. few/carpel; fruit fleshy, capsular/dehiscence irregular/indehiscent; radicle + [O, V.].
3. Anacharidoideae Thomé
(Plant sub-cormose); root trichoblasts 0 [Blyxa]; leaves whorled, spiral, two ranked, (scales +, usually opposite), (petiole + blade - some Ottelia); (flowers perfect - Apalanthe, Blyxa, Ottelia); staminate flowers: released, usually as buds, (not); P (3); A 2 + 1 staminode [Maidenia], 3 (+ 3 staminodes)-12, (dorsifixed); pollen (bicellular - Ottelia), (with discontinuous exine, little or no sculpturing), (surface spiny); carpelate flowers: hypanthium +, usu. long; P 3 + 3; staminodes +; G [3(-20+)]; (carpel walls much intruded); (ovules many/carpel), (micropyle bistomal); antipodal cells persist; seeds usually <30; n = ?6, 8-12, 14, etc., heteromorphic [Maidenia]; plastid transmission biparental [Ottelia].
7/38: Ottelia (23). Tropical to temperate, esp. America. [Photo - Habit © D. Woodland, Blyxa Habit, Flower © M. Clayton.] and Egeria.
Age. The age of the clade [Apalanthe + Lagarosiphon] is ca 40.5 Ma (Les et al. 2003) or ca 32.8 Ma (Z.-Z. Li et al. 2020).
Synonymy: Blyxaceae Nakai, Elodeaceae Dumortier, Otteliaceae Chatin, nom. illeg.
4. Hydrilloideae Luersson
(Marine); (plant rhizomatous), (annual); (leaves with spines - some Naias); root trichoblasts 0 [Vallisneria]; leaves (spiro)two-ranked or whorled, linear, (base expanded, rounded to 2-lobed - Naias); plant dioecious (monoecious - Najas); P (3 + 1), (3), (0); staminate flowers: (released as buds); A 1-9, (1 staminode); pistillode 0; carpelate flowers: staminodes (0-)3; hypanthium +; G [2-9], (stigmas commissural), (filiform, smooth); (micropyle bistomal), (obturator +); (seeds smooth), (with starch); testa (papillae with fenestrate thickenings - V), (with air canals), (exotegmic tuberculae +); n = 6-8, 10, 12, 15. Marine taxa: sulphated flavones and phenolic acids +: Halophila: sulphated phenolic acids 0; Enhalus: leaves with blade + petiole; pollen exine 0; testa cells with small, peg-like projections; fruit a capsule; testa (photosynthetic - Thalassia); radicle 0; n = 6, 9, chromosomes 0.6-13.2 µm long; plastome ndh genes lost [Naias].
8/61: Najas (40), Vallisneria (12). Tropical and subtropical, especially Old World; Najas subcosmopolitan. [Photo - Hydrilla, © H. Wilson, Halophila, Enhalus, flower, © from D. Les website], Thalassia, fruit, © from D. Les website.]
Age. Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020: Naias sister to the rest) estmate an age of ca 46.1 Ma for this clade.
Synonymy: Enhalaceae Nakai, Halophilaceae J. Agardh, Hydrillaceae Prantl, Najadaceae Jussieu, nom. cons., Thalassiaceae Nakai, Vallisneriaceae Dumortier
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Y. Kato et al. (2003) proposed ages for Hydrilloideae of (130-)119(-108) Ma, while He et al. (1991) proposed a Cretaceous age and Gondwana origin for Ottelia (the stem group age for the genus is ca 16.7 Ma and the crown-group age is (20.1-)13.1(-7.1) Ma in Z.-Z. Li et al. 2020...). Stratiotes has a rich fossil record (as seeds) from the middle of the Eocene onwards (Cook & Urmi-König 1983). Marine seagrasses in the [Thalassia + Enhalus + Halophila] clade are estimated to be 47.8-38 Ma (Iles et al. 2015: stem group age) or ca 40.7 and ca 18.7 Ma (Z.-Z. Li et al. 2020: stem and crown group ages).
As will become clear below, although the four subfamilies are well enough supported, their relationships are quite unclear. Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020) discuss diversification in Ottelia.
Ecology & Physiology. Hydrocharitaceae such as Hydrilla and Egeria have C4 photosynthesis with metabolic compartmentalisation within a single cell - PEPC is in the cytosol, RuBisCO in the chloroplast; it is not terribly efficient (Bowes et al. 2002; Bowes 2010; von Caemmerer et al. 2014).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. Pollination mechanisms in Hydrocharitaceae include entomophily, anemophily, epi- and hypohydrophily, zoobenthophily, and selfing. Parallelism is pervasive, and sex expression of the flowers/plants is very labile, whatever the tree (e.g. see L.-Y. Chen et al. 2012b). For details of pollination mechanisms, see Cook (1982, 1994-1995, 1996), these correlate with pollen morphology and phylogeny (Tanaka et al. 2004). Hypohydrophily has evolved at least twice (e.g. Najas, marine genera), and staminate flowers that detach from the plant and rise to the surface of the water perhaps five times (Les et al. 2006 and references). Pollination in those taxa where the staminate flowers are released may be epi- or hypohydrophilous. In the former, small detached staminate flowers floating on the surface of the water on reflexed sepals are caught by the carpelate flowers; the staminate flowers may have two stamens (Maidenia [?= Vallisneria], each A 3-locular, 8 pollen grains/loculus, 48 grains/flower, Nechamandra), three stamens and three erect staminodes that act as little sails (Lagarosiphon), or six stamens (Appertiella). Hydrilla is wind pollinated, the pollen being released explosively by the anthers as they reach the surface in little gas bubbles produced by the submerged staminate flower, while in Elodea the pollen, similarly produced from submerged flowers, floats. In a number of species the hypanthium elongates greatly, but in others the carpelate flowers have long pedicels, e.g. Maidenia and the marine Enhalus; in either case the flowers open onto the surface of the water. In the marine Halophila the pollen is released embdedded in strands of mucilage, and pollination is underwater. Indeed, marine arthropods active at night may pollinate Thalassia testudinum, here the anthers open at night (van Tussenbroek et al. 2016). The insect-pollinated Blyxa has secondary pollen presentation, while Cook and Lüönd (1982) suggested that in Hydrocharis the staminate flowers, which lack nectaries, mimic the carpelate flowers, which have nectariferous antepetalous staminodes. For more details, see e.g. Ernst-Schwarzenbach (1945) and Tanaka et al. (2013: details of pollen and stigma morphology).
The fruit may be follicular or achenial, or in Hydrocharis opening because of the mucilage developing inside it (for other examples, see Kaul 1978) - and in the latter, the embryo, escaping from the seed, floats (Scriabalo ∧ Posluszny 1984b). Although a number of taxa from all four subfamilies have tuberculate seed coats, whether or not the complex anatomy of the exotesta of Hydrocharis morsus-ranae occurs more widely is unclear (but see Montesantos 1913 - Limnobium); it was not mentioned by Shaffer-Fehre (1991a, b).
Vegetative Variation. Marine taxa are rhizomatous, with leaf-bearing short shoots (see Tomlinson 1974b for a summary). Taxa like Elodea have leaves borne all along the stem, while others have whorled leaves, Stratiotes aloides forms floating rosettes in the summer, but the plant sinks to the bottom of the water in winter, rising again in the next year. Leaf shape and margin also vary a great deal.
Indeed, growth and branching in Hydrocharitaceae needs more study. In Enhalus and Stratiotes the first leaves produced after the cotyledon are at right angles to it, whereas in most other taxa these leaves are borne in the same plane as the cotyledon (Haccius 1952a). Axillary buds along the stems are commonly precocious (Wilder 1975), and pseudodichotomous branching, often interpreted as being the result of this precocious axillary branching, is also quite common (Tomlinson 1974b, 1982). Posluszny and Charlton (1999) described the extremely complex branching in Hydrocharis morsus-rana, suggesting that it has components of flower/inflorescence morphology. They thought that the sheathing bracts, separated by a short internode, might be comparable to the first two leaves on a branch. Tanaka et al. (1997) noted that flowers and axillary branches frequently arise from the same axil, and there is also variation in bracteole number and position (lateral, paired, etc.: Eichler 1875).
Root anatomy seems to be variable, and Montesantos (1913) described that of Ottelia as having a single central vessel, the phloem perhaps being in five groups.
Genes & Genomes. The chloroplast ndh genes are all lost or are pseudogenes in Naias, but not in Elodea (King et al. 2017); I do not know what happens in other Hydrilloideae. Blyxa has notably short chromosomes (Uchiyama 1989); for some cytology, see Vanitha et al. (2016)
The mitochondrial nad1 intron 2 is absent in two representatives of this family (Gugerli et al. 2001); the extent of this loss is unclear.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. The plants may be tanniniferous. Hydrocharis, apparently alone in the group, has a root epidermis that comes from the inner epidermis of the root cap (ref.?).
Pistillate flowers of species of Naias like N. minor seem to lack any trace of a perianth (or androecium) whatsoever (Kajita & Tanaka 2018). The anthers sometimes lack an endothecium (Ernst-Schwarzenbach 1945). Elodea is shown as having its carpels opposite the inner perianth whorl (Eichler 1875). The staminodes of Vallisneria are opposite the petals/inner P and V. spiralis, at least, has commissural stigmas (Les et al. 2008). Kaul (1976) looked at the fusion of the carpels at anthesis; carpels are best interpreted as being more or less free from each other laterally but adnate to the receptacular wall abaxially (Weberling 1989 for references, esp. Kaul 1968). The ovary in at least some taxa is filled with mucilage, but it is unclear if there are intra-ovarian trichomes (Rudall et al. 1998c, c.f. Oriani & Scatena 2012).
General information is taken from Kuo and McComb (1980), Tomlinson (1980: esp. anatomy, marine taxa), Cook (1998: he and collaborators have revised almost the entire family, e.g. see Cook & Urmi-König 1985 and earlier papers), Haynes et al. (1998a), Haynes and Holm-Nielsen (2001) and van Tussenbroek et al. (2006: Thalassia); for morphology and anatomy, see Ancibor (1979), for floral anatomy, etc., see Singh (1966 and references), for floral development, see McConchie (1983: Maidenia) and Scribailo and Posluszny (1985a: Hydrocharis, 1985b: seed, etc.), for ovules, etc., see Kausik (1940a), Islam (1950) and Govindappa and Naidu (1956), and for testa anatomy, see Shaffer-Fehre (1991a, b).
Phylogeny. Tanaka et al. (1997: two genes) found a series of quite well-supported nodes; the ultimate groupings recognised there are similar to those of Les et al. (1997b). Les et al. (2006) in a four-gene analysis of all genera bar one, and including morphological characters, again found largely similar relationships: Hydrocharitoideae were sister to the rest of the family (support unclear, only a single outgroup used), and then Stratiotoideae (support barely moderate, 72% bootstrap, all characters), and then the clade [Anacharidoideae + Hydrilloideae] (52% support); however, the monophyly of all four subfamilies was strongly supported.
Analysis of an eight-gene supermatrix by L.-Y. Chen et al. (2012b) yielded an appreciably different tree. Basic relationships are [Stratiotoideae [Anacharidoideae [Hydrocharitoideae + Hydrilloideae]]]. The position of Stratiotoideae was largely driven by mitochondrial data, otherwise support for the backbone of the tree was strong, but that for the particular position of Hydrilla poor (L.-Y. Chen et al. 2012b). Ross et al. (2015) also recovered this topology, again with strong support for all the subfamilies, but the position of Stratiotoideae was unclear. Les and Tippery (2013) noted the variety of topologies that had been found for the four subfamilies; they themselves found the relationships [Hydrocharitoideae [Anacharidoideae [Stratitoideae + Hydrilloideae]]], althought support was weak, as it was for the monophylyy of Anacharidoideae and Hydrilloideae. Du et al found two main clades in the family, one [Hydrocharitoideae + Anacharidoideae] and the other [Stratiotoideae + Hydrilloideae]. For relationships between Chinese taxa, see Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016). Recently Z.-Z. Li et al. (2020) in an analysis of 78 protein-coding plastome genes recovered the relationships [Stratiotoideae [Anacharidoideae + [Hydrocharidoideae + Hydrilloideae]]] - support values were "high". One awaits results from analyses of the nuclear genomes.
Within Hydrilloideae, Najas was strongly supported (98%) as sister to Hydrilla in a combined molecular analysis, although not in all individual analyses, yet the two are notably distant in the tree in morphological analyses (Les et al. 2006). There is a "marine" clade, [Enhalus [Halophila + Thalassia]], here; the latter genus was on a very long branch in the plastid gene analysis of Lam et al. (2016), and relationships [Halophila [Enhalus + Thalassia]] in Nguyen et al. (2018). Despite the obvious morphological differences between Najas and other Hydrocharitaceae, Posluszny and Charlton (1999 and references) noted that both branching and seed anatomy link them, however, Liu and Li (2010) found Najas to be sister to the other Hydrocharitaceae that they examined, while L.-Y. Chen et al. (2012b) found the relationships [sea-grasses [Najas [Hydrilla + the rest]]]. Najas flexilis was on a very long branch in the chloroplast gene analysis of Y. Luo et al. (2016), and had lost eleven ndh genes. For a phylogeny of Vallisneria, see Les et al. (2008), and for that of Naias see Ito et al. (2017a).
Classification. There are eleven family names available for the eighteen genera in Hydrocharitaceae, reflecting the variety of pollination mechanisms and vegetative adaptations to the aquatic life style. I follow the subfamilial circumscriptions suggested by Les et al. (2006), although their relationships are clearly up in the air.
[Scheuchzeriaceae [Aponogetonaceae [Juncaginaceae [Maundiaceae [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]]]]]: primary root poorly developed; calcium oxalate crystals of any sort absent; floral bracts 0; P members with a single trace; pollen surface reticulate; parietal tissue >2 cells across; chromosomes 0.5-2.3(-4.5) µm long.
Age. The first branch in this clade is dated to ca 98 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004); it is estimated to be around 100 Ma in L.-Y. Chen et al. (2014b).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. L.-Y. Chen et al. (2013) thought that this clade began to diverge in Eurasia.
Volkova et al. (2016) suggest that pollen apertures have been lost and then regained (in Aponogetonaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Ruppiaceae) in this clade.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. A number of taxa in this clade have a radicle that is lateral and exogenous in origin (Yamashita 1970, 1972, 1976).
For a summary of much information about the families below, see Sokoloff et al. (2013c); Markgraf (1936) describes general floral studies in the "simplest Helobiae".
Classification. There are many small families in this clade reflecting the very distinctive floral and vegetative morphologies that have evolved in connection with the aquatic habitat its members favour. Maundiaceae are recognised below, further increasing the number.
The nature of the small, tepal-like structures closely associated with the stamens that are found in many taxa in this part of the tree has occasioned much discussion. Sattler (1962) and Singh (1965) considered the perianth and androecium of Potamogetonaceae to be distinguishable although there was but a single trace to each P/A pair. This tepal-like structure is called a retinaculum by some, and then considered to be some kind of enation, not a tepal; indeed, von Mering and Kadereit (2010) suggest that the clade [Maundiaceae + the rest] may be characterized by a flower that lacks a perianth (several taxa here do entirely lack perianth-type structures). Rudall (2003b, see also references) suggested that the flowers of all or many of the taxa were some kind of pseudanthia. However, flowers in which a tepal/perianth member seems to come from the back of a stamen are here considered to be an extreme form of the tepal-stamen association that is common in monocots.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. For the distribution of sulphated compounds, see especially McMillan et al. (1980).
SCHEUCHZERIACEAE F. Rudolphi, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Plant irregularly sympodial, leafy shoot above substrate; "tannins" +, cyanogenic glucoside triglochinin +, flavonoids 0e; adaxial peripheral foliar vascular bundles inverted; stomata tetracytic; leaves two-ranked, linear, ligulate, with apical pore, intravaginal squamules as hairs; inflorescence bracts +, floral bracts +, ± foliaceous, bracteoles 0; A?; pollen in dyads, inaperturate, exine forming a common covering [= calymmate]; septal nectary 0; G 3(-6), opposite outer T, basally connate, fusion usually congenital, placentation parietal, stylulus 0 [?level], ?compitum; ovules (1) 2/carpel, subbasal, endostomal, outer integument ca 4 cells across, inner integument ca 2 cells across, parietal tissue 4-5 cells across, (nucellar cap 2 cells across); T persistent in fruit; testa smooth, mesotesta many layered, cells with thick walls; embryo chlorophyllous; n = 11, x = ?7. ?6, ?8, chromosomes 0.8-2 µm long; cotyledon not photosynthetic, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.065-)1.628(-40.566) pg.
1[list]/1: Scheuchzeria palustris. N. Temperate to Arctic (map: see Hultén 1961; Fl. N. Am. 22: 2000). [Photo - Habit.]
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Although Scheuchzeriaceae are chemically like Juncaginaceae, they are not otherwise particularly similar.
The inflorescence is described as being a closed raceme; there is a terminal flower (Volkova et al. 2016).
Some information is taken from Haynes et al. (1998b: general); see Volkova et al. (2016) for pollen and Stenar (1935) for embryology.
[Aponogetonaceae [Juncaginaceae [Maundiaceae [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]]]]: floral bracts 0.
Age. Silvestro et al. (2020) estimate the time-of-origin of Aponogetonaceae to be ca 115.7 Ma, based on fossil pollen, and this is over twice as much as that based on macrofossils.
APONOGETONACEAE Planchon, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Plant with a short rhizome or corm, apical meristems of vegetative axes bifurcating [?all]; vessels 0; laticifers +, articulated; peripheral vascular bundles in the leaf various; leaves ± amphistomatous, spiral, with petiole and blade, blade vernation involute, primary veins merge with each other, tertiary veins few, apex of old leaves with pore; plants mon(di-)oecious; inflorescence scapose, spicate, flowers sessile, (monosymmetric); P (1-4); staminate flowers: A (8-16), (stamen pairs +), (anthers introrse); microsporogenesis also simultaneous; pollen monosulcate, reticulum uniform, muri broad, (micro)echinate; pistillode ?; carpelate flowers: (P 0); staminodes +; G 2-9, free, alt. P, septal nectaries + (0), placentation basal; ovules 1-12/carpel, (unitegmic - integument 5-6 cells across), nucellar cap ca 2 cells across; fruit ?dehiscence, T etc. persistent or not; seed coat mucilaginous, testa (multiplicative), with air canals, exotesta protective or not, endotegmen tanniniferous, or undifferentiated and translucent; embryo chlorophyllous or not, radicle sublateral, exogenous (0 - Aponogeton crispus); n = ?12, 16, 19, etc., x = 12 (?13), chromosomes 0.5-2.5 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.254-)2.1(-17.381) pg; cotyledon bifacial.
1[list]/50. Old World, esp. South Africa, largely tropical and warm temperate, suspected of being introduced in parts of Southeast Asia-Malesia - localities not on map) (map: from van Bruggen 1985, 1990). [Photo - Aponogeton Flower © H. Wilson, Habit © R. Kowal.]
Age. Crown-group Aponogetonaceae may be ca 23.3 Ma (Les et al. 2003) or (48-)39.8(-32.2) Ma (L.-Y. Chen et al. 2014b).
The distinctive pollen of Aponogeton has recently been reported from western Greenland and North America in deposits around 82-81 Ma (Grímsson et al. 2013); current and past distributions are rather different.
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Given the age of the pollen identified as Aponogetonaceae from the northern hemisphere (Grímsson et al. 2013) and the strongly supported sister-group relationship of the Australian Aponogeton hexatepalus to the rest of the genus, the place of origin and diversification of the clade is difficult to ascertain (L.-Y. Chen et al. 2014b: c.f. Fig 3 and abstract). There is a long lag time - perhaps 60 Ma - between its origin and diversification.
Pollination Biology. Madagascan and Indian species of Aponogeton can be hybridized (Yadav 1995; see also Grímsson et al. 2013).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Epidermal cells may have small chloroplasts (P. Baas, in van Bruggen 1985). For cell death and the development of the fenestrate leaves of Aponogeton madagascariensis, see Gunawardena and Dengler (2006), Wright et al. (2009), Dauphinee et al. (2017) and Rantong and Gunawardena (2018).
The bract may form an hybrid organ with a tepal, so making the flower slightly monosymmetric; separate bracts were not seen (Buzgo 2001). More pronounced monosymmetry occurs in flowers in which only two perianth members develop; these appear to be the abaxial pair, and in a monocot flower with "normal" orientation these would be members of the inner perianth whorl; the median member of the outer whorl of stamens is abaxial (see Singh & Sattler 1976b); a parallelism with Maundia (Sokoloff et al. 2013c). Septal nectaries are absent, according to Tobe et al. (2018). How/if the fruit dehisces is unclear (van Bruggen 1998).
Some information is taken from van Bruggen (1985, 1990, 1998); for floral morphology, see Remizowa et al. (2010b), for embryology, see Sâné (1939), and for embryo development, see Yamashita (1976).
Phylogeny. For the phylogeny of the genus, see Les et al. (2005), Les and Tippery (2013) and especially L.-Y. Chen et al. (2014b). The Australian Aponogeton hexatepalus, with six tepals and quite distinctive pollen, is sister to the rest of the genus.
[Juncaginaceae [Maundiaceae [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]]]: leucanthocyanins, flavones 0; stem/rhizome endodermis +; fibre bundles in leaf; leaf ± linear, ligulate, base with auricles; flowers rather small, closely aggregated, inconspicuous; T-A pair with single vascular trace [T often adnate to A]; filaments shorter than the anthers, anthers ± sessile; pollen inaperturate; septal nectary 0, G free, ascidiate [sampling!]; ovule 1/carpel; carpels the dispersal unit; endosperm nuclear/coenocytic.
Age. The age of this node is estimated at ca 82 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004; see also L.-Y. Chen et al. 2014b), about 77.4 Ma (Tank et al. 2015: Table S2) or ca 68.8 Ma (Magallón et al. 2015).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. The character "ovule one/carpel" is placed at this node by Remizowa et al. (2012b), q.v. for the evolution of a number of characters in this part of the tree. For the evolution of syncarpy around here, see Sokoloff et al. (2013d).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. See Thadeo et al. (2015) for fruitlet anatomy of some taxa in this clade.
Phylogeny. Iles et al. (2009, 2013) and von Mering and Kadereit (2010) suggested that Juncaginaceae are paraphyletic; the separation of Maundia from the rest of the family in fact clarifies gynoecial variation within Juncaginaceae s.l.. However, von Mering and Kadereit (2010) were not sure of the exact position of Maundiaceae.
JUNCAGINACEAE Richard, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Rosette herb; apical meristems of vegetative axes bifurcating [?all]; O- and C-glycosyl flavones, cyanogenic glucoside triglochinin +; (stem endodermis 0); (laticifers - Lilaea); (adaxial peripheral foliar vascular bundles inverted); stomata also tetracytic, subsidiary cells with parallel divisons; leaves spiral, ± unifacial, (2-ranked, ventralized isobifacial [oriented edge on to the stem] - Tetroncium), (ligules - Triglochin); (plant dioecious - Tetroncium), (flowers polygamous); inflorescence scapose, (flowers sessile), bracts (+ - Lilaea); flowers 1-4-merous, (monosymmetric), P 0-4, 6; A 3-8; (pollen bicellular); G 1 [3-10], weakly (more strongly) connate (± free - Cycnogeton), fertile carpels opposite inner P, (opposite P - Tetroncium), (alternating with an outer whorl of sterile carpels), (styluli long - some Lilaea s. str., Tetroncium), stigma penicillate; ovules 1-few/carpel, basal, outer integument ³3 cells across, parietal tissue 4-6 cells across; fruit schizocarpic/drupaceous/achenial/(hooked, winged), T persistent or not; exotesta and entegmen with cuticle, otherwise crushed; (endosperm +), embryo ?colour, with short thick hypocotyl, primary root lateral, exogenous; n = 6, 8, 15, etc., x = ?12, ?8, ?11, chromosomes 0.6-1.1 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.063-)1.441(-33.115) pg.
3[list]/30: Triglochin (15). Cosmopolitan, largely coastal (map: see Hultèn 1961; Meusel et al. 1965; Hultén & Fries 1986; Fl. N. Am. 22: 2000; FloraBase 2004; Köcke et al. 2010). [Photo - Habit, Fruit.]
Age. Crown-group ages for Juncaginaceae are ca 51.7 Ma (Les et al. 2003) and (80.4-)70.2, 44.1(-27.4) Ma (von Mering & Kadereit 2014).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Movement of the family in the southern hemisphere may have been facilitated by the proximity of ex-Gondwana fragments; there is a fair amount of habitat-linked diversification in Triglochin (von Mering & Kadereit 2014).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. Imperfect flowers may lack a perianth (carpelate flowers of Lilaea) and have a single stamen and carpel; to a certain extent the number of parts in the flower is connected with flower size (Buzgo et al. 2006). The abaxial median tepal is somewhat bract-like (Buzgo 2001; Buzgo et al. 2006; Remizowa et al. 2010b). Stamens of the outer tepal-stamen unit may be outside tepals of the inner tepal-stamen unit (Dahlgren et al. 1985; Endress 1995b). There is no evidence of pseudanthia; terminal flowers are close to being peloric (Buzgo et al. 2006). Seedlings of Triglochin have two-ranked leaves.
Some information is taken from Arber (1925: general), Agrawal (1952: embryology), Haynes et al. (1998b: general), and von Mering (2013) and Sokoloff et al. (2015c), both Tetroncium; for alternative interpretations of the gynoecium, see Igersheim et al. (2001).
Phylogeny. Relationships are [Tetroncium [Cycnogeton + Triglochin]]; Lilaea is embedded in Triglochin (von Mering & Kadereit 2008, 2014).
Classification. For a classification of the family, see von Mering and Kadereit (2008). Trias-Blasi et al. (2015) still include Maundia in the family.
Synonymy: Heterostylaceae Hutchinson, Lilaeaceae Dumortier, Triglochinaceae Berchtold & J. Presl
[Maundiaceae [[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]]: vessels 0; peripheral ring of sclerenchyma in peduncle 0 [M, Pot, R]; ovule apical, pendulous, straight.
Age. Janssen and Bremer (2004) suggest that the age of this node is ca 75 Ma.
Phylogeny. For discussion of the position of Maundiaceae, see Les and Tippery (2013).
MAUNDIACEAE Nakai - Back to Alismatales
Rosette herb; rhizome endodermis +, outer vascular bundles of scape inverted; abaxial peripheral foliar vascular bundles inverted, no fibre bundles; leaves 2-ranked, 2 expanded leaves/module, ± triangular, isobifacial, ligule 0, base narrow [ca 1/2 surrounding the stem], cataphylls +, sheath closed, branching extravaginal; inflorescence scapose, spicate, flowers sessile; flowers monosymmetric by reduction; bracteoles also 0; P 2, tranverse-abaxial, (-4 - terminal flowers), clawed, (with three traces); A (4-)6, with separated thecae; G [(3-)4], laterally ± free, cruciform, styluli marginal, recurved; outer integument 3-4 cell layers across, with air canals, inner integument ca 2 cells across, parietal tissue 4(?+) cells across, nucellar coenocyte + [cell walls of tissue immediately distal to vascular bundle break down]; fruit a schizocarp, T persistent; testa obliterated; n/x = ?
1[list]/1: Maundia triglochinoides. East Australia (map: from Australia's Virtual Herbarium, viii.2009).
Evolution: Vegetative Variation. Platonova et al. (2016) drew attention to the remarkable similarity in anatomy of the inflorescence axis and leaves, also describing the distinctive vegetative construction of the plant in detail.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. There appear to be twice as many stamens as tepals, but this is because the anther thecae are separated. Von Mering and Kadereit (2010) discuss the interpretation of the androecium; as they note, similar stamens are found in Posidoniaceae and Zosteraceae. Sokoloff et al. (2013c) described the morphology of Maundia in detail, noting i.a. variation in floral diagrams, while Platonov et al. (2016) looked at its vegetative anatomy..
[[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]] [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]]: submerged marine aquatics; leafy shoot above substrate; rhizome with central vascular tissue; peripheral foliar vascular bundles 0; epidermis chlorophyllous, stomata 0; hydrophily + [water pollination]; flowers imperfect; carpelate flowers: G free, stomata 0; fruit ± drupaceous; embryo with massive elongated hypocotyl, also prominent in seedling, base of hypocotyl [collar] much enlarged.
Age. Janssen and Bremer (2004: c.f. topology; see also L.-Y. Chen et al. 2014b) suggest that the first split within this clade can be dated to ca 73 Ma, and they also give other divergence dates within it; see also Coyer et al. (2013: again, c.f. topology).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Whether vessels and stomata are lost in parallel several times, and/or are lost and then regained, is unclear (see Zosteraceae for more discussion). Thus genes involved in stomatal differentiation have been lost in Zostera (Olsen et al. 2016; H. T. Lee et al. 2016), while the stomata of Potamogetonaceae have a rather odd development, perhaps suggesting that there they have been reacquired.
Ecology & Physiology. Les et al. (1997b) observed that halophily might have evolved at this node, and was subsequently lost, or it evolved twice within this clade, depending on how optimisation was carried out; Australia figures prominently in scenarios for the evolution of halophily (see also L.-Y. Chen et al. 2013). For the ecology of seagrasses, see discussion above.
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. Underwater pollination, hypohydrophily, is particularly common here and pollination mechanisms throughout the group have been much studied (e.g. Pettit et al. 1980; Cox 1988; Cox et al. 1991; Ackerman 2006; Remizowa et al. 2012b; Du & Wang 2014; see also above).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. There are many questions about plant growth, for which, see Tomlinson (1974b); information about the sympodial/monopodial growth habit is taken from Hartog and Kuo (2006). Inflorescence and flower morphology in this clade can also be difficult to interpret. For anatomy, see Sauvageau (1891, 1892), and for details of morphology, anatomy, etc., although not of the non-marine members, see Larkum et al. (2006); stomata are absent even on the carpels (Sokoloff et al. 2013c).
Phylogeny. This clade is only poorly supported in some molecular studies (Les et al. 1997b), but the relationships above were e.g. found by Les and Tippery (2013), Ross et al. (2015: strong support for all families and their relationships), Du and Wang (2014) and Du et al. (2016). However, Cymodoceaceae was found to be sister to the other families of this group by Nauheimer et al. (2012b). L.-Y. Chen et al. 2013) did not recover a [Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae] clade, rather, Cymodoceaceae were either very paraphyletic or polyphyletic, depending on one's interpretation of the tree, and they are paraphyletic in Isles et al. (2013) and unresolved in J.-M. Chen et al. (2004a). Janssen and Bremer (2004) found a clade [Ruppiaceae [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]. Ruppiaceae are sister to [Posidioniaceae + Cymodoceaceae] in a rbcL analysis of Y. Kato et al. (2003), in the analysis of Petersen et al. (2015a), dominated by mitochondrial genes, but relationships in this area were generally unclear in the studies of Liu and Li (2010) and Les and Tippery (2013). A [Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae] clade was recovered by J.-M. Chen et al. (2004a).
For phylogenies of several of the genera included here, see Waycott et al. (2006) and Les and Tippery (2013).
[Posidoniaceae [Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]]: plant monopodial; sulphated phenolic acids +; leaves two-ranked; P 0; anthers with apical development of the connective; pollen much elongated.
Age. For a possible date for this node of ca 27 Ma, see Coyer et al. (2013: c.f. topology).
POSIDONIACEAE Vines, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Rhizome cortex with fibre strands, strands from leaf sheath persistent; inflorescence branched, branches with bracts, flowers sessile [ultimate units spicate]; flowers usu. perfect, bracts +, unvascularized; A 3, thecae more or less separate, deciduous, connective broad, shield-like [T-like after thecae fall]; pollen filiform, smooth, exine 0 [pollen not resistant to acetolysis]; G 1, stylulus 0, stigma complex; compitum necessarily 0; ovule sessile, campylotropous, with an outgrowth of fused integuments opposite the micropyle, outer integument ca 6 cells across, inner integument ca 4 cells across, parietal tissue ca 10+ cells across; fruit a fleshy follicle, surrounded by persistent connective; seed coat photosynthetic; first cleavage of zygote vertical; n = 10, x = 10, chromsomes dimorphic, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.07-)1.435(-29.345) pg; chloroplast ndh genes lost/subfunctionalized; seedling with primary root, root hairs few, or root 0.
1[list]/9. Mediterranean, temperate Australia (map: see den Hartog 1970).
Evolution: Ecology & Physiology. Clones of Posidonia oceanica in the Mediterranean may be up to 15 km across and thousands to tens of thousands or more years old - estimates were up to 200,000 years (Arnaud-Haon et al. 2012: dissemination by fragments of plants taken into consideration). Carbon in dense Posidonia oceanica meadows in the Mediterranean may be more than 3,000 years old, and plant deposits, whether as rhizomes in sediment or leaves washed up along the shore, may be massive (Mateo et al. 2006; Gobert et al. 2006).
In Posidonia oceanica, at least, the thickening on the walls of the root hairs is in spirals, and the root hairs break down into spirals (= helical crack root hairs) that are probably effective energy-dissipating units, furthermore, the apices of the hairs are irregularly expanded, the combination probably helping in th attachment of the plant (Kolátková & Vohník 2019: see also Orchidaceae and Araceae).
Evolution: Seed Dispersal. The fleshy fruits can float (Ackerman 2006).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. The morphology of the ovules is distinctive and basically uncategorizable (see also Remizowa et al. 2012b). Ma et al. (2012) described embryo sac development; it is monosporic and 4-nucleate; two of the nuclei fuse and form a diploid polar nucleus. This should be confirmed, as should the plane of division of the zygote, which was described as being vertical but looks almost oblique (Ma et al. 2012).
Additional information is taken from Tomlinson (1982: esp. anatomy), Kuo and McComb (1998), Gobert et al. (2006) and den Hartog and Kuo (2006), all general; for chemistry, see Heglmeier and Zidorn (2010), for germination, see Kuo and Kirkman (1997).
[Ruppiaceae + Cymodoceaceae]: stem with central stele, cortical bundles +, endodermis indistinct, xylem lacunae + [ruptured xylem tissue, xylem ± 0]; leaves serrulate; flowers monosymmetric by reduction; A 2; compitum 0.
RUPPIACEAE Horaninow, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Flowering plant sympodial; sulphates?; roots unbranched; rhizome cortical bundles 2; leaves 1-veined, sheath not ligulate, ± auriculate [= "stipule"]; inflorescence densely spicate, peduncle long [to 1 m] (not); plant monoecious; pollen elongate-arcuate, triaperturate; G 2-15(-many), stylulus 0, stigma ± peltate/funneliform; ovules also lateral, campylotropous, micropyle bistomal, parietal tissue ca 7 cells across; fruit achene/drupelet, long-stipitate, stone operculate; testa 2-layered, exotegmen cells large with branched protuberances from the walls, all becoming crushed; endosperm helobial, primary root lateral, exogenous; n = 8-12, 15, x = 10, chromosomes dimorphic, 0.7-4.4 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.067-)1.413(-29.85) pg.
1[list]/1-10. More or less world-wide, apparently quite frequently growing well away from the sea in all continents (map: see Hultén 1961; Fl. N. Am. 22: 2000; Heywood 1978 [for some of the southern hemisphere]; Ito et al. 2010; Fl. Austral. vol. 39: 2011; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 7. 2012).
Evolution: Ecology & Physiology. The plant quite often grows in brackish or fresh water, and the epidermis is the main photosynthetic tissue in the plant (Haynes et al. 1998a).
Seed Dispersal. The fruits are eaten by water birds; long distance dispersal is likely (Ito et al. 2010).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. For pollen development, see M. L. Taylor et al. (2018). Although Haynes (1978; see also Haynes et al. 1998a) described the ovules as being campylotropous, they are shown as being straight by Gamerro (1968) and Posluszny and Sattler (1974). I follow the latter for the interpretation of stamen morphology; they mention that parietal tissue is about 1 cell across - but c.f. Haynes et al. (1998a). Ovule morphology needs to be cleared up.
General information is to be found in Tomlinson (1982: esp. anatomy) and Haynes et al. (1998).
Phylogeny. Ito et al. (2010) look at the biosystematics of this difficult group in which cytological variation is considerable and hybridisation is likely; Ito et al. (2015) focussed on southern African taxa.
Classification. Ruppiaceae are only doubtfully distinct from Cymodoceaceae (Les et al. 1997b).
CYMODOCEACEAE Vines, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
(Plant sympodial - Thalassodendron), stems erect; (roots branched), (root hairs 0); distinctive cyclitols; rhizome with two or a ring of vascular bundles; (sieve tubes with thick nacreous walls - Halodule); (adaxial peripheral foliar vascular bundles +, inverted - Syringodium), leaves two ranked, (blade terete - Syringodium), (apex serrulate); plant dioecious (monoecious); flowers in cymose groups enclosed by bracts, or solitary, terminal; staminate flowers: A (2), ± connate, (apical appendages 0 - Syringodium), (filaments 0); (microsporogenesis simultaneous - Thalassodendron); pollen filiform, (smooth), exine 0/?+; carpelate flowers: G 2, stylulus +, stigmatic branches 2, 3, long; fruit achene or drupelet, pericarp/endocarp stony, 1 (2) seeded; testa 0, (seed coat with flattened cells that have annular thickenings - Halodule); n = 7, 8, 10, 12, 14-16, x = 10 (?9), chromosomes 0.22-16.3µm long, nuclear genome [1C] (0.067-)1.413(-29.85) pg; (chloroplast ndh genes lost/subfunctionalized - Amphibolis); (seed viviparous), seedling with tuft of root hairs.
5[list]/16. More or less tropical (to warm temperate), Australia in particular (map: see den Hartog 1970; van Baloogy 1975; Australia's Virtual Herbarium xii.2013). [Photo - Habit.]
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Both Thalassodendron and Cymodocea are known fossil from late Middle Eocene deposits from Florida although their current distribution is entirely Old World (Lumbert et al. 1984; Ivany et al. 1990).
Pollination and Seed Dispersal. For pollination, see Cox and Humphries (1993). Amphibolis and Thalassodendron are viviparous (Ackerman 2006).
Genes & Genomes. For chromosomes, see Kuo (2013: ?Thalassodendron) and Vanitha et al. (2016).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. For Remizowa et al. (2011) the flowers of Cymodoceaceae represented racemose partial inflorescences. Tomlinson (1982) described Thalassodendron as having a basal, anatropous ovule, while Takhtajan (1985) and Tomlinson and Posluszny (1978) described the ovules of Syringodium as being apical and straight. Cymodocea is viviparous, and the cotyledon is at most small (e.g. Arber 1925: C. antarctica).
Additional information is taken from Kuo and McComb (1989, 1998: general); for cyclitols, see Drew (1983) and for floral morphology see Kay (1971) and McConchie et al. (1982).
This family needs work.
Phylogeny. For relationships in Cymodoceaeae, see Ross et al. (2014); Halodule is well supported as sister to the rest of the clade (see also Petersen et al. 2015a) and Cymodocea is paraphyletic.
Classification. Trias-Blasi et al. (2015) included Ruppiaceae in Cymodoceaceae.
Botanical Trivia. Pollen of Amphibolis is up to 5 mm long.
[Zosteraceae + Potamogetonaceae]: roots unbranched; leaf with apical pore, (sheath closed); plant mono- or dioecious; compitum 0.
Age. Estimates of the time these two clades diverged range from ca 100 Ma (Y. Kato et al. 2003) to ca 47 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004); Wilf and Escapa (2014) date the Patagonian Babiancarpus, stem Potamogetonaceae, to 56-42 Ma.
ZOSTERACEAE Dumortier, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Plant monopodial (sympodial - some Zostera); sulphated phenolic acids and flavonoids + (0), fructan sugars accumulated; roots in two groups/rows; rhizome cortical bundles 2 (several - some Zostera), unlignified fibrous strands (0 - Phyllospadix), endodermis +; sieve tubes with thick nacreous walls; fibre bundles in leaf; foliar vascular bundles with xylem and phloem separated; leaves two-ranked, ligule +, (sheath closed); plant (mon-)/dioecious; inflorescence leaf opposed, branched, with spathe and spadix, spadix axis flattened, flowers in two ranks, alternating on adaxial surface; flowers monosymmetric by reduction; staminate flowers: P 1/0; A 1, anther thecae separate, joined by connective, filament 0; pollen filiform, (bicellular - Zostera), smooth, exine 0 [pollen not resistant to acetolysis]; pistillode 0; carpelate flowers: staminode +, G 1, ± asymmetrical, stylulus +, stigmatic branches 2, long (± fimbriate - Phyllospadix), abscise; ovule with outer integument to 7 cells across, parietal tissue none, 2 nucellar layers laterally, supra-chalazal area massive, postament +; fruit an achene/follicle; exotestal cells ± anticlinally and periclinally elongate, other cells persist, ± thickened or not, tegmen degenerates; n = 6, 9, 10, x = ?, chromosomes 0.9-1.6 µm long, nuclear genome ca 202.3 Mb [Zostera]; no primary root.
2[list]/14. Temperate to subtropical (map: see den Hartog 1970; van Balgooy 1975).
Age. Divergence may have started within Zosteraceae ca 33 Ma (Y. Kato et al. 2003), ca 17 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004), or ca 23.3. Ma (Coyer et al. 2013).
Evolution: Ecology & Physiology. The genome of Zostera marina shows many changes that can be linked with adaptations to problems of living the submerged life - genes for u.v. protection, exine production, terpenoid synthesis and stomatal differentiation have all been lost, while the cell wall pectin has a distinctive composition and there are sulphated polysaccharides (galactans) involved in osmotic balance (Olsen et al. 2016; H. T. Lee et al. 2016; Roodt et al. 2019). The ability to synthesize ethylene, an important plant hormone, seems to have been lost (see also Golicz et al. 2015) and the jasmonate and gibberellin pathways have also been affected. However, it is unclear to what extent these features might be restricted to Zosteraceae, to the immediate group of largely marine Alismatales, or to marine Alismatales in general, while some of these features may be associated with the loss of secondary thickening in monocots as a whole (Roodt et al. 2019).
There appears to be significant nitrogen fixation by bacteria on the root surfaces in Zostera marina (Marbà et al. 2006).
The age of a clone of Zostera marina in the Baltic was estimated to be more than 1,000 years (Reusch et al. 1999).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. De Cock (1980) describes pollination and seed dispersal in Zostera marina in detail, noting i.a. that germination of the filiform pollen occurs anywhere along its length, and that the ripe fruit splits down its abaxial side and the seed falls out - a sort of follicle (c.f. Kuo & McComb 1998).
Bacterial/Fungal Associations. The heterokont Labrinthula zosterae causes the wasting disease that has severely affected Zostera marina and may affect other species of the genus (K. A. Moore & Short 2006).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. All leaves on a plant are similar in morphology.
Tomlinson (1982) suggested that the staminate flowers had two bisporangiate/monothecal anthers. The course of endosperm development is unclear.
General information is taken from Kuo and McComb (1998), Tomlinson and Posluszny (2001) and K. A. Moore and Short (2006: Zostera), reproductive morphology from Soros-Pottruff and Posluszny (1994: Phyllospadix).
Phylogeny. For relationships in Zosteraceae see Y. Kato et al. (2003), Les et al. (2001) and in particular Coyer et al. (2013); Phyllospadix is sister to the rest of the family (see also J.-M. Chen et al. 2004a).
Classification. For generic limits, see Les et al. (2001).
POTAMOGETONACEAE Berchtold & J. Presl, nom. cons. - Back to Alismatales
Vessels +; rhizome with cortical bundle system; xylem mostly as xylem lacunae; (stomata +, development odd); leaf with ligule, basal, sheathing, auricles 0; (inflorescence bracts + - "subtending spathe"); (plant monoecious); (floral bracts +, unvascularized); flowers (perfect), (2-)4-merous; (pollen vestigial sulcate?); G (1-)4(-8), alternating with P, ± stipitate, partly ascidiate, stigma ± expanded; ovule becoming campylotropous, parietal tissue 4-6 cells across, (nucellar cap 2-5 cells across), (hypostase +), obturator 0; fruit a drupelet, T persistent; seed exotestal; embryo curved, white; n = 12-18, x = 13 (?14), chromosomes 0.5-2.3 µm long, nuclear genome [1 C] (0.067-)1.481(-32.972) pg.
4[list]/111. Worldwide, esp. temperate. Map: see Hultén (1961), Meusel et al. (1965), Haynes and Holm-Nielsen (2003), Kaplan (2008) and Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 7 (2012). [Photo - Habit, Potamogeton Inflorescence.]
Age. Divergence within Potamogetonaceae may have begun ca 25 Ma (Janssen & Bremer 2004).
1. Potamogetoneae Dumortier
Plant freshwater; rhodoxanthin + [red colour]; leaves spiral, 2-ranked, subopposite pair just below the inflorescence [Potomageton], (whorled), often with petiole and blade, blade vernation involute, with apical pore, primary veins merge with each other, ligule long, adnate to petiole/not, free or connate/0; inflorescence capitate to spicate, or flowers 2; flowers sessile, 4-merous; P clawed, adnate to A; fruit (1-seeded berry - Groenlandia); seed (coat crushed); n = 13 (14).
2. Zannichellieae Dumortier
Plants ± marine (brackish, alkaline waters); flavone sulphates +; apical meristems of vegetative axes bifurcating; leaves 2-ranked/pseudowhorled, ± linear, with apical pore, (margin serrulate), sheath/ligule adnate to leaf base, free ligule (bifid); plant monoecious (dioecious), inflorescence sympodial, ± fasciculate; flowers pedicillate (sessile); staminate flowers terminal: P 0 or 3; A 1, 2-12-sporangiate; carpelate flowers: P tubular, or 3-4; G 1-8, when 3, opposite P, when 4, diagonal or cruciform, stipitate, stylulus +, stigma enlarged, peltate or infundibular with ± feathery margin; seed coat crushed; n = 6.
3-4/13. Europe and North Africa, South Africa, the Antipodes, Zannichellia palustris almost cosmopolitan.
Age. Divergence within Zannichellieae may have begun ca 38.3 Ma (Les et al. 2003).
Synonymy: Zannichelliaceae Chevallier, nom. cons.
Evolution: For character evolution in Zannichellieae, see Ito et al. (2016); there has been some pretty serious long distance dispersal in this clade.
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. Cross-pollination is by wind, or by pollen floating on the surface of the water. Pereira Nunes et al. (2012) suggested that Potomageton illinoensis might have a hyperstigma.
Potamogeton in particular is a very important source of food for ducks in North America; the fruit floats and is photosynthetic.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc.. There is great variation in the leaf base, including the ligules (often called stipules), and in leaf blade shape; this occurs both within and between species, some taxa of Potamogeton being heterophyllous, with submerged and floating leaves differing greatly in form. Potamogeton tends to have trilacunar nodes, and there has been some debate as to whether the ligule is "really" a stipule (Colomb 1887; Sinnott & Bailey 1914).
Remizowa et al. (2011) thought that the flowers of Zannichellia might represent racemose partial inflorescences. Posluszny and Tomlinson (1977) suggested that staminate flowers of Zannichellia had a single anther with up to 12 sporangia, although other interpretations seem possible; the anthers are sessile. There has also been debate as to the nature of the ovule, which is often more or less campylotropous, sometimes because of an ingrowth of the carpel wall (Takaso & Bouman 1984; Pereira Nunes et al. 2010).
Much general information on Alismataceae s. str. is taken from from Haynes (1978) and Haynes et al. (1998b: also Zannichelliaceae) and Haynes and Holm-Nielsen (2003); see also Posluszny (1981) and Charlton and Posluszny (1991) for floral morphology, Pereira Nunes et al. (2009) for pollen development (esp. tetrad shape) and Kaplan et al. (2013) for chromosome numbers (not Zannichellia).
Phylogeny. The morphologically very distinctive Zannichellia and relatives, which alone in the family commonly have flavone sulphates, is rather weakly embedded within Potamogetonaceae (Les et al. 1997) or sister to the rest of the family (Les & Tippery 2013), however, the old Zannichelliaceae are quite well supported as sister to Groenlandia in the plastid phylogenomic study of Ross et al. (2015) while in Du and Wang (2014) and Du et al. (2016) Groenlandia was sister to the rest of the family. For relationships around Zannichellia, see Ito et al. (2016). Potamogeton itself is para- or polyphyletic (Les & Haynes 1995); for the phylogeny and evolution of Potamogeton in particular, see Lindqvist et al. (2006).