EMBRYOPSIDA Pirani & Prado
Gametophyte dominant, independent, multicellular, initially ±globular, not motile, branched; showing gravitropism; acquisition of phenylalanine lysase* [PAL], flavonoid synthesis*, microbial terpene synthase-like genes +, triterpenoids produced by CYP716 enzymes, CYP73 and phenylpropanoid metabolism [development of phenolic network], xyloglucans in primary cell wall, side chains charged; plant poikilohydrous [protoplasm dessication tolerant], ectohydrous [free water outside plant physiologically important]; thalloid, leafy, with single-celled apical meristem, tissues little differentiated, rhizoids +, unicellular; chloroplasts several per cell, pyrenoids 0; glycolate metabolism in leaf peroxisomes [glyoxysomes]; centrioles/centrosomes in vegetative cells 0, microtubules with γ-tubulin along their lengths [?here], interphase microtubules form hoop-like system; metaphase spindle anastral, predictive preprophase band + [with microtubules and F-actin; where new cell wall will form], phragmoplast + [cell wall deposition centrifugal, from around the anaphase spindle], plasmodesmata +; antheridia and archegonia +, jacketed*, surficial; mblepharoplast +, centrioles develop de novo, bicentriole pair coaxial, separate at midpoint, centrioles rotate, associated with basal bodies of cilia, multilayered structure + [4 layers: L1, L4, tubules; L2, L3, short vertical lamellae] (0), spline + [tubules from L1 encircling spermatid], basal body 200-250 nm long, associated with amorphous electron-dense material, microtubules in basal end lacking symmetry, stellate array of filaments in transition zone extended, axonemal cap 0 [microtubules disorganized at apex of cilium]; male gametes [spermatozoids] with a left-handed coil, cilia 2, lateral; oogamy; sporophyte +*, multicellular, growth 3-dimensional*, cuticle +*, plane of first cell division transverse [with respect to long axis of archegonium/embryo sac], sporangium and upper part of seta developing from epibasal cell [towards the archegonial neck, exoscopic], with at least transient apical cell [?level], initially surrounded by and dependent on gametophyte, placental transfer cells +, in both sporophyte and gametophyte, wall ingrowths develop early; suspensor/foot +, cells at foot tip somewhat haustorial; sporangium +, single, terminal, dehiscence longitudinal; meiosis sporic, monoplastidic, MTOC [MTOC = microtubule organizing centre] associated with plastid, sporocytes 4-lobed, cytokinesis simultaneous, preceding nuclear division, quadripolar microtubule system +; wall development both centripetal and centrifugal, 1000 spores/sporangium, sporopollenin in the spore wall* laid down in association with trilamellar layers [white-line centred lamellae; tripartite lamellae]; plastid transmission maternal; nuclear genome [1C] <1.4 pg, main telomere sequence motif TTTAGGG, KNOX1 and KNOX2 [duplication] and LEAFY genes present, ethylene involved in cell elongation; chloroplast genome with close association between trnLUAA and trnFGAA genes [precursors for starch synthesis], tufA, minD, minE genes moved to nucleus; mitochondrial trnS(gcu) and trnN(guu) genes +.
Many of the bolded characters in the characterization above are apomorphies of more or less inclusive clades of streptophytes along the lineage leading to the embryophytes, not apomorphies of crown-group embryophytes per se.
All groups below are crown groups, nearly all are extant. Characters mentioned are those of the immediate common ancestor of the group,  contains explanatory material, () features common in clade, exact status unclear.
Sporophyte well developed, branched, branching dichotomous, potentially indeterminate; hydroids +; stomata on stem; sporangia several, terminal; spore walls not multilamellate [?here].
II. TRACHEOPHYTA / VASCULAR PLANTS
Sporophyte long lived, cells polyplastidic, photosynthetic red light response, stomata open in response to blue light; plant homoiohydrous [water content of protoplasm relatively stable]; control of leaf hydration passive; plant endohydrous [physiologically important free water inside plant]; PIN[auxin efflux facilitators]-mediated polar auxin transport; (condensed or nonhydrolyzable tannins/proanthocyanidins +); xyloglucans with side chains uncharged [?level], in secondary walls of vascular and mechanical tissue; lignins +; roots +, often ≤1 mm across, root hairs and root cap +; stem apex multicellular [several apical initials, no tunica], with cytohistochemical zonation, plasmodesmata formation based on cell lineage; vascular development acropetal, tracheids +, in both protoxylem and metaxylem, G- and S-types; sieve cells + [nucleus degenerating]; endodermis +; stomata numerous, involved in gas exchange; leaves +, vascularized, spirally arranged, blades with mean venation density ca 1.8 mm/mm2 [to 5 mm/mm2], all epidermal cells with chloroplasts; sporangia adaxial, columella 0; tapetum glandular; ?position of transfer cells; MTOCs not associated with plastids, basal body 350-550 nm long, stellate array in transition region initially joining microtubule triplets; archegonia embedded/sunken [only neck protruding]; suspensor +, shoot apex developing away from micropyle/archegonial neck [from hypobasal cell, endoscopic], root lateral with respect to the longitudinal axis of the embryo [plant homorhizic].[MONILOPHYTA + LIGNOPHYTA]
Sporophyte growth ± monopodial, branching spiral; roots endomycorrhizal [with Glomeromycota], lateral roots +, endogenous; G-type tracheids +, with scalariform-bordered pits; leaves with apical/marginal growth, venation development basipetal, growth determinate; sporangium dehiscence by a single longitudinal slit; cells polyplastidic, MTOCs diffuse, perinuclear, migratory; blepharoplasts +, paired, with electron-dense material, centrioles on periphery, male gametes multiciliate; nuclear genome size [1C] = 7.6-10 pg [mode]; chloroplast long single copy ca 30kb inversion [from psbM to ycf2]; mitochondrion with loss of 4 genes, absence of numerous group II introns; LITTLE ZIPPER proteins.
Sporophyte woody; stem branching lateral, meristems axillary; lateral root origin from the pericycle; cork cambium + [producing cork abaxially], vascular cambium bifacial [producing phloem abaxially and xylem adaxially].
SEED PLANTS† / SPERMATOPHYTA†
Growth of plant bipolar [roots with positive geotropic response]; plants heterosporous; megasporangium surrounded by cupule [i.e. = unitegmic ovule, cupule = integument]; pollen lands on ovule; megaspore germination endosporic [female gametophyte initially retained on the plant].
EXTANT SEED PLANTS
Plant evergreen; nicotinic acid metabolised to trigonelline, (cyanogenesis via tyrosine pathway); microbial terpene synthase-like genes 0; primary cell walls rich in xyloglucans and/or glucomannans, 25-30% pectin [Type I walls]; lignin chains started by monolignol dimerization [resinols common], particularly with guaiacyl and p-hydroxyphenyl [G + H] units [sinapyl units uncommon, no Maüle reaction]; roots often ≥1 mm across, stele diarch to pentarch, xylem and phloem originating on alternating radii, cork cambium deep seated; stem apical meristem complex [with quiescent centre, etc.], plasmodesma density in SAM 1.6-6.2[mean]/μm2 [interface-specific plasmodesmatal network]; eustele +, protoxylem endarch, endodermis 0; wood homoxylous, tracheids and rays alone, tracheid/tracheid pits circular, bordered; mature sieve tube/cell lacking functioning nucleus, sieve tube plastids with starch grains; phloem fibres +; cork cambium superficial; leaf nodes 1:1, a single trace leaving the vascular sympodium; leaf vascular bundles amphicribral; guard cells the only epidermal cells with chloroplasts, stomatal pore with active opening in response to leaf hydration, control by abscisic acid, metabolic regulation of water use efficiency, etc.; axillary buds +, exogenous; prophylls two, lateral; leaves with petiole and lamina, development basipetal, lamina simple; sporangia borne on sporophylls; spores not dormant; microsporophylls aggregated in indeterminate cones/strobili; grains monosulcate, aperture in ana- position [distal], primexine + [involved in exine pattern formation with deposition of sporopollenin from tapetum there], exine and intine homogeneous, exine alveolar/honeycomb; ovules with parietal tissue [= crassinucellate], megaspore tetrad linear, functional megaspore single, chalazal, sporopollenin 0; gametophyte ± wholly dependent on sporophyte, development initially endosporic [apical cell 0, rhizoids 0, etc.]; male gametophyte with tube developing from distal end of grain, male gametes two, developing after pollination, with cell walls; female gametophyte initially syncytial, walls then surrounding individual nuclei; embryo cellular ab initio, suspensor short-minute, embryonic axis straight [shoot and root at opposite ends], primary root/radicle produces taproot [= allorhizic], cotyledons 2; embryo ± dormant; chloroplast ycf2 gene in inverted repeat, trans splicing of five mitochondrial group II introns, rpl6 gene absent; ??whole nuclear genome duplication [ζ - zeta - duplication], 2C genome size (0.71-)1.99(-5.49) pg, two copies of LEAFY gene, PHY gene duplications [three - [BP [A/N + C/O]] - copies], 5.8S and 5S rDNA in separate clusters.
IID. ANGIOSPERMAE / MAGNOLIOPHYTA
Lignans, O-methyl flavonols, dihydroflavonols, triterpenoid oleanane, apigenin and/or luteolin scattered, [cyanogenesis in ANA grade?], lignin also with syringyl units common [G + S lignin, positive Maüle reaction - syringyl:guaiacyl ratio more than 2-2.5:1], hemicelluloses as xyloglucans; root cap meristem closed (open); pith relatively inconspicuous, lateral roots initiated immediately to the side of [when diarch] or opposite xylem poles; epidermis probably originating from inner layer of root cap, trichoblasts [differentiated root hair-forming cells] 0, hypodermis suberised and with Casparian strip [= exodermis]; shoot apex with tunica-corpus construction, tunica 2-layered; starch grains simple; primary cell wall mostly with pectic polysaccharides, poor in mannans; tracheid:tracheid [end wall] plates with scalariform pitting, multiseriate rays +, wood parenchyma +; sieve tubes enucleate, sieve plate with pores (0.1-)0.5-10< µm across, cytoplasm with P-proteins, not occluding pores of plate, companion cell and sieve tube from same mother cell; ?phloem loading/sugar transport; nodes 1:?; dark reversal Pfr → Pr; protoplasm dessication tolerant [plant poikilohydric]; stomata randomly oriented, brachyparacytic [ends of subsidiary cells level with ends of pore], outer stomatal ledges producing vestibule, reduction in stomatal conductance with increasing CO2 concentration; lamina formed from the primordial leaf apex, margins toothed, development of venation acropetal, overall growth ± diffuse, secondary veins pinnate, fine venation hierarchical-reticulate, (1.7-)4.1(-5.7) mm/mm2, vein endings free; flowers perfect, pedicellate, ± haplomorphic, protogynous; parts free, numbers variable, development centripetal; P = T, petal-like, each with a single trace, outer members not sharply differentiated from the others, not enclosing the floral bud; A many, filament not sharply distinguished from anther, stout, broad, with a single trace, anther introrse, tetrasporangiate, sporangia in two groups of two [dithecal], each theca dehiscing longitudinally by a common slit, ± embedded in the filament, walls with at least outer secondary parietal cells dividing, endothecium +, cells elongated at right angles to long axis of anther; tapetal cells binucleate; microspore mother cells in a block, microsporogenesis successive, walls developing by centripetal furrowing; pollen subspherical, tectum continuous or microperforate, ektexine columellate, endexine lamellate only in the apertural regions, thin, compact, intine in apertural areas thick, orbicules +, pollenkitt +; nectary 0; carpels present, superior, free, several, spiral, ascidiate [postgenital occlusion by secretion], stylulus at most short [shorter than ovary], hollow, cavity not lined by distinct epidermal layer, stigma ± decurrent, carinal, dry; suprastylar extragynoecial compitum +; ovules few [?1]/carpel, marginal, anatropous, bitegmic, micropyle endostomal, outer integument 2-3 cells across, often largely subdermal in origin, inner integument 2-3 cells across, often dermal in origin, parietal tissue 1-3 cells across, nucellar cap?; megasporocyte single, hypodermal, functional megaspore lacking cuticle; female gametophyte lacking chlorophyll, four-celled [one module, nucleus of egg cell sister to one of the polar nuclei]; ovule not increasing in size between pollination and fertilization; pollen grains bicellular at dispersal, germinating in less than 3 hours, siphonogamy, pollen tube unbranched, growing towards the ovule, between cells, growth rate (20-)80-20,000 µm/hour, apex of pectins, wall with callose, lumen with callose plugs, penetration of ovules via micropyle [porogamous], whole process takes ca 18 hours, distance to first ovule 1.1-2.1 mm; male gametophytes tricellular, gametes 2, lacking cell walls, ciliae 0, double fertilization +, ovules aborting unless fertilized; fruit indehiscent, P deciduous; mature seed much larger than fertilized ovule, small [<5 mm long], dry [no sarcotesta], exotestal; endosperm +, ?diploid [one polar nucleus + male gamete], cellular, development heteropolar [first division oblique, micropylar end initially with a single large cell, divisions uniseriate, chalazal cell smaller, divisions in several planes], copious, oily and/or proteinaceous, embryo short [<¼ length of seed]; plastid and mitochondrial transmission maternal; Arabidopsis-type telomeres [(TTTAGGG)n]; nuclear genome [2C] (0.57-)1.45(-3.71) [1 pg = 109 base pairs], ??whole nuclear genome duplication [ε/epsilon event]; ndhB gene 21 codons enlarged at the 5' end, single copy of LEAFY and RPB2 gene, knox genes extensively duplicated [A1-A4], AP1/FUL gene, palaeo AP3 and PI genes [paralogous B-class genes] +, with "DEAER" motif, SEP3/LOFSEP and three copies of the PHY gene, [PHYB [PHYA + PHYC]]; chloroplast chlB, -L, -N, trnP-GGG genes 0.
Evolution. Possible apomorphies for flowering plants are in bold. The actual level at which many characters, particularly the more cryptic ones, should be assigned is unclear. This is because some taxa basal to the [magnoliid + monocot + eudicot] group have been surprisingly little studied, there is considerable homoplasy as well as variation within and between families of the ANITA grade in particular for several of these characters, and also because details of relationships among gymnosperms will affect the level at which some of these characters are pegged. For example, if reticulate-perforate pollen is optimized to the next node on the tree (see Friis et al. 2009 for a discussion), it effectively makes the pollen morphology of the common ancestor of all angiosperms ambiguous... For other features such as a nucellus only one (Nymphaeales) to three cells thick above the embryo sac and a stylar canal lacking an epidermal layer, although plesiomorphous for basal grade angiosperms (Williams 2009), where on the tree a thicker nucellus and a stylar epidermal layer are acquired has not yet been indicated.
[NYMPHAEALES [AUSTROBAILEYALES [[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]]]]: wood fibres +; axial parenchyma diffuse or diffuse-in-aggregates; pollen monosulcate [anasulcate], tectum reticulate-perforate [here?]; ?genome duplication; "DEAER" motif in AP3 and PI genes lost, gaps in these genes.
[AUSTROBAILEYALES [[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]]]: phloem loading passive, via symplast, plasmodesmata numerous; vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates in primary xylem; essential oils in specialized cells [lamina and P ± pellucid-punctate]; tension wood + [reaction wood: with gelatinous fibres, G-fibres, on adaxial side of branch/stem junction]; anther wall with outer secondary parietal cell layer dividing; tectum reticulate; nucellar cap + [character lost where in eudicots?]; 12BP [4 amino acids] deletion in P1 gene.
[[CHLORANTHALES + MAGNOLIIDS] [MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]] / MESANGIOSPERMAE: benzylisoquinoline alkaloids +; sesquiterpene synthase subfamily a [TPS-a] [?level], polyacetate derived anthraquinones + [?level]; outer epidermal walls of root elongation zone with cellulose fibrils oriented transverse to root axis; P more or less whorled, 3-merous [?here]; pollen tube growth intra-gynoecial; extragynoecial compitum 0; carpels plicate [?here]; embryo sac monosporic [spore chalazal], 8-celled, bipolar [Polygonum type], antipodal cells persisting; endosperm triploid.
[MONOCOTS [CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]]: (veins in lamina often 7-17 mm/mm2 or more [mean for eudicots 8.0]); (stamens opposite [two whorls of] P); (pollen tube growth fast).
[CERATOPHYLLALES + EUDICOTS]: ethereal oils 0 [or next node up]; fruit dry [very labile].
EUDICOTS - Back to Main Tree
(Myricetin +), asarone 0 [unknown in some groups, + in some asterids]; root epidermis derived from root cap [?Buxaceae, etc.]; (vessel elements with simple perforation plates in primary xylem); nodes 3:3; stomata anomocytic; flowers (dimerous), cyclic; protandry common; K/outer P members with three traces, ("C" +, with a single trace); A ?, filaments fairly slender, anthers basifixed; microsporogenesis simultaneous, pollen tricolpate, apertures in pairs at six points of the young tetrad [Fischer's rule], cleavage centripetal, wall with endexine; G with complete postgenital fusion, stylulus/style solid [?here], short [<2 x length of ovary]; seed coat?
Note: In all node characterizations, boldface denotes a possible apomorphy, (....) denotes a feature the exact status of which in the clade is uncertain, [....] includes explanatory material; other text lists features found pretty much throughout the clade. Note that the particular node to which many characters, particularly the more cryptic ones, should be assigned is unclear. This is partly because homoplasy is very common, in addition, basic information for all too many characters is very incomplete, frequently coming from taxa well embedded in the clade of interest and so making the position of any putative apomorphy uncertain. Then there are the not-so-trivial issues of how character states are delimited and ancestral states are reconstructed (see above).
Age. Estimates of the age of the crown eudicot clade commonly range from 150-120 m.y.a., e.g. (147-)137(-128) m.y. (with eudicot calibration) to (172-)153(-138) m.y. (without: S. A. Smith et al. 2010, see also their Table S3), ca 146 m.y. (Zeng et al. 2017, c.f. Foster & Ho 2017), (154-)145(-136) m.y. Foster et al. 2016a), (153-)147, 131(-125) m.y. (Wikström et al. 2001, 2004), (167.3-)149(-128.4) m.y. (Tank & Olmstead 2017: note topology), ca 135 m.y. (Tank et al. 2015: Table S1), 122-120 m.y. (Anderson et al. 2005), (123.9-)122.2(-116.8) m.y. in Schwery et al. (2014), 131.1-118.5 m.y. (Moore et al. 2007), ca 125 m.y. (Magallón & Castillo 2009), ca 131.7 m.y. (Magallón et al. 2015), (145-)130, 129(-117) m.y. (or thereabouts: Bell et al. 2010), (127-)126(-123) m.y. (N. Zhang et al. 2012; see also Xue et al. 2012), (129.4-)124.8-123.6(-120.2) m.y. (Magallón et al. 2013) and 125-119.5 m.y. (Morris et al. 2018). Soltis et al. (2008: a variety of estimates) suggest an age for crown eudicots of 152-110 m.y., a mid-Jurassic age for the clade of 164-127 m.y. was found when using a broad (15 m.y.) prior on fossil calibrations (Beaulieu et al. 2013), a similar age of (161-)156(-146) (or (128-)125.5(-115) m.y.) was found by Zeng et al. (2014), while the age in Z. Wu et al. (2014) is around 197 m.y., it is 188-129 m.y. in Barba-Montoya et al. (2018), but only 128-124 m.y. in Foster and Ho (2017). See also a variety of ages that depend on whether dating is by phytoliths, nuclear or chloroplast genes, etc., in Christin et al. (2014); a rather unlikely age of (100.4-)96.3(-93) m.y. is suggested by Iles et al. (2014). See also Guindon (2018).
Tricolpate pollen has been found in the Late Barremian-Early Aptian of the Cretaceous some 127-120 m.y.a., and so a minimum age of some 125 m.y. for the eudicots is reasonable (e.g. Doyle & Hickey 1976; Magallón et al. 1999; Sanderson & Doyle 2001; Friis et al. 2011; Herendeen et al. 2017), about the age of the oldest monocot fossils. However, S. A. Smith et al. (2010) note that when tricolpate pollen first appears in the fossil record it is both widely dispersed geographically and quite heterogeneous (see also Friis et al. 2006b), and this might imply an earlier origin of the clade, the fossils then being more marks of its "rise to dominance" than of its origin (Beaulieu et al. 2013: p. 4).
The recent discovery of Leefructus, dated to at least 122.6 m.y. old and assigned to stem group Ranunculaceae (G. Sun et al. 2011; c.f. Crepet et al. 2004 for an earlier mesofossil estimate), could also imply a substantially greater age for Ranunculales - and hence the whole eudicot clade - of ca 152-140 m.y. (simple extrapolation from the ages of various clades in Ranunculales given by Anderson et al. 2005; c.f. W. Wang et al. 2014a, 2016b below). Although Leefructus seems quite well preserved, it is not associated with pollen (Sun et al. 2011). Friis et al. (2011, see also 2017a) discuss a variety of other early fossils that are, or from general morphology might be, associated with plants with tricolpate grains.
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. There is a substantial period of ca 34 m.y. between the [[Ceratophyllales + Chloranthales] eudicots] node and the beginning of eudicot diversification (Zeng et al. 2014). Subsequent divergence of eudicot clades like Proteales, Buxales, etc., may have been rapid, occurring 120-116 m.y.a. (Anderson et al. 2005), while Wikström et al. (2001) thought that the clades immediately below core eudicots had diverged by (140-)135, 123(-118) m.y. ago.
Doyle (2007) scored chloranthoid teeth as plesiomorphous for eudicots; given current ideas of phylogeny, they may be an apomorphy here. He also considered palmate-crowded veins to be an apomorphy for all eudicots, but Sabiaceae were not mentioned, and the interpretation of the venation of Euptelea is debatable, as he noted (Doyle 2007). The palmate venation in aquatics like Nelumbo may further confuse the situation; palmate venation is common in aquatics with their broad peltate or cordate-based leaf blades and so is associated with the aquatic life style.
Sauquet et al. (2017: see Supplementary Fig. 4) note how difficult it is to reconstruct the morphology of the flower at this node. There is a valuable survey of floral morphology of the whole eudicot clade in Endress (2010c: p. 540); "a first [sic] attempt to characterize the major subclades of eudicots". Characterizations there are a mixture or apomorphies and plesiomorphies, with an emphasis on "tendencies".
Dimerous flowers are to be found in the basal eudicot grade, but are uncommon in taxa at the nodes above core eudicots and in monocots (Drinnan et al. 1994; Soltis et al. 2003; Wanntorp & Soltis et al. 2005; Ronse De Craene 2005; Doust & Stevens 2005; Kramer & Zimmer 2006; Moody & Les 2007; Doyle 2013; such flowers are found in the core eudicot Haloragaceae); Endress (2010c) also emphasized that the flowers may be trimerous. Indeed, it has been suggested that the pentamerous flowers of Sabiaceae (Proteales) are derived from trimerous ranunculalean flowers, there being some kind of relationship between the two groups (e.g. Endress 2010c; Ronse De Craene et al. 2015a; c.f. Züñiga 2015) which perhaps have apomorphic tendencies in common (Ronse De Craene et al. 2015b). Stamens are also quite often inserted opposite the tepals in the basal eudicot grade, even if there is more than a single whorl of tepals (e.g. see Endress 1995a for illustrations of these in Ranunculales; Doust & Stevens 2005). This feature is placed at the [monocots [Ceratophyllales + eudicots]] node here, but the flowers of Lauraceae (magnoliids) are similar in this respect.
Taxa with androecia that are initiated as antesepalous triplets are scattered throughout the group (Hufford 2001a), although they are rather uncommon. Although stamen number may be high, development is rarely simply centripetal, as in Magnoliales (e.g. Corner 1946b), and carpel and perianth/petal number do not often increase in parallel, unlike in the euasterids. The basic pollen type for eudicots seems to be tectate/semitectate-reticulate, the latter grains being found in e.g. Platanacaeae, Menispermacaeae, Hamamelidaceae, Gunneraceae (Denk & Tekleva 2006) and Nelumbonaceae; see M.-Y. Zhang et al. (2017) for pollen evolution in the basal eudicots. Matomoro et al. (2015) discuss the evolution of pollen morphology/morphogenesis in terms od selection pressures and developmental constraints; they note that when apertures are not equatorial, pollen morphology and development in particular vary considerably. For an optimisation of syncarpy in this part of the tree, see Sokoloff et al. (2013d).
The evolution of giberellin receptors is of considerable interest in this part of the tree, the receptor(s) being different from those in other land plants (Yoshida et al. 2018), although sampling needs to be improved to work out what is going on. Thinking about cellulose synthesis, xylans are more common than glucomannans, as in other angiosperms. There are glucoronosyl units (α1,2-MeGlcA) every 6 or 8 or so xylosyl residues, and every other xylosyl residue is acetylated, as are the glucoronosyl units themselves, and there are no α-arabinosyl units (Busse-Wicher et al. 2016). This is not that different from what is going on in magnoliids, and exactly where any changes in cell wall synthesis should be placed on the tree is unclear. Triterpenoids produced by a variety of CYP716 enzymes throughout this clade (Miettinen et al. 2017). Cuticle waxes as clustered tubules, nonacosan-10-ol the main wax, could be optimised to this position, later being lost in Sabiaceae, Platanaceae, Buxales, and perhaps also in core eudicots (such waxes are present in a few Santalales, also in woody Saxifragales: see Barthlott et al. 2003).
Ecology & Physiology. Liu et al. (2014) suggest that it is only with the eudicots that we see generally faster litter decomposition, with all the implications this has for nutrient cycling.
Pollination Biology. Diversification of eudicots is roughly contemporaneous with that of bees; the latter is estimated to have begun (132-)123(-113) m.y.a. (Cardinal & Danforth 2013). Protandry is common in eudicots, although aquatic taxa tend to be protogynous, and protogyny - rather, interfloral protogyny - is also common in mono- and dioecious taxa (see Bertin & Newman 1993).
For the possible functional significance of the evolution of triaperturate pollen and of pollen apertures in general see e.g. Dajoz et al. (1991), Halbritter and Hesse (2004), Furness and Rudall (2004) and Matomoro-Vidal et al. (2015); the occurrence of several apertures on one grain may increase the speed of germination of the pollen, but at the same time decrease its viability and affect its harmomegathic movements.
The Eudicot Evolutionary Research website should also be consulted.
Genes & Genomes. Salse et al. (2009) suggested that the common ancestor of the eudicots had seven chromosomes.
There is a ycf68 pseudogene practically through the clade (exception: Citrus aurantiifolia), indeed, throughout the eudicots (Su et al. 2014). For the gene content of the inverted repeat in the immediate ancestor of the eudicots, see Y. Sun et al. (2015).
Taxa in which GLO-like proteins cannot form heterodimers predominate in this clade (Melzer et al. 2014); DEF-like proteins also cannot do this (see also above). Melzer et al. (2014) suggest that this may contribute to the increasing canalization of floral development.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. See Hegnauer (1990) for a discussion of the chemistry of the old Polycarpicae, which has turned out to be a grade group including many Ranunculales, the magnoliids and Austrobaileyales. The Cellulose Synthase gene superfamily is involved in synthesising components of the cells wall, and of these, CslB (sister to the monocot CslH) and CslM (sister to CslJ) can be placed at this node (Little et al. 2018).
Phylogeny. Ranunculales are usually sister to all other eudicots, and Ceratophyllaceae may be sister to eudicots (e.g. Moore et al. 2007); see also the discussion at the mesangiosperm node. The relationships between Chloranthales, magnoliids, Ceratophyllales and monocots, all immediately basal/sister to the eudicots, still remains unclear.
There is some uncertainty about basal eudicot relationships. An unresolved Proteales and Sabiaceae are often sister to eudicots minus Ranunculales (e.g. S. Kim et al. 2004b). A position [Ranunculaceae [Sabiaceae [all other eudicots]]] had only 83% support, of which most came from the matK gene (the other genes examined were petD and trnL-F) in analyses by Worberg et al. (2006, 2007); for this topology, see also Qiu et al. (2010: support weak). A three-gene analysis by Soltis et al. (2003) also found that that Sabiaceae were near Proteales, Buxales, etc., while Morton (2011: nuclear Xdh gene) found some support for a [Platanaceae + Ranunculales] clade and a four gene analysis (Kim et al. 2004a) had a weakly supported [Trochodendrales [Sabiaceae + Buxales]] clade. Moore et al. (2008) did not find strongly-supported relationships in this part of the tree, and various permutations of relationships of the groups being discussed, none strongly supported, were found by Zhu et al. (2007). Soltis et al. (2008) used the topology [Proteaceae [Sabiaceae [Buxaceae [Trochodendraceae + core eudicots]]]] in their book, a topology also recovered by Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016), while [Proteaceae [Sabiaceae ....]] relationships were found by Gitzendanner et al. (2018) - see also Goloboff et al. (2009) and Fiz-Palacios et al. (2011) for other relationships.
Chase et al. (1993) and Drinnan et al. (1995) had found Platanaceae and Nelumbonaceae to be sister taxa; a close relationship was confirmed in the chloroplast genome analysis of Xue et al. (2012). A Proteales s. str. (Nelumbonaceae, Platanaceae and Proteaceae) and Sabiaceae are sister taxa in an analysis of all 79 protein-coding plastid genes and four mitochondrial genes (Moore et al. 2008: support only moderate; see also Soltis et al. 2011 and Moore et al. 2011: support weak in both cases). The two were also sister in the major analyses of chloroplast and nuclear data in M. Sun et al. (2014), but not in the mitochondrial study and in many of the supplementary trees; support was strong in the analysis of Y. Sun et al. (2015). Savolainen et al. (2000a), Qiu et al. (2006b, c.f. 2010), Burleigh et al. (2009), N. Zhang et al. (2012) and Y.-x. Sun et al. (2013); Ruhfel et al. (2014: not all analyses), Z. Wu et al. (2014), Magallón et al. (2015), Barba-Montoya et al. (2018) and T. Yang et al. (2018: chloroplast data, other hypotheses of relationships rejected) have also found evidence for an association of Sabiaceae with Proteales (support sometimes weak), and so an expanded Proteales is recognised here (see also A.P.G. IV 2016). Morphology is consistent with such a position.
The relationships of Buxales and Trochodendrales are also unclear, hence the tritomy in the main tree. Qiu et al. (2006b) found uncertain relationships in a three-gene analysis of mitochondrial data, but with eight genes a topology [Buxales + core eudicots] was recovered (see also Qiu et al. 2010; Hilu et al. 2003; Wikström et al. 2003). Soltis et al. (2011) in their seventeen-gene analysis also found strong support for the [Buxales + core eudicots] clade (see also Moore et al. 2010; Xue et al. 2012; Vekemans et al. 2012; Y.-x. Sun et al. 2013; Ruhfel et al. 2014; Z. Wu et al. 2014; Magallón et al. 2015; Foster et al. 2016a; Barba-Montoya et al. 2018; T. Yang et al. 2018: chloroplast data). In a 3-gene (chloroplast) phylogenetic analysis focussing on the eudicots with a similar combined-data topology (Worberg et al. 2006, esp. 2007a), individual trees showed a variety of relationships. Most of the relationships they found along the eudicot spine were strongly (>90% jacknife) supported. However, Y. Sun et al. (2015) obtained the relationships [Trochodendrales + core eudicots] in their plastome study, but with around only 55% ML bootstrap support. Such relationships had sometimes been obtained before, for example, with strong support by Moore et al. (2011), and also in a few early studies (see Y. Sun et al. 2015 for references). Finally, Gitzendanner et al. (2018) obtained a weakly-supported [Buxales + Trochodendrale] clade sister to the eudicots.
RANUNCULALES Berchtold & J. Presl - Main Tree.
(O-methyl)flavonols, flavonols +; vessel elements?; young stem with separate bundles, vessels only in central part of bundles, true tracheids +; rays exclusively wide multiseriate [and in wood, where present, composed mostly of procumbent cells]; (wood fluorescence +); cambium storied; sieve tube plastids large S-type, dispersive P-protein +; petiole bundles annular; leaf cuticle waxes as clustered tubules with nonacosan-10-ol the main wax [?Euptelea]; leaves spiral; lamina serrate, ?tooth morphology; G opposite P, style 0; ovules 1-2/carpel, bistomal; P deciduous in fruit; seed exotestal; endosperm development?, embryo size? - 7 families, 199 genera, 4510 species.
Note: In all node characterizations, boldface denotes a possible apomorphy, (....) denotes a feature the exact status of which in the clade is uncertain, [....] includes explanatory material; other text lists features found pretty much throughout the clade. Note that the particular node to which many characters, particularly the more cryptic ones, should be assigned is unclear. This is partly because homoplasy is very common, in addition, basic information for all too many characters is very incomplete, frequently coming from taxa well embedded in the clade of interest and so making the position of any putative apomorphy uncertain. Then there are the not-so-trivial issues of how character states are delimited and ancestral states are reconstructed (see above).
Age. Crown-group Ranunculales may be (146-)140, 126(-120) m.y. (Wikström et al. 2001: c.f. topology); Anderson et al. (2005) dated them to 121-114 m.y., Magallón and Castillo (2009) to ca 113.2 m.y., while about 114.8 m.y. is the estimate in Magallón et al. (2015) and about 132.5 m.y. that in Tank et al. (2015: Table S1, S2, relationships at base unclear).
Magallón et al. (1999) suggested a fossil-based age of ca 70 m.y. for the clade, but the fossil was a member of the decidedly non-basal Menispermaceae. Teixeiraea is a name given to multistaminate staminate flowers from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal - the stamens are of two sizes and have tricolpate pollen - that can perhaps be assigned to crown-group Ranunculales, but these fossils might rather belong to Berberidopsidales or Saxifragales (von Balthazar et al. 2005). Paisia, a late Aptian/early Albian fossil from Portugal ca 113 m.y.o. has 5-merous flowers with perianth, stamens and conduplicate carpels all opposite each other and pantoporate pollen, and it, too, may belong around here (Friis et al. 2018). If the identity of Leefructus, a fossil assigned to stem group Ranunculaceae that is at least 122.6 m.y. old (G. Sun et al. 2011), is confirmed, Ranunculales may be 152-140 m.y.o. or so (extrapolating from the dating suggestions of Anderson et al. 2005, but see below).
Krassilov and Volynets (2008) discuss a number of fossils from the Early to Middle Albian (ca 105 m.y.a.) of Primorye that they associated with Ranunculidae sensu Takhtajan, specifically comparing some with Ranunculaceae. The morphology of these fossils is odd, some appearing to have abaxially dehiscent follicles (c.f. Cercidiphyllaceae) and others have axillary fruits at nodes from which branches also arise. The plants are very small, and were described as being weedy (Krassilov & Volynets 2008). The Early Cretaceous Archaefructus has also been compared with Delphinium (Becerra et al. 2012), while Klitzschophyllities, around 110 m.y.o., probably was an aquatic; it is known from Brazil, Portugal, and North Africa and may be stem Ranunculales (Gomez et al. 2009).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Anderson et al. (2005) noted that all families had diverged before 105 m.y. except Ranunculaceae/Berberidaceae, where divergence occurred 104-90 m.y.a. (see also Wikström et al. (2001). However, the recent discoveries of Potomacapnos, ca 120 m.y.o. from the eastern U.S.A., Papaveraceae-Fumarioideae (Jud & Hickey 2013) and Leefructus, 125.8-123 m.y.o. from China, stem Ranunculaceae (G. Sun et al. 2011; W. Wang et al. 2014a, b) may suggest a different scenario. They suggest a very rapid diversification within Ranunculales; since tricolpate pollen is first known from 127-125 m.y.a., or slightly earlier, all families in the order must have diverged within 5 m.y. and so had appeared by ca 123 m.y.a - the "accelerated angiosperm evolution" of Wang et al. (2016b: p. 338).
Flowers in Ranunculales show considerable variability; Damerval and Becker (2017) summarize what is known about floral development here. M.-Y. Zhang et al. (2017) discuss pollen evolution in the group. See W. Wang et al. (2009: extensive morphological data matrix) for the evolution of characters optimised on to a tree with the same topology as that used here, although it is difficult to work out where a character such as 1-2 ovules/carpel should be placed - however, low ovule numbers are probably plesiomorphic in the order. For the distribution of a compitum, see Armbruster et al. (2002) and X.-F. Wang et al. (2011).
Ecology & Physiology. Liu et al. (2014) suggest that it is only somewhere around this node that the origin of angiosperm leaves that decompose rather fast can be pegged.
Pollination Biology. Endress (2010c) emphasized the several independant origins of wind and especially fly pollination in the clade. There are a number of reports of delayed fertilization (up to some two months or more after pollination) in members of Ranunculales, including Eupteleaceae, Circeasteraceae, Lardizabalaceae, and Ranunculaceae (Sogo & Tobe 2006d for references).
Floral nectar spurs have evolved four to six times in Ranunculales; they may be on members of the outer (Myosurus, Delphinium) or inner (Aquilegia) perianth whorls, and be five (Aquilegia), two (Dicentra) or one (Delphinium) in number (Damerval & Nadot 2007).
Plant-Animal Interactions. Ranunculales - perhaps especially Menispermaceae and Ranunculaceae - are little used as food plants of butterfly caterpillars (Ehrlich & Raven 1964), probably because alkaloids and other noxious compounds are common (but see Papaveraceae).
Genes & Genomes. For the complex pattern of duplication of APETALA3 and FUL-like genes and their expression in Ranunculales, see Sharma et al. (2011) and Pabón-Mora et al. (2013) and references. Where to put these duplications on the tree is unclear, but perhaps at the [Ranunculaceae + The Rest] node (see also Zahn et al. 2005b; Cui et al. 2006; Tank et al. 2015). Indeed, a genome duplication (the ARTHγ event) ca 136.9 m.y.o. has been associated with this node (Landis et al. 2018).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. See Hegnauer (1990) for a discussion of the chemistry of the Polycarpicae, which also includes the magnoliids and Austrobaileyales. Berberin, common in Ranunculales, is synthesised via the tyrosine pathway. Gleissberg and Kadereit (1999) discussed the evolution of leaf form in the order, with polyternate/acropetal/basipetal-pedate leaves perhaps being plesiomorphic. The glandular leaf teeth have a clear, persistent, swollen cap into which higher order lateral veins also run. What is the distribution of colleters?
There has been considerable discussion over the identity of the different petal/tepal/sepal/stamen parts of the flower in Ranunculales. Almost all Ranunculales, perhaps minus Euptelea, have petals, that is, more or less expanded and attractive parts of the flower (Rasmussen et al. 2009). An inner, more or less petal-like, nectar-secreting whorl is especially obvious in Berberidaceae and Ranunculaceae and is usually interpreted as being derived from stamens. Drinnan et al. (1994) suggested that petals had been derived from stamens several times, and they may also be lost (Glover et al. 2015). However, Sharma et al. (2014 and references) found no developmental evidence for a connection between more or less petal-like nectaries and stamens in Ranunculaceae, at least.
This next paragraph to be reworked: Gene expression patterns in the inner perianth whorl of Ranunculaceae and Berberidaceae are unique, and intermediates can be explained by the fading boundaries model of development (ref.). Chanderbali et al. (2010) found that expression of genes active in each floral whorl in flowers of the one member of Ranunculales they examined (Escholtzia) were restricted to that whorl, as in other eudicots; within Ranunculales, Papaveraceae-Papaveroideae, to which Escholtzia belongs, have a perianth that is apparently made up of a rather conventional calyx and corolla. On the other hand, in Delphinium (Ranunculaceae) expression patterns of genes active in the two outer floral whorls were not sharply differentiated (Voelckel et al. 2011). If on occasion I call the outer whorl, "calyx", and the inner whorl, "corolla", it is simply for descriptive purposes.
Monosymmetry has evolved at least twice in this clade, and Cycloidea genes are involved. However, they are variously expressed in the flower, ad- or abaxially or laterally, and may also be expressed in the outer perianth whorl (Jabbour et al. 2014 and references: see Papaveraceae-Fumarioideae and Ranunculaceae below). This is unlike the consistent adaxial expression in Pentapetalae studied (Hileman 2014 and references). For floral development, see also Becker (2016).
Antipodal cells are commonly other than simply persistent; data are summarized in Williams and Friedman (2004).
For additional information, see Ernst (1964: general), Fay and Christenhuz (2012: illustrated summary), Hao et al (2018: chemistry and medecine), Hennig et al. (1994) and Barthlott and Theisen (1995: both cuticle waxes), Behnke (1995b: sieve tube plastids and phloem proteins), Carlquist and Zona (1988) and Carlquist (1995b), wood anatomy, Endress (1995a: floral morphology), Ronse Decraene and Smets (1995b: androecial variation), Blackmore et al. (1995: pollen, very variable), Brückner (1995: summary of seed anatomy), Floyd et al. (1999: embryology), and Floyd and Friedman (2000: endosperm).
Phylogeny. Relationships in the order are fairly well understood - see Hoot and Crane (1995), Kadereit et al. (1995), Oxelman and Lidén (1995), Hoot et al. (1999: three genes), and Soltis et al. (2011). Soltis et al. (2003a: four-genes), Kim et al. (2004a), Worberg et al. (2006, 2007: non-coding chloroplast DNA), Y. Sun et al. (2018: plastome phylogenomics) and Lane et al. (2018: phylogenomic analysis) all suggest that Eupteleaceae may be sister to the whole of the rest of the order, although support for this position has sometimes been only moderate (e.g. Hoot et al. 2015). W. Wang et al. (2009: four genes, see also 2016b) found a similar position, but support was again only moderate, however, it was strengthened when morphological data were added. Some earlier studies have suggested other topologies, such as Ranunculaceae (Soltis et al. 2000; Hilu et al. 2008 - but no strong support for any position of Eupteleaceae) or Papaveraceae (Soltis et al. 2007a; Anderson et al. 2005; Bell et al. 2010; Z.-D. Chen et al. 2016: strong support) as sister to all other members of the order.
Euptelea was placed well outside Ranunculales in purely morphological analyses and formed a clade with Nelumbo, Illicium, Paeonia, etc. - but mercifully without any bootstrap support (W. Wang et al. 2009); the topology was hightly pectinate, and very few branches had even poor bootstrap support and posterior probabilities were still worse. Loconte et al. (1995) found Ranunculales to be paraphyletic in a morphological phylogeny. Analysis of mitochondrial genes suggested a rather different set of relationships between the families (Qiu et al. 2010), although support was mostly (very) weak, only the [Berberidaceae + Ranunculaceae] clade having strong support.
Classification. For a classification of the order, largely followed here, see W. Wang et al. (2009).
Previous Relationships. A Papaverales, containing three families (= Papaveraceae below), were commonly recognised as a separate order next to Ranunculales (Cronquist 1981; Dahlgren 1989), but there is no point in recognising them, especially if Eupteleaceae are sister to all other Ranunculales.
Includes Berberidaceae, Eupteleaceae, Circaeasteraceae, Lardizabalaceae, Menispermaceae, Papaveraceae (inc. Fumarioideae, Papaveroideae), Ranunculaceae.
Synonymy: Papaverineae Thorne & Reveal, Ranunculinae Bessey - Berberidales Berchtold & J. Presl, Circeasterales Takhtajan, Eupteleales Reveal, Fumariales Link, Glaucidiales Reveal, Helleborales Nakai, Hydrastidales Takhtajan, Lardizabalales Loconte, Menispermales Berchtold & J. Presl, Nandinales Doweld, Papaverales Berchtold & J. Presl, Podophyllales Dumortier - Eupteleineae Shipunov, Lardizabalineae Shipunov - Berberidanae Doweld, Eupteleanae Doweld, Papaveranae Doweld, Ranunculanae Reveal - Ranunculidae Reveal - Berberidopsida Brogniart, Papaveropsida Brongniart, Ranunculopsida Brongniart
EUPTELEACEAE K. Wilhelm - Back to Ranunculales
Deciduous trees; (dihydro)chalcones +; cork cambium deep in cortex; vessel elements with scalariform-reticulate perforations; rays to 10-seriate; nodes 1:5(-9); cuticle wax crystalloids 0; buds perulate; lamina vernation subplicate-conduplicate, margins gland-toothed, secondary veins pinnate; inflorescence axillary, fasciculate or umbellate; P 0; A 6-20, filaments short [much shorter than the anthers], anthers inconspicuously valvate, latrorse, connective prolonged; pollen (3-) 6-colpate, with lamellate exinous oncus orbicules +; G 6-31, stipitate, "intermediate ascidiate", stigma brush-like, at most weakly secretory; ovules (-4/carpel), epitropous, outer integument 2-5 cells across, inner integument ca 2 cells across; antipodal cells do not persist; fruit a samara; exotestal cells ± enlarged, (mesotesta sclerotic), endotesta lignified, subpalisade; endosperm cellular; n = 14; germination epigeal.
1 [list][list]/2. Temperate South East Asia (map: from Fu & Hong 2000). [Photo - Collection]
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested an age of ca 120-111 m.y. for stem-group Eupteleaceae, and Wikström et al. (2001) an age of (141-)135, 122(-116) m.y., but note topologies. Euptelea represents a very old and species-poor clade.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Lateral veins only approach the glandular teeth; the gland itself has an apical cavity. Is the wood storied, what about fluorescence, separate bundles?
See Endress (1970a, 1993) for some general information, Hegnauer (1973, 1989, 1990) for chemistry, H.-F. Li and Ren (2005) for wood anatomy, Ren et al. (2007b) for floral development and Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2016) for pollen.
Previous Relationships. Eupteleaceae were placed next to Cercidiphyllaceae in Hamamelidales by Cronquist (1981) or Hamamelididae by Takhtajan (1997). They have been often been linked with Eucommiaceae, for which see Garryales (asterid I/lamiid).
[Papaveraceae [[Circaeasteraceae + Lardizabalaceae] [Menispermaceae [Berberidaceae + Ranunculaceae]]]]: vessel elements with simple perforation plates, in diagonal groups; with both vasicentric tracheids and nucleated libriform fibres; leaves (ternately compound or palmately lobed), secondary venation palmate; outer A nectariferous, whether petal-like or not; stigma wet [optimization?].
Age. Magallón et al. (2013) estimated an age of around (404-)394.3-389.9(-382) m.y. for this clade, but it is much younger in most other scenarios; N. Zhang et al. (2012) estimate an age of slightly under 100 m.y., about 112.9 m.y. is the age in Magallón et al. (2015) and (146-)117(-102) m.y. in J. Li et al. (2018: see other dates).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Ranunculales, or perhaps more properly this node, contain ca 1.6% of eudicot diversity.
Endress (2011a) suggested that the presence of sepals and petals was a key innovation somewhere around here; optimization on the tree is not easy, and it is unclear at what level/for what purpose the sepals and petals of Papaveraceae-Papaveroideae and Ranunculaceae-Ranunculoideae might be considered to be the "same" (see below). Damerval and Becker (2017) suggest that there may have been two successive duplications of the AP3 lineage, involved in stamen and petal formation, here, although there are only two paralagous families in Papaveraceae, three elsewhere.
Genes & Genomes. A genome duplication some 124.4 m.y.o. is linked to this node (Landis et al. 2018).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Wink (2008) noted that the berberine bridge enzyme (BBE), involved in the synthesis of berberine and other distinctive alkaloids from this clade (Kutchan 1998: berberine is also found in some Rutaceae, etc.) was quite widely distributed in flowering plants. Another gene in this pathway, FAD-dependent (S)-tetrahydroprotoberberine oxidase (STOX), is at least scattered in Ranunculales, and the different forms are quite similar in their activities if with different substrate specificities (Gesell et al. 2011). STOX and BBE genes were members of different clades of FAD-dependent oxidases (Gesell et al. 2011). For features of wood anatomy common in this part of the clade, see Carlquist and Zona (1988); some may be higher-level apomorphies.
PAPAVERACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - Back to Ranunculales
Plant herbaceous, mycorrhizae 0; numerous alkaloids [inc. protopine], little oxalate accumulation; roots diarch [lateral roots 4-ranked]; uniseriate rays common; cork?; laticifers +, articulated or not, anastomosing or not; nodes 1:3-5; subepidermal collechyma in stem; petiole bundles arcuate; leaves soft, ± fleshy, quite often glaucous, lamina margins usu. spiny toothed, leaf base broad; inflorescence determinate, terminal; flowers dimerous, parts whorled; P = K + C, fugaceous, K 2, median, C 4; anthers extrorse; pollen microechinate, oncus with islets and granules of endexine; G connate, , collateral, occluded by secretion, placentation parietal (protruding-diffuse), (carpels gaping apically), (stigmatic lobes commissural); compitum +; ovules (with zig-zag micropyle), inner integument (2-)3 cells across; antipodal cells endopolypoid; capsule septicidal [= placenticidal], (fruit with false [commissural] septum - ?level), (persistent placental strands [= replum] +); seeds (arillate, raphal), curved; endotesta also well developed, with coarse fibrillar network and calcium oxalate crystals, (exo- [and meso-] tegmen fibrous, fibres crossing), endotegmen walls thickened; endosperm nuclear.
44[list]/825 - three subfamilies and five tribes below. Largely N. Temperate, also S. Africa, scattered in South America, etc.
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested an age of ca 119-106 m.y. for crown-group Papaveraceae.
1. Papaveroideae Eaton - Back to Ranunculales
(Annual herbs); (berberine + [isoquinoline alkaloid]); latex +, milky; nodes also 1:1; lamina vernation variable, entire to lobed, colleters +; flowers large, K protective, often green, enclosing the bud, lobed [usu. on left], C (6), crumpled in bud; A (4-)many, (in multiples of two or three); (pollen orbicules +); ?nectary; (placentation ± axile), stigmas often confluent, dry; ovules many/carpel, ± anatropous/campylotropous, outer integument (2-)4-10 cells across, inner integument 2-4 cells across, parietal tissue 2-4 cells across, nucellar cap ca 3 cells across, hypostase +; antipodals also multinucleate; capsule also with transverse dehiscence, (indehiscent, schizocarp); (exotesta with stomata), exotegmen often with thickened outer walls, unlignified, (anticlinal walls sinuous), (endotegmen not persistent); n = 5-10 (14, 19); non-RNase-based gametophytic incompatibility system present; duplication of PAPACYL gene.
23/230 - four tribes below. Largely N. temperate (map: from Ownbey 1958, 1961; Hultén & Fries 1986; Fl. N. Am. III 1997; Fu & Hong 2000; Malyschev & Peschkova 2004). [Photos - Collection (except Dicentra and Corydalis - Fumarioideae)]
1A. Papavereae Dumortier
(Small trees); (uniseriate rays 0); (nodes also 1:1, 3:3); hairs multicellular and multiseriate; G [3-24], (style +), (stigmatic lobes commissural); epistase, postament +; (megaspore mother cells several); fruits opening by valves/pores; n = 6-8, 11, 12, 14...
8/95-125: Papaver (50-80), Meconopsis (50). N. (warm) temperate, Argemone also South America, A. mexicana commonly introduced in the tropics, and southern Africa and Cape Verde Islands (1 sp. in each - Papaver).
1B. Chelidonieae Dumortier
Latex orange, yellow or red; nodes 3-5(-9):3-5(-9); hairs multicellular and terminally uniseriate; (C 0 - Macleaya, Bocconia); pollen also pantoporate; G [(3)], (gynophore + - Bocconia); ovules (1/gynoecium, basal - Bocconia); fruit elongated, (not), (replum +); seeds often arillate; n = 5, 6, 9, 10...
9/48. East Asia and E. North America (also Europe, C. and S. America, West Indies).
Age. Crown-group Chelidonieae are ca 47.9 m.y.o. (J. Li et al. 2018).
Synonymy: Chelidoniaceae Martynov
1C. Eschscholtzieae Baillon
(Exudate watery); nodes 1:1(-3); hairs unicellular; subepidermal collenchyma in stem; hypanthium ± developed; pollen 4-11-colpate; capsule with 10 conspicuous longitudinal ridges, dehiscing explosively, opening from base; n = 6, 7, 11...
3/16. W. North America.
Synonymy: Eschscholziaceae Seringe
1D. Platystemoneae Spach
Nodes 1:1; hairs multicellular and multiseriate; flowers 3-merous; A 6-many, (filaments expanded, toothed); G [3(-25 - Platystemon)], styluli +; ?embryology; fruit lacking replum strands; seeds not arillate; n = 6-8.
3/5. W. North America, Baja California and Nevada to Oregon.
Synonymy: Platystemonaceae Lilja
[Hypecoöideae + Fumarioideae]: exudate watery; acetylornithine, (berberin) +; nodes uni(-multi)-lacunar; exudate in often non-articulated sacs; nodes 1:1+; leaves to 3X palmately compound/deeply lobed; flowers transversely disymmetric; K and C in 2's, K small, not enclosing C, C 4; nectaries +, at abaxial base of stamens; A 6, opposite C; secondary pollen presentation +; pollen exine spinose; style long; ovules 1-many/carpel, campylotropous, outer integument 2-4 cells across, inner integument ca 2 cells across, parietal tissue ca 4 cells across, nucellar cap 0 [?always]; fruit a septicidal capsule; seeds curved; exotesta palisade or not, endotesta lacking fibrillar network, exotegmen not fibrous; (embryo long).
19/530. Mostly N. temperate, also S. Africa (map: from Hultén & Lidén 1986; Fries 1986; Hong 1993; Fl. N. Am. III 1997; Fu & Hong 2000; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 1. 2003; Malyschev & Peschkova 2004; Serban Procheŝ, pers. comm. S. Africa).
Age. Bell et al. (2010) offered an age for this node of (106-)88, 82(-61) m.y.; (129-)123, 110(-104) m.y. is the age suggested by Wikström et al. (2001: note topology) and 106.3-95.5 m.y. by Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2015a: excl. Pteridophyllum).
Leaf fossils of Potomacapnos about 120 m.y.o. are embedded here in morphological phylogenetic analyses (Jud & Hickey 2013).
2. Hypecoöideae Prantl & Kündig
Annual herbs; protopine alkaloids alone; (nodes 1:1); outer petals often lobed, inner petals 3-lobed; A 4, bithecate, opposite C, median A with 2 vascular bundles [= 2 unithecal A connate], lateral A with 1 vascular bundle; pollen bicolpate; pollen deposited on inner petals; nectary; style with two commissural branches; inner integument ca 3 cells across; fruit (a lomentum), replum +; seeds covered with rectangular crystals, aril/elaiosomes 0; (exotesta ± collapsing), endotesta with cellulose network; suspensor of two massive cells; n = 8, 9; cotyledons long-cylindrical.
1/17. The Mediterranean to W. China.
Age. The age for crown-group Hypecoeae is 95.5-44 m.y.a. (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. 2015a).
Synonymy: Hypecoaceae Willkomm & Lange
3. Fumarioideae Eaton
(Vines with leaf tendrils); (nodes with up to 5 traces); (inflorescences racemose); (flowers monosymmetric, 900 resupinate, single spur adaxial); K minute, (vascular trace 0), C decussate, two outer spurred, (one spurred), inner C apically coherent, with median joint; A in two groups of three, central anther dithecal and lateral anthers monothecal, nectary at abaxial base of dithecal anther [±], filaments coherent (connate); endothecium from outer secondary parietal cell layer, inner layer dividing; pollen 3-12-colpate, 6-12 syncolpate, 6(-8) porate, (apertures with fluffy plugs [= ?tapetal endoplasmic reticulum]), surface smooth to verrucate, not perforated, (granulate infratectum); (placentation axile), style white, caducous (green, persistent), stigma (flattened, with marginal lobes/quadrangular), wet, pollen deposited on stigma; fruit (indehiscent, a nutlet), replum + [?how common]; aril + (0); exotesta usu. pigmented, (palisade, crystaliferous), endotesta not crystaliferous; suspensor cells like a small bunch of grapes, (embryo undifferentiated); n = (6-)8(+); plastid transmission biparental.
20/595: Corydalis (400), Fumaria (55). Eurasia (three quarters of the species in Sino-Himalayan region), North America, North and South Africa, mountains of E. Africa. [Photo - Corydalis Flower, another, Dicentra Flower.]
Age. the age for crown-group Fumarieae is ca 74 m.y.a. (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. 2015a).
Synonymy: Corydalaceae Vest, nom. illeg., Fumariaceae Marquis, nom. cons.
Pteridophyllum Siebold & Zuccarini - goes where?
Perennial herbs; alkaloids +; laticifers 0; leaf blade pinnately lobed; inflorescence scapose; K petal-like, small, deciduous; A 4, alternating with C; pollen (2-, 6-colpate), orbicules +; nectary?; style +, branches short, commissural; ovules 1 (2)/carpel, ± campylotropous, endostomal, outer integument ca 2 cells across, inner integument ca 3 cells across, raphe short, massive; replum +; aril/elaiosome 0; endotesta lacking crystals, with cellulose network, tegmen thin; n = 9.
1/1: Pteridophyllum racemosum. Japan.
Synonymy: Pteridophyllaceae Nakai
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Hoot et al. (2015) optimise numerous characters on a phylogeny of the family; note the topology used (Pteridophyllum sister to the rest) and their discussion about the interpretation of some characters. Kadereit et al. (2011) look at evolution within Papavereae, offering some dates, while J. Li et al. (2018) focus on Bocconia and Macleaya (Chelidonieae). Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2015a) discuss the evolution of Fumarioideae-Fumarieae in particular, giving numerous dates. Gleissberg and Kadereit (1999) discuss the complexities of leaf development and interpret them in a phylogenetic context. Leaflets may develop acropetally, basipetally, or both acro- and basipetally, depending on the species (Gleissberg 1998, see also 2004).
Ecology & Physiology. Several species of Fumaria and its relatives are chasmophytes. They grow in the apparently most inhospitable habitats from North Africa and the Mediterranean region eastwards despite their delicate and rather succulent habit (see also Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. 2012, 2015a).
Dactylicapnos, Cysticapnos , and several other genera (Fumarieae) are climbers with tendrils that represent modified leaves/leaflets (Sousa-Baena et al. 2018a).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. The stigma of Fumaria and relatives, on which the pollen is deposited for secondary pollen presentation, can be complex; there is also secondary pollen presentation in Hypecoum, and here the pollen is deposited on the central lobe of the inner petals. Papaveraceae - Papaver rhoeas, at least - have a fast-acting gametophytic self-incompatibility system which, however, is very different from that in core eudicots (Franklin-Tong & Franklin 2003; Charlesworth et al. 2005); Wheeler et al. (2009) suggest that the PrpS gene encoding the pollen S determinant lacks any homologues in other angiosperms that have similar incompatibility systems. The gametophytic self-incompatibility system of Papaver is associated with a dry stigma (Wheeler et al. 2001).
Quite a number of taxa, both forest herbs and chasmophytes and from both subfamilies, are myrmecochorous, the ants being attracted to the arils developed on the seeds (Fukuhara 1999; Lengyel et al. 2009, 2010); these arils have probably evolved several times.
Plant-Animal Interactions. Species of most of the subgenera of the papilionid Parnassius (but not subgenus Parnassius itself) have caterpillars that eat Fumarioideae, and are particularly diverse in eastern Asia (Michel et al. 2008; Simonsen et al. 2011; Condamine et al. 2011, 2018).
Genes & Genomes. There is a genome duplication event associated with Papaveraceae and dated to ca 113 m.y.a. (Landis et al. 2018).
Economic Importance. For Papaver, see Bernáth (1998).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. 1-benzyltetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids are found only here and in a small group of related genera of Rutaceae-Rutoideae, and in Apiaceae and Asteraceae (Kubitzki et al. 2011). Acetylornithine, reported from [Hypecoöideae + Fumarioideae], is involved in nitrogen transport (Jensen 1995). The single species in each subfamily examined had distinctive UV fluorescence of unlignified cell walls (Hartley & Harris 1981).
For the unusual (transverse) plane of floral monosymmetry in [Hypecoöideae + Fumarioideae], see e.g. Troll (1957), Ronse Decraene and Smets (1992a), Endress (1999), etc.; asymmetry of expression of the CYC gene is in the transverse plane here, and is rather late (Damerval et al. 2013; Hileman 2014). CYCLOIDEA genes have been duplicated in Papaveraceae s.l., and this may be connected with the development of monosymmetry (Kölsch & Gleissberg 2006; Damerval et al. 2007; see Jabbour et al. 2014 for analogous happenings in Ranunculaceae). In Corydalis and some other genera only a single outer petal is spurred and the flower is monosymmetric; there is a 90° rotation of the flower rather late in development so the spur is in the adaxial position (Ronse Decraene & Smets 1992a) and the monosymmetry is functionally vertical. There is a correlation between flowers with monosymmetry and indeterminate inflorescences, a variant on the correlation of determinate inflorescences and polysymmetric flowers.
Vascularization of the petals of Papaveroideae varies, but even if there is more than a single trace entering the base of the petals, the traces seem to have a single point of origin (Dickson 1935). I am unsure if all/some Papaveroideae have extrorse anthers, but anthers are clearly extrorse in other members of the family (Murbeck 1912). As in Ranunculaceae, the numerous stamens in Papaver, etc., may be derived from a paucistemonous condition. The nature of the androecium of Fumarieae in particular has occasioned much discussion, and it has sometimes been suggested that two anthers have each split into two, monothecal units, so there would be only four stamens altogether, but it is likely that the androecium consists of two dithecal and four monothecal stamens, the dithecal stamens being opposite the outer petals and the monothecal stamens on either side of the insertion of the inner petals (e.g. Brückner 1992; Damerval et al. 2013). In Hypecoum the monothecal stamens have fused in pairs, hence the double vascular supply to two of what appear to be ordinary dithecal stamens (Ronse Decraene & Smets 1992a for literature). The androecium of Pteridophyllum has also been interpreted as being derived from a flower with six stamens, the lateral stamens having been lost (Ronse Decraene & Smets 1992a); the stamens alternate with the petals and are diagonally arranged.
The "fluffy plugs" over the pollen apertures in many Fumarioideae are 3- or 5-lamellate structures that may be derived from tapetal endoplasmic reticulum (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. 2015b, q.v. for other white line/lamellated structures, etc.). Interestingly, nectary development is associated with the expression of CRABSCLAW genes, unlike the development of nectaries in monocots and Ranunculaceae, but like that in Pentapetalae (Damerval et al. 2013: Proteales?).
When there are four carpels (mostly Papaveroideae-Papavereae) they are diagonally arranged (Ronse Decraene & Smets 1997b); see Brückner (2000) for discussion of carpel numbers in [Hypecoöideae + Fumarioideae]. Papaveraceae are described as having hollow styles, although the central space may become occluded by papillae (Hanf 1935). The ovary of Fumaria has only a single ovule and the fruit is nut-like and indehiscent. Jernstedt and Clark (1979) describe stomata in the exotesta in some Papaveroideae.
For general information, see J. W. Kadereit (1993: as Papaveraceae), Lidén (1993: as Fumariaceae and Pteridophyllaceae) and Grey-Wilson (2014: Meconopsis et al.), also Hao et al (2018: chemistry and medecine), Léger (1895: vegetative morphology and anatomy), Mikhailova (2015: rootstock variation in Corydalis, Brückner, e.g. 1982 (fruit, mostly Papaveroideae), 1983 (seed, mostly Papaveroideae), 1984 (stigma and carpel, Fumarioideae), 1992 (Pseudofumaria), and 1993 and references (carpels). Some information on Papaveroideae is taken from Carlquist et al. (1994: wood anatomy), Ronse Decraene and Smets (1990: comparison with Begoniaceae), Becker et al. (2005: Eschscholzia) and Zumajo-Cardon et al. (2017: Bocconia), all floral development, Dickson (1935: floral vascularization), Sachar (1955), Sachar and Mohan Ram (1958), and Berg (1968), all embryology, Röder (1958), Kapil et al. (1980), and particularly Meunier (1891) for seed coat anatomy and development and arils, and Ernst (1967: Platystemoneae); see
For general information about [Hypecoöideae + Fumarioideae], see Lidén (1986: esp. Fumarioideae), see Hegnauer (1969, 1990) and Preininger (1986) for chemistry, Bersillon (1955) for nodal anatomy and floral vasculature, Bull-Hereñu and Claßen-Bockhoff (2011b) for inflorescences of Fumarioideae, Murbeck (1912) for floral morphology, Erbar (2014) and Zhang and Zhao (2018) for nectaries, Guignard (1903) for the embryology of Hypecoum, G. Dahlgren (1981) for stigma secretions, Tarasevich (2014) and Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2015b) for pollen, and Fukuhara and Lidén (1995) for testa anatomy. For ovule orientation, see Goebel (1932) and Endress (2011b), for style morphology and development, see Kadereit and Erbar (2011). Additional information on Pteridophyllum is taken from Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2016: pollen) and Brückner (1985: fruit and seed); the seeds have a cellulose network in the endotesta like that of some Papaveroideae.
Phylogeny. The groupings above are taken from Hoot et al. (1997), Kadereit et al. (1994, 1995) and especially from W. Wang et al. (2009). However, there are uncertainties. Pteridophyllum is rather distinctive (although included in Fumariaceae by Cronquist 1981) with its rather harsh deeply pinnately-lobed and fern-like leaves; in versions 8 and earlier of this site it was placed as a monotypic subfamily sister to the rest of Papaveraceae, and that is where Hoot et al. (2015) have found it to be, although support was not strong. Pteridophyllum linked with [Hypecoöideae + Fumarioideae] in molecular analyses, although without much support for any particular position, but in total evidence analyses there was strong bootstrap and somewhat less strong posterior probability support for a sister group relationship with Hypecoum in particular (W. Wang et al. 2009). Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2015a) and Sauquet et al. (2015: matk sequence suspect) all found its position to be unclear. See also Judd et al. (1994) and Nikolic (1995) for earlier studies.
Within Papaveroideae, Papaver is paraphyletic and Meconopsis polyphyletic (Kadereit & Sytsma 1992; Kadereit et al. 1997, 2011; Carolan et al. 2006); see Xiao and Simpson (2015, 2017) for Meconopsis in particular. Relationships in Chelidonieae in particular are discussed by J. Li et al. (2018); [Sanguinaria + Eomecon] are sister to the rest of the tribe. For a phylogeny of Fumarioideae, see Lidén et al. (1997), Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2015a) and Sauquet et al. (2015). Within Fumarioideae, Dicentra is dismembered with Dicentra (now = Lamprocapnos) spectabilis sister to all other Fumarioideae, and the old Corydaleae becomes highly paraphyletic, relationships being [Lamprocapnos [Ehrendorfia [Dicentra [Icthyoselmis [Adlumia + The Rest]]]]] (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. 2015a; Hoot et al. 2015). However, morphological studies tend to recover a Fumarieae and Corydaleae; for relationships within the former, which is monophyletic, see Pérez-Gutiérrez et al. (2012).
Classification. A.P.G. II (2003) allowed as an option the possibility of including Papaveraceae, Fumariaceae, and Pteridophyllaceae in an expanded Papaveraceae, which I follow here, but the limits of the family were formally expanded (e.g. A.P.G. III 2009).
I have been conservative in placing Pteridophyllum (c.f. Hoot et al. 2015: separate subfamily). Within Papaveroideae, generic limits need major adjustments (e.g. Kadereit & Baldwin 2011; Kadereit et al. 2011, 2015; Kadereit 2017); for an infrageneric classification of Meconopsis, see Xiao and Simpson (2017). Within Fumarioideae, Dicentra has been dismembered, being paraphyletic (e.g. D. spectabilis = Lamprocapnos spectabilis: Lidén et al. 1997), and so the morphology of the old Dicentra is the basic morphology of Fumarioideae as a whole.
Previous Relationships. In some earlier systems, Papaveraceae s.l. were grouped with Brassicaceae, etc., in Parietales, a single-character group characterised by having parietal placentation. Hardly surprisingly, its members are now scattered throughout the tree.
[[Circaeasteraceae + Lardizabalaceae] [Menispermaceae [Berberidaceae + Ranunculaceae]]]: vascular rays broad; flowers often 3-merous, K, C and A opposite each other, K/P ± petal-like, "C" +, nectariferous [= A], development notably retarded; AP3 gene triplicated.
Age. Bell et al. (2010) suggested an age for this node of (106-)92, 85(-71) m.y.; ages of (126-)120, 111(-105) m.y. were suggested by Wikström et al. (2001), about 98.2 m.y. by Magallón et al. (2015), (127.3-)126.4(-125.6) m.y. by W. Wang et al. (2016a), and ca 108.1 m.y. by J. Li et al. (2018).
Evolution. Ecology & Physiology. Lardizabalaceae and Menispermaceae are both lianes, sometimes vines, and they both have very large sieve tube plastids. Fossil woods of lianes that can be identified as belonging somewhere in this part of the tree are relatively common in woods Cretaceous-Palaeogene age; woods of Vitaceae-Vitoideae are first known from the Palaeogene (S. Y. Smith et al. 2013a).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. If the evolution of nectaries/nectariferous petals can be placed at this node, details of the pattern of expresssion of AP3-III petal identity genes become interesting (see also Sharma et al. 2011). Nectariferous petals are often interpreted as being staminodial in origin (Erbar 2014 and references), but that idea has been contested (Sharma et al. 2014).
Genes & Genomes. The duplication of Cycloidea genes can be pegged to this node (Jabbour et al. 2014); they are involved in the development of monosymmetric flowers in Ranunculaceae (see below).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. For the vasculature of the sepals/outer tepals, see Hiepko (1965); for their development, see Zhang et al. (2009 and literature). When th "petals" are modified stamens, as seems to be the case here, they are delayed in development (Zhao et al. 2016b). For pollen morphology, see Nowicke and Skvarla (1982). For chromosome size, see Langlet (1928, 1931) and Okada and Tamura (1979).
[Circaeasteraceae + Lardizabalaceae]: leaves palmately compound; K/P with a single trace; anthers extrorse; endosperm cellular.
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested an age of ca 116-107 m.y. for this node, Bell et al. (2010) ages of (102-)87, 81(-66) m.y., Wikström et al. (2001) ages of (121-)115, 106(-100) m.y., Magallón et al. (2015) an age of about 86.3 m.y., J. Li et al. (2018) an age of ca 91.3 m.y., while at ca 126.1 m.y., the estimate of Tank et al. (2015: Table S2) is the oldest.
CIRCAEASTERACEAE Hutchinson, nom. cons. - Back to Ranunculales
Herbs; chemistry?; cork cambium?; true tracheids?; nodes 1:1; petiole bundle ?arcuate; prophyll adaxial; lamina margins toothed, venation largely dichotomous; inflorescence terminal, cymose or thyrsoid, or flowers terminal, perfect or not; parts spirally arranged; A (1-)2-6(-8), not obviously opposite P; pollen exine layered-striate; G 1-9, ?compitum; ovules ± apical, unitegmic, parietal tissue 0; embryo sac tetrasporic, 4- or 8-nucleate; fruit an achene; seed coat degenerating, thin; embryo relatively large.
2[list]/2. N. India to S.W. and W. China (map: from Fu & Hong 2000).
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested an age of ca 84-72 m.y. for the divergence of these genera, Bell et al. (2010) ages of (65-)48, 45(-30) m.y., and Wikström et al. (2001) ages of (72-)68, 54(-50) m.y..
1. Circaeaster Maximowicz
Leaves simple; bracteoles 0; P +, uniseriate, small, ± green and ± sepal-like, 2-3; A latrorse?, anthers bisporangiate, ?thecae, monothecal; ovule straight, integument ca 2 cells across; fertilization mesogamous [pollen tube entering ovule laterally penetrating integument]; endosperm with chalazal haustorium; n = 15, chromosomes "Ranunculus type".
1/1: Circaeaster agrestis. India (Himalayas), W. China.[Photo - Circaeaster Habit.]
2. Kingdonia Balfour f. & W. W. Smith
Annual; prophyll adaxial; leaves two-ranked; K 5(-7), "C" of 8-13 clavate glands; G 3-9, ovules hemianatropous, integument 2-5 cells across; n = 9.
1/1: Kingdonia uniflora. W. and N.W. China.
Synonymy: Kingdoniaceae Airy-Shaw
Evolution: Pollination Biology. For heterodichogamy, etc., in Kingdonia, see X.-M. Wang et al. (2012).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Kingdonia may have up to four bundles departing from the single foliar trace (shades of a 1:2 node?) and, like Circaeaster, several root hair zones on the roots (Foster & Arnott 1960; Ren & Hu 1998). Xylem perforation plates may also be scalariform. Kingdonia at least appears to have an adaxial prophyll (see s.e.m. of axillary buds in Ren et al. 2004 - no comment made).
Circaeasteraceae do not show the same relationship between the stamens and perianth members of many other Ranunculales. The perianth members of Kingdonia have a single trifid vein, indeed, all floral organs are innervated by a single vein, apart from the first perianth member, which has two traces (as in some Ranunculaceae, see Ren et al. 2004). The genus also has 8-13 glistening clavate glands immediately inside the perianth whorl; these are described as petals by Tamura (1993) and as staminodes by Ren et al. (2004) and may secrete nectar. Mesogamy, i.e. the pollen tube entering the ovule laterally by penetrating the integument, is reported for Circaeaster, and the mature endosperm is differentiated into two zones; Circaeaster also has endosperm with a chalazal haustorium (see Junell 1931).
General information is taken from Tamura (1993: in Ranunculaceae) and Wu and Kubitzki (1993); see also Nowicke and Skvarla (1981) for pollen, Hu et al. (1990), Ren and Hu (1995) and Tian et al. (2006) for information on Circaeaster agrestis, and Ren et al. (1998, 2004) for information on Kingdonia uniflora. The inside cover of Act. Bot. Bor.-Occid. Sinica 24(1) (2004) has a photograph of K. uniflora flowers with excellent details of gross morphology.
Classification. Keeping Kingdoniaceae separate from Circaeasteraceae was optional in A.P.G. II (2003).
Previous Relationships. Kingdonia has been placed in the Ranunculaceae-Anemoneae, e.g. by Kosuge et al. (1989). The dichotomous venation of the leaves and the separate carpels of Circaeasteraceae have attracted attention as possibly indicating a very "primitive" group.
LARDIZABALACEAE R. Brown, nom. cons. - Back to Ranunculales
Lianes; benzylisoquinoline alkaloids 0; (plant Al-accumulators); petiole bundles arcuate; plant glabrous or hairs uniseriate; buds perulate; leaflet vernation conduplicate, margins entire; inflorescence axillary, racemose; flowers six-merous; "C" small, apices nectariferous; staminate flowers: A 6, connective often prolonged apically; tapetal cells 2-nucleate; pollen exine smooth; carpellate flowers: staminodia +; G 3, also spiral, placentation marginal, carpels with postgenital fusion and secretion, stigma wet; suprastylar extragynoecial compitum; ovules campylotropous, inner integument 2-4 cells across; fruit a berrylet; germination phanerocotylar; chromosomes "small".
7[list]/40 - two groups below. South East Asia and Chile (map: see Taylor B. 1967; Ying et al. 1993).
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested an age of 95-66 m.y. for crown-group Lardizabalaceae, Bell et al. (2010) ages of (51-)38, 35(-23) m.y., and Wikström et al. (2001) ages of (88-)81, 76(-67) m.y..
Kajanthus has recently been described from Portugese Cretaceous deposits around 113 m.y.a. and the characters that can be taken from it are identical to those of Sinofranchetia, so it may even be assignable to crown-group Lardizabalaceae (Mendes et al. 2014).
1. Sargentodoxoideae Thorne & Reveal
Triterpenoid saponins 0; cork cambium deep-seated; tanniniferous cells +; leaves ternate; plant dioecious (some flowers perfect); carpellate flowers: K 4-9, C 5-7; staminodes +, like inner T; G 40<, stipitate; ovule 1(2)/carpel, ± campyltropous, pendulous, outer integument 4-5 cells across; receptacle becoming fleshy; surface of testa featureless; endosperm reserve?; n = 11.
1/1: Sargentodoxa cuneata. China.
Synonymy: Sargentodoxaceae Hutchinson
2. Lardizabaloideae Kosteletzky
(Shrubs); oleanone triterpenoid saponins +; (vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates); (stomata cyclocytic); leaves (odd-pinnately compound - Decaisnea), petiolules long (terminal leaflet only), (leaflets with basal tooth or lobe), (secondary veins pinnate); plant monoecious (dioecious), (flowers perfect): (outer T 3), ("C" 0); staminate flowers: (A 3, 8), filaments connate (not); (tapetal cells to 4 nucleate); (pollen grains colporoidate), (tricellular); carpellate flowers: staminodes +; G 3-12, (placentation laminar), (stigma peltate); ovules many/carpel (few), (hemitropous, anatropous), (micropyle endostomal - Decaisnea), outer integument 2-4(5-6 - Decaisnea) cells across, parietal tissue 3-8 cells across, (nucellar cap ca 2 cells across); (antipodal cells persistent - Decaisnea); (fruit a fleshy follicle), placenta fleshy in fruit; testa multiplicative, exotestal cells lignified, elongated, ± oblong [Descaisnea] or unlignified, fibrous [Akebia, Hoelboellia], hypodermal cells thickened; endosperm starchy [Decaisnea] or with hemicellulose, (nuclear - Decaisnea); n = 14-16, ?17, 18.
6/39: Stauntonia (28). South East Asia and Chile (Lardizabala, Boquila). [Photos - Lardizibala Staminate flower, Boquila Flowers, Fruit, Fruit close-up.]
Age. Wikström et al. (2001: Decaisnea sister to rest) suggested ages of (69-)61, 51(-42) m.y. for crown-group Lardizabaloideae.
Synonymy: Decaisneaceae Loconte, Sinofranchetiaceae Doweld
Evolution. Ecology & Physiology. The Chilean Boquila trifoliata is reported to mimic the leaves of a variety of species on which it climbs, the one stem mimicking different species sequentially, and even mimicking the plant closest to it when climbing on a different species; herbivory may be reduced (Gianoli & Carrasco-Urra 2014). See also Alseuosmia (Asterales-Alseuosmiaceae) and Loranthaceae. Incroyable!
Pollination Biology. Smets (1986) suggested that the nectaries are staminal nectaries; stamen and petal develop primordia develop immediately adjacent to each other in Holboelllia (X.-H. Zhang & Ren 2011). In Decaisneahectar may be secreted by stamens, while in Akebia the stigmatic secretions are sweet (Endress 1995; Erbar 2014 and references), but nectar production and pollination are poorly known here. In some taxa, at least, the stigmatic exudate spreads and joins adjacent stigmas so forming a hyperstigma (Wu and Kubitzki 1993; X.-H. Zhang & Ren 2011).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Wood fluorescence? The leaves of Akebia pentaphylla, at least, are peltately palmate (Kim et al. 2003).
X.-H. Zhang and Ren (2011) depict dehiscence of the staminodes of Decaisnea insignis; the pollen looks normal (but are there some kind of viscin strands?). Nowicke and Skvarala (1982) studied the pollen morphology especially of Sargentodoxa; there may be additional apomorphies for that genus. The seeds of Akebia, at least, are embedded in some kind of fleshy tissue.
For additional general information, see Wu and Kubitzki (1993), Qin (1997), and Christenhusz (2012) and other papers in Bot. Mag. 29(3). 2012; for chemistry, see Hegnauer (1966, 1989, also 1973, as Sargentodoxaceae) and Zheng and Yang (2001), seed surface, Xia and Peng (1989), carpel development, van Heel (1983), ovule morphology (X.-h. Zhang et al. 2015), and some anatomy, Yong and Su (1993); X.-H. Zhang et al. (2005, 2009, 2012) provide detailed studies of Sinofranchetia.
Phylogeny. Sargentodoxa is sister to the rest of the family (Hoot et al. 1995b, see also Hoot 1995a; Kofuji et al. 1994). Decaisnea may be sister to the remainder (Kofuji et al. 1994; Hoot et al. 2015); it has a number of distinctive (apomorphic) embryological features (H. F. Wang et al. 2009b). However, based on the recent discovery of the fossil Kajanthus, very similar to Sinofranchetia, Mendes et al. (2014) suggest that the root may be misplaced, Sargentodoxa being nested within the crown group.
Classification. Although Sargentodoxa has a number of autapomorphies (see above, also X.-H. Zhang & Ren 2008), there is no compelling reason to segregate it as a family (H.-F. Wang et al. 2009a).
See Christenhusz (2012) for a summary of the family.
[Menispermaceae [Berberidaceae + Ranunculaceae]]: (berberine + [isoquinoline alkaloid]); nucellar cap +; endosperm nuclear.
Age. The age of this node may be (119-)113, 103(-97) m.y. (Wikström et al. 2001); on the other hand, Magallón et al. (2013) estimate an age of around 65.9 m.y., Magallón et al. (2015) an age of ca 89.9 m.y., Anderson et al. (2005) an age of 116-105 m.y., Bell et al. (2010) an age of (99-)83, 77(-63) m.y., Jacques et al. (2011) an age of 125-115.6 m.y., J. Li et al. (2018) an age of ca 103 m.y., while at some 127.9 m.y. and (127.1-)126.2(-125.3) the estimates of Tank et al. (2015: Table S2) and W. Wang et al. (2016a) respectively are the oldest.
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. There have been nested diversification rate increases here (98.2-)93.8(-89.9) m.y.a. and again ca 10 m.y. later (Magallón et al. 2018).
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. For alkaloids found in members of these three families, see Aniszewski (2007). For perianth vasculature, see Hiepko (1964a, b).
MENISPERMACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - Back to Ranunculales
Lianes (vines), stem twining, (shrubs, trees); also/or aporphine alkaloids, sesqui- and diterpenoids +, (plant tanniniferous); successive cambia frequent; (rays narrow); secretory cells +, in files; sclereids common; crystals common; stomata various, often ± cyclocytic; hairs unicellular to uniseriate; leaves simple (compound - Burasaia), lamina ± peltate [at least with the base joining the top of the petiole], margins entire (toothed; lobed), petiole pulvinate at base and apex; plants dioecious; inflorescence axillary; flowers small, parts whorled or spiral; K with a single trace, (1-)6(-12), "C" 0-8, often connate, ± petal-like and nectariferous, (clasping A); staminate flowers: A 3, 6, 12 (1-40, if many, not all opposite petals), anther thecae horizontal, (bisporangiate, monothecal); pollen tricolporate, endapertures circular; pistillodes +/0; carpellate flowers: staminodes +/0; G (1-)3(-30<), with postgenital fusion and secretion, opposite P [Cissampelos], five bundles per carpel, gynophore common, style terminal, stigma ± flaring; suprastylar extragynoecial compitum +; ovules 2/carpel, often unitegmic, hemianatropous, micropyle endostomal (zig-zag), integuments folded, outer integument 2-5 cells across, inner integument 2-3 cells across, (single integument 3-6 cells across), parietal tissue 2-11 cells across, chalazal part large to massive; antipodals multiplying, multinucleate; fruit a drupelet, 1-seeded, endocarp dorsoventrally curved, (with longitudinal ridging); seed with condyle [placental intrusion], curved, coat undistinguished, (exotesta tabular, lignified); endosperm + (0), variously ruminate (smooth), embryo long, cotyledons incumbent, longer than the radicle; n = (9-)11-13(+); chromosomes small.
71 (many small)[list]/442: nine groups below. Pantropical, usually lowland (map: see Wickens 1976; Frankenberg & Klaus 1980; van Balgooy 1993; Fu & Hong 2000; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 1. 2003; Malyschev & Peschkova 2004; Rosa Ortiz-Gentry, pers. comm. 2004; Australia's Virtual Herbarium i.2013). [Photo - Fruit, Fruit.]
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) thought that the crown-group was ca 80-70 m.y.o., Wikström et al. (2001) gave a rather younger age of (59-)53, 48(-42) m.y., while that of Bell et al. (2010) at (52-)35, 33(-18) m.y. is even younger. However, Jacques et al. (2011) estimated an age of 124.4-103.3 m.y., and W. Wang et al. (2012: calibration using Menispermaceae fossils) suggested ages of (115.2-)109.1, 106.3(-101.7) m.y.; (54.2-)41.5(-32) m.y. and ca 110 m.y. are the ages recently suggested by W. Wang et al. (2016a: focus on Ranunculaceae) and (2016b) respectively. Take your pick.
Callicrypta, from the mid-Cretaceous of Siberia, has very small flowers (carpellate) with the parts more or less opposite, or forming spirals, and may be Menispermaceae; however, it is unclear what a link between Menispermaceae and Amborellaceae - hardly close - that the fossil is supposed to represent might look like (c.f. Krassilov & Goloneva 2004). Fossils menisperms are reported from the Upper Turonian of ca 89.3 m.y. from the Czech republic and many fossils are known from Lower Ypresian deposits of ca 55.2 m.y. age (Jacques et al. 2011; see also Jacques 2009a). Although Cretaceous records of Menispermaceae seemed questionable to Herrera et al. (2011), W. Wang et al. (2012) accepted that of Prototinomiscium vangerowii, from the Turonian of the Czech Republic (Knobloch & Mai 1986; see also Anderson et al. 2005).
1. Chasmantheroideae Luersson
(G several); ?ovules; seed subglobose-reniform; endocarp bilaterally curved; condyle ± boat-shaped or a ventral groove; endosperm ruminate, embryo spathuliform, cotyledons foliaceous, divaricate.
28/145. Pantropical, Atlantic North America.
Age. Chasmantheroideae are ca 107 m.y.o. (W. Wang et al. 2016c).
1a. Coscinieae J. D. Hooker & Thompson
Sepals in three whorls; staminate flower: A 6 or more, anthers with transverse dehiscence, filaments ± connate; carpellate flower: C 0; drupelets subglobose, style remnant subapical-adaxial; endocarp ?compression.
3/6. Eastern Asia, temperate to tropical.
1B. Burasaieae Endlicher
Staminate flower: A 6 (more); ovules anatropous; endocarp straight, dorsiventrally compressed, (condyle 0); seeds boat-shaped.
25/139: Tinospora (36), Odontocarya (36). Pantropical, east Asia.
Age. Crown-group Burasaieae are (109-99.5(-88) m.y.o. (W. Wang et al. 2016c).
2. Menispermoideae Arnott
Staminate flowers: (anthers connate, extrorse); (pistillode 0); carpellate flowers: (staminodes 0); (G 1), style lateral to basal; endocarp curved, ± laterally compressed, often with transverse ridging as well; cotyledons strap-like/rounded, fleshy, accumbent (incumbent).
44/300. Pantropical, east North America, eastern Asia
2A. Menispermeae de Candolle
Stamens 6<; stone semiannular-crescentic; cotyledons strap-like.
2/3. East North America, eastern Asia.
[Anomospermeae [Limacieae [Tiliacoreae [Pachygoneae [Spirospermeae + Cissampelidae]]]]]: A 6.
2B. Anomospermeae Miers
(Endosperm not ruminate), cotyledons strap-like.
13/80: Abuta (31). South America, East Asia to Australia, the Pacific.
[Limacieae [Tiliacoreae [Pachygoneae [Spirospermeae + Cissampelidae]]]]:
2C. Limacieae Prantl
Sepals in three whorls; endocarp with longitudinal ridge, laterally weakly convex.
1/2. Temperate and tropical East Asia.
[Tiliacoreae [Pachygoneae [Spirospermeae + Cissampelidae]]]: cotyledonary area subcylindric.
2D. Tiliacoreae Miers
16/111: Tiliacora (22). ±Tropical, Pacific Islands.
[Pachygoneae [Spirospermeae + Cissampelidae]]: endocarp longitudinally and transversely ribbed.
2E. Pachygoneae Miers
staminate flowers: K 6, C 6; A 6, free; pistillode +; carpellate flowers: K 6, C 6; staminodes +; stigma/style linear.
4/45: Hyperbaena (22). Pantropical.
[Spirospermeae + Cissampelidae]: filemants connate.
2F. Spirospermeae R. Ortiz & W. Wang
Tree; staminate inflorescence with cymules; (A 5); drupelets stipitate.
4/10. Madagascar (west tropical Africa).
2G. Cissampelideae J. D. Hooker & Thompson
Staminate flowers: K 6, C 3; A 3-4, connate; pistillode 0; carpellate flowers: monosymmetric; K 1, C 2; staminodes 0; G 1, stigma flaring ["crest-like"]; cotyledons shorter than the radicle, cotyledonary area subflattened.
5/128: Stephania (69}, Cyclea (32). Pantropical, Pacific Islands.
Age. Fossil endocarps of Stephania are known from early Palaeocene deposits ca 64 m.y.a. in Argentinia (Jud et al. 2018).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. Major clades within the family diverged during the late Cretaceous (Jacques et al. 2011: Table 5 for dates, Menispermeae sister to rest). Indeed, extensive diversification and migration in the family, perhaps Laurasian in origin, may have occurred around the K/T boundary during a period spanning (82.2-)71.7, 60.3(-45.3) m.y.a. (W. Wang et al. 2012), and New World clades are embedded in Old World clades (Ortiz et al. 2016). W. Wang et al. (2016c) give dates for various clades within Burasaieae.
South American is proving to be quite diverse in fossil menisperms. Doria et al. (2008) found Eocene leaf fossils from northern Colombia, and well preserved endocarps have been recorded from two Palaeocene localities in Colombia, one dated to ca 60 m.y.a. (Herrera et al. 2011). Some have been identified as Stephania, now known only from the Old World, and Stephania has also been found in Palaeocene deposits in North America (Han et al. 2017) and in southern South America (Jud et al. 2018). If the identifications are correct, the younger ages for crown-group Menispermaceae above are incorrect. For the menisperm fossil record, see also Jacques et al. (2007).
Wefferling et al. (2013) and Ortiz et al. (2007, esp. 2016) discuss character distributions of fruit and seed and their optimization on the tree; polarization of the variation is not so easy. Hoot et al. (2009) optimized characters on a tree with Menispermum and immediate relatives (Menispermeae) sister to the rest of the family. Jacques and Zhou (2010) used Procrustes analyses to understand variation in endocarp morphology; they placed this in the context of a molecular tree.
Ecology. Menispermaceae are an important component of the climbing vegetation in the tropics, perhaps especially in the New World (Gentry 1991).
Plant-Animal Interactions. Larvae of the large noctuid moths of the subfamily Catocalinae use Menispermaceae as their major food source throughout the tropics, although they can also be found on other plants like Erythrina (some Menispermeae have pentacyclic Erythrina-type alkaloids). The adult moths, with their saw-like proboscides, attack ripe or ripening fruits and cause a considerable amount of damage to commercial crops (Fay 1996).
Economic Importance. The muscle relaxant D-tubocuranine is obtained from Chondrodendrum tomentosum. This is also a major ingredient of the South American poison curare and is put on arrows and darts.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. There are few records of cork position. Tamaio et al. (2010) did not find serial cambia in the Menispermaceae they examined, but see Tamaio et al. (2009). The tangential cell walls of the rays of Tinomiscium petiolare are oblique to the ray axis when viewed in transverse section; this is uncommon in other Menispermaceae, where the walls are at right angles (Jacques & de Franceschi 2007), but I do not know the distribution of this feature in the outgroups. In at least some Menispermaceae, the presence of laticifers or sclereids is mutually exclusive (Wilkinson 1986). The Columbian Cissampelos grandifolia has twining petioles and rather fleshy, epulvinate leaves; then I first saw it, I thought it was an odd Tropaeolum... Cocculus has plagiotropic branches (Keller 1996); does it also have two-ranked leaves?
Flowers can be monosymmetric, as in the carpellate flowers of Stephania dielsiana, where there are 1 + 2 sepals and petals and a single carpel (H. Wang et al. 2006; Meng et al. 2012); the staminate flowers are always polysymmetric. Tepals in e.g. Menispermum canadense have only a single trace (Smith 1928). Q.-j. Wang et al. (2018) examined nectar secretion on the "petals" of Stephania; there is variation here, including whether or not the nectariferous tissue (= nectarioles) is connected with sieve tubes. There is considerable variation in pollen morphology in the family (Harley & Ferguson 1982 and references) which needs to be integrated with the clades that are becoming evident. The upper of the two ovules is epitropous and fertile, the lower is apotropous (Mauritzon 1936; Joshi 1939). Joshi (1939) suggested that in the unitegmic Tinospora cordifolia, the thinner upper part of the integument represented the outer integument, the thicker part, both integuments fused. There is apparently a period of 6-8 weeks between fertilization and first division of the zygote in T. cordifolia (Sastri 1964).
Additional general information is taken from Réaubourg (1906), Kessler (1993), and Jacques (2006); Hegnauer (1969, 1990) summarized information on chemistry, Wilkinson (1986) described leaf anatomy and Jacques and de Franceschi (2007), wood anatomy; see H. C. Wang et al. (2006) for floral development and Harley (1985 and references) for pollen morphology. Much work has recently been carried out on the complex drupelets of the family; see also Jacques (2009b), Jacques and Zhou (2010), and Ortiz (2012: curved embryos develop in different ways).
Phylogeny. Hoot et al. (2009: three chloroplast genes) had found that Menispermum and Sinomenium formed a clade sister to all the rest of the family in two gene analyses, but with little support (see also Ahmad et al. 2009; Jacques et al. 2011), although in three-gene analyses they were in a position like that found by Ortiz et al. (2007) where Menispermum was sister to other Menispermoideae. Although Tinomiscium was strongly supported as sister to all other Menispermaceae (Ortiz et al. 2007), the sequences were corrupt (R. Ortiz, pers. comm.). The genus belongs in the [Tinosporeae (now in Burasaieae) + Coscinieae] clade, Tinosporoideae (= Chasmantheroideae), a clade that had at most moderate bootstrap support (Ortiz et al. 2007; see also W. Wang et al. 2009: three chloroplast and one nuclear genes, morphology, support weak, sampling poor; Ortiz 2012). The tree above follows relationships suggested by analyses of molecular data in Ortiz et al. (2016); much of the backbone and many of the relationships within the tribes have strong support. However, relationships within Tiliacoreae and Anomospermeae are less well supported, and the position of Pachygoneae was also poorly supported, indeed, when morphological data were added, Pachygoneae formed a clade with Tiliacoreae (Ortiz et al. 2016).
The monophyly of Chasmantheroideae was well supported in the analyses described by Wefferling et al. (2013), and the tropical Coscinieae are sister to the rest of the subfamily (W. Wang et al. 2012; Wefferling et al. 2013; Hoot et al. 2015). For some relationships in Burasaieae, see W. Wang et al. (2016c).
Menispermoideae include the rest of the family and are well supported (but less supported in Wefferling et al. 2013 and Hoot et al. 2015). Within Menispermoideae the temperate Menispermum and relatives (Menispermeae) are sister to the other taxa, often with strong support, and there are other well supported relationships (Ortiz et al. 2007, 2016; W. Wang et al. 2012; Wefferling et al. 2013: c.f. Jacques et al. 2007: morphological data only, variously treated; Jacques & Bertolino 2008, some samples mislabelled, see Jacques et al. 2011). The old Menispermeae, Fibraureae and Peniantheae are polyphyletic (see also Wang et al. 2007a). Hoot et al. (2009: three chloroplast genes) had found that Menispermum and Sinomenium formed a clade sister to all the rest of the family in two gene analyses, but with little support (see also Ahmad et al. 2009; Jacques et al. 2011), although in three-gene analyses they were in a position like that found by Ortiz et al. (2007).
Hong et al. (2001) discuss phylogenetic relationships within Menispermeae. Within Stephania, S. tetrandra may be sister to the rest of the genus (Xie et al. 2015).
Classification. For the tribal classification above, I follow Ortiz et al. (2016).
Thanks. To Rosa Ortiz, for continuing discussions and information.
Synonymy: Pseliaceae Rafinesque
[Berberidaceae + Ranunculaceae]: perennial herbs, rhizomatous; nodes also multilacunar; vascular bundles V-shaped, in herbaceous taxa often closed, not in a single ring [scattered or in concentric rings]; leaf base ± sheathing, (paired petiolar stipules +); inflorescence terminal; K with three or more vascular traces; AP3-III gene expressed in P whorl alone; outer integument at least 4 cells thick; endosperm reserves other than oil or protein.
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested an age of ca 104-90 m.y. for this node, Bell et al. (2010) an age of (87-)72, 67(-54) m.y., Xue et al. (2012) an age of ca 77.8 or 89.1 m.y., Magallón et al. (2015) an age of about 80.3 m.y., and Wikström et al. (2001) an age of (106-)100, 84(-78) m.y.; the ca 128 m.y. in Z. Wu et al. (2014) and ca 127.9 and 124.4 m.y. in Tank et al. (2015: Table S1, S2) are dramatically older (see also Yu & Chung 2017; (124.3-)123.7(-123.3) m.y. is an age suggested by W. Wang et al. (2016a). A crown-goup age of ca 92.8 m.y. is found in J. Li et al. (2018). However, see ages of fossils perhaps attributable to Ranunculaceae.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Nowicke and Skvarla (1981) thought that aperture columellae might be a synapomorphy for the two families (see also Nowicke & Skvarla 1979 for pollen). For the expression of the AP3-III gene, see Sharma et al. (2011).
For general information, see Janchen (1949).
BERBERIDACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - Back to Ranunculales
Myricetin, isoprenylated flavonoids +, tanniniferous; cork also pericyclic; hairs 0 (unicellular or -seriate); lamina vernation curved or conduplicate (complex in Podophyllum, etc.), margins variously toothed (entire), (secondary venation pinnate); inflorescence often racemose; flowers (2-)3(-5)-merous, parts whorled; "C" 6; ("C"/A primordia +); A 6, opening by flaps; tapetal cells multinucleate; G 1, postgenital occlusion by secretion, stylulus short, stigma ± funnel-shaped, corrugated, dry or wet; ovules with zig-zag/bistomal micropyle, outer integument 4-12 cells across, inner integument 2-5 cells across; antipodal cells endopolyploid, (not persistent); fruit a berrylet; exotestal cells lignified, oblong-fibrous to cuboid; endosperm with hemicellulose; embryo minute; chromosomes large.
14 [list: as subfamilies]/701 - three clades below. Mostly East Asia and E. North America, also South America, a few species general N. temperate, scattered in Africa (map: from Ahrendt 1961; Hong 1993; Fl. N. Am. III 1997; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 1. 2003; Malyschev & Peschkova 2004). [Photos - Collection.]
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) suggested a crown-group age of ca 88-72 m.y. for Berberidaceae, while the age in W. Wang et al. (2016a) is (124.3-)123.7(-123.3) m.y, estimates in Yu and Chung (2017), at a little under 100 m.y., are intermediate, and those in Y. Sun et al. (2018), at around 35 m.y., are far younger.
1. Podophylloideae Eaton
Leaves palmately compound, 2-foliolate, or simple and ± deeply lobed, (stipules +); lowermost branch of inflorescence subtended by reduced leaf; K (0 - Achlys), 4-18, "C" (0, 7-9), (4, with nectar spurs); (stamens sensitive), (-19, Podophyllum, Achlys), (dehiscence by slits); microsporogenesis successive [?all], pollen striate (spiny), (diads; tetrads); flower with cortical vascular system/0, placentation parietal/basal; ovules 1-many/carpel, (hemitropous), (micropyle zig-zag), (integuments lobed), inner integument 2-3 cells across, (endothelium +), parietal tissue 0-2 cells across, (postament +); (megaspore mother cells several - Diphylleia); fruit also an achene, or follicle (also with transverse dehiscence); (seeds arillate); outer integument multiplicative [?all], (undifferentiated - Gymnospermium); n = 6.
8/75: Epimedium (55). Mostly (Europe to) East Asia (some desert xerophytes) and W. or E. North America. [Photo - Podophyllum Flower © R. Kowal, Fruit, Ripe Fruit.]
Age. Crown-group Podophylloideae are (104.7-)81.2(-18.5) m.y.o. (Yu & Chung 2017) or 36-27 m.y.a. (Y. Sun et al. 2018).
Synonymy: Diphylleiaceae Schultz-Schultzenstein, Epimediaceae Menge, Leonticaceae Airy Shaw, Podophyllaceae Candolle, nom. cons., Ranzaniaceae Takhtajan
[Nandinoideae + Berberidoideae]: K with 1 trace; stigma wet.
Age. The crown-group age of this clade is estimated to be (109.1-)90.2(-64.9) m.y. (Yu and Chung 2017) or 37-25 m.y. (Y. Sun et al. 2018).
2. Nandinoideae Heintze
(Shrubby); wood diffuse porous, rays broad, complex; leaves to 3x palmately compound, petiole concave at the base, stipules ?+; lowermost branch of inflorescence subtended by ± leaf-like inflorescence bract; (P many, green, "C" 0 - Nandina), (P 6, petaloid - Gymnospermium); (nectary 0 - Nandina), (A dehiscence by slits); ovules 1-2 (4) carpel, endothelium + [Nandina]; (fruit with pericarp evanescent or bladder-like); funicle swollen, (testal cells thin-walled, endotegmic cells large, lignified - Nandina); n = 8, 10 [Nandina].
4/15. E. Europe to Japan.
Age. (97.5-)85.6(-69.2) m.y. or (90.1-)63.8(-27.5) m.y. is the crown-group age of this subfamily (W. Wang et al. 2016a and Yu and Chung 2017 respectively), while a mere 33-13 m.y. is the estimate in Y. Sun et al. (2018).
Synonymy: Nandinaceae Horaninow
3. Berberidoideae Kosteletzky
Shrubby/herbaceous; wood ring porous, (vessel elements with scalariform perforation plates - Berberis); cork cambium deep-seated [?level]; (petiole bundles arcuate - Berberis); leaves (palmate), odd-pinnate/unifoliolate/reduced to branched spines [on long shoots - Berberis], margins often spiny-toothed, secondary veins various, stipules +; inflorescences borne on short shoots/not, (determinate); K 3-12, "C" nectaries basal; stamens sensitive; tapetum amoeboid, cells 4-8-nucleate; microspore development successive, tetrads isobilateral, pollen 6-12 colpate, or apertures irregular (spiraperturate), wall undifferentiated; flower with cortical vascular system [Ranzania]/0, placentation parietal/basal; ovules 1-many/carpel, parietal tissue ca 2 cells across; (megaspore mother cells several); endosperm cellular [Mahonia], embryo long; n = 7.
2/601: Berberis s.l. (610). General N. temperate, also South America, N. and E. Africa.
Age. Crown-group Berberidoideae are (87.1-)68(-51.7) m.y.o. (Yu & Chung 2017) or 28-6 m.y.o. (Y. Sun et al. 2018).
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. For additional dates in the family and a critical evaluation of the fossil record, see Yu and Chung (2017.
Within the family, Berberis is by far the most widely distributed genus, and fossils have been reported from Palaeocene deposits ca 60 m.y. old in northeast China; Oligocene and younger fossils are known from elsewhere in the Northern Hemisphere (Y.-L. Li et al. 2010). The genus may have originated in North America, with one move to South America and two to Eurasia (Adhikari et al. 2015). Several genera in Berberidaceae are disjunct and/or occupy only limited areas, and many of the taxa involved may have originated in East Asia. Despite the probably late Cretaceous age of the family, these disjunctions may be relatively recent, forming within the last 10 m.y., although disjunctions in the desert xerophytes Bongardia and Leontice are probably rather older (Donoghue & Smith 2004; W. Wang et al. 2007b). Y. Sun et al. (2018) estimated that 27 dispersals and three vicariance events were needed to explain the distributions of their fifteen terminals; Berberidaceae may have originated in eastern Asia.
See M.-Y. Zhang et al. (2012) for pollen evolution.
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. Lebuhn and Anderson (1994) describe how the sensitive stamens of Berberis thunbergii work, noting i.a. that they return to their resting position in about twenty minutes and that there are viscin threads (sic) in the pollen, and although details of the process vary between species (Sharma & Verma 2016), little is known about pollination here.
Seeds of a number of taxa, both forest herbs and desert xerophytes, have elaiosomes/are arillate (not necessarily different things) and are myrmecochorous (Lengyel et al. 2009, 2010); Berberidoideae in particular have berries.
Bacterial/Fungal Associations. Some seventy species of Berberis (inc. Mahonia) are alternate hosts for Puccinia graminis, the economically very important black stem rust of wheat and other grain crops in Pooideae.
Vegetative Variation. Pabón-Mora and González (2012) discuss leaf levelopment in Berberis s.l., focussing on what the spines on the long shoots of Berberis might represent. They are articulated and stipulate. and there are usually simple but articulated photosynthetic leaves (i.e. they are unifoliolate) on the short shoots, while the scale leaves are basically stipular (Gonzalez & Pabon Mora 2009). Mahonia s. str. (with ca 100 species) has compound leaves, but it hybridises with Berberis.The first leaves of the short shoots seem to be borne in the same plane as the prophylls (Pabón-Mora & González 2012).
Genes & Genomes. For the evolution of the chloroplast genome, see Y. Sun et al. (2018); there has been considerable expansion of the inverted repeat in Berberis s.l..
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. The epidermal waxes of Podophyllum are solid rods.
In Epimedium the nectaries are inside spurs coming from the four inner tepals; see Erbar (2014) for the diversity of nectaries in the family. Although Podophyllum has many stamens, single stamens or groups of stamens are opposite the innermost perianth members (Schmidt 1928); Zhao et al. (2014) described all floral organs (except the carpel) as originating in whorls of three in the related Dysosma, and, unlike elsewhere in the family, there were no C-A primordia. X. L. Liu et al. (2017) also recorded C-A primordia in Gymnospermium, although here they described much reduced staminodes with pollen sacs immediately adaxial to the bases of the filaments possibly "homologous to nectariferous petals in Caulophyllum and the six perianth members were not strictly decussating. Ghimire and Heo (2012) described the anther tapetum of Berberidoideae as being glandular; if true, multinucleate tapetal cells would still separate Berberidoideae from other Berberidaceae. Successive microsporogenesis has been reported (Min et al. 1995). The carpel in Berberidaceae varies in its orientation. According to Chapman (1925, c.f. e.g. Feng & Lu 1998), the gynoecium is derived from two or three carpels, with the gynoecia of the n = 6 clade alone being derived from two carpels (Kim & Jansen 1998), however, the gynoecium is probably unicarpellate throughout the family (Brückner 2000 for a summary). The single carpel of Dysosma is shown as being obliquely oriented (Zhao et al. 2016b). Ghimire et al. (2010) described the thinly crassinucellate ovules of Gymnospermium (Podophylloideae) as having a well-developed endothelium, while in Nandina, aside from the endothelium, the outer epidermal cells of the inner integument are anticlinally elongated (Kumazawa 1938a). The carpel walls of Caulophyllum (Podophylloideae) do not surround the maturing blue seeds, so the plant is a kind of gymnosperm...
Some general information is taken from Schmidt (1928), Loconte (1993) and Stearn (2002: herbaceous Berberidaceae) and chemistry from Hegnauer (1964, 1989). For some wood anatomy, see Shen (1954: mostly Nandina), for inflorescence development in Berberis, see Bull-Hereñu and Claßen-Bockhoff (2011b), for floral development of Caulophyllum (common stamen-nectary primordia), see Brett and Posluszny (1982) and for that of Gymnospermium see X. L. Liu et al. (2017), for the chaotic arrangement of the androecium in Achlys, see Endress (1989), for pollen, see Nowicke and Skarvla (1981), for microsporogenesis, see Furness (2008b), for spore/gamete development in Diphylleia, see Huang et al. (2010), for the female gametophyte, see Huss (1906), for that of Podophyllum, see Sreenivasulu et al. (2010), and for arils, see Pfeiffer (1891).
Phylogeny. Nandina is a very distinctive plant, and in the past it has been segregated as a monotypic family or subfamily (as in versions 7 and earlier of this site). However, Nickol (1995) had suggested on morphological grounds that it was close to Caulophyllum, although it was placed sister to the rest of the family in the most parsimonious tree that he found. Early molecular studies (e.g. Adachi 1995) also found relationships between the two genera, and these have since been confirmed, as by Kim et al. (2004), Hoot et al. (2015), and Y. Sun et al. (2018), even if Nandina did sometimes tend to wander about the tree (e.g. Kim & Jansen 1996, 1998).
The three subfamilies above, which more or less form a tritomy, appear in the analyses carried out by Kim et al. (2004); Podophylloideae have only moderate support (see also W. Wang et al. 2007b). W. Wang et al. (2009) confirmed these three main clades, and although molecular support for a [Nandinoideae + Berberidoideae] clade was weak, it was much strengthened in analyses that included morphological data; these relationships were also found in the plastome analyses of Y. Sun et al. (2018). However, Hoot et al. (2015) found the relationships [Nandinoideae [Podophylloideae + Berberidoideae], but again support could have been stronger, while W. Wang et al. (2016a), Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016) and Yu and Chung (2017: weak support) found the relationships [Berberidoideae [Nandinoideae + Podophylloideae]], but [Nandinoideae [Berberidoideae + Podophylloideae]] in BEAST analyses.
Relationships within Berberis s.l. are ["B. higginsae" [B. nivenii + The Rest]] (Adhikari et al. 2015, but see Yu & Chung 2017 for problems with the B. higginsiae sequences), but the first two species were in a clade sister to the rest in Yu and Chung (2017), while B. claireae, from Baja California, was sister to all other Berberis s. str. (<4% of that clade was sampled).
Classification. For an infra-familial classification, see W. Wang et al. (2009). Berberis includes Mahonia, and although Wu and Chung (2017) split this group into four genera, sampling of Berberis in particular was rather exiguous.
Previous Relationships. Fruit dehiscence in some Berberidaceae and Papaveraceae is transverse, at least in part. Although on this account these families are similar (e.g. Endress 1995a), little else indicates immediate phylogenetic relationships.
RANUNCULACEAE Jussieu, nom. cons. - Back to Ranunculales
Tannin 0, little oxalate accumulation; cork cambium deep-seated, rarely developed; when woody with broad primary rays persisting and cambium developing in the primary vascular bundles; (cuticle waxes as platelets); stomata also paracytic; lamina margins usu. gland-toothed; flowers medium to large, K, C, and A not opposite each other, K petal like; A many, spiral; receptacle well developed, stigma ± dry; compitum 0; ovules several/carpel, apotropous, micropyle endostomal, obturators various; fruit a follicle; exotestal cells often thickened, unlignified, or seed ± pachychalazal, coat thin; endosperm starchy, embryo minute to short, cotyledons connate or not, cotyledonary tube common; chromosomes short [0.5-2.5 µm long], ± rod-like [T(Thalictrum)-type]; germination epigeal.
62 [list]/2,525 - five subfamilies below. ± World-wide, but most temperate.
Age. Anderson et al. (2005) estimated a crown-group age of ca 87-73 m.y. for Ranunculaceae, Bell et al. (2010) ages of (73-)59, 55(-41) m.y., Wikström et al. (2001) ages of (91-)85, 65(-59) m.y., while (114.8-)108.8(-101.6) m.y. is the age in W. Wang et al. (2016a).
The recent discovery of Leefructus from early Cretaceous deposits 125.8-122.6 m.y. old in China and assigned to stem Ranunculaceae (G. Sun et al. 2011; see also W. Wang et al. 2014a) may, if confirmed, very much change our ideas of the evolution of Ranunculaceae (see W. Wang et al. 2016a), Ranunculales, perhaps of eudicots as a whole, but there may be some question about "the authenticity of the specimen" (sic: Z. Zhou 2014: p. 553).
[Glaucidioideae + Hydrastidoideae]: vessel elements also with scalariform perforation plates; stem with cortical + medullary bundles; vascular bundles flat; petiole with medullary bundles; palisade mesophyll 0; leaves two-ranked, lamina simple, vernation plicate, margin deeply palmately lobed; flowers single, terminal; C 0, nectaries 0; androecial vascular supply fasciculate; stigma bilobed; nucellar cap massive.
Age. Bell et al. (2010) estimated crown-group ages for this clade of (66-)51, 48(-34) m.y. and Wikström et al. (2001) ages of (80-)74, 47(-41) m.y. ago.
1. Glaucidioideae Loconte
Coumarin +, alkaloids, berberin 0; lamina vernation also supervolute-curved; flowers with cortical vascular system; K 4; A development centrifugal; G 2, basally connate, opposite outer P [transverse], grooved, stigma ?irregular-laminate; ovules many/carpel, parietal tissue 0, outer integument 6-13 cells across, with vascular bundle, inner integument ca 5 cells across; megaspore mother cells several; follicle with stigma on lower abaxial surface, also dehiscing abaxially; seeds winged, outer integument vascularized; polyembryony common, embryo long, cotyledons foliaceous; n = 10.
1/1: Glaucidium palmatum. Japan (map: from H.-L. Li 1952, blue).
Synonymy: Glaucidiaceae Tamura
2. Hydrastidoideae Martynov
Roots bright yellow; nodes swollen, multilacunar; petiole base on rhizome encircling stem; K inconspicuous, (2) 3 (4), with a single trace; A ?development; pollen tectum striate-reticulate; G several, stigma with multicellular projections; ovules 1-2(-4)/carpel, micropyle bistomal/zig-zag, outer integument 4-8 cells across, inner integument 2-4 cells across, nucellus ca 4 cells across; fruit a berrylet; exotesta strongly palisade, exotegmen lignified, testa and tegmen multiplicative; embryo minute; n = 13.
1/1: Hydrastis canadense. Central and eastern North America (map: above, from H.-L. Li 1952, red).
Synonymy: Hydrastidaceae Martinov
[Coptidoideae [Thalictroideae + Ranunculoideae]]: vascular bundles with xylem surrounding phloem [= amphivasal], vessel elements with simple perforation plates [usu.]; paratracheal parenchyma ± absent; (nodes 1:1, 2:2); petiole bundles with associated lignification; leaves (opposite, two-ranked), palmately compound, lamina vernation variable; inflorescence often cymose, or flowers single; K 5-merous, "C" 0-13, usu. obviously nectariferous, very diverse in form; A development centripetal, extrose or introrse; (pollen inaperturate); G (1-)many, usually with complete postgenital fusion, (ascidiate), when 3, orientation variable; ovules 1-15/carpel; outer integument 4-6 cells acrosss, inner integument ca 2 cells across; (endosperm 0).
60/2,523. ± World-wide, but especially northern and montane (map: from Vester 1940; Hultén 1971; Frankenberg & Klaus 1980; Trop. Afr. Fl. Pl. Ecol. Distr. 1. 2003; Wilson 2007).
Age. Bell et al. (2010) estimated crown-group ages for this clade of (59-)45, 42(-30) m.y. and Wikström et al. (2001) ages of (71-)66, 51(-46) m.y.; (96.6-)89.9(-83.3) m.y. are the ages in W. Wang et al. (2016a).
3. Coptoideae Tamura
Small shrub or perennial herbs; "C" nectaries 5-10, petal-like, thick, stalked; carpels stipitate; n = (8) 9.
3/17: Coptis (10). East Asia, E. and W. North America.
Age. Crown-group ages for this clade of (20-)17, 12(-9) m.y. (Wikström et al. 2001), (26-)16.2(-8.5) m.y. (W. Wang et al. 2016a) or ca 15.5 m.y.a. (Xiang et al. 2018), all Cop. Xan..
[Thalictroideae + Ranunculoideae]: ovules apotropous [when single], outer integument 2-10 cells across, inner integument 2-3 cells across, (integument single); postament + (0); (fruit an achene), (embryo medium).
4. Thalictroideae Rafinesque
Tyrosine derived cyanogenic compounds, 18:3[d]5t,9c,12c, also 18:1[d]5t, 18:2[d]5t,9c fatty acids +; hairs capitate; leaves to 3x compound, leaflet vernation ± curved-involute, ([adaxial] stipules + - Thalictrum); (plant dioecious); flower parts ± whorled; nectaries ± petal-like and stalked, (internal staminodes +); (polle pantoporate); (ovule bistomal - Delphinium), integument single, 7-8 cells across; n = (6) 7, 35S sites proximal to centromere [?all T-type chromosomes]; chloroplast rpl32 gene transferred to nucleus.
9/450: Thalictrum (330), Aquilegia (80). N. temperate, also South America, Africa and New Guinea.
Age. The crown-group age for this subfamily is (41.2-)33.8(27.6) m.y. (W. Wang et al. 2016a: note topology).
Synonymy: Aquilegiaceae Lilja, Thalictraceae Rafinesque
5. Ranunculoideae Arnott
(Liane), (annual herbs); lactone-forming glycosides [ranunculin], (20:3[d]5c,11c,14c fatty acid), (bufadienolides [cardiac glycosides]) +, benzylisoquinoline alkaloids usu. 0, berberine 0; (palisade mesophyll with arm cells); stomata ³35 µm long; (petiole bundles arcuate), (wing bundles +), (medullary bundles +); hairs clavate; (leaves opposite - Clematis), (simple), (pedate), lamina segments ± involute (supervolute and/or curved), (stipule adaxial - Caltha); (flowers vertically monosymmetric); (K sepal-like), "C" various, (nectaries 0); (staminodes surrounding G); (A development centrifugal); tapetal cells 2≤ nucleate; (pollen multicolpate/pantoporate); ovule often 1/carpel, median (lateral - Adonidae), (micropyle endostomal), (integument single, 4-12 cells across), parietal tissue 1-2 cells across, (0 - Anemone), (nucellar cap 0), (postament +); (antipodal cells multinucleate - Caltha); fruit (achene), (style persistent, plumose), (berrylet - some Actaea); (seed coat poorly developed [e.g. "testa undifferentiated" - Eranthis]), (with a vascular bundle - Anemone), (exotesta short-palisade), endotesta ± developed; endosperm nuclear, (embryo undifferentiated), (cotyledon 1), (cotyledons connate); n = (6-)8(-9), chromosomes long [(3-)4.1-10.5(-12) µm long], 2-armed, often curved [R-/Ranunculus-type], 35S sites terminal or subterminal; (germination hypogeal - some Clematis).
46/2025: Ranunculus (600), Delphinium (400), Aconitum (300), Clematis (325), Anemone s.l. (190). Worldwide, but few in lowland tropics. [Photo - Flower.]
Age. Crown-group Ranunculoideae are estimated to be (156.4-)123.4(-94.5) m.y.o. (J. Cheng & Xie 2014).
Synonymy: Aconitaceae Berchtold & J. C. Presl, Actaeaceae Berchtold & J. C. Presl, Anemonaceae Vest, Calthaceae Martynov, Cimicifugaceae Bromhead, Clematidaceae Martynov, Delphiniaceae Brenner, Helleboraceae Vest, Nigellaceae J. Agardh
Evolution: Divergence & Distribution. A number of dates for Ranunculoideae are suggested by Cheng and Xie (2014); they tend to be rather old. Paleoactaea, from the Late Palaeocene some 58 m.y.a., has fruits very similar to those of Actaea down to the palisade tissue in the testa (Pigg & deVore 2005). Somewhat older Eocaltha has seeds rather like those of extant Caltha, e.g. both have a flotation chamber; this fossil is from the Mexican Campanian (Cretaceous) some ca 77 m.y. old (Rodríguez de la Rosa et al. 1998; see also Pigg & deVore 2005 for early records), but its identity needs confirmation (Friis et al. 2011). If these fossils are placed in the crown groups of their respective genera, they will affect how we understand the evolution of the family as a whole.
Indeed, both relationships within the family and ages of clades seem rather up in the air right now. W. Wang et al. (2016a: q.v. for dates, c.f. topology, see below) suggested that the early evolution of the family took place in angiosperm-dominated forests during the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution ca 109-90 m.y.a., and that all tribes had diverged by the end of the Cretaceous. They thought that around 83 m.y.a. Ranunculaceae moved to non-forest habitsts, eleven or so clades diverging within 1-14 m.y. (Wang et al. 2016a). Note that in Berberidaceae, sister to Ranunculaceae, the woody Berberis is sister to the rest of the family (Wang et al. 2016a), and in Ranunculales as a whole there are other clades of herbaceous taxa.
The beginning of diversification within the speciose Clematis clade has been dated to (13.1-)7.8(-4.0) m.y.a., however, the stem age is some (43.8-)26(-9.2) m.y. (Mikeda et al. 2006; Xie et al. 2011). The stem of the Coptis-Xanthorhiza clade may be as much as around 55 m. years (c.f. Xiang et al. 2018).
For the evolution of Arctic Ranunculaceae, see Hoffmann et al. (2010) and for that of sub-Antarctic Ranunculus, see Lehnebach et al. (2017). Crown-group Ranunculeae may date to around (47.1-)39.5, 38.4(-28.6) m.y.a. (W. Wang et al. 2014b, q.v. for other dates). In the widely-distributed Ranunculus there has been a substantial amount of dispersal in tropical and subtropical mountains and in the Southern Hemisphere - even between southern Africa and America - often followed by radiations (Emadzade et al. 2010, 2011; Hörandl & Emadze 2011), however, some of these dispersal events have been questioned (Wang et al. 2014b: some questionable sequences in earlier work). Apomixis is also well known from three groups in the genus, and ca 800 apomictic microspecies have been described from the R. auricomus area (Majeský et al. 2017 and literature). Diversification within Aquilegia (Thalictroideae) has been much studied, the nectar spurs that characterise most of the genus being considered a key innovation that triggered recent and rapid diversification in the clade (Hodges & Arnold 1995 and references). There are only ca 80 species in the clade and they show little molecular differentiation (Whittall et al. 2006), and in a study of the 25 North American species, Whittall and Hodges (2007) found that there had been punctuational (at speciation) and directional (short to long spurs) evolution, the plants evolving to fit the morphologies of their pollinators - so not cospeciation.
Delphinium s.l., Aconitum, and relatives (Ranunculoideae-Delphinieae) have monosymmetric flowers and between them account for about a quarter of the diversity in the whole family. This group is largely Mediterranean-East Asian in distribution, but with forays into Africa and North America. Delphinieae began diversifying early in the Oligocene (41.8-)32.3(-23.0) m.y.a., and the transition from a short-lived (± annual) to a perennial habit in Delphinium is associated with bursts of diversification (Jabbour & Renner 2011, 2012a). Much diversification in the group has been in alpine habitats in the Himalaya-Hengduan region (Hughes & Atchison 2015), but rate shifts in Delphineae from the Hengduan region are dated to ca 37 and 27 m.y.a., which predates the uplift of the Hengduan Mountains (Xing & Ree 2017, see also below for their pollinators). There has been duplication of Cycloidea genes involved in this monosymmetry, and they are variously expressed, ad- or abaxially, in the flower, and also in the outer whorl of petaloid sepals (Jabbour et al. 2014; c.f. Hileman 2014).
Expression of a duplicated A-class gene, APETALA 3, is intimately involved in the development of the nectariferous petals found in Delphinieae and many other Ranunculaceae. Absence of the gene has been linked to the loss of the nectarial function, and these nectary-type structures then look much more like the petaloid sepals (R. Zhang et al. 2013; Gonçalves et al. 2013; Sharma et al. 2014). For rather surprising details of floral development in Nigella which suggest considerable flexibility in other Ranunculaceae, at least, see P. Wang et al. (2015).
Ecology & Physiology. Rhizomes and tubers of some Ranunculaceae perennate in a state of extreme dessication (Gaff & Oliver 2013).
Many species of Clematis (inc. Naravelia, etc.) are lianes, sometimes very robust, that climb using leaflet or petiole tendrils, and, as with other clibers, older stems tend to be more flexible, the structural Young's modulus decreasing (Isnard et al. 2003a, b).
Pollination Biology & Seed Dispersal. One commonly thinks of Ranunculaceae as having rather unspecialized flowers, and in an analysis of European members of the family Waser et al. (1996) found as many as 53 species of pollinating insects from 29 genera visiting a single species - or as few as one. Indeed, many Ranunculaceae have distinctive nectaries which can be more or less like petals, and some species have complex flowers in which these nectaries take very different forms. Thus Delphinieae have monosymmetric flowers with paired nectary spurs that are borne inside a spurred petaloid member of the outer floral whorl; Renner and Jabbour (2012b) discuss the evolution of this unusual pollination morphology. Bumble bees are the predominant pollinators of the 600-700 species of this tribe, which is very speciose in the Himalayas (Renner & Jabbour 2012b). Diversification of bumble bees, generalist bees that handle specialized flowers quite easily (see below, probably occurred 40-25 m.y.a. (Hines 2008 and references), i.e., about the same time as that of Delphinieae. Rather unusually for a bumble bee, Bombus consobrinus has specialized on Aconitum, especially on A. septentrionale, although several other bumble bees also pollinate members of that genus (Laverty & Plowright 1988; Thostesen & Olesen 1996); Kronfeld (1890: p. 19) early declared Aconitum to be an excellent example of an insect-adapted flower. Pollen deposition on the pollinator may be quite precise in Aquilegia (Kay et al. 2006b).
The five, coloured nectar spurs of the polysymmetric flowers of Aquilegia are unusual in flowering plants (exceptions - Halenia, etc.); nectar spurs are usually single, rarely two (Diascia) and are associated with monosymmetric flowers. Whittall and Hodges (2007) and Kramer and Hodges (2010) review the evolution of these in part petal-like spurs (see above). Variation in length, which is considerable, is not linked to changes in cell number, roughly the same in the three species examined, rather, to the duration and direction of cell elongation (Puzey et al. 2012). Caltha has nectariferous hairs on the carpels (e.g. Kapil & Jalan 1962), while taxa like Clematis and Ranunculus have apparently unspecialized flowers and may be visited by many species of pollinators. Many species of Thalictrum are wind-pollinated, and some of these species are monoecious or dioecious. Monoecy and dioecy are restricted to and predominate in New World species; wind pollination may reverse to animal pollination (Soza et al. 2012). No compitum of any sort has been recorded from the family (e.g. X.-F. Wang et al. 2011)
For the intimate association between Old World Trollius and its pollinators/seed parasites, the fly Chiastocheta (close to Botanophila), see Pellmyr (1992) and Ibanez et al. (2013: plant volatiles). Moraceae, Saxifragaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Caryophyllaceae and Asparagaceae-Agavoideae have similar interactions - see Hembry and Althoff (2016) and Kawakita and Kato (2017f) for reviews diversification and coevolution in them.
Apomixis is well known in the Ranunculus auricomus complex, which includes some 800 microspecies (Hörandl et al. 2007 and references).
A number of forest herbs in Ranunculoideae in particular are myrmecochorous, the outgrowths that attract ants developing either from the seed or the fruit (Lengyel et al. 2009, 2010).
Plant-Animal Interactions. North temperate Ranunculaceae are hosts to over 110 species of dipteran agromyzid leaf miners (Phytomyza: Spencer 1990; see also Jensen 1995), which for the number of species of Ranunculaceae involved may be the most diverse assemblage in flowering plants. Phytomyza (well over 700 species) may have moved on to Ranunculaceae from asterids, perhaps in the late Oligocene ca 24.5 m.y.a., and diversified there as the climate cooled; they have since moved back to asterids, especially to campanulid groups (Winkler et al. 2009).
Aquilegia eximia, which has sticky hairs, is protected from herbivores, including florivores, by carnivorous insects that are at least in part atracted to the plant by dead insects trapped by these hairs - this is by no mean unique, but this particular situation is the subject of a recent study by LoPresti et al. (2015).
Genes & Genomes. A genome duplication in Aquilegia has been dated to (60.4-)51.1(-44.8) m.y.a. (Vanneste et al. 2014a), so it may be fairly deep in the family.
It is over 80 years since Langlet (1932) realized that the cytological variation in the family had a stong systematic signal, with genera having large R(anunculus)- or small T(halictrum)-type chromosomes, a finding that was at odds with the then-accepted classification. Okada and Tamura (1979) note characters other than gross size and shape that also separate the two chromosome types (see also Tamura 1993). However, the correlation between chromosome morphology and taxonomy sometimes breaks down; Chung et al. (2013: note lengths given for the two types) found that the chromosomes of some species of Ranunculus like the annual R. sceleratus were quite small, rather like those of T-type chromosomes. Baltisberger and Hörandl (2015) look at karyotype evolution in Ranunculus and its immediate relatives, while Filiaut et al. (2018) examined the Aquilegia genome, finding a rather high (and inexplicable) level of polymorphism on chromosome 4, as also in Semiaquilegia.
Although the rpl32 gene is also found in the chloroplast in Thalictroideae, it is non-functional there (Park et al. 2015b).
Mlinarec et al. (2016a) examined retrotransposon (Tekay chromoviral elements) and genome evolution in Anemone s.l. and found a correlation between the two.
Chemistry, Morphology, etc. Benzylisoquinoline alkaloids are largely absent from Ranunculaceae, although present in Coptis and Isopyyrum (Coptoideae: Jensen 1995), which makes placing this feature on the tree difficult (lost and regained versus two losses). Ruijgrok (1966) clarified the distribution of the lactone ranunculin and of cyanogenic compounds. The vascular bundles often have xylem surrounding the phloem, but c.f. Takhtajan (1997). Clematis, secondarily woody, has storied wood (see Carlquist 1995a for wood and bark anatomy); it is a liane with opposite leaves with sensitive, twining petioles. There are cortical bundles in the erect stem of Hydrastis, but not in the rhizome; the rhizome of Glaucidium is an irregular sympodium. Variation in petiole anatomy is extensive (Tamura 1962, 1995) and adaxial/intrapetiolar stipules occur sporadically in the family (Hagemann 1970).
Monosymmetry in flowers of Delphinieae becomes apparent only rather late in development after organ initiation has begun (Jabbour et al. 2009a). Soltis et al. (2003a) suggest that both Glaucidium and Hydrastis have a bimerous perianth. Floral phyllotaxy in Anemoneae is particularly variable, transitions between various spiral and whorled arrangements occuring with variation in numbers of perianth parts, even within a species (Ren et al. 2010; Kitazawa & Fujimoto 2018).
For an early discussion on stamens and nectaries in Ranunculaceae, and a suggestion that the flower might be fundamentally 3-merous, see Salisbury (1919). Nectaries in the family vary greatly in morphology from beaker-like to ± complex petal-like structures, and they have generally thought to be modified stamens. The two have a number of points of similarity, e.g. the "petals" have a single trace, although in some Delphinieae they have two traces (Novikoff & Jabbour 2014). They are in the same parastiches as androecial members, are similar to stamens in early development, are often peltate, originate from a primordium that is a mound rather than a ridge, and there are sometimes intermediates (Jäger 1961; Tamura 1965; Kosuge & Tamura 1989; Erbar et al. 1999; Leins 2000; Zhao et al. 2011; c.f. Kosuge 1994). Normally the nectaries are rather different morphologically from the "sepals" and are sometimes quite elaborate beaker- or hood-shaped structures; the "sepals" are more consistently petal-like and visually attractive. However, in Ranunculus and Ficaria "sepals" are green and protective, while the nectaries are very petal-like, the nectary proper being a small scale at the base of what otherwise appears to be an ordinary petal, while in Laccopetalum and relatives there are a number of nectary ridges on the "petals"; in the latter both petals and stamens may have three traces (Hiepko 1964a). Pabón-Mora et al. (2013) suggested that aspects of floral development in Aquilegia differed from those in other members of the family. There the basal/abaxial member of alternating staminal rows is a spurred petal/nectary which has three vascular traces running into it. Recent work seems not to confirm a stamen identity for the nectaries (see above). Genera like Clematis, Thalictrum and Anemone s.l. may lack nectaries/petal-like structures adaxial to the petal-like sepals, but in some species of Anemone the carpels are nectariferous and in some Clematis nectar is secreted by the innermost stamens (Erbar et al. 2014). For spurs and different modes of nectar secretion within Ranunculoideae, see Anton and Kaminska (2015).
In Anemone s.l. the floral bracts/bracteoles tend to be calycine, and this is especially evident in the Hepatica group where the bracts are borne immediately underneath the flower with its petal-like sepals, although they do not particularly closely envelop the rest of the flower. These "sepals" have only a single trace and there are no nectaries. W. Wang and Chen (2007) discuss "petal" evolution in Thalictroideae; see also above, again, petals/nectaries have been lost. In Aquilegia the stamens are in ten vertically-arranged two-ranked series, each opposite an internal staminode, unique to Ranunculales (see Sharma & Kramer 2012 for their development). Insertion of the stamens, etc., can be spiral or whorled (Gonçalves et al. 2013).
Tamura (1996) described the androecial development of Glaucidium as being centrifugal and the androecium as being innervated by branches of staminal trunk bundles, very like the androecial development common in polystaminate core eudicots. Laccopetalum has huge flowers up to 15 cm across and with ca 10,000 carpels. Although the carpels of Nigella are connate, no compitum is developed (Erbar 1998). There are often five traces to each carpel. When there is only one ovule/carpel, it is the basal member of the series (c.f. Rosaceae, with which Ranunculaceae share a superficial similarity, but where the single ovule is the apical member of the series). Uniovulate taxa are usually also unitegmic and have a nucellar cap (Philipson 1974). Bouman and Calis (1977) give details of the integuments of some Ranunculoideae. Z.-F. Wang and Ren (2008) suggested that unitegmic ovules have arisen in different ways, the single integument being either the outer (e.g. Clematis) or the inner integument (e.g. Ranunculus); they also described a rather obscure annular structure that surrounds the ovule in Coptis. The adaxial side of the carpels of Glaucidium grows more than the abaxial as the fruit develops, so the stigma ends up on the "lower" surface; there the embryo is shown as being long by Tamura (1972) and Takhtajan (1988), but it is described as being minute by Takhtajan (1997). There is extensive variation in embryo size (Tamura & Mizumoto 1972) and seedling morphology; the development of a cotyledonary tube is quite common in the family, while Ranunculus ficaria, for example, has only a single cotyledon (Förster 1997).
For general information, see Marié (1885), Kumazawa (1937b), Johri et al. (1992) and Tamura (1993, 1995: including infrageneric groupings), also Hegnauer (1969, 1986, 1990) and Jensen (1995), all chemistry, Hao et al (2018: chemistry and medecine), Aizetmüller (1995, 1996, 1999 (fatty acids), Kumazawa (1937: leaf vernation), Jabbour et al. (2015: significance of floral terata), Schöfel (1932: esp. floral diagrams), Brouland (1935: floral vasculature), Rohweder (1967a: carpels), Huss (1906), Bhandari (1967 and references), and Engell (1995), all embryology, van Heel (1981, 1983: carpel development), Trifonova (1990 and references: petiole and seed anatomy), Weberling (1989: nectaries), G. H. Smith (1928), Endress (1995a), Tucker and Hodges (2005: Aquilegia and immediate relatives), Leins and Erbar (2010), Ren et al. (2009: Adonidae, 2011: Thalictroideae), and Zhao et al. (2011, 2012, 2016a: some Ranunculoideae), all floral (and some inflorescence) morphology, Ren et al. (2009: floral development of Adonidae, 2011: floral development of Thalictroideae), Xie and Li (2012: pollen of Clematis), X.-q. Wang et al. (1993, also paper before it) pollen and seed, and for fruit and seed anatomy, see Heiss et al. (2011: Nigella), Ghimire et al. (2015: Ranunculoideae) and Jung and Heo (2017: Korean taxa). See Tobe and Keating (1985) and Tobe (2002) for Hydrastis and Tamura (1972) for much information on Glaucidium, embryology mostly from Kumazawa (1938a) and Tobe (1981).
Phylogeny. The clade [Hydrastis + Glaucidium] has been found to be sister to the rest of the family by Hoot et al. (1998) and others since. This and other major phylogenetic structure within the family - [Coptoideae [Thalictroideae + Ranunculoideae]] - might seem quite well established (c.f. also in part Ro et al. 1997; W. Wang et al. 2005). However, W. Wang et al. (2009) found strong molecular support for the relationships [Glaucidium [Hydrastis + rest of Ranunculaceae]], that for [Hydrastis + rest of Ranunculaceae] being weakened slightly by the addition of morphological data, and there was weak support for this topology in Hoot et al. (2015), while Soltis et al. (2011) found some support for a topology [Hydrastis [Glaucidium + Ranunculus]] (the only three taxa of Ranunculaceae in the analysis). W. Wang et al. (2016a: 6 genes, good sampling) found a rather differenmt set of relationships, [Glaucidium [Hydrastis [Coptidoideae [Adonideae [Nigella [Thalictroideae + other Ranunculoideae]]]]. See also Z.-D. Chen et al. (2016) for relationships among Chinese taxa of the family; [Coptis [[Eranthis + Cimicifuga] [Asteropyrum [[Thalictrum + Caltha] [other Ranunculoideae]]]]] were the relationships obtained. Similarly, Cossard et al. (2016), using eight markers from all three compartments, found the relationships [Glaucidium [Hydrastis [Coptidoideae [[Adonideae + Thalictroideae] [other Ranunculoideae (includes Nigella)]]]], although support for the position of Adonidae was weak and that for [other Ranunculoideae] not too strong, either. Hence the topology of the relationships above should be interpreted with caution, thus the vegetative and anatomical similarities between Glaucidium and Hydrastis are quite extensive, and if the two do not form a clade, using simply parsimony (ACCTRAN) these might be apomorphies for the whole family.... For other work on the family, see Hoot (1991, 1995) and Jensen et al. (1995).
For relationships within Thalictroideae, see Ro and McPheron (1997), W. Wang and Chen (2007) and Park et al. (2015b). The latter found the clade [[Isopyrum + Enemion] [Aquilegia + Semiaquilegia]] to be sister to the rest. Relationships along the spine of Thalictrum are for the most part poorly supported, but an insect-pollinated clade is sister to the rest; current sections seem largely useless (Soza et al. 2012).
Relationships around Ranunculus are interesting. Ficaria, Myosurus, with its very elongated receptacle and as a result a flower that looks like the inflorescence of Houttuynia (Saururaceae), and [Laccopetalum + Krapfia], with their large to huge flowers, many carpels, polyporate pollen, an androgynophore, etc. (Lehnebach et al. 2007) form a basal grade in a strongly supported clade with a monophyletic Ranunculus - see Hörandl et al. (2005), Paun et al. (2005), Hoot et al. (2008), Gehrke and Linder (2009: African montane taxa), Emadzade et al. (2011, but see W. Wang et al. 2014b in part) and Baltisberger and Hörandl (2015). Hoot and Palmer (1994), Hoot et al. (1994), Hoot et al. (2004), Schuettpelz et al. (2002) and Meyer et al. (2010) discuss relationships in Anemone s.l., which includes Hepatica, Pulsatilla, etc.; there is a considerable amount of pollen variation in the clade (e.g. Ehrendorfer et al. 2009). . For the phylogeny of Actaea, see Compton et al. (1998). Luo et al. (2005) discuss the phylogeny of Aconitum subgenus Aconitum. Jabbour and Renner (2011, 2012a; also W. Wang et al. 2013) focussed on the speciose Delphinieae, and the clades they found only partly mapped on to previously-recognized genera, while Aconitum gymnandrum, although belonging there, did not link with any major clade; see Xiang et al. (2017) for the limits of and relationships within subgenus Delphinium. There was little resolution of relationships within the speciose Delphinium section Diedropetala (Koontz et al. 2004). W. Wang et al. (2010) discuss relationships in Adonidae. Xie et al. (2011; see also Mikeda et al. 2006) provide a fairly comprehensive analysis of Clematis, unfortunately, several of the deeper branches in the genus are poorly supported, and the main clades that are evident neither correlate very well with previous infrageneric taxa nor have much morphological support.
Classification. The back-bone of the classification above is largely based on that in Tamura (1993) and especially Jensen et al. (1995). Glaucidium has quite often been placed in its own family (indeed, it was excluded from Ranunculaceae by Tamura), but it would be monotypic; although a distinctive plant, it has quite a lot in common with Hydrastis (see also Cai et al. 2010, c.f. in part Cai et al. 2009).
There are a number of problems with generic limits; see E. Welk in Kadereit et al. (2016) for a summary of some of these. For generic limits around Ranunculus, see Emadzade et al. (2010), in Adonidae, see W. Wang et al. (2010), and around Anemone, see Hoot et al. (1994), Ehrendorfer (1995) and Hoot (1995). Thus Pfosser et al. (2011) suggests that Anemone may be best divided into two, one clade having x = 7 (inc. Hepatica) and the other x = 8 (see also Zhang et al. 2015; Mlinarec et al. 2016b: 5S rDNA). There is certainly a lot of variation around here in bract morphology, staminode presence/absence, pollen morphology, etc. (Ziman et al. 2008 and references), and the genus is currently being dismembered (see Mosyakin 2016, 2018 and references). In the Delphinium area, Aconitella is derived from within Consolida, and the combined clade is to be included within Delphinium (Jabbour & Renner 2012; see also Jabbour et al. 2011; Xiang et al. 2017: infrageneric classification); Pseudodelphinium is a peloric form of Delphinium (Espinosa et al. 2017). Actaea is to include Cimicifuga (Compton et al. 1998).
Previous Relationships. Ranunculaceae are a classic example of a "famille par enchaînement", nothing in particular seeming to hold them together, but work over the last two decades suggests that they are largely monophyletic. However, Paeonia, quite often associated with Ranunculaceae in the past, is now included in Saxifragales as Paeoniaceae, while Tamura (1972) thought that Glaucidium was close to Hypericales (= Malpighiales).
Botanical Trivia. The zygote of Anemone flaccida is undivided at the time of seed dispersal (Tamura & Mizumoto 1972).