|
The rich databases of museums and herbaria serve as the primary data
for the application of ecological niche models. Yet key assumptions about
primary data often are either ignored or untested in model development. This
project focuses on testing whether plant voucher specimens adequately sample
the climatic gradient in two countries of conservation interest for CCSD:
Ecuador and Bolivia. Note that ecological niche modeling may help to correct
geographic sampling bias in the distribution of voucher specimens, but may be
severely and adversely affected by environmental sampling bias. We have detected
marked collection bias relative to several environmental variables in the
countries of interest. Currently we are assessing the effect of such bias on

|
A) Partitioning of Ecuador into ten climate bins determined by mean annual
precipitation in millimeters. B) Comparison of the distribution of proportion
of geographic area (black bars labeled "expected") and proportion
of plant voucher specimens (white bars labeled "observed") across
the ten climate bins defined for Ecuador in A. C) Partitioning of Bolivia into
ten climate bins determined by mean annual precipitation in millimeters.
D) Comparison of the distribution of proportion of geographic area (black bars
labeled "expected") and proportion of plant voucher specimens (white
bars labeled "observed") across the ten climate bins defined for
Bolivia in C. In Ecuador climate bins 1, 6, and 7 are under-sampled, and bins 2
and 3 are most clearly over-sampled. In Bolivia climate bin 1 (dry areas) is
dramatically under-sampled while bin 3 is most clearly over-sampled
|
For more information, contact
Bette Loiselle
ANALYSIS UNIT
|