Correspondence of Asa Gray and G. W. Clinton
Edited by P. M. Eckel
Res Botanica
Missouri Botanical Garden
October 13, 2005
Return to home

The Correspondence of

Asa Gray (1810-1888) and

George William Clinton (1807‑1885)

 

1875

 


 

January 2d 1875

 

Mr. Clinton

 

Dear Sir

 

I packed up and sent to Prof. Asa Gray Cambridge Mass all of my brother's collections & among other things a number of bound copies of the Mosses of Wilkes Expl. expedition ‑ by writing to Prof. Gray you can procure a copy. If any one wishing a perfect copy of the original Musci Alleghanienses with all the specimens perhaps I can furnish one ‑ for about $40.‑

 

respectfully yours

 

J. Sullivant

 

[Recd Jan. 4 & wrote him ["I'll take it, 1 ‑ 15 Feb." crossed out] NOTE: this is probably the exsiccat.

 


 

Vol. 10 (205) [A 38]

 

[printed stationary: Botanic Garden, Cambridge, Mass.]

 

Hon. George W. Clinton

 

My dear Sir,

 

Dr. Gray asks me to say that the larger set of Dr. Palmer's plants will be retained for you and forwarded whenever you wish, payment to be made at your convenience.

 

As Dr. Palmer is no botanist, his collection was made without much judgement and contains the most common as well as the rarest things. Still I think it is well worth the price ‑ especially as the specimens have been named after a pretty careful examination by us.

 

With the compliments of the season

 

Yours very truly

 

Sereno Watson

 

[Recd Dec. 28. Jan. 5 sent him draft on New York for $53.76]

 


 

Vol. 10 (208) [A 31, 32]

 

[printed stationary: Botanic Garden, Cambridge, Mass.]

 

Jan. 6th, 1874 [year printed: actually 1875]

 

My Dear Sir,

 

I have your favor of the 4th inst. enclosing your check for $53.76 in payment for Set I of Palmer's Floridan Collection ‑ for which I thank you in Dr. Palmer's behalf.

 

I forward the specimens by Express today in two bundles, & add herewith a ticket in correction of determination of No. 52. I shall be happy to do whatever I can for you at any time. At any rate do not hesitate to ask me.

 

Prof. Brown was here yesterday & Prof. Eaton a few days ago. Money has been raised in California for the printing of their Flora, & efforts will be made to get it out in the next year or so. There has a good deal of work, you know, already been done upon it, both by Dr. Gray & myself, besides what Prof. Brown has been able to do.

 

As for your Californian unnamed plants, if they are Kellogg & Harford's things, there is a chance of a list being printed during the summer. Prof. Eaton has had them worked up with some care during the winter by one of his students, and proposes his publishing the list as a graduation thesis.

 

See sample sheet of the "Indep." of N. Am. botany, of which you have perhaps heard as being on the stocks [stacks].

 

Yours Very Truly

 

Sereno Watson

 


 

Vol. 10 (213) [A 20]

 

[United States Postal Card. Feb. 10 postmark [1875]

 

To Hon. Geo. W. Clinton, Buffalo, New York Herbarium Cambridge, Feby. 9th, 1875

 

221. Hamelia patens. Chapman, 79.

 

385. Conradina canescens, Gray

 

see Proc. Am. Acad. June 1870, p. 295. (Calamintha canescens, T. & G., Chapman, 318.)

 

Yours very Truly

 

Sereno Watson

 

[Recd Feb. 11]

 

 Conradina in the Lamiaceae, or Mint Family: the genus was erected by A. Gray. There are four species in it. Conradina canescens (T. & G.) A. Gray, is a shrub less than a half meter in height found in pinelands, the upper Gulf coast region, Florida and Alabama, flowering in the spring (Small, 1933). Hamelia is in the Rubiaceae, or Madder Family. Hamelia patens Jacq. is a shrub or small tree growing in hammocks of the southern peninsula of Florida and the Florida Keys. The calyx, corolla, inflorescence branches and hypanthium are all red (Small, 1933). ]

 


 

Vol. 10 (219) [A 11]

 

[printed stationary: Botanic Garden, Cambridge, Mass.]

 

Feby 25th, 1875

 

My Dear Sir,

 

The scrap you sent is of Eugenia buxifolia, Willd., or at least what Chapman considered such.

 

We retained no specimen of 287. It is probably Coriopsis gladiata, or may possibly be C. nudata ‑ you can readily determine which. There ought to be no mistaking Euxo..us viridis, which is common enough. I do not know which your Amaranthus hybrids may be. We have no authentic specimen of it. I have nothing to say about 547 or 507.

 

Yours very truly

 

Mr. Sereno Watson

 

Hon. G. W. Clinton

 

Buffalo, N.Y.

 

[Recd Feb. 28]

 

Eugenia is in the Myrtaceae, or Myrtle Family. Eugenia buxifolia (Sw.) Willd. is a shrub or small tree, called the Spanish‑stopper, of the coastal hammocks of south peninsular Florida and the Keys (Small, 1933). Coriopsis is in the Carduaceae of Small (1933). Coriopsis  gladiata Walt. of swamps and low pinelands, Coastal Plain, Florida to Mississippi and North Carolina, flowering in the fall. Coreopsis nudata Nutt. is distinguished by its thick, rush‑like leaves rather than the flat blades of C. gladiata.

 


 

Vol. 10 (221) [A 6]

 

[United States Postal Card, March 3 cancelled]

 

To Hon. Geo. W. Clinton, Buffalo, New York Herbarium, Cambridge

 

March 2, 1875

 

My Dear Sir.

 

Cannot help you on 603, as we saved no specimen. Don't know why there need have been a mistake.

 

Though Panicum dichotomum was the commonest of all things. There is a big pile here that passes for it, of very different looking things, making it exceedingly variable.

 

Yours very truly

 

Sereno Watson

 

[Recd March]

 


 

Vol. 10 (223) [A 1]

 

[United States Postal Card, cancelled March 6]

 

Herbarium, Cambridge

 

March 6, 1875

 

My dear Sir,

 

Your scrap belongs to No. 403. Avicennia nitida, Jacq.

 

Had you "63 Hibiscus ‑o" It is a Kosteletzkya, perhaps K. althaeifolia. Will keep your request in mind. Know of nothing now ‑ unless you want Austrian things by way of Exchange.

 

Yours very truly

 

Sereno Watson

 

[Recd March 8]

 

Avicennia nitida Jacq. is in the Avicenniaceae, or Black‑mangrove Family. There is only one genus in the family, with three species. The A. nitida is a shrub or tree, growing on sandy shores and coastal hammocks of the Coastal Plain from Florida to Texas. Note in a letter above, Clinton's request for mangrove specimens. Kosteletzkya is in the Malvaceae, or Mallow Family. The common name for this genus is the Fen‑roses. K.  althaeifolia (Chapm. A. Gray has pink petals , growing in swamps, hammocks on the Coastal Plain, Florida to Texas and North Carolina (Small, 1933). Hibiscus is in this family.

 

 

 


 

Volume 11 (4) [J

 

LETTER NOT IN ORDER ‑ UNABLE TO LOCATE

 


 

Volume 11 (5) [J 281]

 

[United Stated Postal Card, cancelled March 18 (1875)]

 

To Hon. George W. Clinton, Buffalo, New York Herbarium, Cambridge

 

March 17, 1875

 

My Dear Sir,

 

Palmer's sets were all disposed of long ago.

 

"Dr. Karl Keck, Aistersheim, Upper Austria", is the botanist who desires to exchange European things, including "our rarest species", for plants from Southern & western States particularly. I have written him & you may hear from him ‑ or, you can address him yourself. Dr. & Mrs. Gray left today for the south, till 1st May. 

 

Yours truly

 

Sereno Watson.

 

[Recd]

 


 

Volume 11 (17) [J 262]

 

[United States Postal Card, cancelled April 10 [1875]

 

To Hon. George W. Clinton, Buffalo, New York Herbarium, Cambridge

 

April 9, 1875

 

My Dear Sir,

 

Prof. Aighey's address I suppose to be "University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska",

 

Yours truly

 

Sereno Watson

 

Dr. Gray was at last accounts (a week ago) in Florida, doing nicely as far as we can gather from his scrappy notes. [no received note]

 


 

Volume 11 (24) [J

 

LETTER OUT OF ORDER ‑ UNABLE TO LOCATE

 


 

Volume 11 (25) [J 255]

 

[printed stationary, Botanic Garden, Cambridge, Mass.]

 

May 14, 1875

 

My Dear Sir,

 

If your specific name may rightly be considered as one word, the two numbers being united by a hyphen, I suppose there is nothing in the laws of botanical nomenclature to exclude it. Still such names are not looked upon with favor, though occasionally proposed. You remember Wood's "Brevoo.... Ida‑Maria" and how Dr. Gray in referring the species to Brodiaea [?] did not hesitate to drop the specific name also. He himself made an "Astogalus Anther‑Schottei," which however must be united with an earlier species. The worst thing of the kind that I recall is Bailton's genus "Asagraia", which I certainly hope will never be taken  up. 

 

I would not myself propose such a name, though I would not feel justified in rejecting one once published, without some other good reason. As to the validity of the publication of a species in the reports of the N.Y. Regents, I have no doubt whatever. It is perfectly legitimate, in my opinion,

 

Yours very truly

 

Sereno Watson

 

P.S. In my Revision of Ceanothus sent you, please correct a couple of typographical oversights. On first page read C. Americanus, & on the next, C. ovatus, Desf., instead of Bigelow.

 

S. W.

 


 

Volume 11 (55) [J 324]

 

[United States Postal Card, cancelled Aug. 16, 1875]

 

To Hon. G. W. Clinton, Buffalo, N.Y.

 

Have you got your box from MacOwan?

 

I offered to look after it, [way] charges &c. But getting no response from Taylor & [S.] ‑ suppose it was sent on to you direct.

 

A. G.

 

[Recd Aug. 17]

 


 

Volume 11 (58) [J 217]

 

[United States Postal Card, cancelled Aug. 20, 1875]

 

To Hon. G. W. Clinton, Buffalo, N.Y.

 

I find your box has gone on. The clerk is to send bill of charge to me.

 

(See "Nation" cf. pg. 12)

 

A.G.