|
DELModern Evolutionary
Systematics: Basic Literature August 12, 2009 |
|
Modern Evolutionary Systematics:
Basic Literature These recent
papers support the insistence of modern evolutionary systematics that
macroevolution, as ancestor-descendant relationships commonly involving
paraphyly on molecular trees, should be represented in classification. [Some
papers have been communicated to this Web site by others, for which many
thanks!] Barraclough,
T. G. 2010. Evolving entities: towards a unified framework for understanding
diversity at the species and higher levels. Phil.
Trans. Roy. Soc. B 365: 1801-1813. Bock,
W. J. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 40:
169-194. Bock, W. J. 2004.
Explanations in systematics. Milestones in Systematics, D. M. Williams &
P. L. Forey, eds. Systematics Assoc. Special
Volume 67. CRC Press, Bridgham,
J. T., E. A. Ortlund & J. W. Thornton. 2009. An epistatic ratchet constrains the
direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 461: 515-519. Brothers, D. J. 1985.
Species concepts, speciation, and higher taxa. In: E. S. Vrba, ed. Species
and Speciation. Transvaal
Mus. Monogr. 4: 35–42. Brummitt, R. K. 2006. Am I
a bony fish? Taxon 55: 268--269. Cavalier-Smith, T. 2010.
Deep phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 365:
111--132. Crawford, D. J.
2010. Progenitor-derivative species pairs and plant speciation. Taxon 59: 1413–1423. Dayrat, B. 2005.
Ancestor-descendant relationships and the reconstruction of the Tree of Life.
Paleobiology 31: 347--353. de Carvalho, M. R., F. A. Bockmann, D. S. Amorim & C.
R. F. Brandão. 2008. Systematics must embrace comparative biology and
evolution, not speed and automation. Evol. Biol. (preprint) Funk,
D. J. & K. E. Omland. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly:
frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial
DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol.
Syst. 34: 397--423. Gould, S. J. & N.
Eldredge. 1993. Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366: 223--227. Grant, V. 2003.
Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems. Am. J. Bot. 90: 1263--1270. Hörandl, E. 2006. Paraphyletic
versus monophyletic taxa---evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564--570. Hörandl, E. 2007.
Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon
56: 1--5. Hörandl, E. 2010. Beyond
cladistics: extending evolutionary classifications into deeper time levels. Taxon 59: 345--350. Hutchinson, J. M. C. &
G. Gigerenzer. 2005. Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where
psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes 69:
97–124. Fitzhugh, K. 2007. Fact,
theory, test and evolution. Zoologica Scripta
preprint Knox, E. B. 1998. The use
of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63: 1--49. or http://tinyurl.com/nuo3x3
Koonin, E. V. 2009.
Darwinian evolution in the light of genomics. Nucleic Acids Research 37: 1011--1034.
or http://tinyurl.com/kwrqes
Lecointre, G. & P.
Deleporte. 2004. Total evidence requires exclusion of phylogenetically
misleading data. Zoologica
Scripta 34: 101--117. Mayr, E. & W. J. Bock.
2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. J. Zool. Evol. Research 40: 169--194. Mercier,
H. & D. Sperber. 2010. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an
argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
(in press). Quine,
W. V. 1966. On simple theories of
a complex world. The Ways of Paradox. Random House, Also
at: http://tinyurl.com/debto8 Paul,
C. R. C. 1992. The recognition of
ancestors. Historical Biology 6: 239--250. Harwood Academic Publishers. Rachootin,
S. P. & K. S. Thomson. 1981. Epigenetics, paleontology, and evolution.
Pp. 181-193, in G. G. E. Scudder & J. L. Reveal (eds.), Evolution Today,
Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Systematic and
Evolutionary Biology. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Rieppel, O. 2010. The
series, the network, and the tree: changing metaphors of order in nature. Biol. Philos. 25: 475--496. Rieseberg, L. H. & L.
Brouillet. 1994. Are many plant species paraphyletic? Taxon 43: 21–32.
[Contributed by Carlos Aedo Pérez.] Sneath, P. H. A. 1995. Thirty years of
numerical taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 44: 281--298.
[“Do we indeed wish to classify crocodiles with birds and away from lizards
and snakes on phylogenetic grounds (Mayr, 1969)? Is it useful to ecologists,
conservationists, teachers, and others to separate the ostrich and the rhea so extremely widely as the DNA evidence (Sibley et al.,
1988) indicates? These issues again raise the question of the purpose of our
classifications. Evolutionary systematics may have a revival if it addresses
these questions.”] Stuessy, T. F. & C. König. 2008.
Patrocladistic classification. Taxon
57: 594--601. Wilkinson,
L., R. Rosenthal, R. Abelson, J.
Cohen, L. Aiken, M. Appelbaum, G. Boodoo, D. A. Kenny, H. Kraemer, D. Rubin,
B. Thompson, & H. Wainer. 1999. Statistical methods in psychology
journals: guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54: 594–604. Zander, R. H. 2006. The Pottiaceae
s.str. as an evolutionary Lazarus taxon. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 100: 581--602. Note: [This
file is 990 kb, and is an image-based reprint, but is searchable within Adobe
Acrobat Reader. A text version is at click here.] Zander, R. H. 2007. When biodiversity
study and systematics diverge. Biodiversity
8: 43-48. OR Zander, R. H. 2007. Nine easy steps for
constructing reliable trees from published phylogenetic analyses. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 94: 691-709. See
also: Supplement. Zander, R. H. 2007. Neutralist evolution and
strict monophyly adversely affect biodiversity study. Anales del Jardin Botánica de Madrid. 64:
107-108. Zander, R. H. 2007. Paraphyly and the species
concept, a reply to Ebach & al. Taxon
56: 642-644. Zander,
R. H. 2007 [2008]. Future FNA volumes with APG influence. FNA Newsletter 21 (1--2): 3--4. Zander, R. H. 2008. Evolutionary inferences from
non-monophyly on molecular trees. Taxon 57: 1182--1188. or http://tinyurl.com/6frd9l Zander,
R. H. 2008. Statistical evaluation of the clade “Rhabdoweisiaceae.” Bryologist 111: 292--301. Zander, R.
H. 2009. Short Essays on Macroevolution in Classification. Res Botanica (a Zander, R.
H. 2009. Evolutionary analysis of five bryophyte families using virtual
fossils. Anales del Jardín
Botánico de Madrid 66: 119--134.
or http://tinyurl.com/yfa9xjs Zander, R. H. 2010. Taxon mapping exemplifies punctuated
equilibrium and atavistic saltation. Plant
Syst. Evol. 286: 69--90. or http://tinyurl.com/32cw5ms Zander, R. H. 2010
(2011). Structuralism in phylogenetic
systematics. Biological
Theory 5: 383–394. |
|
|